Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Sanders started his speech warning that "we have an administration that is leading us to oligarchy, an administration that is leading us to an authoritarian form of society, an administration that is leading us towards kleptocracy."

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Bernie Sanders draws 10,000 supporters to Warren for a 'Fight Oligarchy' rally

michiganadvance.com/2025/03/08/b ... [image or embed]

-- Federal Employee News (@fednews.bsky.social) March 9, 2025 at 8:17 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Ben Meiselas @meiselasb.bsky.social

Bernie Sanders led another massive rally in Warren, Michigan on Saturday after his packed Kenosha rally on Friday. He is filling venues with more people than Trump during the campaign. Corporate media refuses to cover it. We cover the full speeches. Here is in Michigan

WOW! Bernie TEARS Trump to SHREDS at MICHIGAN RALLY
www.youtube.com

Ben Meiselas
@meiselasb.bsky.social
The media showed every Trump rally but won't show a single Bernie Sanders rally. Now that we control the biggest independent news network in America we will flip the script and show every Bernie Sanders rally, like the last one on Sunday in Altoona, Wisconsin

Bernie Leads POWERFUL RALLY in GOP TERRITORY
www.youtube.com

#1 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-10 06:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Oh what could have been had we have had Bernie as the Democratic party candidate in 2016. Sighhhhhhhhhhh.

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-10 06:04 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 4

https://static.vecteezy.com/system/resources/previews/018/923/665/original/arrow-target-icon-png.png

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-03-10 06:18 PM | Reply

Where's Madbomber? Bernie's a Menace, You Know.

A Communist seeking to make America a totalitarian hellhole?

Madbomber is always talking about soshulist evil and the wonder of Cash and free enterprise.

This thread was made for him.

Madbomber, we need Ya..

#4 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-03-10 07:08 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Video at link:

Bernie Sanders: "I think this is a prelude not only to cutting benefits, but to privatizing Social Security ... why do you lie so much about Social Security? Why do you make it look like it's a broken system? The reason is to get people to lose faith in the system so you can give it over to Wall St"

bsky.app

#5 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-11 12:32 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#5 ... Bernie Sanders: "I think this is a prelude not only to cutting benefits, but to privatizing Social Security ... why do you lie so much about Social Security? Why do you make it look like it's a broken system? The reason is to get people to lose faith in the system so you can give it over to Wall St" ...

Well, yeah.

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-11 12:36 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Field Report - Home (Leave the Lights On) (2014)
www.youtube.com

genius.com

...
[Verse 1]
Cold snap like a coiled spring
You can feel the frost coming on
We are Marigolden, dropping orange and umber
And barely holding on, just barely holding on

And now the downtown's dolled up with tinsel and angels
Seasons sneak like hair cuts teased apart and tangled
We were praying for awhile and we took it all down
Like garland and the traffic signals

[Chorus]
Leave the lights on
Cause it might be nighttime when I get there
When I'm on my way home

Leave the the lights on
Cause it might be nighttime when I get there
And I'm on my way home

[Verse 2
Putting on old clothes in a new way
Putting on a pose of a new stage
Waking up every day just a little bit changed
As it breaks over us like waves

Long live beauty, short live pain
Lust for wonder, and hunger pain
Face your fears, not your shame
Cause in the end it just wears away

[Chorus]
Leave the lights on
Cause it might be nighttime when I get there
When I'm on my way home
Leave the the lights on
Cause it might be nighttime when I get there
And I'm on my way home
...


#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-11 12:42 AM | Reply

"I think this is a prelude not only to cutting benefits, but to privatizing Social Security ... why do you lie so much about Social Security? Why do you make it look like it's a broken system? The reason is to get people to lose faith in the system so you can give it over to Wall St"

fElon said the quiet part out loud yesterday. fElon also either lied his ass off or is genuinely ignorant AF about social security. That moron/reprobate even said SS was a way of attracting "illegal immigrants" with all the cash handouts it gives them. Seriously - there is something really wrong with fElon.

#8 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 09:04 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"why do you lie so much about Social Security?"

Half of them are so stupid they don't know they're lying.

Half of them are so deplorable they are okay with lying when it hurts they people that need to be hurt.

Half of them exhibit both of those traits.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-11 09:10 AM | Reply

We're heading for the day of blessings, I'm telling ya.
It's all building up to something.
Something that can only be redeemed with fire.

#10 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-03-11 10:19 AM | Reply

Where were all of these people on election day?

#11 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2025-03-11 11:04 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#11 The kindest estimate, and it was biased, was a total of just under 9000 people combined for all his rallies. The high school gym has a capacity of 800 and it was not full.

#12 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2025-03-11 11:13 AM | Reply

"He's facing several hundred ecstatic voters huddled outside a suburban Detroit high school - the group that did not fit inside the high school's gym or two overflow rooms. The crowd screams in delight when he tells them that a combined total of 9,000 people had shown up for the rally."

"He drew a crowd of 4,000 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Friday night. He faced another 2,600 or so the next morning a few hours away in Altoona, Wisconsin, a town of less than 10,000"

Moron.

#13 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 01:20 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#13 - I meant "Liar" not "Moron." My mistake.

#14 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 01:21 PM | Reply

I like how Bernie used to spout "millionaires" before changing it to "billionaires." Maybe it's because he's accumulated 3 million since he's been in office. Must be a smart guy to turn an annual salary of 175k into that kind of money.

#15 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-03-11 01:37 PM | Reply

I like how Dems are so nice to MAGATs....

A Message To MAGA As Trump Faceplants Into A Recession

www.youtube.com

less than 2 mins

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 01:43 PM | Reply

#15 Oh sorry, my bad. He's worth 18 million. Forgot that he gets 2 million a year from big pharma.

#17 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-03-11 01:45 PM | Reply

FishP worried about big money in politics??

hahahahahahaha!!

You weren't worried about it when Musk bought himself an e'bil gub'mint job for $300 million given to Trump.... a job Auditing the source of his 40 billion so far, $8 mil a day income.

He's auditing his Bank, for F's sake.

#18 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 01:53 PM | Reply

2.5 Million. 1.7 million from a series of books.
Not particularly rich, despite the laughable spin Forbes tries to put on it.
www.forbes.com

#19 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 02:32 PM | Reply

#18. Um Musk built and sold PayPal, built Tesla, which before he went right, was according to the left the best thing on the planet and then he built SpaceX which includes starlink which will provide internet to anyone in the world. Name something, anything that Bernie has done that benefits this country.
And I'm not the one blasting millionaires and billionaires, Bernie is. And he does it while collecting 2 million a year from Pharma in exchange for votes that benefit them.

#20 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-03-11 02:37 PM | Reply

That was 2019. for 2025 there's this:
"With an estimated net worth of $3 million, the outspoken Democratic Socialist and political icon is actually a part of "the 1%.""
www.thestreet.com

Which is also laughable in so many ways. This declaration of "1%" with his net worth is inaccurate, to be kind. Maybe in the top "10%".

For the geniuses of the two articles provided, Bernies' net worth is 33,333% less than someone whose network with one billion dollars. Quite a difference.

www.investopedia.com

#21 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 02:38 PM | Reply

Um, #19... if you can actually read, FishyP.

Hope you have Soc Sec if you ever need it... you know, before Herr Musk takes it away.

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 02:41 PM | Reply

#22 Why don't you read this. www.caclubindia.com

#23 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-03-11 02:42 PM | Reply

No, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren aren't top recipients of pharmaceutical industry donations

Behind misleading claim by RFK Jr. is a quirk in the OpenSecrets site

Sanders, in fact, received no contributions at all from political action committees affiliated with drug companies, or from top pharmaceutical executives. But because of a quirk in the site's methodology, donations from individual, low-ranking employees are counted the same as official contributions from corporate PACs.

Typically, in Washington, corporations' support for political candidates is measured by donations from its PAC, and to an extent, from its top executives.

OpenSecrets, by contrast, measures corporate giving by combining PAC spending with any contribution of $200 or more from any company employee. In other words: if an entry-level human resources officer at a pharmaceutical company wrote Sanders or Warren even a modest check, the website would count that sum toward the company's total giving, no differently than a check written by the company's PAC.

This methodology appears to have misled users. Both Sanders and Warren ran for president in 2020, and raised millions of dollars from supporters across the country. Many of them were rank-and-file employees at drug companies, whose voting preferences may not always align with their companies' interests.

"Some of the people making these claims know full well that they're being misleading," said Daniel Weiner, the director of elections and government at the Brennan Center for Justice. "There is a distinction between a random donation from someone who happens to work in a particular industry, versus a donation from a corporate PAC."

Historically, Democrats have favored aggressive measures to reduce drug prices, while many Republicans have argued that limiting drug companies' profits could stifle future innovation of lifesaving medicines.

When measuring PAC spending specifically, Sanders and Warren are nowhere near the top. According to OpenSecrets, neither is among Capitol Hill's top 25 recipients of donations from pharmaceutical manufacturing PACs. In 2020, the top pharmaceutical PAC recipient in Congress was Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), who accepted $240,600 in official committee gifts; in 2024, it was Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), who accepted $441,800.

www.statnews.com

#24 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-11 02:45 PM | Reply

Um Musk built and sold PayPal, built Tesla,

You really shoud get his biography right if you're going to try and tell people about it.

#25 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 02:45 PM | Reply

And I'm not the one blasting millionaires and billionaires, Bernie is. And he does it while collecting 2 million a year from Pharma in exchange for votes that benefit them.
#20 | Posted by fishpaw

See my above post #24.

#26 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-11 02:46 PM | Reply

Thanks Gal, for #24.

#27 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 02:48 PM | Reply

fishpaw caught lying again.

He wont learn from it.

#28 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-03-11 02:50 PM | Reply

Hard to believe that FishyPoo has been fooled yet again.

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 02:50 PM | Reply

#13 LOL. The headline says 10,000 at a rally, not rallies. The kindest source I found said under 9000 at COMBINED rallies. What is 4,000 plus 2,600 (your numbers)? Moron.

#30 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2025-03-11 02:57 PM | Reply

And my favorite for the sheep: "The crowd screams in delight when he tells them that a combined total of 9,000 people had shown up for the rally."

#31 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2025-03-11 03:02 PM | Reply

And I'm not the one blasting millionaires and billionaires, Bernie is. And he does it while collecting 2 million a year from Pharma in exchange for votes that benefit them.
#20 | Posted by fishpaw

See my above post #24.

#26 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-11 02:46 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

"Typically, in Washington, corporations' support for political candidates is measured by donations from its PAC, and to an extent, from its top executives."

Ok, I'm sorry, just because he got the donations from the execs from big pharma doesn't mean he got it from Big Pharma. LOL.

#32 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-03-11 03:09 PM | Reply

#32

Ah.... I see the problem now; extremely poor reading comprehension.

#33 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 03:14 PM | Reply

Ok, I'm sorry, just because he got the donations from the execs from big pharma doesn't mean he got it from Big Pharma. LOL.
#32 | Posted by fishpaw

No, that's not what the article said. Why would big pharma executives vote for Bernie, who is a champion of cutting drig prices? They didn't.

#34 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-11 03:16 PM | Reply

Also from the above linked to article

During his 2020 presidential run, Sanders pledged to reject contributions from PACs, and even returned donations of over $200 from "lobbyists, or executives of health insurance or pharmaceutical companies." In that statement, the Sanders campaign explicitly said it would accept contributions from "rank-and-file workers employed by pharmaceutical giants."

A STAT examination of Senate and presidential campaign committees for Warren and Sanders since 2016 found no donations from PACs related to the brand-drug lobby PhRMA or any of its 26 current member companies, or from three companies that left the organization recently. No CEOs of the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies by market cap donated to either of the senators since at least 2016.

#35 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-11 03:20 PM | Reply

#35 Wow, that makes it even more bizarre that he is worth $18 million on an annual salary of $210k.
When he started his political career as the mayor of Burlington he shook down a local developer for contributions in exchange for permits for a development that he previously opposed. He's crooked and always has been.

#36 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-03-11 04:08 PM | Reply

FishPawn, you still happy you voted for Trump?

Is the destruction of the federal government and kowtowing to Putin proceeding as you had hoped?

Are you still telling yourself, "This is fine?"

#37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-11 04:22 PM | Reply

FishPus STILL lying:

"Yet Sanders himself is a millionaire. According to online sources, his 2025 net worth is estimated to be around $3 million.

Forbes reported that according to his financial disclosures, Sanders made $2.5 million between 2011 and 2023 from book advances and royalties alone. Sanders either wrote or republished six books over the period:"

www.thestreet.com

But then, he's a Trumper so the Lyin' King expects him to lie.

#38 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 04:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Maybe FishPawn could tell the class when Bernie Sanders took a vow of poverty.

#39 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-11 07:20 PM | Reply

i"m posting this now so you ------- hypocrites / liars can get your lies synced up

UCLA PROF CALLS FOR A "VIOLENT" MILITARY COUP AGAINST TRUMP.

50 bucks says you ------- morons won't have a problem with this "insurrection"

#40 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-03-11 09:05 PM | Reply

You gonna be upset if people chant "Hang JD Vance"?

#41 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-11 10:29 PM | Reply

The Russian fanboi or the commie. What great choices. Red star either way.

I think in practice their policies would have about the same effect on me.

#42 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-03-12 03:29 PM | Reply

Taxing the rich so that society can function well seems like a much needed idea. The oligarchs don't like it though so instead we're f****d

#43 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-03-12 03:47 PM | Reply

"Taxing the rich so that society can function well seems like a much needed idea."

The rich are already taxed. Why not tax those who aren't being taxed?

Can you name me a European country where taxes on lower income earners are less than what they are in the US?

#44 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-03-12 05:15 PM | Reply

-Taxing the rich so that society can function well seems like a much needed idea.

Actually, we already have that idea in place now.

I'm not attacking it but it's certainly more than an idea. It's real.

taxfoundation.org

#45 | Posted by eberly at 2025-03-12 05:22 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort