This is the corporate raider strategy kicking into high gear.

The US has a lot of valuable assets. The plan is to get into office, sell the assets to oligarchs at pennies on the dollar. This way, the oligarchs have all of the assets and the public is left with all of the debt.

This is a criminal conspiracy to strip the shared wealth that all Americans have in their country and hand it off to a select few.

In this specific case, the practice could also be termed "privatization for profit" or "predatory privatization." It involves the sale of public assets to private interests, who then lease them back to the government at inflated rates, essentially creating a rent-seeking situation.

You cultists are such fnkcin' suckers.

#2 | Posted by jpw

At this rate, they'll actually carve Trump's fat pigface onto Mount Rushmore.

Everything Musk wanted out of that database is now his. Ironically, Musk minions used a private server to do it.

Any DR resident cultists willing to explain how Musk minions use of a private server in this case is perfectly okay, but Hillary's use was considered treason in the eyes of cultists?

That's not even recent. I'm sure it's much worse after COVID.
#16 | Posted by BellRinger

By your MAGA calculations, does it add up to half?

The situation described in the quote about Elon Musk's private server being attached to a government network is reminiscent of the adage, "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." This saying aptly captures the irony and apparent double standard in the current scenario[4][6].

This proverb suggests that what is considered appropriate for one person or group should be equally acceptable for another. In this context, it highlights the contrast between the Republican party's strong criticism of Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State and their apparent silence regarding Elon Musk's similar actions[6][8].

The quote points out the perceived hypocrisy, as Republicans who were vocal about Clinton's email practices seem to be notably quiet about Musk's installation of a private server on government networks, despite the potential security risks and privacy concerns it raises[1][2][3].

This situation exemplifies how political perspectives can shift based on who is involved, rather than maintaining consistent principles across different cases involving similar actions.

The expression "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander" uses "sauce" to mean that what is suitable or acceptable for one should be equally so for another. The saying means that what is appropriate in one case is also appropriate in another.

The etymology of the phrase dates back to the 1670s and figuratively uses "goose" and "gander" to represent women and men. Literally, it meant that the same sauce works for both a cooked goose, regardless of sex.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger

When someone like Musk or Trump is in charge of determining what should and should not be sold, ----------------.

You really are a sucker, eh?

#26 | Posted by BellRinger

Be specific. LOL

Ahhhnuld did that in California.

The rationale was to "get rid of the burden of maintenance" on the properties and then the 1% purchasers had California sign leases that repaid their purchase price in a few years AND have California continue to pay for the maintenance costs.

This scheme to enrich the 1% will be no different.

#35 | Posted by Nixon

NEWSWORTHY

Totally logical.
#38 | Posted by BellRinger

Stay ignorant, JEFF.

It suits you.

Swallow it.

#40 | Posted by LauraMohr

JEFF has no interest in following the constitution. Why bother? He's a cuck for Elon and now that Elon is here, we can all relax and reap the rewards of his genius.