Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, July 11, 2026

Gov. Ron DeSantis pushed for a proposal to slash property taxes. But after some local Republican officials protested, he backpedaled, sort of.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Florida officials are scrambling to prepare for a potential overhaul of how they pay for all sorts of services, from policing to pothole repairs. "It's not a haircut, it's an amputation," one said about the proposal to slash property taxes in the state. on.wsj.com/4aIdlqX

[image or embed]

-- The Wall Street Journal (@wsj.com) 8:28 PM · Jul 10, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More: In recent weeks, Mr. DeSantis has been at the center of a topsy-turvy drama over the future of property taxes in Florida as he has tried to reduce the burden of soaring tax bills for homeowners. But a proposed constitutional amendment that emerged from those efforts has been met with considerable pushback, most notably from some of his fellow Republicans, including local officials faced with billions in lost revenue that would force them to cut services.

Now, even Mr. DeSantis is backing away from the proposal, which is set to appear on the November ballot. The backlash reflects the real-world budgetary challenges that come with one of the Republican Party's core beliefs " that taxes should be lower.

Property taxes, which tend to fund local services, have come under particular scrutiny of late, as Republican state lawmakers around the country search for new strategies to address the affordability crisis.

Mike Fasano, the tax collector for Pasco County, Fla., is a lifelong Republican and a DeSantis fan. But if the proposal passes, he says, it will have a "devastating impact on our county, and counties throughout the state."

He checked off the services in Pasco that could be hit, including "the sheriff's department, fire-rescue, veterans' services, senior services, parks and rec, libraries."

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-07-10 08:52 AM | Reply

Another view ...

Florida's proposed property tax cuts rely on a population boom that has slowed dramatically
theconversation.com

... From 2020 to 2024, Florida's population grew by 8.5%, from 21.6 million to 23.4 million.

This is nothing new: The state's warm weather, amenities that include world-class golf courses and beaches, and lack of income tax have long attracted newcomers, so Florida often leads the U.S. in population growth.

But recent data suggests that population growth may be slowing. ...

In other words, the tax collector would deduct the exempted amount from the assessed value of a homesteaded property, and the property tax rate would then be applied to that lower number.

Supporters of the tax cut argue that reduced tax revenue would be recouped by the continued arrival of new residents. These newcomers would be buying homes at the usual property tax rates, with an exemption of only $50,000. After four years, that would increase to $250,000. It's also possible that the proposed tax cuts might attract new residents.

If Floridians vote for this exemption in November, the state's continued population growth would be vital to maintaining local and state government budgets. ...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-07-10 12:21 PM | Reply

"But recent data suggests that population growth may be slowing. ..."

That's because we're on the downslope of the 17 years of baby-boomer retirements. Hello?

#3 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-10 12:36 PM | Reply

@#3 ... That's because we're on the downslope of the 17 years of baby-boomer retirements. Hello? ...

I suspected one cause may be something along those lines.

But that still leaves open the question of why Florida seems to be relying upon the old population growth rate?

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-07-10 12:45 PM | Reply

"the 17 years of baby-boomer retirements"

Correction: 19 years. Baby boomers were born between 1946-1964. The youngest of them is eligible for Social Security this year.

#5 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-10 12:48 PM | Reply

" that still leaves open the question of why Florida seems to be relying upon the old population growth rate?"

Easy answer: Politicians get to spend more.

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-10 12:48 PM | Reply

The movers and shakers in FL seem impervious to the idea of creating infrastructure that comes anywhere close to matching the pace at which housing is created. Or, in many cases, any infrastructure at all to keep up with growth. It's astonishing.

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-07-10 12:49 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The Republicans don't have many plays left in their play book since they continued to use the same few over and over and over to drive short term profits.

Now, as we reap the consequences of that greed, there isn't really much left for them to cut without causing outsized political damage.

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-10 12:50 PM | Reply

-" that still leaves open the question of why Florida seems to be relying upon the old population growth rate?

"Because rich people don't want to pay the taxes on their million dollar homes or on their million dollsr incomes

Their answer: sales taxes and increased fees 1on ever4ything from 1drivers licenses to building permits. Republicans run Florida and Republicans hate low income peop2le like most of MAGA! Sales tax is one of the most regressive forms of taxation.3; it basically taxes every penny of income for low income peop1le,. If Florida wanted to help property owners and renters, wh89i9ch most low income 14people are, we could devise a system that allows a reduction in 7property taxes fo8r landlords who can document a 4comparable rent reduction for their tennants; not all of the tax savings would have to pass through to tennants but a significant portion would. Don't expect any ideas like that from DeSantis unless Donald Trump endorses it first; Until Trump endorses a Republican Presidential candidate for 2028 there will be a bootlicking competitiion between the various rivals; especially here in Florida,

#9 | Posted by danni at 2026-07-11 10:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

1 in 7 US Homes for sale are currently for sale in Florida
The population growth rate in Florida hsa fallen to BELOW 1% - Deaths are outpacing Births now
Florida is facing a crisis of working age people

#10 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-07-11 10:45 AM | Reply

California! Like everything else.

#11 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-07-11 11:40 AM | Reply

ppssssttt... it used to come from Canadians...but ya blew that one... didn't you...

#12 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-07-11 11:41 AM | Reply

What is unsaid in Florida and other states trying to lower or eliminate property taxes is that sales taxes, including taxes paid at grocery stores, must jump to double digits to make up the shortfall. Of course, sales taxes are regressive, hitting harder those in lower income brackets. Further, in hard times touch revenue falls faster when consumers slow or stop their spending. The result is that tax revenue swings wildly, causing constant scrambling by public officials trying to balance their budgets while delivering services such as public safety and public education. Good times. Watch what happens in Florida and use it as a lesson for your state ...

#13 | Posted by catdog at 2026-07-11 12:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#11

Prop 13 continues to screw kids out of a better education.

#14 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-11 07:03 PM | Reply

Prop 13 continues to screw kids out of a better education.

#14 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-11 07:03 PM | Reply MMHHMMM

I know... I was there when it happened.

#15 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-07-12 03:59 AM | Reply

Prop 13 continues to screw ...

... the government out of taxing people out of their homes.

Raise taxes on the rich.

Don't expect seniors to choose between pay increases on their property taxes or be forced to move out.

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-07-12 04:31 AM | Reply

#9
Lay off the booze bitch.

#17 | Posted by fortfisher at 2026-07-12 07:46 PM | Reply

#16

You know who benefits the most from Prop 13? Businesses. Who should pay more in taxes anyways, you ------- ignorant clown.

#18 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-12 10:11 PM | Reply

It's ironically stupid that Floridians constantly bleat, "We're full, go home" and then want to base their tax structure on new residents.

#19 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2026-07-13 07:18 AM | Reply

No argument that sales tax is a regressive tax (although meds and groceries are exempt). However, the municipalities have reaped huge increases in revenue solely because of the giant rise in valuations. So they get the money and then spend it. It is not like they needed all that extra money. What would they have done if instead of the huge rise in valuations, they stayed the same over the last decade?

#20 | Posted by rosemountbomber at 2026-07-13 08:28 AM | Reply

What is unsaid in Florida and other states trying to lower or eliminate property taxes is that sales taxes, including taxes paid at grocery stores, must jump to double digits to make up the shortfall. Of course, sales taxes are regressive, hitting harder those in lower income brackets. Further, in hard times touch revenue falls faster when consumers slow or stop their spending. The result is that tax revenue swings wildly, causing constant scrambling by public officials trying to balance their budgets while delivering services such as public safety and public education. Good times. Watch what happens in Florida and use it as a lesson for your state ...

#13 | Posted by catdog at 2026-07-11 12:43 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)
| Newsworthy 1

Unsaid that sales taxes need to double? By who? How about government being more efficient, cutting fraud and stupid spending? This is something foreign to Democrats who want to increase spending with other people's money.

#21 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-07-13 12:03 PM | Reply

Unsaid that sales taxes need to double? By who? How about government being more efficient, cutting fraud and stupid spending? This is something foreign to Democrats who want to increase spending with other people's money.

#21 | Posted by fishpaw

Trump gave elon free reign to examine the entire federal budget and elon found none of the waste that your cult always claims is rampant.

Although he did defund all the agencies that were investigating his crimes.

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-13 01:05 PM | Reply

#22 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

This is pretty funny because you're deflecting to the Federal level

FL spends $12,689 to $15,100 per pupil, X ~17.8 per classroom ~= $213,000 on the low end.

Avg teacher salary =$56,663.

You can do arithmetic right? Where ---- is the money going?

This is MN but its the same around the country.

#23 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-13 01:20 PM | Reply

Where ---- is the money going?

#23 | Posted by oneironaut

Into stuff your little brain can't comprehend.

"When you look at the raw math"roughly $213,000 allocated per classroom versus an average teacher salary of $56,663"it looks like a massive chunk of money vanishes into thin air.

The gap isn't usually a single "black hole" of administrative waste (though bureaucracy certainly plays a role). Instead, it's driven by the massive structural reality that a school building requires a small army, expensive benefits, and physical infrastructure to keep that single classroom doors open.

A breakdown of where that remaining ~$156,000 per classroom actually goes includes the following expenses:
1. Teacher Benefits (The "Total Compensation" Gap)

That $56,663 is just the take-home base salary. School districts must pay significant mandatory and optional benefits on top of that, which generally add 30% to 45% to the cost of every employee.

Florida Retirement System (FRS): The state mandates significant employer pension contributions.

Healthcare & Insurance: Health, dental, and life insurance premiums paid by the district.

Taxes: Employer-paid Social Security, Medicare, and workers' compensation.

The Real Cost: A teacher making $56k actually costs the district roughly $75,000 to $80,000 in total compensation.

2. The Rest of the Building's Staff

A school cannot run with just a teacher and 18 kids in a room. A huge portion of per-pupil funding pays for the people who support that classroom from the outside. That $213,000 per room has to partially fund:

Student Support: School nurses, guidance counselors, speech pathologists, and librarians.

School Operations: Principals, vice-principals, front office secretaries, security guards, and janitorial/maintenance staff.

3. Special Education & ESE Services

In Florida, funding is pooled across the district, but the cost to educate students varies wildly. Exceptional Student Education (ESE) and English Language Learners (ELL) require dedicated resources:

Specialized parateachers, interpreters, and behavioral therapists.

Heavily reduced class sizes for high-needs students (sometimes a 3:1 or 5:1 student-to-teacher ratio), which drains a disproportionate share of the per-pupil average pool.

4. Operations, Technology, and Facilities

Just keeping the physical lights and air conditioning on (a massive budget line item in Florida summers) takes a toll.

Utilities & Maintenance: Electricity, HVAC maintenance, roof repairs, and cleaning supplies.

Software & Tech: Laptops/tablets, Wi-Fi networks, cybersecurity, and educational software licenses (which are increasingly billed on a expensive per-student annual subscription model).

Instructional Materials: Textbooks, lab supplies, and physical classroom materials.

5. Transportation and Food Services

Getting the students to the classroom and feeding them is entirely separate from instruction but eats from the same macro-budget.

Busing: Fleet acquisition, diesel fuel, mechanic salaries, and bus driver wages.

Cafeteria: Food prep staff, supply chain costs, and kitchen equipment maintenance.

6. District Administrative Overhead & Capital Debt

The "District Office": Superintendent salaries, HR departments (hiring hundreds of teachers), legal teams, payroll processors, and IT management.

Capital Outlay & Debt Interest: Building new schools to keep up with population growth or paying off the interest on bonds used to build existing ones.

When you apply that 55-60% metric to your $213,000 figure, you get about $117,150 going strictly to direct classroom instruction. Once you subtract the teacher's total compensation package (salary + benefits) from that slice, the math aligns closely with the reality of running a school system."

#24 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-13 01:33 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort