Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, June 03, 2026

The House offered a rare rebuke to President Donald Trump on Wednesday, passing a Democrat-led measure to end his war with Iran over objections from Republican leadership.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Breaking: The GOP-led House votes to halt the US war with Iran, a rebuke to Trump that doesn't end the conflict[image or embed]

" Bloomberg News (@bloomberg.com) 5:27 PM Jun 3, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More: It was one of two Democratic-led measures opposed by the White House that advanced in the GOP-led House. Lawmakers also passed a motion that would unlock a vote on sending aid to Ukraine.

[I]t passed 215-208, with four Republicans joining all Democrats in voting yes. Those Republicans were Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Tom Barrett of Michigan and Warren Davidson of Ohio.

The resolution directs Trump to remove U.S. armed forces from hostilities with Iran, unless Congress votes to declare war or authorizes the use of military force against the Middle East nation. It would not force him to end the conflict, however, and is a symbolic expression of disapproval of Trump's war with Iran.

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-06-03 06:08 PM | Reply

Now it's meaningless as Trump would never sign such a bill, but it does show that his hold the Republicans in Congress is being diminished. They're coming to the realization that Trump, for all intents and purposes, is already a 'lame-duck' president, and it's only going to get more obvious as we approach the midterms if it continues to look like the Democrats will at least win back the House, if not the Senate as well.

OCU

#2 | Posted by OCUser at 2026-06-03 07:11 PM | Reply

But TrumpCultInc. said it's not a war so it couldn't have an end because it never had a beginning and even if it was a war and it did have an actual beginning and Congress then told Trump to end it he wouldn't do so because he doesn't give a rat's ass what Congress thinks.

#3 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2026-06-03 07:46 PM | Reply

finally.

#4 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-06-03 08:10 PM | Reply

I doubt he wanted to stop this; now he can TACO and blame it on Congress.

He's now actually made Persia Great Again, and kicked the ever-lovin' chit outta the USofA.

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-06-03 08:20 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

good

#6 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-06-03 08:24 PM | Reply

Now we see the votes.

Who loves War and who doesn't.

Who love$ Israel and who is less, shall we say, Compromised?

Votes give Information.

#7 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-06-03 09:03 PM | Reply

#7 Why do you care?

"I'm not Participating in the Elections.

Nobody in either party represents me.

If that helps the Republicans, I don't give a ----.

I'm not voting for people who help Killers.

It's that simple.

#33 | Posted by little boi at 2026-05-03 04:43 PM

#8 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-06-03 09:07 PM | Reply

Trump may well take this chance to TACO, and it will get him out of his mess, but he's going to hate everyone for it. And I do mean hate, and I do mean everyone..

#9 | Posted by Zed at 2026-06-03 09:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

and kicked the ever-lovin' chit outta the USofA.
#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-06-03 08:20 PM | FLAG PFFFTT

in record time... whew... OPEC must be thrilled.

Corky old man... do tell... any tea on Venezuela? How are they doing these days?

Shall we start calling it Forgetazuela? or... ahem.. Olvidarzuela?

#10 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-06-03 09:45 PM | Reply

four Republicans joining all Democrats in voting yes

Todd Blanche's first job as AG will be to declare Lawfare on those four miscreants.

#11 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-06-03 11:17 PM | Reply

Trump may well take this chance to TACO,

So long as President Netanyahu wants to wage the unending war to stay in power, the US will continue to attack Iran.

Anyone that thinks Pedo Pisswig is in charge is an idiot.

#12 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-06-04 08:01 AM | Reply

"I'm not Participating in the Elections.

You're stupid enough to give them exactly what they want.

#13 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-06-04 08:02 AM | Reply

How does legislation end this war? Does it compel the US to accede to Iran's demands?

Right now that is the only thing I see that ends this war.

#14 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-06-04 11:30 AM | Reply

"How does legislation end this war?"

Remember when our Republican President famously said:
"We are a Nation Of Laws?"

That's how.
But that America died, under our Republican President's leadership.

#15 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-04 11:32 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Trump is really mad that the House voted to end the war. "Unpatriotic! They should be ashamed of themselves"!

Months ago he said the war was essentially over, Iran had nothing to shoot with and were begging for a deal.

#16 | Posted by Derek_Wildstar at 2026-06-04 01:34 PM | Reply

Congress isn't exactly off the hook. Someone has to decide whether this war ends on US terms, or on the terms of the Islamic Republic.

Donny is out of his element. That's not a decision he is capable of making.

#17 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-06-04 03:46 PM | Reply

__________
#17 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-06-04 03:46 PM
Donny is out of his element. That's not a decision he is capable of making.

He is entirely in his element of a lifetime of making decisions he is incapable and unfit to make... and blaming everyone else for consequences.

www.latimes.com - Trump is stuck between two realities. Neither serves the American people - Jonah Goldberg, LAT / Dispatch, 2026-06-02

|------- ... In the contest of wills, Trump blinked.

The Iranian regime's tolerance for punishment proved - so far - to be greater than Trump's and that of our gulf allies. Militarily we could finish the job, but that would require ground troops and much greater economic turmoil. In a conflict Trump launched unilaterally without the prior support of Congress, NATO or the American people, Trump doesn't have the political capital for that.

But that's only half the problem. Trump wants the war over, but he doesn't want to pay - militarily, economically, politically - what that would cost. So he wants to make a deal that ends it. But there is no deal available that wouldn't come at an equally undesirable cost. Any deal that looks like what President Obama struck with the Iranians would be too embarrassing to bear. But the Iranians are convinced that they can get just such a deal, and they're willing to drag things out as long as it takes.

The result: Trump's in a box of his own making. He thinks he can talk his way out by simply asserting a reality that doesn't exist. When the financial markets get nervous, he announces a breakthrough that is, at best, a possibility. When the Iranians agree to a deal that looks similar to one Obama might negotiate, Trump goes back to his threats.

It can't go on forever. But I'm sure it'll last until long after this column is forgotten.
-------|

What will be the next distraction from the previous distraction? Cuba ? 250th aka "celebration of Don"? FIFA World Cup? Next rerun episode of Presidential Apprentice picking fights with Greenland, Canada, Mexico, India...?

Meanwhile, Trump continues his full retreat from the "Western front" : www.politico.com - Pentagon likely to cancel missile deal with Germany over fears of Russia - 2026-06-04

|------- The Pentagon is expected to cancel a plan to send Tomahawk missiles to Germany partly because officials are concerned Russia will view it as an escalation, a startling reversal of a long-planned agreement with one of America's biggest allies. ... -------|

"De-escalation / de-escalate" were the often-repeated words of Biden administration officials.
__________

#18 | Posted by CutiePie at 2026-06-04 11:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

__________
#8 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-06-03 09:07 PM
#7 Why do you care?

#7 | Posted by Effeteposer ... - Effeteposer "cares" because it's his job - he is a directly paid low-level "script chatbot" troll for Putin's Internet Research Agency (founded by Evgeny Prigozhin, founder of Wagner PMC).

Effeteposer has been running the same stupid Russian script for years now, with very slight variations, depending on how things were going in Ukraine. Initially it was to justify Russian invasion and promoting "Ukraine Nazis" and "everything wrong with the world is USA+NATO fault" and equating "both sides" pablum... basically - "Russians / Putin are well-intentioned but stupid fools that are trying to save the world from Nazis, like the great Soviet Union did in WW2, but fell for evil cunning USA and NATO trap in Ukraine because they justifiably feel threatened by NATO's expansion..." yada, yada, yada.

That no longer working, since 2024 the trolls were instructed to "mute" Russia and their efforts have been directed towards Israel-USA relations, so pretty much to turn any thread into bashing Israel, Jews ("ZioNazis"), Netanyahu, AIPAC, etc. and "mute" the words Hamas, PIJ, Hezbollah, Hoothies replacing them with "Palestinians," "people of Gaza," "Muslims," etc., while and emphasizing the usual "grievances" and agitprop KGB used against Israel since 1950s.

Anything to separate US allies from the US, though Trump is doing much more real damage on his own, but they are serving the same masters. There are now much better-skilled trolls than Effeteposer on this site alone, no doubt because many of his "ideas" have been well accepted here.

spyscape.com - Inside Russia's Notorious 'Internet Research Agency' Troll Factory -

www.npr.org - Meet The Activist Who Uncovered The Russian Troll Factory Named In The Mueller Probe

More recently, they "unofficially" became part of wider Russian Matryoshka network's disinformation campaign of "flooding the zone with s**t":
www.sgdsn.gouv.fr - Matryoshka Network - Operation Overload - A pro-Russian campaign targeting media and fact-checking community (PDF, 16 pg)
__________

#19 | Posted by CutiePie at 2026-06-05 01:20 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort