NATO Without the U.S.: 'Good Luck'
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte insisted Monday that Europe is incapable of defending itself without U.S. military support ...
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
boaz
Joined 2005/05/30Visited 2026/01/27
Status: user
MORE STORIES
NATO Without the U.S.: 'Good Luck' (7 comments) ...
This is why we have Foxnews; to tell the whole story (33 comments) ...
Husband saves wife because of the 2nd Amendment (28 comments) ...
Trump knocks it out of the park on Greeland (175 comments) ...
There's no such thing as a moderate Democrat (32 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
France has snapped back at NATO chief Mark Rutte in a feud over Europe's defense muscle. ðŸ"-- www.politico.eu/article/fran ... [image or embed] -- POLITICO Europe (@politico.eu) Jan 27, 2026 at 4:51 AM
France has snapped back at NATO chief Mark Rutte in a feud over Europe's defense muscle. ðŸ"-- www.politico.eu/article/fran ... [image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
"NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte insisted Monday that Europe is incapable of defending itself without U.S. military support and would have to more than double current military spending targets to be able to do so"
Something of a contradiction there.
#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-01-27 08:52 AM | Reply
Muriel Domenach, France's former ambassador to NATO, posted on X that "with all due respect to the NATO Secretary General, this is not: the right question ... the right answer: brandishing European weakness to secure the U.S. guarantee is an outdated approach and sends the wrong message to Russia." Without mentioning Rutte specifically, French Armed Forces Minister Catherine Vautrin told French radio that "what we see today is the necessity of NATO's European pillar." The idea of making Europeans collectively stronger within the military alliance, first pitched by France a few years ago, is now endorsed by other countries including Germany. MEP Nathalie Loiseau, a former French minister who now sits in the committee where Rutte made the controversial remarks, echoed Barrot's criticism: "It was a disgraceful moment. Rutte thinks that being rude with Europeans will please Trump. We don't need a Trump zealot. NATO needs to rebalance between US and European efforts."
Without mentioning Rutte specifically, French Armed Forces Minister Catherine Vautrin told French radio that "what we see today is the necessity of NATO's European pillar." The idea of making Europeans collectively stronger within the military alliance, first pitched by France a few years ago, is now endorsed by other countries including Germany.
MEP Nathalie Loiseau, a former French minister who now sits in the committee where Rutte made the controversial remarks, echoed Barrot's criticism: "It was a disgraceful moment. Rutte thinks that being rude with Europeans will please Trump. We don't need a Trump zealot. NATO needs to rebalance between US and European efforts."
#2 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 09:07 AM | Reply
Every coin has two sides. While it's good that Europe is moving towards taking a stronger role for its own security, this could potentially come back to haunt American in a few decades...
#3 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 09:09 AM | Reply
*America
Damn typoes.
#4 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 09:09 AM | Reply
Defend itself against who?
Who is the threat they are talking about?
Russia that can't even take over non-NATO Ukraine?
Maybe Serbia is going to rise up with its 150 man army?
The super power Algeria?
China is the only country with a comparable military but they are on the other side of the world and more intent on keep things stable to continue trading. They won't even invade Asian or African countries anymore.
The only other threat is the US itself...which if it decides to invade, NATO is meaningless anyway.
#5 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-01-27 10:40 AM | Reply
" China is the only country with a comparable military but they are on the other side of the world and more intent on keep things stable to continue trading"
China seeks a global hegemony. If the US were to pull out of NATO (which would be a colossal mistake) China might feel emboldened to seize territory.
#6 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-27 11:45 AM | Reply
The Russian Federation has a pipeline of slave soldiers from the "global south" to use in their war of attrition against the rest of Europe. They keep them in line by "snow boarding" them. If you haven't seen the pictures, involves stripping them down, tying them upside down to a post in the cold winter, and forcing snow into their noses and mouths. It works to deter Russian defectors as well.
#7 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 12:29 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy