Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, September 06, 2024

Donald Trump on Thursday got a question about what he would do as president to make child care more affordable and accessible. The answer he gave might charitably be described as a rambling non sequitur, or less charitably as policy gibberish. Either way, Trump did not actually offer a concrete proposal - or even express much interest in finding one.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Trump started his answer by saying he "would do that," then name-dropped his daughter Ivanka and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who has talked about child care and introduced legislation he says would improve access.

"It's a very important issue," Trump said. "But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about, that - because - child care is child care ... It's something, you have to have it in this country. You have to have it."

"But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're not used to, but they'll get used to it very quickly, and it's not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country," he said.

"Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we're talking about, including child care, that it's going to take care," Trump continued. "We're going to have - I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country."

"We're going to be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it's - relatively speaking - not very expensive, compared to the kind of numbers we'll be taking in," he said.

"I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I'm talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just told you about," he said.

Exactly how all of this was supposed help working parents find or pay for child care wasn't clear, especially given widespread predictions from economists that Trump's tariffs would actually lead to higher deficits and a weaker economy, as well as higher costs to families who would pay more for imported goods.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-09-05 07:06 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

JD Vance has the answer. Grandparents should just start helping. You know no grandparent in the country helps out but now that the donut boy suggested it I guess they all will.
www.vanityfair.com

#2 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-09-05 08:17 PM | Reply

The mush-brained kid diddler's weave is getting more absurd by the minute.

#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-09-05 09:30 PM | Reply

Trump suggests he will lift US sanctions on Russia and Iran if he wins.

Why does Dotard hate America?

#4 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-09-05 09:49 PM | Reply

Dotard also bragged about securing Kim Jong Un's endorsement.

#5 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-09-05 11:11 PM | Reply

Fox News Host Hits Colleagues With A 'Dare' To Decode Trump's Rambling Answer

Fox News' Jessica Tarlov struggled to make sense of Donald Trump's confusing response to a question about making child care more affordable on Thursday.

"I would dare any of you to listen to his answer on child care and tell me what the hell he was talking about," the co-host of "The Five" said of the former president.

"It was one of the more incoherent things I've ever heard."

Tarlov declared that the former president's remarks "really highlight a big problem."

"Everyone is saying, 'Well, Trump is so transparent and Trump's out there and that's all that matters. What matters is the content of what he's saying and none of it, none of it is explainable," Tarlov said.

What's even worse about this mental acuity trainwreck?

Many in the audience actually cheered at the end of decompensating Donald's rambling, totally incoherent "answer" as though they'd heard something of substance or coherence. For folks like that, there is simply nothing any Democrat could do to win their votes because these folks aren't persuadable voters, they're cult followers.

#6 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-09-06 06:31 AM | Reply

"It was one of the more incoherent things I've ever heard."

Wait'll you get a load of the crappola that's just gurgling to come out tomorrow at the gooberfest in Mosinee, New Mexico or Tralfamador or Michoacn or Dublin or wherever. I'll give you value for your money. And speaking of your money ... feed me!
~ Orange Julius

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-09-06 06:43 AM | Reply

Trump's response to a carefully crafted question calling for specific policy proposals demonstrated what fool this goober is. Pure gobbledegook from the thirty-four times convicted felon and obvious ignoramus the GOPers declare to be their sideshow Orange Julius.

#8 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-09-06 06:56 AM | Reply

Why Trump's world salad answer on child care policy matters

Right off the bat, it's worth emphasizing that Trump - who presumably has been engaged in debate preparations, and should be at the top of his game - appeared wholly incapable of speaking coherently about a common issue. For those who believe the Republican nominee is in a state of cognitive decline, his answer on child care costs offered fresh evidence.

Similarly, Trump's nonsensical rambling served as a timely reminder of a familiar problem: The former president doesn't know or care about public policy, and he routinely has trouble faking it. Those expecting him to have meaningful governing plans - on any issue - are going to be disappointed.

After the remarks, New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu said he prefers Trump's economic policies because the former president "can actually speak to details." Reality suggests otherwise: We're routinely confronted with proof that Trump is effectively economically illiterate.

#9 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-09-06 09:57 AM | Reply

Many in the audience actually cheered at the end of decompensating Donald's rambling, totally incoherent "answer" as though they'd heard something of substance or coherence

Because they are only concerned about one thing .... TAX CUTS for millionaires.

They don't give a ---- about childcare, healthcare or school shootings.

Every policy donOLD has laid out is a vague goal with ABSOLUTELY NO DETAILS.

He says tariffs are massive taxes on foreign countries. They're not. They're taxes on US consumers. If it was a tax on China and not Taiwan, the way around it is China sends products to Taiwan who sells them to US. The US-China trade war hurt severely US farms that exported their goods. Dementia Don compensated for it with massive government cash payments to farmers.

He wants to replace income taxes with tariffs. That would decimate the middle class but would be an enormous benefit to the 1%

JD Vance's solution to making childcare more affordable is to get elderly relatives to watch the kids for free.

They have NO PLANS.

#10 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-09-06 10:09 AM | Reply

-Trump's response to a carefully crafted question calling for specific policy proposals demonstrated what fool this goober is.

This question is for everyone.......

Forget Trump for a moment and tell me what should be his answer? What should a presidential candidate say about childcare and the challenges of affording/finding it?

For a long time we've baked child tax credits and deductions into the federal tax code....including the EITC which can result in zero tax liability and even money back. Without looking I'll assume Harris is suggesting an increase in the credit. It took a pandemic to get that done before and I'll further assume Trump supports some sort of increase in that credit as well.

We also allow for child care costs to be included in flex spending benefit plans allowing for the costs to be deducted.

What do you want a candidate to tell you?

Ask child care providers for work for less?

What can a candidate for POTUS tell you that you'd want to hear regarding a solution for this challenge?

And I agree....it IS a challenge.

But if you need to feel good about what Trump or Harris tells you about childcare then you're pretty ------ dumb in the first place....

#11 | Posted by eberly at 2024-09-06 10:45 AM | Reply

@#10 ... Because they are only concerned about one thing .... TAX CUTS for millionaires.

They don't give a ---- about childcare, healthcare or school shootings. ...

Exactly. Fmr Pres Trump has no plan, so he makes things up as he goes along.

That is likely the reason for his incoherent nonsensical babbling.

#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-06 12:14 PM | Reply

www.emptywheel.net

Very apropos

#13 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-09-06 12:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

A benefit of the word salad is that VPOTUS won't be able to decode it, or call it out as a lie, while the MSM will praise bim for standing on a stage for 90 mins talking about policy. He makes it obvious every time he talks about tariffs that he has no idea what they are, and that was part of this rambling answer. Orange Adolf is quadrupling down on his tariff solution to all of America's financial problems, claiming that it will solve the national debt in short order. I think she needs to have a top flight canned answer for what a tariff is, and how it is a tax on Americans, and why all the major financial forecasters, who are not liberal, are saying Dotard's plan will crash the economy and blow up the debt.

#14 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2024-09-06 06:04 PM | Reply

#11 | Posted by eberly

The crux of this post is that Fat Donnie Felon's mind is gone.
You listen to that answer and tell me any different.

He thinks the sea level is going down.
He thinks wind makes bacon cost more.
and on and on and on and on and on.

You keep trying to cover over that crap, you're a god-damned idiot.

#15 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-09-06 07:47 PM | Reply

@#11 ... The crux of this post is that Fat Donnie Felon's mind is gone. ...

Yup. Fmr Pres Trump has rambled incoherently about child care.

So, when will the Republican Party replace him as a candidate?

That aside...

And the #11 post seems to blatantly try to change the topic of discussion to an open thread about child care costs.

Why?


#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-06 08:00 PM | Reply

@#17

Do try to be coherent.

#18 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-06 08:25 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Do try to be coherent.

Absolutely. That's Trump level ignorance of a $218B per year industry and its potential ripple effect on GDP.

But then, look who we're talking about....?

#19 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-09-06 08:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#20

Nah trump's trying to explain he doesn't like christmas sweaters because his ------- are to sensitive.

#21 | Posted by Tor at 2024-09-06 08:50 PM | Reply

Is the mush-brained pedo offering to have Ivanka and Marco Rubio watch your kids?

#23 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-09-06 08:51 PM | Reply

Proving my point - twice.

Complete ignorance.

Hey moron, daycare affects every aspect of your life when and where you depend upon another adult who can only do their jobs for you if they can figure out how to have their younger children taken care of. The cost of daycare is built-in to the price of almost anything, since most people with children make their employment choices based on whether it allows them - by pay or practice - to insure their children are taken care of while they work.

Saying the above doesn't mean that every parent expects something. Saying the above only recognizes the child care is a huge sector of our economy on its own, and impacts even more. Daycare has a direct impact on worker productivity, something every business is concerned with.

The federal government employees almost 3 million citizens. Daycare is an issue impacting more than half of them. Government can make things better for families by shaping policies where they're needed. And they likely will be offset by savings or taxes on extra revenues made if the industry grows.

Don't be so myopic.

#24 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-09-06 09:03 PM | Reply

This is exactly what his non-answers will look like in the upcoming "debate".

It should be quite a hoot and toot.

#25 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-09-07 11:10 AM | Reply

I suppose I'm supposed to feed them for you too?

#17 | POSTED BY ORGAN_BANK

Not if they are childless cat ladies. They should be rounded up with the rapists and the vermin and the deep state radicals and mass deported. On your tax dollars and in your name.

AmIRight?

#26 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-09-07 11:16 AM | Reply

Seems to me - and others will agree - Trump is slowing down.

Yeah, he can still ramp up a good showing and go on the attack as he always has - but now you're seeing equal time of him struggling to put a sentence together - or just make sense.

The other day, think it was in MI, he was sweating like he was about to have a heart attack. He looked horrible.

I'm surprised he's made it this far - he'll be ramped up for the debate for sure but that may not be a good thing with someone who can hopefully punch back.

#27 | Posted by brass30 at 2024-09-07 12:03 PM | Reply

Maybe if we could get the parents to get together with the grandparents, they could impose a tariff on, uhh, Mexican nannies ...

#28 | Posted by cbob at 2024-09-07 05:01 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort