Advertisement
NATO Without the U.S.: 'Good Luck'
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte insisted Monday that Europe is incapable of defending itself without U.S. military support ...
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
boaz
Joined 2005/05/30Visited 2026/01/28
Status: user
MORE STORIES
NATO Without the U.S.: 'Good Luck' (36 comments) ...
This is why we have Foxnews; to tell the whole story (33 comments) ...
Husband saves wife because of the 2nd Amendment (28 comments) ...
Trump knocks it out of the park on Greeland (175 comments) ...
There's no such thing as a moderate Democrat (32 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
France has snapped back at NATO chief Mark Rutte in a feud over Europe's defense muscle. ðŸ"-- www.politico.eu/article/fran ... [image or embed] -- POLITICO Europe (@politico.eu) Jan 27, 2026 at 4:51 AM
France has snapped back at NATO chief Mark Rutte in a feud over Europe's defense muscle. ðŸ"-- www.politico.eu/article/fran ... [image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
"NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte insisted Monday that Europe is incapable of defending itself without U.S. military support and would have to more than double current military spending targets to be able to do so"
Something of a contradiction there.
#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-01-27 08:52 AM | Reply
Muriel Domenach, France's former ambassador to NATO, posted on X that "with all due respect to the NATO Secretary General, this is not: the right question ... the right answer: brandishing European weakness to secure the U.S. guarantee is an outdated approach and sends the wrong message to Russia." Without mentioning Rutte specifically, French Armed Forces Minister Catherine Vautrin told French radio that "what we see today is the necessity of NATO's European pillar." The idea of making Europeans collectively stronger within the military alliance, first pitched by France a few years ago, is now endorsed by other countries including Germany. MEP Nathalie Loiseau, a former French minister who now sits in the committee where Rutte made the controversial remarks, echoed Barrot's criticism: "It was a disgraceful moment. Rutte thinks that being rude with Europeans will please Trump. We don't need a Trump zealot. NATO needs to rebalance between US and European efforts."
Without mentioning Rutte specifically, French Armed Forces Minister Catherine Vautrin told French radio that "what we see today is the necessity of NATO's European pillar." The idea of making Europeans collectively stronger within the military alliance, first pitched by France a few years ago, is now endorsed by other countries including Germany.
MEP Nathalie Loiseau, a former French minister who now sits in the committee where Rutte made the controversial remarks, echoed Barrot's criticism: "It was a disgraceful moment. Rutte thinks that being rude with Europeans will please Trump. We don't need a Trump zealot. NATO needs to rebalance between US and European efforts."
#2 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 09:07 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Every coin has two sides. While it's good that Europe is moving towards taking a stronger role for its own security, this could potentially come back to haunt American in a few decades...
#3 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 09:09 AM | Reply
*America
Damn typoes.
#4 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 09:09 AM | Reply
Defend itself against who?
Who is the threat they are talking about?
Russia that can't even take over non-NATO Ukraine?
Maybe Serbia is going to rise up with its 150 man army?
The super power Algeria?
China is the only country with a comparable military but they are on the other side of the world and more intent on keep things stable to continue trading. They won't even invade Asian or African countries anymore.
The only other threat is the US itself...which if it decides to invade, NATO is meaningless anyway.
#5 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-01-27 10:40 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3
" China is the only country with a comparable military but they are on the other side of the world and more intent on keep things stable to continue trading"
China seeks a global hegemony. If the US were to pull out of NATO (which would be a colossal mistake) China might feel emboldened to seize territory.
#6 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-27 11:45 AM | Reply | Funny: 2
The Russian Federation has a pipeline of slave soldiers from the "global south" to use in their war of attrition against the rest of Europe. They keep them in line by "snow boarding" them. If you haven't seen the pictures, involves stripping them down, tying them upside down to a post in the cold winter, and forcing snow into their noses and mouths. It works to deter Russian defectors as well.
#7 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-01-27 12:29 PM | Reply
Rutte thinks that being rude with Europeans
Liberals recoil from true statements, perceive them as insult andor attak. Rutte better watch out, one more and they will plonk him.
#8 | Posted by john_savage1 at 2026-01-27 04:31 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
" China is the only country with a comparable military but they are on the other side of the world and more intent on keep things stable to continue trading" China seeks a global hegemony. If the US were to pull out of NATO (which would be a colossal mistake) China might feel emboldened to seize territory.
#6 | Posted by BellRinger
Yes, Jeff. Global Hegemony with all those countries they've invaded in the last 40 years...like...umm.... hmmm...
They are territories all over the WORLD China could seize. Especially in Africa. It hasn't.
It builds a hospital. Opens trade. And leaves.
China's basic diplomacy is "Keep the status quo and keep trade moving."
#9 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-01-27 04:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
#9 Antithesis for that is, China has always operated on the belief that conflict with the West is inevitable, which was a main reason that China differed with USSR during the Cold War. Also, Communist doctrine comprises eventual defeat of Capitalism globally.
#10 | Posted by john_savage1 at 2026-01-27 05:12 PM | Reply | Funny: 2
More hubris.
#11 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-01-27 05:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
NATO is incapable of defending itself from itself, the US?
The US are viewed as the bad guys now by NATO former allies
#12 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-01-27 06:12 PM | Reply
#11 | Posted by fresno500
It may be hubris if an American said it. Rutte is not an American, just a realist.
#13 | Posted by john_savage1 at 2026-01-27 06:59 PM | Reply
#6 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-27 11:45 AM | Reply | Flag:
Realize the irony here.
The place they can seize value territory the easiest is Russia.
#14 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-01-27 08:41 PM | Reply
It's a 2,600 mile border.
#15 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-01-27 08:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
#14 | Posted by sitzkrieg
>seize ... the easiest -ya think?
I suppose they could disappear into siberia... History teaches us that No One "seizes territory" from russia, and anyways why would anyone want to?
#16 | Posted by john_savage1 at 2026-01-27 08:50 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
Bo@ss without the Klan... GOOD LUCK
#17 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-27 09:53 PM | Reply
Ballwasher the ignorant --------, Bo@ss the ignorant backwoods ------- dumbass, and SSentinel, the idiot Nazi ---------- are going to explain the international order to us.
Ah, ---- all y'all.
#18 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-27 09:55 PM | Reply
re: Sitzkrieg
What resources does Russia have that China might consider invasion-worthy?
#19 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-01-28 06:34 AM | Reply
What good is MAD, mutually assured destruction, without being able to drop a few nuclear bombs on one's enemy? Goodby Moscow, it was nice to know you and your pretend democracy....is that what the future holds for our "civilization"?
#20 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-01-28 08:22 AM | Reply
#19
Oil
#21 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-01-28 11:46 AM | Reply
#1 | Posted by Zed
I am going to cautiously say he is right with a major "but" - not totally incapable. Europe is waking up. They are expanding military production capabilities. They do have many weapons superior to the US already and they are quickly developing new ones. They are building manufacturing capabilities. They are working with Ukraine like the US but maybe even more so. It will take time but I believe the EU WILL become an equal. They WILL proliferate nuclear war heads throughout the region. They will build their own ICBMs and the like and everything will be new and the latest tech. Not 1960s and 1970s tech. Where Europe lags and likely will remain lagging is power projection capabilities.
The true defining difference that will remain IMHO is that the US is a militarized society.
#22 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2026-01-28 01:30 PM | Reply
They do have many weapons superior to the US already
No they dont. Where do you get this B.S. from? LOL
NATO would fall apart without the U.S.
#23 | Posted by boaz at 2026-01-28 01:41 PM | Reply
European nations have used their tax revenues to take care of their citizens.
The United States of America has used its taxes to fund billionaires and the military industrial complex.
Why dos America worship billionaires and death?
It's insane.
#24 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-01-28 01:53 PM | Reply
#23 | Posted by boaz
Notice Boaz can't explain how they would fall apart?
NATO would basically just be the EU without the US. And the EU would be fine.
#25 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-01-28 02:21 PM | Reply
Without America NATO is like a car without a windshield.
Without Europe its like a car without headlines.
#26 | Posted by Tor at 2026-01-28 02:22 PM | Reply
Their reach wouldnt be as far. They wouldnt be able to hold engagements or fights as long.
#27 | Posted by boaz at 2026-01-28 02:28 PM | Reply
NATO would fall apart without the U.S. #23 | Posted by boaz
Why do you want NATO to fall apart, is the thing we can't understand. You don't think NATO represents Jack Nicholson's character guarding that Wall, in A Few Good Men?
#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-28 02:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
I agree. We're already seeing Ukraine losing ground to Russia without proper support from the US. Without NATO, there isn't much to stop a Chinese supported Russia pushing further into Western Europe. So why do you seem to actively hope that Trump pulls us out of NATO?
#29 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-01-28 03:33 PM | Reply
Boaz was elated when Russia invaded the Ukraine.
He was boasting about what a "Savvy Genius" Putin was.
Fact is, Boaz hates America.
#30 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-01-28 04:13 PM | Reply
So why do you seem to actively hope that Trump pulls us out of NATO?
I dont want us to come out of NATO. I want us out of the U.N.
I actually like NATO. I got to command a unit in NATO in combat. I hold a few NATO medals I've been awarded.
It's not NATO I dislike, it's the U.N.
#31 | Posted by boaz at 2026-01-28 04:29 PM | Reply
The United States created the UN to advance US foreign policy.
Why is that bad?
#32 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-28 05:04 PM | Reply
The U.N. was created because the league of nations failed.
#33 | Posted by boaz at 2026-01-28 05:33 PM | Reply
#31
Perhaps for different reasons, but I don't care much for the UN as it is either.
So what was the point of this post?
#34 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-01-28 05:38 PM | Reply
Boaz is working on convicting himself that MAGA is right, those NATO soldiers he commanded in Afghanistan were losers and mooches, and we should leave NATO.
That's what this thread is for.
#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-28 05:41 PM | Reply
He commanded a drawer full of paper clips
#36 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-28 05:46 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy