Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, May 29, 2024

Norman Eisen: On Tuesday, we at last came to closing arguments in the Manhattan criminal trial of former President Donald Trump after 20 days of trial, testimony from 22 witnesses and over 200 exhibits.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Concluding remarks:

"If the defense's theme was that Cohen lied, the prosecution's was corroboration of Cohen " and they hammered it home discussing the unlawful means by which they allege the conspiracy proceeded, going through extensive testimony of other witnesses and what felt like the majority of their hundreds of exhibits.

The prosecution had the better of the argument here as well, helped by the applicable law. Even if Trump paid hush money to Daniels to protect his family, for example, the law still allows conviction if the intent of the conspiracy was to help the campaign as well.

The prosecution was ahead on points going into the closing arguments and Tuesday did not change that calculus. Yes, the closing left off-ramps such as the question of intent if a juror wants to hang the case " but a hung jury is unlikely."

.

To me, the bottom line is that the Jury now knows some things for certain; Donald Trump is lying when he says there was no affair, that he didn't know about any hush money, and that it wasn't about protecting the Campaign... which was why ------ said he was quashing the stories.

Which is enough for the Jury to convict Trump of most if not all of the counts.


#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-28 11:27 PM | Reply

"Alvin Bragg's Team Points To 'Smoking Gun' in Trump Case

Prosecutors from the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg have argued that "smoking gun" documents were presented in the New York City criminal trial of former President Donald Trump.

Joshua Steinglass called notes from former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg and former controller Jeff McConney "the smoking guns" while delivering the prosecution's closing arguments in the Trump trial on Tuesday, according to Newsweek reporter Katherine Fung, who was present in the courtroom.

The notes purportedly instructed Trump to illegally falsify business records to cover up "hush money" payments that former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016.

Steinglass said during his closing statement that he was "speechless" Trump's defense team was still claiming that the payments were "legal fees," calling the documents presented during trial "so damning you almost have to laugh."

www.newsweek.com

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-28 11:33 PM | Reply

It hinges on one question. Is there a MAGA cult member on the jury?

My money is on yes.

#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-28 11:33 PM | Reply

""so damning you almost have to laugh."

I laughed when, on cross, Todd Blanche asked Cohen how he could verify that was Weisselberg's signature.

Cohen answered: I saw him sign it.

#4 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-05-28 11:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The prosecution delivered a pitch perfect closing argument.

Trump's defense attorney, Todd Blanche, "beat a dead horse" for 3 hours. One could assume he may have provided the defense Trump wanted and not necessarily the defense he might otherwise have offered.

One big issue he raised was trying to claim that A, Trump never slept with Daniels, and B, this wasn't a "reimbursement" to Cohen.

The problem with Blanche's claim was that Trump called the payments to Cohen a reimbursement in a deposition.

Steinglass (prosecutor who gave the closing argument) made a lot of great points. One that sticks out is his retort to Blanche's referring to Cohen as a "liar and cheat." In his closing, Steinglass said (sic) "well, we didn't find him at a witness store. The defendant hired him for having just those qualities.

#5 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-29 12:08 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It hinges on one question. Is there a MAGA cult member on the jury?

My money is on yes.

#3 | Posted by REDIAL

If a mistrial happens, it'll be one juror. Betcha Bragg asks to set a trial date for retrial ASAP.

It's rare to get a jury composed of 100% professionals with college degrees. They're the kind that pay attention to news and can't have the wool pulled over their eyes with vocal gymnastics.

My money is on a guilty verdict. The evidence was pretty overwhelming that the precise reason Daniels was even paid off was because of the Access Hollywood story and, most importantly, the election was just a couple of weeks away.

The prosecution sewed that up with ------- testifying about "catch & kill" to help Trump's election odds, and Hope Hick's testimony.

They didn't even really need Michael Cohen. The documents and every other witness verified it was to help Trump in the election.

#6 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-29 12:14 AM | Reply

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass argued in summations late Tuesday afternoon that it was "no coincidence" that the Stormy Daniels payoff did not happen until a decade after the alleged sexual encounter in 2006. Steinglass argued that that fact disproves any defense suggestion that the Daniels payment was related to sparing his family. The hush money deal was reached in October 2016, two weeks before Election Day, "because the defendant's primary concern was not his family, but the election."

www.washingtonpost.com

There's your intent to commit a crime which upgrades the other charges to felonies.

#7 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-29 01:40 AM | Reply

Trump was unconcerned about Stormy Daniels and what she might say any time in the 10 years prior.

He would have paid her to keep quiet years before, if he had any concern that Melania might hear about it.

#8 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-29 01:49 AM | Reply

Donald Trump officially endorsed Rep. Bob Good's primary challenger on Tuesday, despite the fact that Good joined the parade of GOP Congress members who traveled to Trump's New York trial to kiss the ring.

Way to throw someone under the bus who came to support you!

#9 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-29 02:13 AM | Reply

"The trial is rigged!"

"It should have never happened!"

"It should have happened 7 years ago!"

-Herr Gropenfurher ---------------

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-05-29 11:50 AM | Reply

"The trial is rigged!"

Trump saying that multiple times while looking worn out and dejected, and you have what happened when Trump came out of the courthouse after the jury received their instructions.

#11 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-29 12:07 PM | Reply

If Trump doesn't have intimate relations with an erotic performer while is wife is expecting, we never would've heard of Daniels and Cohen. Time wounds all heels. Trump's trial is self-inflicted.

#12 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2024-05-29 12:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Re 11

Those were all direct quotes made by Defendant --------------- right after the jury received the case.

Almost in the same breath.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-05-29 12:35 PM | Reply

If he hadn't been so worried about his past being exposed before the election that he had a newspaper owner squashing and paying off multiple scandals, and a lawyer paying off his adulterous affairs then hiding the payments as business expenses... which he then wrote off his taxes!... we might never have heard about them.

As Ann Coulter said, he's a stupid man.

#14 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-29 12:37 PM | Reply

Hung jury.

Even without a MAGAt true-believer on the jury, there's a lot of money to be made by way of the MAGAt lecture market/SCOTUS appointment (see, e.g., Diamond & Silk, en.wikipedia.org).

#15 | Posted by censored at 2024-05-29 12:43 PM | Reply

If there is one juror, they'll be found out and run out of NYC. They'll be ridiculed and attacked relentlessly.

#16 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2024-05-29 12:49 PM | Reply

Courthouse Confidential

The Lincoln Project (1 min)

www.youtube.com

#17 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-29 12:50 PM | Reply

"Hung jury."

That's Trumpy's best hope.

But..

There are 34 charges. 279 pieces of evidence.

Pretty sure they can agree on at least one of them.

#18 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-05-29 12:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

18

Perhaps that's why the article author said a hung jury is unlikely.

#19 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-29 01:00 PM | Reply

Idk it would take someone with a strong ego to withstand 11 people in a jury room for days

A magat might but most Magats are cowards

#20 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-29 01:05 PM | Reply

That's Trumpy's best hope. But.. There are 34 charges. 279 pieces of evidence. Pretty sure they can agree on at least one of them. #18 | Posted by donnerboy

I'd agree, except I've had IRL conversations with a MAGAt, COVID-hoaxer, or someone who stood to gain by pretending to be one.

"It Is Difficult to Get a Man to Understand Something When His Salary Depends Upon His Not Understanding It"

#21 | Posted by censored at 2024-05-29 01:08 PM | Reply

#18 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY
#19 | POSTED BY CORKY

Agreed. The potential MAGAt on the jury more than likely isn't THAT deep into the cult to acquit on ALL charges. My guess is that Trump will be found guilty on at least one of the charges. If that happens, we won't hear about it for weeks. If they wrap it up today, or even this week, it'll be guilty on multiple charges, IMO.

#22 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-29 01:14 PM | Reply

While you wait.... a little dance music ( Lee's Eyes Only! )

www.youtube.com

#23 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-29 01:17 PM | Reply

Absolutely wild that the first criminal case against Trump to make it to a jury is a business records case concerning his hush money payments to a pornstar he rawdogged, and not, say the one about him trying to end American democracy or steal top secret documents and hide them next to his toilet.

#24 | Posted by JOE at 2024-05-29 01:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

So... it turns out that Diaper Don went to sleep again; he just shut down completely in front of the Jury during Jury Instructions:

www.youtube.com

#25 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-29 01:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

GOP allies misrepresent judge's instructions
www.nbcnews.com

... Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., once an opponent of Trump when they ran for president in 2016, tweeted that the judge told the jury that they don't have to unanimously agree on which crime was committed.

"Judge in Trump case in NYC just told jury they don't have to unanimously agree on which crime was committed as long as they all at least pick one. And that among the crimes the can pick from are ones Trump WASN'T EVEN CHARGED WITH!!! This is exactly the kind of sham trial used," he wrote.

That's a blatant misrepresentation of what Judge Merchan said. The judge told the jury that they don't have to unanimously agree on what crime Trump was trying to cover up. They just have to agree he was trying to cover up a crime. ...


#26 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-29 01:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

This is a direct assault on the basic foundation of the US system of justice. The DA is asking the jury to rule on 2 separate crimes - which is an important distinction as we have an assumption of innocence under the law and the 2nd crime has not even been to trial much less decided by an authority with jurisdiction over the alleged crime. The closest we have is the FEC where they determined it was not a crime. Thus, Trump should be granted the presumption of innocence as any decision by the jury on this matter would violate his due process rights to face his accusers on this charge. As such, a judge should have immediately tossed this case based on statute of limitations as the 2nd crime has not been determined to even be a crime. If the Democrats forge ahead with this nonsense, the GOP will act in kind with similar show trials.

#27 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-30 01:00 AM | Reply

@#27 ... This is a direct assault on the basic foundation of the US system of justice. The DA is asking the jury to rule on 2 separate crimes - which is an important distinction as we have an assumption of innocence under the law and the 2nd crime has not even been to trial much less decided by an authority with jurisdiction over the alleged crime. ...

... and the 2nd crime has not even been to trial ...

Perhaps that is why the Judge gave the Jury instructions he did.

Really, do try harder.

If that is all your current alias has got, well, wow.


#28 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-30 01:11 AM | Reply

"Perhaps that is why the Judge gave the Jury instructions he did.
#28 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

Of course it is - he was tasked by the Democrats to bring in a guilty verdict - it is clear based on all his ruling with the biggest being not allowing the FEC official to clearly state that this has been investigated and ruled not to be a crime. But again, this jury passing a guilty verdict on the 2nd crime (which is required as no second crime has actually been tried), violates Trump's based due process rights as he does not get to face his accusers on that alleged 2nd crime. As this is clear, the judge is clearly wrong in not tossing this case which is why this is a show trial.

#29 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-30 01:17 AM | Reply

" If the Democrats forge ahead with this nonsense, the GOP will act in kind with similar show trials.

#27 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO AT 2024-05-30 01:00 AM | FLAG: "

It might be the only way to bring this kangaroo crap to an end.

#30 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-30 01:48 AM | Reply

" If the Democrats forge ahead with this nonsense, the GOP will act in kind with similar show trials.
#27 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO AT 2024-05-30 01:00 AM | FLAG: "
It might be the only way to bring this kangaroo crap to an end.
#30 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Bring it on! I mean, WTF are you talking about? Bringing criminals to justice or framing innocent people for crimes they did not commit?

Are you both ignoring indictments have been brought against Trump via grand juries? Or is that ALSO part of y'alls' plot? HAHAHAHA!

#31 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-30 01:52 AM | Reply

*y'all's

I think so, at least.

#32 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-30 01:53 AM | Reply

@#29 ... he was tasked by the Democrats to bring in a guilty verdict ...

Got any evidence of that?

Or is it just the usual "court of public opinion" that fmr Pres Trump seems to try to influence, as opposed to the Court of Justice that is ruling here.

Yer up.

#33 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-30 01:57 AM | Reply

@#30 ... this kangaroo crap ...

What kangaroo crap?

Please be specific.

thx.

#34 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-30 01:58 AM | Reply

"Bringing criminals to justice or framing innocent people for crimes they did not commit?
#31 | POSTED BY RSTYBEACH11"

We will call it bringing criminals to justice - you will scream framing. It will happen and I will be happy for it.

#35 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-30 01:59 AM | Reply

@#31 ... Bringing criminals to justice or framing innocent people for crimes they did not commit? ...

Yeah, the Jury's ultimate decision will be interesting, to say the least.

From the start I have said that I thought this particular case was the weakest of all the current outstanding cases against fmr Pres Trump.

If fmr Pres Trump is declared by the Jury to be not-guilty, well, Truth Social may even become a profitable enterprise.



#36 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-30 02:02 AM | Reply

We will call it bringing criminals to justice - you will scream framing. It will happen and I will be happy for it.
#35 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

Your wishcasting is delicious! Please, give me MORE!!

#37 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-30 02:26 AM | Reply

#36 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Both you and JEFFY

#38 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-30 02:28 AM | Reply

@#38 ... Both you and JEFFY ...

I have to say, that is a sentence I'd not imagined to occur.

Can you explain the equivalence you see in this instance?

thx.

#39 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-30 02:53 AM | Reply

If the Democrats forge ahead with this nonsense, the GOP will act in kind with similar show trials.
#27 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

It might be the only way to bring this kangaroo crap to an end.
#30 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

How does more of something bring something to an end?

#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-05-30 08:39 AM | Reply

If the Democrats forge ahead with this nonsense, the GOP will act in kind with similar show trials.
#27 | POSTED BY comrade CLAUDIA

They already shot their wad with the Hunter Biden hearings remember?
This case wasn't a show trial, 34 felony convictions came from it. Thats as real as it gets Cletus. Cry harder son.

#41 | Posted by a_monson at 2024-05-31 06:12 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort