Jack Smith under investigation by Office of Special Counsel

Friday, August 01, 2025

Smith had been tapped by the Justice Department to lead two high-profile criminal cases involving President Donald Trump"one focused on classified documents and another on Trump's role in the events of January 6, 2021, and whether they constituted an effort to overturn the election. Both cases ultimately ended in dismissal. According to a message obtained by the Post, the Hatch Act Unit"which is responsible for ensuring that federal employees do not engage in political activity in violation of the law"is now examining Smith's conduct. The email was authored by Charles Baldis, a senior attorney with the Office of Special Counsel.

Posted by lfthndthrds at 07:49 PM | 22 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"Vengeance is mine!" Sayeth the Orange Pedo Hitler.

Funny though, this farce won't werk any better as a Distraction than the Epstein Pedo Pimp Pardon will.

Whatever, LFT will continue to bend over for his Cult Leader, however far it takes.

One wonders though, where Jack Smith hired all those Dem Crisis Actors to pretend to be Trump's Staff who testified to his crimes under Oath.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-01 08:20 PM | Reply

Pedo Lover LeftHandTurds,

Trump and Elon sold Teslas on the front lawn of the White House.

No one cares about your BS to distract from being a party of Pedophiles.

#2 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-08-01 08:23 PM | Reply

Cry all you want but the gig is up... Jack should have continued his prosecution if he had the juice, but he didn't... My money is on guilty of election interference.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 08:46 PM | Reply

Cry all you want but the gig is up... Jack should have continued his prosecution if he had the juice, but he didn't... My money is on guilty of election interference.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You're such an unAmerican piece of s(*&.

#4 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-01 08:52 PM | Reply

Cry all you want but the gig is up... Jack should have continued his prosecution if he had the juice, but he didn't... My money is on guilty of election interference.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You Pedos were crying even in cases where there was enough evidence and he was convicted.

And Smith would have been able to continue if you Pedo Lovers hadn't elected the Giant Orange Pedo Blob to office again.

#5 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-08-01 09:02 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

- One wonders though, where Jack Smith hired all those Dem Crisis Actors to pretend to be Trump's Staff who testified to his crimes under Oath.

A question that will go unanswered on this thread as it has around here for years now.

Truth is, Trumpers don' care that he is guilty... because politics. Party Over Country at it's finest.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-01 09:02 PM | Reply

And Smith would have been able to continue if you Pedo Lovers hadn't elected the Giant Orange Pedo Blob to office again.

#5 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-08-01 09:02 PM | Reply | Flag:

You're an unfiltered idiot. The Biden DOJ had 4 years to prosecute Trump and put him away. It was all theatrics to sway an election. Why didn't Biden have the DOJ go after Trump for what was uncovered in the Epstein data? Why?? Because there was nothing. Lets pretend there was something incriminating and Biden didn't pursue, you're making yourself a bigger an even bigger idiot.

Kamala lost. It's over, and I hope anyone who meddled in this ------ goes to prison.

#7 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 09:11 PM | Reply

You're such an unAmerican piece of s(*&.

#4 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-01 08:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

Brilliant comeback. Fkkn raetard. You're still pushing the NYT lie today on another thread after THEY even retracted.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 09:14 PM | Reply

You're still pushing the NYT lie today on another thread after THEY even retracted.

#8 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

You maga morons know all about pushing lies.

Who won the 2020 presidential election?

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-01 09:23 PM | Reply

Turds is nothing more than a kultist who will say anything to defend Trump.

#10 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-08-01 09:28 PM | Reply

You're still pushing the NYT lie today on another thread after THEY even retracted.

#8 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

C&P it you stupid little b*^%#.

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-01 11:12 PM | Reply

Is that child severely malnourished? Yes or no.

#10 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-31 01:13 AM | Reply | Flag

Cerebral Palsy. I'm pretty sure the NYT already walked this one back.

Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 04:50 PM | Reply

#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 11:32 PM | Reply

Go back to the thread raetard... I wasn't the only one who called you out.

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 11:33 PM | Reply

I'm pretty sure the NYT already walked this one back.

Pretty sure it was a hunger strike.

Journalism in America will never accurately report the situation in Israel.

#14 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-08-01 11:38 PM | Reply

Bullschitt... It was a picture of the same kid the NYT ran and had to retract.

#15 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 11:41 PM | Reply

And it's not like the raetard hasn't posted parody articles before - without even opening them.

#16 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 11:43 PM | Reply

I'm not denying they retracted the original article.

I'm denying the reason why they retracted the article.

My reason why the kid was severely malnourished, hunger strike, is just as accurate, if not a little more humorous, than the claim it's due to cerebral palsy.

Regardless.

Just admit it. Whether all the Israelis kill all the Palestinians or all the Palestinians kill all all the Israelis.

You don't really care.

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-08-01 11:45 PM | Reply

Whether all the Israelis kill all the Palestinians or all the Palestinians kill all all the Israelis.

You don't really care.

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-08-01 11:45 PM | Reply | Flag

You don't know what I care about. I've been vocal about Israel for a long time. But NYT posting a lie isn't helping anything.
Personally I don't believe we ought to be running guns for Israel or Ukraine. We should have stepped in between Israel and the Palestinian people to ensure that terrorists were removed without causing carnage to the majority of people just for collateral damage and shock & awe as more or less a humanitarian effort. I don't get to make these rules so it really doesn't matter what I think. As far as Israel goes, there just another foreign country to me, same as Iran and Ukraine. But I do not like the idea that Israel is allowed to meddle in our elections and call on our favor when they need bunker buster bombs used on their nighbor. I'm also aware that what started this last shttshow is the fact that Israel bombed the Iranian embassy in Damascus - and it was clearly labeled - unlike the propaganda later fabricated.

#18 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-02 12:27 AM | Reply

Cerebral Palsy. I'm pretty sure the NYT already walked this one back.

Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-01 04:50 PM | Reply

#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds

#19 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-02 12:40 AM | Reply

Not sure what happened there.

In any case, 31 July is not today.

Also, I wasn't pushing their narrative because it was pointed out to be more than poor nutrition and I acknowledged it and stated why it wasn't particularly relevant.

But s(*&bags like you thrive on details and minutia when it allows you to support objectively false narratives based on emotion, bitterness, rage and stupidity.

Which, in case you don't know it, is the basis of nearly all your views.

#20 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-02 12:52 AM | Reply

#20 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-02 12:52 AM | Reply |

You know exactly what I'm talking about. You've been corrected more than once and there was an active thread on this site addressing exactly what I said to you.

Be honest or dont. I DGAF.

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-02 01:17 AM | Reply

#21 I know what was said.

Just because some other terard can't read and "corrected" me doesn't mean a thing, idiot.

The point still stands. Nothing prevents that child being removed from that situation for proper care other than a lack of will to do so.

#22 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-02 12:29 PM | Reply