""whatever you do - don't post a link that would prove your argument "
I did."
Where is your link --------? Still waiting. What post number is this link?
"You just don't know how to read it, or analyze it."
You have not posted any link you lying little bitch. When you do, copy and paste the statement from it stating that the top .1% received over 50% of the tax cut like a normal, non-lying person would do.
"Why can't you admit your initial posted article didn't cover the world, it just covered America? It's not difficult."
I posted 2 links - and both say you are full of ----. And your response - 'trust me bro'.
Just admit that you lied and we can move one from this.
"Just ask yourself: which way would the macro dials go, if the WORLD's wealthiest were included in the analysis? Does that 45% floor raise, or lower?"
I don't need to ask myself anything - YOU need to post a link that backs up your claim - still waiting on that --------. And that 45%, that is the TOP 5%, not the top .1% you lying piece of ----.
"Why is it so hard to believe that, once included, THE WORLD's top 1/10th of 1% got OVER HALF the cost of the Trump 1.0 tax code?
#137 | Posted by Danforth"
Because it is mathematically impossible -------- - which is why you can't find a single link that backs up your ridiculous statement. But again - this is the easiest argument for you to win and shut me up - all you need to do is post a link proving you didn't lie. Unfortunately for you, that link does not exist.
Go cry to mommy --------.