Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, August 15, 2026

Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley pushed back against claims that the company's expanding network of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) is contributing to a surveillance state ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

A Flock presentation shows the company planned to use around 350,000 Uber, Lyft, and delivery drivers to collect license plate data for its surveillance system.

[image or embed]

-- 404 Media (@404media.co) 8:15 AM · Aug 7, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Critics of Flock, however, argue the opposite is true, saying the company's influx of cameras raises significant privacy concerns and, rather than making communities safer, can leave sensitive data vulnerable to misuse and mass surveillance. ...

Flock Safety is among the country's largest providers of ALPRs, which scan and record vehicle information that can then be searched by a policing network. The company has cameras in every U.S. state except Alaska, and partners with over 6,000 law enforcement agencies and more than 5,000 private customers across the U.S. ...

When asked if Flock's technology is pushing the U.S. toward a dystopian "big brother" society, Langley responded, "No, I don't think so," adding, "I'm a father of three little kids, I live in Atlanta, I pay my taxes, like I'm a pretty normal person. I have the same types of anxieties of like, where's the world going? What are we setting up for?" ...

[emphasis mine]

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-14 12:37 AM | Reply

@#1 ... I'm a pretty normal person ...

So... the Flock states that only "normal" people should not be concerned about the Flock cameras?

And then there is also this ...

... When asked if Flock's technology is pushing the U.S. toward a dystopian "big brother" society, Langley responded, "No, I don't think so," ...

imo, the Flock cameras are the eyes of Big Brother. Not the full embodiment of Big Brother, but just the eyes.


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-14 12:41 AM | Reply

The technology executive told Newsweek in a Tuesday video interview that Flock's "end goal isn't a dystopian future of surveillance; it's one where I'm wealthy enough to be above the hell I'm creating."

That's what he's really saying.

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2026-08-14 03:02 AM | Reply

"transparency and accountability are central to the company's approach "

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-08-14 11:25 AM | Reply

"Flock CEO Says 'Goal Isn't a Dystopian Future'"

IOW, pointy-Haired boss caught brain golfing again....

#5 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2026-08-14 11:37 AM | Reply

This is a joke, right?

#6 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-08-14 04:06 PM | Reply

Hilarious thing about this is I saw a story today where the police somewhere were seeking the public's help in finding the person or people who "vandalized" a bunch of Flock cameras by spraying the lens with expanding foam.

The police statement said the perps approached from behind and sprayed them before the cameras "could identify them."

The first twenty comments were all centered around the general idea of 'I thought they only registered/recognized license plates.'

Dude could be telling the God's honest truth and it won't matter one bit. He brought this monstrosity on people and they aren't standing for it.

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2026-08-14 06:12 PM | Reply

Okay, how about flock introduce a code change that automatically deletes any image after 24 hours? If necessary Congress require it.

#8 | Posted by et_al at 2026-08-15 03:21 AM | Reply

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2026-08-14 03:02 AM | Reply | Flag:

What's the privacy like over in Eastern Europe, or wherever you claim you relocated to?

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-08-15 02:55 PM | Reply

A flock camera already captured images of Luvsorangeturds hosing down his telescoping pink sock.

#10 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-08-15 02:58 PM | Reply

@#8 ... Okay, how about flock introduce a code change that automatically deletes any image after 24 hours? If necessary Congress require it. ...

What happens then if Pres Trump issues an Executive Order overriding that time limit and also gives ICE unfettered access to any and all images that Flock has and the Flock AI analyses of those images?

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-15 03:02 PM | Reply

Was your license plate searched in Flock's system? Connecticut drivers can check
www.newstimes.com

... As debate over automated license plate readers intensifies across Connecticut, a website is giving drivers a way to check whether someone has searched for their license plate using Flock Safety's system.

The website, HaveIBeenFlocked.com, allows users to enter a license plate number and search a database of audit logs obtained from police departments and other government agencies through public records requests.

A match does not necessarily mean a Flock camera spotted the vehicle or that its driver was under investigation. Rather, it means an operator using Flock's system searched for that license plate, according to the website. The person conducting the search is not necessarily a police officer.

The site's database is also incomplete. The site says many government agencies do not make Flock audit logs readily available and records that are released can be heavily redacted. The website says it is not a real-time monitoring tool. There can be delays of months or years before records are added to the website. ...


#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-15 07:20 PM | Reply

Just more collateral damage? Baloney.
One look at those contracts the cities signed pretty much tosses all his spin right into the dumpster.

#13 | Posted by morris at 2026-08-15 07:30 PM | Reply

What's preventing Flock from just straight up giving this information to criminals that aren't in uniform?

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-08-16 12:17 AM | Reply

Well, we sure as hell seem to be following a path, the one that leads to Orwell's "1984".

#15 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-08-16 06:49 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Flock doesn't really gaf how the cameras are used by any of its customers, especially the government. Although, I'm certain Flock will consider surveillance of innocents a feature. What Flock and its shareholders are MOST concerned about is making money.

#16 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-08-16 05:32 PM | Reply

America grows more Big Brotherly with every passing day, and Flock cameras, as well as the Trump administration - with the help of Elon Musk's massive data theft - are accelerating the pace. It's another alarming attack on our right to be left alone.

#17 | Posted by cbob at 2026-08-17 03:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

OpEd: The Flock uprising is just the beginning
www.salon.com

... People are sick of tech billionaires trying to control our lives.

According to an exhaustive 10-month analysis by Electronic Foundation Frontier, a nonprofit dedicated to defending civil liberties in our digital age, local police were using the cameras to track protesters, such as those at No Kings rallies, who were then put in a national database to be used across all jurisdictions.

Despite claims that the cameras only record license plates, the technology-focused outlet 404 Media found that the database is also being used to collect information on individual people whom cops can then search for using descriptions of clothing, race, gender and body type.

In Johnson County, Texas, police officers fixated on a woman suspected of having an abortion, and used the database to track her movements in an effort to prove it -- even though state law is supposed to exempt the patient from criminal prosecution. Police have been outed for using the cameras to stalk people for personal reasons, such as having a conflict -- or even a sexual obsession -- with them.

Flock has claimed the company will reform its policies to address these issues, but history suggests it would be unwise to trust them. One former Flock employee, Jonathan Paz, has accused the company of lying about its intentions to gain government contracts, which are then abused by law enforcement to harm the public.

Paz told 404 Media that company management had assured him they weren't feeding information to agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a falsehood he passed on to city governments in his sales pitch. After finding out about a secret pilot program to help track down and detain immigrants, Paz left the company. ...


[many links in that article...]



#18 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-17 03:26 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort