Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, June 20, 2025

Barack Obama warns the U.S. is dangerously close' to slipping into autocracy under Trump In rare public remarks, the former president said recent actions from the administration are "not consistent with American democracy."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"If you follow regularly what is said by those who are in charge of the federal government right now, there is a weak commitment to what we understood " and not just my generation, at least since World War II " our understanding of how a liberal democracy is supposed to work," Obama said.

"What we're seeing right now ... is not consistent with American democracy," he added. "It is consistent with autocracies. It is consistent with Hungary under Orbn.

It's consistent with places that hold elections but do not otherwise observe what we think of [as] a fair system in which everybody's voice matters and people have a seat at the table, and there are checks and balances, and nobody's above the law.

We're not there yet completely, but I think that we are dangerously close to normalizing behavior like that."

more from the one guy that could win an Election tomorrow at the link

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-18 07:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"We're not just going to be waiting for legislation," Obama announced. "I've got a pen and I've got a phone ... and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions."

#2 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-06-18 09:03 PM | Reply

Funny, I don't remember Obama sending goon squads into red states and illegally detaining American citizens. You stupid ----.

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-06-18 09:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Obama drone struck an American citizen. He acted as judge, juriy and executioner.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 09:40 PM | Reply

Obama is the Hypocrite in Chief.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 09:42 PM | Reply

Obama drone struck an American citizen. He acted as judge, juriy and executioner.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 09:40 PM | Reply

The Constitution doesn't apply on the battlefield. Just sayin

#6 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-18 09:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

If that's the case Trump could just declare the US a battlefield.

#7 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-06-18 09:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#7

Wow... Visitor is finally catching on!

It's a Miracle!

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-18 09:58 PM | Reply

Quite a loophole that Obama left to his successors.

#9 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-06-18 10:23 PM | Reply

The only people talking about Obama and Biden are people who are TOTALLY UNABLE to defend WHAT TRUMP IS DOING RIGHT NOW... not what someone else presumably did some other time.

The funny part is they 'think' they are fooling people with such obvious obfuscations in lieu of argument.

#10 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-18 10:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

The only people talking about Obama and Biden are people who are TOTALLY UNABLE to defend WHAT TRUMP IS DOING RIGHT NOW... not what someone else presumably did some other time.
The funny part is they 'think' they are fooling people with such obvious obfuscations in lieu of argument.

Posted by Corky at 2025-06-18 10:48 PM | Reply

You noticed that too huh?? Quite typical of you ask me.

#11 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-18 10:51 PM | Reply

And, of course, the truth of the statements is ignored in favor of blind disdain of a POTUS who was far better and competent than the skid mark in chief we currently have thanks to those same morons.

#12 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-19 10:06 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Quite a loophole that Obama left to his successors.

#9 | Posted by visitor_

If you weren't such a stupid f(*&, you'd know that the fundamental issue leading to our proximity of autocracy is the fact that loopholes aren't needed for this administration. They're creating illegal and unconstitutional "legal" rationales for their power grabs.

There's a reason the courts have brutalized them over and over again and why, in response, they want to destroy the notion of co-equal branches exercising checks and balances.

#13 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-19 10:10 AM | Reply

Obama announced. "I've got a pen and I've got a phone ... and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions."

That has to sting.

#14 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-06-19 10:51 AM | Reply

#14

It's too dull to sting.

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-19 12:10 PM | Reply

Obama
#14 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Nobody cares.

You stupid trolls don't seem to understand what Trump is doing to this nation and how it's going to negatively impact everyone.

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-19 12:11 PM | Reply

"The windmills are driving the whales crazy, obviously."

"I have concepts of a plan."

"They're eating the dogs, the people that came in. They're eating the cats. They're eating."

"The kidney has a very special place in the heart."

"And then I see the disinfectant that knocks [COVID-19] out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside, or almost a cleaning."

"This is a tough hurricane, one of the wettest we've ever seen from the standpoint of water."

That has to sting.

#17 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-06-19 12:28 PM | Reply

i.imgur.com

#18 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-06-19 02:14 PM | Reply

#18

MSGT kneels to King Trump.

Hopefully most former and current soldiers prefer the Constitution.

#19 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-19 02:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

There's this ...

Appeals court says Trump can keep control of California National Guard troops
www.nbcnews.com

... President Donald Trump is within his rights to deploy the California National Guard amid protests against federal law enforcement over immigration raids, an appeals court ruled Thursday night.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government made a required "strong showing" in arguing it would prevail against California's challenge to the legality of the deployment of troops usually under the governor's control.

"Under longstanding precedent ... our review of that decision must be highly deferential" to the president, the panel wrote in its ruling. "Affording the President that deference, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority." ...


#20 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-19 11:26 PM | Reply

So what exactly is Trump doing right now that's threatening democracy? Not hypotheticals. Not January 6. I've heard that rerun a hundred times. I'm asking for a current pattern of behavior that is a treat to democracy.

If your big concern is that he made a dictator joke at a rally, that's not a threat, it's a soundbite. If you're pointing to future possibilities or what he might do, that's speculation, no evidence.

You say he's dangerous, so show me the trend. What actions is he taking now that are damaging democracy?

Not what he said. Not what you think he'll do but what he's doing.

Other than recycled outrage or you don't agree with him, what is happening now that's hurting democracy?

Be specific with facts...not opinions...not speculation...facts.

#21 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 09:22 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

If you don't take January the 6th seriously then you won't take the rest seriously BillJohnson. It's painfully obvious that you don't care about the truth. It's quite typical of you BillJohnson. Not surprised in the least.

#22 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-20 09:35 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

So what exactly is Trump doing right now that's threatening democracy?

#21 | Posted by BillJohnson

Defying court orders and judgments.

Stop being stupid, BILL.

Please.

#23 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-20 09:48 AM | Reply

If you don't take January the 6th seriously then you won't take the rest seriously BillJohnson. It's painfully obvious that you don't care about the truth. It's quite typical of you BillJohnson. Not surprised in the least.

#22 | Posted by LauraMohr a

LAURA has a good point, BILL. If you can't admit that Trump staged a coup then everything else is a non-starter.

Including the fact that the man brings the entire weight of the US government against people who oppose or offend him.

#24 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-20 09:54 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Zed,

Ah yes, defying court orders...like every blue city ignoring immigration law.

If defying court orders disqualifies someone, you'd better start cleaning house on your side too.

Or does that only apply when it's Trump?

#25 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 09:57 AM | Reply

Zed,

Try not to reach back four years to make your point.

I'm talking about now.

#26 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 09:59 AM | Reply

Ah yes, defying court orders...like every blue city ignoring immigration law.

#25 | Posted by BillJohnson at

You asked what Trump is doing that is dictatorial.

When reminded, you attack "Blue Cities".

Who have no ambitions or possibility of being dictator.

#27 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-20 10:00 AM | Reply

Zed,

It was not officially declared that Trump "staged a coup."

That's a political accusation, not a legal finding.

#28 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 10:02 AM | Reply

Zed,

Trump's a dictator?

Must be the first in history with a 4-year lifespan, no control over the bureaucracy, and a press corps dedicated to destroying him.

If that's your idea of tyranny, you've clearly never met men who actually have power.

#29 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 10:08 AM | Reply

Zed,
It was not officially declared that Trump "staged a coup."
That's a political accusation, not a legal finding.
Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 10:02 AM | Reply

WOW that's hilarious. You should do stand up comedy. You'd be a hit for sure.

#30 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-20 10:08 AM | Reply

i.imgur.com

#31 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-06-20 10:15 AM | Reply

It was not officially declared that Trump "staged a coup."

#28 | Posted by BillJohnson

No one likes you when you're disingenuous, BILL.

#32 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-20 10:57 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trump's a dictator?

#29 | Posted by BillJohnson

Of course he is.

He's just not a very good one.

Or an all-powerful one (yet).

Give it up. BILL. Everyone understands that when Trump goes full Genghis Khan you're there with him

#33 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-20 10:59 AM | Reply

Zed,

You missed your chance.

Instead of saying "he's just not a very good one"...you could have said..."yea...we keep him in check".

I would have considered that idea.

#34 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 11:10 AM | Reply

At this point I see a lot of political accusations, which is to be expected.

Thats's how freedom works.

#35 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 11:13 AM | Reply

Trumpy is not a full dictator ... yet.

Only a sick dic.. So far.

The ..tator comes later.

#36 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-06-20 11:31 AM | Reply

Kendonesian: "Let me tell you about your country"

#37 | Posted by twinkhunter at 2025-06-20 11:50 AM | Reply

Liberals once again proving they can't handle a world in which others have different opinions from them. We aren't even close to an Autocracy. What we have is the Rep party getting wins for a few years and liberals are losing any capability of waiting until their party is in power again to get the wins they want. Dems and Reps (and other parties no longer in existence) have been doing this for 250 years.

#38 | Posted by humtake at 2025-06-20 12:18 PM | Reply

Liberals once again proving they can't handle a world in which others have different opinions from them.

#38 | Posted by humtake

Trump's tyrant.

Once again, it's not rocket science.

But, then again, you were never interested in rockets and science.

It's not that you have a differing opinion so much as that you aren't really an American and so your opinions don't have much to do with American culture.

In other words, you start and finish by being FOS.

#39 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-20 12:31 PM | Reply

Liberals once again proving they can't handle a world in which others have different opinions from them.

#38 | Posted by humtake

Trump's tyrant.

Once again, it's not rocket science.

But, then again, you were never interested in rockets and science.

It's not that you have a differing opinion so much as that you aren't really an American and so your opinions don't have much to do with American culture.

In other words, you start and finish by being FOS.

#40 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-20 12:31 PM | Reply

Liberals once again proving they can't handle a world in which others have different opinions from them. We aren't even close to an Autocracy. What we have is the Rep party getting wins for a few years and liberals are losing any capability of waiting until their party is in power again to get the wins they want. Dems and Reps (and other parties no longer in existence) have been doing this for 250 years.

Posted by humtake at 2025-06-20 12:18 PM | Reply

That sounds EXACTLY like Boaz. That fits him to a T. Just sayin

#41 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-20 01:39 PM | Reply

Hum,

"Dems and Reps " and plenty of parties long gone " have been at this for 250 years."

But this time feels different.

We're not just fighting over land, money, or influence.

We're fighting over control of humanity itself...how we live, what we say, even how we think.

Look at China. The government doesn't just police behavior. It regulates belief.

That's the endgame for today's liberals...total control, financial dependence, emotional manipulation, and a culture where dissent means being canceled.

They controlled the mainstream media for decades.

And they're not hiding it anymore.

And what about AI?

We all know it's going to eliminate jobs.

What better setup for socialism...wipe out work, then step in as savior.

And who's building the AI?

The same unelected billionaires who already control your speech, your data, and your digital life.

Liberals say "no kings". What about Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates...

There's your kings.

#42 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 02:57 PM | Reply

And how are these billionaires financed?

Indirectly through government debt via massive contracts, subsidies, and policies that inflate their wealth, while burying the rest of us into oblivion.

#43 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 03:07 PM | Reply

And let's be honest.

The spending has come from both parties, so don't bother playing that card.

#44 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 03:13 PM | Reply

#18 | Posted by MSgt

Holy s*&^ you're an idiot.

#45 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-20 03:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Liberals say "no kings". What about Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates...
There's your kings.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 02:57 PM | Reply

Zuckerberg,Bezos aligned themselves with Trump. Gates I'll give you that. He did contribute to Kamala's campaign even though Kamala isn't a liberal. Please do try again.

#46 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-20 03:29 PM | Reply

Laura,

"Zuckerberg,Bezos aligned themselves with Trump.'

Seriously?

Zuckerberg and Bezos aligned with Trump?

Both were openly critical of Trump. Bezos especially.

Trump went after them, not the other way around.

Let's not rewrite history.

#47 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 03:35 PM | Reply

Laura,

You really think these guys have changed their stripes?

#48 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 03:40 PM | Reply

Laura,
You really think these guys have changed their stripes?

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 03:40 PM | Reply

They aligned themselves with Trump because one. They are afraid of angering him and two. They stand to benefit from his tax cuts for the ultra wealthy. It's painfully obvious to anyone else who understands the fact.

#49 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-20 03:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Laura,

It's a marriage of convenience.

Temporary and will vanish the moment it's no longer useful.

What have they really done except stop feuding in public?

#50 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 03:59 PM | Reply

Laura,

Back to my post earlier.

There's your kings.

Not Trump.

#51 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 04:01 PM | Reply

Laura,
Back to my post earlier.
There's your kings.
Not Trump.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 04:01 PM | Reply

You can't accept the truth can you?? ---- dude.

#52 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-20 04:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Laura,

I wouldn't put it past Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates or any of the other liberal tech giants vying for power to twist the "No Kings" narrative as a way to deflect from their own power grabs and pin it all on Trump.

So they pretend to align with Trump to get the target off their back.

Laura...don't be so gullible.

#53 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 05:46 PM | Reply

I wouldn't put it past Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates or any of the other liberal

Only an idiot believes these people to be liberal.

They're billionaires and above politics.

They own the politicians. All of them.

Also. They were all present at Trump's inauguration.

No liberal would be there.

#54 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-20 06:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Anyone else notice that Vlad held off siccing Iran on Israel until his stooge Donald was in power again?

#55 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-20 06:07 PM | Reply

Clown,

For now, tech elites and liberals are comrades.

They're united in controlling information and suppressing freedom.

But alliances like that don't last. Look at China and Russia. They're partners until they aren't.
Now China is hacking Russia for military secrets.

My bet is on tech elites to come out on top.

Information is power more than money.

They're pretending to support Trump but we know it won't last.

#56 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 06:30 PM | Reply

#55: Why would Vladimir Putin "sic" the sovereign nation of Iran against nuclear-powered Israel who is backed by the US? Iran counterattacks against the ethnic cleansing Israelis without imprimatur from the Kremlin. This is the same fantastic notion that somehow the Kremlin was behind the 7 Oct 2023 Palestinian raid against the Israelis to seize hostages. The Russians support any enemy of the US, and may consult with them, but the only state the Kremlin was able to dictate to was Syria who they propped up for years until Bashar al-Assad fell. The Kremlin is nefarious enough without throwing in chaff.

#57 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-06-20 06:35 PM | Reply

#56 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

That was a pretty apt description of Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Trump.

You've got quite the blind spot.

#58 | Posted by memyselfini at 2025-06-20 06:51 PM | Reply

Clown,

Throughout my career, one thing has been consistent.

I watched the PC evolve. First standalone, then networked, then online.

Software pushed hardware. Hardware caught up.

And each time, we called it progress and absorbed the changes into our systems.

But at every stage, one thing was always treated as an afterthought.

Security. Not Bugs...Security.

Techs were so eager to show off their breakthroughs (hey, I get it, computerheads love getting things up and running) that they pushed it live and patched the holes after the fact.

Even now, with all the talk of DevSecOps and zero trust, the pattern hasn't changed much.

Security is still more a marketing term than a mindset in too many places.

AI will be no different. In fact, it's worse.

We're rushing models into the world that can think, react, and adapt. And we still don't fully understand how to secure them.

My hope is that when the gaps show up, and they will, we're still the ones in control.

And there's one wildcard people still underestimate.

The system administrator.

Even with cloud and tighter access controls, someone always has root.

Look at Snowden. He wasn't an outsider. He was inside, with full security permissions.

That's a layer of risk that still gets overlooked.

How will this all play out in 10 or 20 years?

We'll see.

But if history is any guide, we're not ready.

#59 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 06:59 PM | Reply

Me,

You're not wrong...Thiel and Musk are power players too.

But the difference is, they're not pretending to be moral saviors while doing it.

#60 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 07:06 PM | Reply

#57

Chaff?

"Both Iran and Russia shared an ally in former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and intervened on his behalf in the Syrian war until his eventual defeat late last year.

Iran has supplied Russia with Shahed kamikaze drones to be used on Ukrainian targets, and last year, there were reports that Russia received hundreds of Fath-360 ballistic missiles from Iran, which are known to be accurate at short range.

"Of course, Russia should be friends with Iran because, in politics and in life, everything is very simple," hawkish Russian TV personality Sergey Mardan commented after the latest Middle East crisis escalated.

"If you have an enemy and your enemy has partners and allies, his partners and allies are automatically your enemies.

"There are no illusions about this, and there can't be any. Since Israel is a key ally of the United States; ... of course, we are interested in the weakening of Israel and helping its adversaries."

more
www.aljazeera.com

#61 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-20 07:11 PM | Reply

#61: We know all that Corky. When did the Kremlin 'sic' the sovereign nation of Iran on Israel?

#62 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-06-20 07:20 PM | Reply

#62

The sovereign nation of Iran is a major Russian military supplier, much of which money ends up in the hands of Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.

Among other reasons...

"Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in January: The Iran-Russia treaty showed "the desire of Moscow and Tehran for closer cooperation on security and defense."

Gregg Roman, executive director of the Middle East Forum: "Putin understands that this is Trump's Middle East. Israel is the United States' top Middle East ally and Putin is trying to walk a fine line with the United States over Ukraine."

www.newsweek.com

www.acfcs.org

www.arabnews.com

#63 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-20 08:32 PM | Reply

#28 It was not officially declared that Trump "staged a coup."

In the case of Anderson v. Griswold a Colorado state trial court, following a 5 cay trial in which the Buffoon participated, "found by clear and convincing evidence that President Trump engaged in insurrection ..." on J6. (pdf p.8) As a result the Colorado Supreme Court declared the Buffoon ineligible to run for the Presidency pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment section 3. law.justia.com The USSC reversed holding only Congress can disqualify. The factual finding of "insurrection" was not challenged and remains valid.

Insurrection synonym coup. www.merriam-webster.com

#64 | Posted by et_al at 2025-06-20 08:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Et,

That's a civil court opinion from a state judge. It's not a criminal charge, not federal law, and not proof of insurrection.

It was challenged, and the Supreme Court killed it.

#65 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 09:36 PM | Reply

That's a civil court opinion from a state judge. It's not a criminal charge, not federal law, and not proof of insurrection.
It was challenged, and the Supreme Court killed it.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-20 09:36 PM | Reply

No they did not you Dummkopf. All the Supreme Court said was that states couldn't make the decision to leave off the ballots Trump because they didn't have standing to do so only Congress could do that BillJohnson. They never answered the question of did Trump commit an insurrection. Get your facts straight next time damnit.

#66 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-20 09:45 PM | Reply

#62: Of course Russian supplies end up with Iran or her allies. If the US helped the Shia Arab Houthis during the Yemen Civil War and famine, they might have been on our side, not the Persian Iranians or Lebanese Hezbollah who did help them.

Again, Corky, when did Russia ever order the government of Iran to launch an attack against Israel?

Attacking Iran in 2025 because they are economic and strategic partners of Russia is merely an AIPAC talking point. US military action only benefits Israel, not the American taxpayer or Servicemember. The JCPOA was functioning well-- something Benjamin Netanyahu and AIPAC hated-- so Dotard Trumpf withdrew the US from the agreement during his first administration.

Iran is a signatory to the NPT, Israel is not. In fact, an Israeli cabinet minister publicly contemplated using a nuclear weapon against the Muslims in the Gaza Strip.

Over the decades Israel invaded Lebanon twice. Remember the Sabra and Shatila massacre 16"18 Sep 1982? 1,300 to 3,500 civilians, mostly Palestinians and Lebanese Shias, were slaughtered. Israel is occupying parts of Syria. Now Israel launches a surprise attack against the sovereign country of Iran. But because the victims are Muslims, nobody in the Judeo-Christian West cares.

Who is the aggressive nuclear-powered threat in the Middle East? Iran? How many people has Tehran killed in 2025? 55,000 like the Israelis?

Sources:

www.timesofisrael.com

en.wikipedia.org

www.cbsnews.com

#67 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-06-20 09:59 PM | Reply

#65 | Posted by BillJohnson

Your ignorance of the law is no excuse. Officially, i.e legally, finding that the Buffoon engaged in insurrection does not require a criminal court. The USSC ruling was about who decides qualification not who decides the predicate facts.

The court did not reach some of the other issues that Trump had urged them to decide in his brief on the merits " such as whether Trump "engaged in insurrection" on Jan. 6.
www.scotusblog.com

Unlike your nonfactual personal opinions about mail ballots, to which you are entitled, that does not work with matters of law. Your personal opinion is irrelevant.

#68 | Posted by et_al at 2025-06-20 10:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Laura,

I'll avoid questions about law.

Regardless I'll never be convinced Jan 6 was anymore than an angry crowd that went out of control.

#69 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-21 12:38 AM | Reply

Et,

No. Law is not my hobby.

However, I'm still not finding you are correct.

The Supreme Court didn't rule on whether Trump committed insurrection. They ruled that states can't make that call. Only Congress can.

So I still feel fine saying Trump did not officially stage a coup.

#70 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-21 12:58 AM | Reply

No. Law is not my hobby.
However, I'm still not finding you are correct.
The Supreme Court didn't rule on whether Trump committed insurrection. They ruled that states can't make that call. Only Congress can.
So I still feel fine saying Trump did not officially stage a coup.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-06-21 12:58 AM | Reply

You're not going to face the truth are you BillJohnson?? Not surprised by this.

#71 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-21 01:01 AM | Reply

Visitor posted "Obama announced. "I've got a pen and I've got a phone ... and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions."

A tru;y laughable post after watching Donald Trump using more Executive Orders than any President, virtually replacing the Legislative Branch with them and because of his political power the Republican Congressional leaders are afraid to stand up to him. Obama is right, it will be up to the voters to replace them with Democrats and Trump is doing a good job of converting Republicans into Democrats. Another year of his insanity it is doubtful that the GQP will not control either House of Congress.

#72 | Posted by danni at 2025-06-21 06:04 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort