Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, October 09, 2026

US President Donald Trump says he has reached an agreement with Russian President Vladimir Putin allowing Moscow to "immediately release" diesel into the global market. He said Putin had agreed to release 300,000 tonnes of diesel immediately, followed by 500,000 tonnes in November and another million after that. "Diesel Prices for Americans and, indeed, the World, will be COMING DOWN, IN RECORD NUMBERS, AND FAST!" Trump wrote on Truth social.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

I was just watching news on this.... turns out the 300k tons of oil for the US is about 18 mins worth.

The total couple of million is less than a tanker full.

This is just more idiotic Midterm dancing he's doing for his Cult.

www.youtube.com

Oh, and attempted intimidation of Ukraine not to target Russian fuel production.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2026-10-09 04:36 PM | Reply

So. One day's supply.

"In 2025, the U.S. transportation sector used about 2.94 million barrels of diesel fuel per day, which is roughly 350,000 tons daily.". -- AI summary

This reminds me of a Pimp, doling out Newports one by one to his Tricks.

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-10-09 04:43 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

'Plays into Russia's hands,' Zelenskyy tells Trump

The deal gives Putin an economic lifeline as Russia's economy remains under significant strain amid the war in Ukraine."

"In recent weeks, Trump has complained to Zelenskyy about Ukrainian strikes against Russian energy infrastructure.

Zelenskyy, in a statement after Trump announced his deal with Putin, slammed Trump's decision to lift sanctions.

"Any easing of sanctions against Russia without a clear and lasting de-escalation agreement with Russia is an obvious weakness," Zeleneskyy said.

"It plays into Russia's hands " allowing it to kill more, wage war for longer, have even less respect for America, and inflict even greater losses and damage on the world."

www.usatoday.com

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2026-10-09 05:21 PM | Reply

@#1 ... I was just watching news on this.... turns out the 300k tons of oil for the US is about 18 mins worth.

The total couple of million is less than a tanker full. ...

The conversion rate between tonnes of diesel and barrels of diesel seems to be, at best, confusing.

There see to be different ratios, mainly because "diesel oil" seems to be an ambiguous weigh-to-volume ratio in the realm of measurements.

Having said that, here's one ...

Convert diesel [metric ton] to barrel [us, petroleum]
www.gowebtool.com

... One diesel [metric ton] is equal to how many barrel [US, petroleum]? The answer is 7.3997773769789 ...


#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 07:02 PM | Reply

"I'd Rather Be A Russian Than A Democrat"

Remember when Republicans were proud to say that?

They weren't lying.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-10-09 07:04 PM | Reply

My guess, at this point, is that Pres Trump purposefully used "tonnes" instead of barrels to hide the extent of this "deal."

Secondarily, I also have a concern about what Pres Trump's puppet-master wanted in return for this opportunity for Pres Trump to announce this "deal."


#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 07:05 PM | Reply

purposefully used "tonnes" instead of barrels to hide the extent of this "deal."

Or, equally likely, he just doesn't know the difference.

#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-10-09 07:24 PM | Reply

@#1 ... I was just watching news on this.... turns out the 300k tons of oil for the US is about 18 mins worth. ...

When I first saw this announcement, I thought it odd that the unit of measure was tonnes, and not barrels or gallons.

(and, yes, there is a difference between tonne and ton.)

I wondered, what is Pres Trump trying to hide behind his bluster?

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 07:25 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#7 ... Or, equally likely, he just doesn't know the difference. ...

I do not disagree.


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 07:26 PM | Reply

Zelenskyy calls DJT out for this backstabbing:

www.youtube.com

#10 | Posted by Corky at 2026-10-09 08:12 PM | Reply

@#6 ... Secondarily, I also have a concern about what Pres Trump's puppet-master wanted in return for this opportunity for Pres Trump to announce this "deal." ...

There still is that question ...

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 08:26 PM | Reply

There still is that question ...

Putin might just be trying to maintain his own control. If the GOP get "shellacked" in the mid-terms, Putin could conceivably have less power.

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-10-09 08:31 PM | Reply

#7

Diesel is measured in tons or metric tonnes, due to the fact the volume expands and contracts depending on temperature, while the weight remains the same.

#13 | Posted by willowby at 2026-10-09 08:50 PM | Reply

#8

Just proves you don't know what in the Hell you're talking about, as usual. Plenty of stuff to trash Trump about. Why do you trolls jump on this, since that's the way diesel is sold in bulk.

#14 | Posted by willowby at 2026-10-09 09:03 PM | Reply

@#13 ... Diesel is measured in tons or metric tonnes, due to the fact the volume expands and contracts depending on temperature, while the weight remains the same. ...

OK, allow me to ask the same question in a different way ...

... 300k tons ...

How much is that quantity relative to the daily, or weekly, or monthly usage here in the US?

300k tons - how long would that last, based upon current consumption?

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 09:15 PM | Reply

#15

If you don't know, look it up. This isn't google.

#16 | Posted by willowby at 2026-10-09 09:32 PM | Reply

@#16

So, your current alias has got nothing?

Good to know.

Do try harder.


#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 09:40 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

300k tons - how long would that last, based upon current consumption?
#15 | Posted by LampLighter

tons or tonnes?

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-10-09 09:42 PM | Reply

Time to Admit It: Trump Is a Great President. He's Still Trying To Be a Good One. (2025)
www.politico.com

... Donald J. Trump in his second inaugural address was everything his supporters hoped he would be: Breathtakingly expansive about his intention to reshape the vast federal government around his vision; raucously jingoistic in proclaiming that the country will do whatever it wants to advance its interests around the world; openly triumphal in asserting his belief that his survival from an assassin's bullet and his victory show he is God's chosen instrument to lead an American revival.

Trump was also everything his adversaries feared: Messianic in tone; lovingly protective of his grievances; wholly uncharitable to the people, sitting just feet from him under the Capitol Rotunda, who he defeated so convincingly.

In one light, it was all quite familiar.

But the second occasion of Trump taking the oath of office also put him in an entirely new light. For the first time, he is holding power under circumstances in which reasonable people cannot deny a basic fact: He is the greatest American figure of his era. ...


#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 09:50 PM | Reply

#17

You got punked.

#20 | Posted by willowby at 2026-10-09 11:09 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort