Right Continues Crusade to Censor Speech

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

The Trump administration is using the killing of bigoted conservative activist Charlie Kirk to justify a crackdown on a purported network of left-wing agitators in America, but a stream of evidence continues to undermine their false narrative.

Posted by retort at 05:19 PM | 82 COMMENTS | permalink

The right is trying to criminalize people who tell the truth about one of their beloved figures, but it will not change the reality of what he stood for.

Comments

They should just plonk everybody they don't agree with, or add them to their 'k*ll list' ..oops 'k*ll file'. Is the thought that counts.
In communism, the citizen censors off-narrative information.

#1 | Posted by sir_vicks at 2025-09-17 05:45 PM

I'm SURE our Free Speech Crusader Jeff posted this!

Oh...

I forget he only cares if Dems are censoring fake doctors, foreign agents, and calls for violence.

#2 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-09-17 05:45 PM

In communism

#1 | POSTED BY SIR_VICKS

Someone would have pushed you out a window ten years ago.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-17 05:53 PM

who farted?

#4 | Posted by sir_vicks at 2025-09-17 06:00 PM

archive.is

#5 | Posted by sir_vicks at 2025-09-17 06:35 PM

wow!!! the left has been trying to sensor speech for as long as I can remember. back in the Clinton years Bill and Hillary and Company tried to shut down opposing views all the time, especially Rush Limbaugh. May not have agreed with Rush, but he had the right of Free Speech!! And, so did Charlie Kirk, and the Left killed him for it

#6 | Posted by Maverick at 2025-09-17 07:08 PM

So, you are saying that both sides do it (supposedly) so it's OK to do?

That makes it alright?

Even your Whatabouisms suck.

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-17 07:14 PM

ABC Pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live!' Indefinitely After Host's Charlie Kirk Comments

variety.com

#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-17 07:20 PM

There's a thread up about it.

But

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-17 07:22 PM

Trump loves him some Viktor Orban.
Trump - turning America into ------ nation.
Congrats all you MAGAt fccks.

#10 | Posted by YAV at 2025-09-17 07:37 PM

" I'm SURE our Free Speech Crusader Jeff posted this!

Oh...

I forget he only cares if Dems are censoring fake doctors, foreign agents, and calls for violence.

#2 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT AT 2025-09-17 05:45 PM | FLAG: "

You are such a pathetic troll. You actively cheered a censorship regime for 4 years. Shut up and sit in the corner and feel shame.

As for this ... Bondi has been getting blasted over this by all sorts of conservative pundits along with NRO. I don't know about other outlets - busy day today and I haven't had time to check. Unlike Sycophant, I oppose ALL efforts by our government to engage in censorship regardless of which party is making the effort.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 07:45 PM

the Left killed him for it

#6 | POSTED BY MAVERICK

That's right. We all stayed up late one night and watched old movies, munching popcorn, and decided that we'd just up and kill Charlie Kirk.

And we couldn't find anyone better than that sad college dropout to do it for us.

#12 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-17 07:52 PM

"You actively cheered a censorship regime for 4 years."

You've made that claim dozens of times, and dozens of times you've been asked to point to ONE EXAMPLE.

So far, zero-for-everything.

You're not even batting above The Mendoza Line.

Meanwhile, Trump LITERALLY STATES HE's WEAPONIZING the Justice Department, and you don't make a peep.

STFD and STFU.

#13 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-17 07:53 PM

" I oppose ALL efforts by our government to engage in censorship"

When will you be posting your first thread about the guy who ADMITTED he's doing it?

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-17 07:55 PM

I oppose ALL efforts by our government to engage in censorship regardless of which party is making the effort.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger

Yeah you oppose them so hard by voting for the con man traitor who TOLD YOU AHEAD OF TIME he'd attack the free press.

#15 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-17 07:55 PM

Biden set a bad president.

It's too bad ----------- didn't tell them to pound sand. What he did then and what he's doing now is ----, but I digress.

There are better solutions for dealing with -------- who present demonstrateable -------- as legitimate news.

But, like a lot of things these days, this is unhinged.

#16 | Posted by horstngraben at 2025-09-17 08:01 PM

President was obviously a hilarious pun, and definitely not an error.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

#17 | Posted by horstngraben at 2025-09-17 08:03 PM

" It's too bad ----------- didn't tell them to pound sand."

Zucker never mentioned WHAT was "censored", when there was every reason to ... unless it was embarrassing to Zuck, of course.

Since Zuck avoided the specifics, the only logical conclusion is, it was about the impossibility of overdosing on ivermectin.

Basically, the Tide Pods challenge of COVID.

#18 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-17 08:07 PM

" 13 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-09-17 07:53 PM | FLAG: "

You've been given tons of evidence. Twitter files. Zuckerberg's own admission. For starters. More has come out since. I can lead you to water but can't make you drink.

Between you and I this discussion long ago became circular.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 08:45 PM

Biden set a bad president.

It's too bad ----------- didn't tell them to pound sand. What he did then and what he's doing now is ----, but I digress.

There are better solutions for dealing with -------- who present demonstrateable -------- as legitimate news.

But, like a lot of things these days, this is unhinged.

#16 | Posted by horstngraben

Biden should have kicked fox news out of the white house when they pled in court that they're just entertainment not news.

As for him asking facebook and twitter to censor russian propaganda, what is the problem with that. He actually did far too little to combat russia's espionage attacks.

#20 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-17 08:46 PM

You've been given tons of evidence. Twitter files. Zuckerberg's own admission. For starters. More has come out since. I can lead you to water but can't make you drink.

Between you and I this discussion long ago became circular.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger

Then I'll tag in.

If the government finds that online platforms are being used by america's enemies to harm america, what is the government's duty in that situation?

#21 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-17 08:47 PM

" If the government finds that online platforms are being used by america's enemies to harm america, what is the government's duty in that situation?

#21 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2025-09-17 08:47 PM | FLAG: "

Encourage the likes of community notes and trust its citizens to call out obvious BS.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 09:05 PM

" Then I'll tag in."

Be honest, at some point in your life you were a WWE fan. It was WWF when I was a fan.

#23 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 09:13 PM

You are such a pathetic troll. You actively cheered a censorship regime for 4 years. Shut up and sit in the corner and feel shame.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger

Censorship to Jeff:
Twitter won't PROMOTE the posts of a doctor thrown out of three courtrooms for junk science. He can still post to his audience, just not promoted by Twitter.

Not Censorship to Jeff:
Trump attacking networks, shows, newspapers, reporters, and anyone else who is critical of him, even revoking VISAs and Green Cards of people critical of him

Jeff, we all said this would happen.

#24 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-09-17 10:31 PM

#24.

When you resort to assigning to me a position I've never taken, you've already lost.

I am critical of censorship. Period. Your criticisms are 100% situational.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 10:34 PM

" You've been given tons of evidence. Twitter files."

Which showed ZERO instances of the government overriding the editorial board.

"Zuckerberg's own admission."

Of NOTHING. The fact Zuckerberg wasn't SPECIFIC makes it painfully obvious it was embarrassing to Zuck, otherwise he would've NAMED what the government was trying to censor.

Clearly, it was something like "the Drinking Bleach challenge".

But you're already on record supporting MALINFORMATION, the kind of post which could injure or kill others. And why?!?

Water-carrying partisanship.

#26 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-17 11:18 PM

Which showed ZERO instances of the government overriding the editorial board.
- DeflectionForth

How about intimidation?

Not what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that held;

several Biden administration officials violated the First Amendment in two ways: First, some officials unlawfully bullied and intimidated social media platforms into changing their content moderation policies, and second, other officials became so entangled with the companies' moderation processes that those companies were no longer making their own independent decisions.

#27 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-17 11:32 PM

You are such a pathetic troll. You actively cheered a censorship regime for 4 years. Shut up and sit in the corner and feel shame.

Still pushing this bulls*&^ line.

Sorry to inform you, but your team, the people you voted for, are participating in actual censorship. The type the 1A is meant to prevent.

You're responsible for far more actual censorship than any librul here, sport.

#28 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-18 09:33 AM

And, so did Charlie Kirk, and the Left killed him for it

#6 | Posted by Maverick

GFY idiot.

#29 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-18 09:34 AM

Meanwhile, Trump LITERALLY STATES HE's WEAPONIZING the Justice Department, and you don't make a peep.
STFD and STFU.

#13 | Posted by Danforth

I wish I had more than one NW flag to give for my country.

#30 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-18 09:35 AM

You've been given tons of evidence. Twitter files.

The twitter files were a bust, tiger.

Merely the beginning of Musk ingratiating himself with the maga moron crowd because he saw opportunity and $$.

#31 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-18 09:37 AM

Encourage the likes of community notes and trust its citizens to call out obvious BS.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger

Except idiots like you fall for it. Every time.

The reason people like you get all pissy about 'cradle to the grave gubmint' and whine about how you don't need it is because you know, deep down, that you actually do need it and it pisses you off.

#32 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-18 09:40 AM

Iircthe "twitter files" refers to the federal government allegedly getting news companies to not publish stories about the hunter Biden laptop before the 2020 election

Jeff can never explain why foxnews the Washington times OAN etc didn't pursue the story

#33 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-18 09:53 AM

And, so did Charlie Kirk, and the Left killed him for it

#6 | Posted by Maverick

The "left" didnt kill anyone.

His name is Tyler Robinson and he represents and speaks only for himself. And maybe a few friends on discord who were as surprised as the rest of us.

He is from a Mormon family and is not even a registered voter.

And if the truth be told (it will someday but not by this President obviously) he came from the same warped online world as Charlie Kirk. So if he "represents " anyone it's the people from that community.

#34 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-09-18 10:51 AM

"the Left killed him for it"

Of course, a political ideology doesn't actually kill people.

That's an absurd notion.

Are you saying that when a mentally unbalanced person grabs a gun and kills someone or multiple people, you think it's possible a political ideology is to blame?

what a notion.........

#35 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-18 11:01 AM

#24.
When you resort to assigning to me a position I've never taken, you've already lost.
I am critical of censorship. Period. Your criticisms are 100% situational.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger

Sorry.

We had this debate.

The example at #24 is the ONLY example of censorship you could find at the height of your crazy "Biden is censoring Conservatives" hysteria.

And you voted 3 times for a man known to be the Censor in Chief.

You are done here. EVERYONE knows your real positions.

#36 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-09-18 11:17 AM

Nothing but cowards.

#37 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-18 11:40 AM

Encourage the likes of community notes and trust its citizens to call out obvious BS.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger

So the government has no obligation to protect the country against foreign attacks other than warning people about them?

#38 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-18 01:56 PM

Bunch of pedo protecting snowflakes.

#39 | Posted by 2020Rocks at 2025-09-18 02:45 PM

Trump wants the four women who protested him at a restaurant to be arrested under RICO charges.

"Free DC! Free Palestine! Trump is Hitler of our time!" [VIDEO]

His response isn't fear. He smirks and finger waves security take them out.

Brave ladies.

#40 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-09-18 02:47 PM

PEDO DONNIE is a little -----.

#41 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-18 03:44 PM

and the Left killed him for it
#6 | Posted by Maverick

---- off troll -----.

#42 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-18 03:47 PM

The people who bleated about the world going to ---- over the past fifty years brought us there

#43 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-09-18 07:24 PM

" We had this debate.

The example at #24 is the ONLY example of censorship you could find at the height of your crazy "Biden is censoring Conservatives" hysteria.

And you voted 3 times for a man known to be the Censor in Chief.

You are done here. EVERYONE knows your real positions.

#36 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT AT 2025-09-18 11:17 AM | FLAG: | "

You almost never debate. You make proclamations with zero factual or evidentiary backing, proclaim yourself the winner and pat yourself on the back.

#44 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-18 11:27 PM

You almost never debate. You make proclamations with zero factual or evidentiary backing, proclaim yourself the winner and pat yourself on the back.

#44 | Posted by BellRinger

AGAIN - So the government has no obligation to protect the country against foreign attacks other than warning people about them?

#45 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-18 11:33 PM

Foreign attacks are things like a bombing run or flying high ceiling surveillance ballon's over the country. Russia dropping a couple hundred K on clumsy bot Facebook ads is not an attack.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-18 11:52 PM

" Russia dropping a couple hundred K on clumsy bot Facebook ads is not an attack."

Don't strain yourself with all that water-carrying.

And for Putin, no less.

#47 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-18 11:54 PM

or flying high ceiling surveillance ballon's over the country.

Whaddabout Biden!!!!!

#48 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-18 11:59 PM

@#46 ... Russia dropping a couple hundred K on clumsy bot Facebook ads is not an attack. ...

Then, the question becomes ...

Why does Russia do that, if there is no benefit for them?

#49 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-09-19 12:02 AM

" Don't strain yourself with all that water-carrying.

And for Putin, no less.

#47 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-09-18 11:54 PM | FLAG: "

I am correcting the language. It wasn't an "attack" and the people who claim it was want to justify past censorship and want more of it in the future simply by claim8ng anyth8ng they disagree with is Russian propaganda and therefore must be censored by the government.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-19 12:32 AM

" I am correcting the language. It wasn't an "attack""

It was lies, intended to affect the Presidential election outcome to benefit Putin and Russia at the expense of America.

Be sure to dry off and mop up all the spills.

#51 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-19 12:36 AM

" It was lies, intended to affect the Presidential election outcome to benefit Putin and Russia at the expense of America. "

If you truly believe those stupid little ads had any effect on the election than you are too far gone.

#52 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-19 01:06 AM

" If you truly believe those stupid little ads"

Why did Trump "hire" Manafort?

Why didn't Manafort get paid?

Why are you carrying water for Putin?

#53 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-19 01:13 AM

Why does Russia do that, if there is no benefit for them?
#49 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-09-19 12:02 AM | Reply

Because they believe there's a benefit to causing division in America.

You think they can target their ads at the "undecided" vote? Not how the algos work really, it's going to target ads on the people most likely to click them, partisans.

#54 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2025-09-19 09:01 AM

This thread has left out one small detail in history. It says the right wants to censor it's opponents. It left out that the left tried to bankrupt it's opponent, jail it's opponent, remove their opponent from the ballot and then try to assassinate him twice. When that didn't work they promoted assassinating those who promoted their opponent. I remember even Biden saying Trump needed to be in the bullseye.
So in other words just STFU about loser Kimmel. His ratings sucked, he's been replaced by Celebrity Family Feud. That should tell you something.

#55 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-09-19 10:53 AM

Fishpud, the Butler,Pa shooter was a useless repug incel. Just like you.

#56 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-09-19 10:59 AM

It says the right wants to censor it's opponents. It left out that the left tried to bankrupt it's opponent, jail it's opponent, remove their opponent from the ballot and then try to assassinate him twice.

It wasn't "left out." I was ignored because it's fever dream bulls(*& believed by idiots like you.

So in other words just STFU about loser Kimmel. His ratings sucked

His and Colbert's ratings were as good or better than your typical Faux News show, dips*&^.

You f*&^ing morons will say whatever you're told to say without any thought as to how it looks in the context of your previous ramblings.

#57 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-19 11:11 AM

History informs.
Unfortunately MAGAts can't and won't be informed, no matter what.

The censorship in the United States has almost always, always been against "liberal" ideas and people.

This continued nonsense of Biden and COVID public health "censorship" should be kicked in its tiny mouse balls anytime anyone brings it up. There is zero equivalence to what Trump is doing today. Biden never threatened anyone if they did not comply, they worked with social media to moderate or police dangerous information. The worst accusation was excessive "jawboning." Trump's people are flat out threatening license revocation, rejecting mergers, and waging an all out war against anyone that even speaks poorly of Trump and/or his admin. Yes, one extreme conservative lower court ruling from Lousianna ruled against Biden, but SCOTUS threw the case out - ducking the issue, because they ---- well knew they were handling a MAGAt grenade. That's what happens when you politicize every last ---- thing.

It's so bad even the WSJ is screaming along with a whole host of "conservative" right-wing influencers.

Biden didn't do even a tenth of what's going on with Trump.

This attempted "whataboutism" and "equivalence" is wrong, but it finds its target with the MAGAts.

By the way, MAGAts were perfectly happy with Peter Thiel's utter destruction through lawfare, so spare me your "It was so bad under Biden!" --------.

#58 | Posted by YAV at 2025-09-19 11:14 AM

His and Colbert's ratings were as good or better than your typical Faux News show, dips*&^.
You f*&^ing morons will say whatever you're told to say without any thought as to how it looks in the context of your previous ramblings.

#57 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-19 11:11 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Kimmel 1.77 million viewers
Gutfeld 3.3 million viewers
The Five 3.8 million viewers

Do some research before you post you moron.

#59 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-09-19 11:30 AM

Hey dumbf*&^, you posted this.

STFU about "research" you stupid pile of s*&^.

#60 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-19 11:32 AM

This attempted "whataboutism" and "equivalence" is wrong, but it finds its target with the MAGAts.
By the way, MAGAts were perfectly happy with Peter Thiel's utter destruction through lawfare, so spare me your "It was so bad under Biden!" --------.

#58 | Posted by YAV at 2025-09-19 11:14 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Sure, watch Kimmel's monologue after Carson got fired from Fox after Schumer and the rest of the Dems pressured Fox. Kimmel's ratings were so bad he's being replaced by Family Feud. Gutfeld has twice the viewership.

#61 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-09-19 11:35 AM

Fishpud, the Butler,Pa shooter was a useless repug incel. Just like you.

#56 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-09-19 10:59 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sure, just like the Kirk shooter.

#62 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-09-19 11:36 AM

Censoring speech is the LAST thing ANY Dem/liberals is allowed to right against. You crusaded as hard as you possibly could for the last 10ish years to censor many people just because they don't agree with your ideology/opinion. This isn't even debatable; there are a huge number of documented cases even in liberal media outlets like CNN that can be cited to prove it.

That being said, if you think it's a bad thing, then get your party to start acting right before pointing fingers. Jesus, censoring is by far...BY FAR...the biggest valid complaint anyone can have against liberals in the last 10 years and you want to show off how awesome your hypocrisy skills are by trying to vilify others for it now?

#63 | Posted by humtake at 2025-09-19 11:51 AM

The Kirk shooter wasn't an incel. He got BJ's from a tranny.

#64 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-09-19 12:16 PM

#63 | Posted by humtake at

I support the 1st Amendment.

One of these days somebody like you is going to go looking to take my livelihood or my life.

#65 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-19 12:18 PM

Gutfeld is the first one to go when the Dems get back in power.

#66 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-09-19 12:19 PM

#63 | Posted by humtake

1) Charlie Kirk should not have been shot. His death is now hurting us all.

2) Charlie Kirk was a bad man. His life was hurting us all.

3) I get to say these things because I am an American.

4) Argument?

#67 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-19 12:20 PM

Some people are saying Charlie Kirk was getting railed by Caitlyn Jenner.

#68 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-09-19 12:23 PM

69!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#69 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-09-19 12:23 PM

Foreign attacks are things like a bombing run or flying high ceiling surveillance ballon's over the country. Russia dropping a couple hundred K on clumsy bot Facebook ads is not an attack.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger

Semantics. So why did they do it?

AGAIN - What should the government do when our enemy is trying to harm our nation by using our nation's media companies against us?

#70 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-19 01:58 PM

Russia dropping a couple hundred K on clumsy bot Facebook ads is not an attack.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger

Wrong.

Cyber attacks are still attacks friend.

#71 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-09-19 02:00 PM

#55 | Posted by fishpaw

Social media companies censored trump after he used their platforms to foment a fascist coup based on lies. As is their right, and their patriotic duty.

And the left did not try to assassinate trump.

#72 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-19 02:01 PM

The left didn't even put trump in jail when they had the absolute power to do so.

#73 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-19 02:05 PM

#11 | Posted by BellRinger

Ah, so you're actually answering to Jeff now....

#74 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2025-09-19 04:50 PM

Foreign attacks are things like a bombing run or flying high ceiling surveillance ballon's over the country. Russia dropping a couple hundred K on clumsy bot Facebook ads is not an attack.
#46 | Posted by BellRinger

Notice Jeff "I love the Pedo" Bellringer VERY carefully avoids mentioning Election Interference?

I can't imagine why...

Yes, Jeff, Facebook ads are an attack if its misinformation and they don't identify the source being a foreign nation.

AND FOREIGN NATIONS DON'T HAVE 1ST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS!

For Jeff:
Russia gets First Amendment Protection.
But NOT Citizens and Immigrants...unless they are MAGAt Pedo Lovers.

#75 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-09-19 10:18 PM

The left didn't even put trump in jail when they had the absolute power to do so.
#73 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

When?

#76 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-19 11:13 PM

Cyber attacks are still attacks friend.
#71 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY

Not if its an ad, ads are cyberattacks. Do you even understand english?

#77 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-19 11:14 PM

Gutfeld is the first one to go when the Dems get back in power.
#66 | POSTED BY LEE_THE_AGENT

How? Looking at the laws the FCC only controls airwaves, Fox is cable news not under FCC control.

Also why would Fox get rid of some one making money? Clearly kimmels 129K viewers wasn't making the locals money.

#78 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-19 11:15 PM

Russia gets First Amendment Protection.
But NOT Citizens and Immigrants...unless they are MAGAt Pedo Lovers.
#75 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

Facebook ads aren't a first amendment right, perhaps your ire should be directed at Facebook.

#79 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-19 11:16 PM

" Ah, so you're actually answering to Jeff now....

#74 | POSTED BY WHATSLEFT AT 2025-09-19 04:50 PM | FLAG: "

Most call me "Jeff".

#80 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-20 02:07 AM

Sycophant may be one of the lamest on this site. Pure straw. Intellectual laziness to 5he nth degree.

#81 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-20 02:09 AM

Fox is cable news not under FCC control.

#78 | Posted by oneironaut

Social media isn't under FCC control either. Yet I see claims every day that Biden was forcing censorship upon social media. So one narrative for me, another for thee. I sure wish you Connie's would make up you minds.

#82 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2025-09-20 01:48 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Trump 'would love' Unconstitutional Third Term (29 comments)

Confederate General Statue Toppled in 2020 Restored in DC (27 comments)

Netanyahu orders 'immediate and powerful strikes in the Gaza Strip' (26 comments)