MAGA WORKS: Native born +2M jobs, Foreign -543K

147,000 jobs
70,000+ jump in state and local education jobs (summer student jobs for university students)

Only 74,000 jobs outside of government (79% was in healthcare, again think university students)
That's HALF of what May was.

Outside of healthcare, we added only 14,000 jobs... 2nd straight month of manufacturing job losses too. That's a really bad sign.

Squats the ------- liar.

Go tell Jeff to shoot himself. Put the gun in your mouth, traitor, and pull the trigger.

No one will miss you.

You pathetic loser.

At the top of the comments section there is a bit of text. Part of it reads " abusive conduct is not allowed."
I have often wondered what kind of conduct would be considered abusive.

Posting these ------- MAGAT fascist lies.

@#2 ... Funny how only the state media outlet Fox News is saying that. ...

Yup. and that article (OpEd?) seems to be remarkably devoid of any links to back up the specific data it cites.

Ah, it's ScottS's daily troll thread. He's ALREADY WON THE DEBATE!!!!

HE'S DESTROYED ALL ARGUMENTS WITH FACTS!!!

Did I miss anything?

He TOOK A SHOWER with the FACTS!

He TOOK A SHOWER with the FACTS!

He molested THE FACTS?? LOCK HIM UP IN A CAGE!!!!

"Also funny is that I'm looking at the report and don't see this trend indicated anywhere.
#2 | Posted by jpw"

Of course YOU can't - you could not find your own ass using both hands as proven here daily.

They are referring to the BLS reports which I have referenced here many times which clearly breaks out employment of native born vs. foreign born.

Here is the latest report: www.bls.gov
Here is the end of Jan 2025 report: www.bls.gov

In each, find Table 7 and the subtract the 2 numbers for the change.

And exactly as stated, for the first time in years, native born employment is growing - by 2M so far under Trump. Trump is doing what liberals said was impossible. I remember not long ago - ------- Danforth said this was impossible as native born will decline due to boomer retirement so it is not possible to reverse the trend - much like everything he says - that is now clearly proven to be wrong.

For JPW, stick to talking about incompetence in research labs causing global pandemics, this economics stuff is beyond your intelligence level.

"HE'S DESTROYED ALL ARGUMENTS WITH FACTS!!!
Did I miss anything?
#9 | Posted by REDIAL"

I give you -------- a little rope to hang yourselves and you do exactly that.

Look at my #12. You -------- can't believe the data to be true because it hurts your fee-fees, but then I go and crush you again by - AS ALWAYS - bringing actual FACTS to the argument.

Rinse and repeat with you -------- liberals.

Now, let's see you resort to the last line of ------- liberal defense against the truth: saying that Trump is forcing the BLS to lie. I see ------- Zed going that route already. Join your fellow ------- Canadian in repeating this nonsense.

#9 | Posted by REDIAL

Typical Canuck, just yelling and screaming while tilting at windmills.

Oh look, ScottS and the ---------- "pilot" once again show up at the same time.

LOL. Carry on...

@#13 ... I give you -------- a little rope to hang yourselves and you do exactly that. ...

Or maybe ...

The objections raised here made your current alias dig deeper and post the inks that should have been in the original post?

... find Table 7 ...

I don't see a Table 7 in either.

I see a Table A-7.

Is that what your current alias' comment refers to?

@#13 ... I give you -------- a little rope to hang yourselves and you do exactly that. ...

So, trolling?

Good to see your current alias admit it.

"The objections raised here made your current alias dig deeper and post the inks that should have been in the original post?"

I posted the original article ------- - that is sufficient for most non-smooth brained Americans to accept as the truth. I went above and beyond in my follow-up so I could, once again, spike the football in your ------- faces.

"Is that what your current alias' comment refers to?
#16 | Posted by LampLighter "

Ya think?

Do you want me to come shove your nose into it for you?

"#15 | Posted by REDIAL"

How about you make your first fact filled post on this website by admitting that I was correct - AGAIN?

"+ WAGES RISE
So is inflation.
Predictably.
#1 | Posted by jpw"

I should have addressed this ------- post first but I wanted to give the source of the numbers before you -------s kill anyone else's brain cells with your dull-normal posting.

Inflation under Trump is running at ~1.6% (annualized). This is a very low compared to the HUGE wage gains - which is why Trump has delivered the best REAL wage gains of any president in the last 60 years.

That inflation due to tariffs? Yeah - still didn't happen -------.

Put your fee-fees to the side and let's stick to facts here.

@#18 ... I posted the original article ...

Yes, your current trolling alias did.

And as I noted in #17 ...

... @#13 ... I give you -------- a little rope to hang yourselves and you do exactly that. ...

So, trolling?

Good to see your current alias admit it. ...

So, your current trolling apparently knew of the dearth of data (a little rope) in the article and posted it for replies (you do exactly that), but not to inform.

Good to see your current trolling apparently admit that.

REAL wage gains

"REAL" = "Imaginary, cherry picked".

""REAL" = "Imaginary, cherry picked".
#22 | Posted by REDIAL"

"Real" = Nominal - Inflation

Hope this helps -------. Now, post how you -------s were wrong AGAIN and just got the football spiked in your stupid faces, AGAIN. Facts are Facts - and I always bring them.

"#21 | Posted by LampLighter"

I post nothing but facts - I don't give 2 ----- if your fee-fees get hurt in the process.

Now, you can post different stats refuting mine - or - you can say that I am correct. No other comment has any validity to this discussion.

Inflation under Trump is running at ~1.6% (annualized).

Nope. Been bracketing 3% s^*%bag.

"Nope. Been bracketing 3% s^*%bag.
#25 | Posted by jpw"

------- - you get are ass-kicked in every debate that we have. You really think I am throwing out an unsupported statistic now?

I will provide for you the actual numbers though - BUT - I want you to admit that I was 100% correct with my statements with regard to the native and foreign born jobs numbers that you "couldn't find (understand)" as posted in your #2. Let's have some accountability for your prior stupidity, then we can move on to your current stupidity.

What to know about the Trump administration's favorite economic data point
www.axios.com

... The Trump administration has a new favorite talking point on the economy: That blue-collar wages are rising the most, in inflation-adjusted terms, at the start of a presidential administration in modern history.

The big picture: The data reflect solid wage growth paired with low inflation through the first five months of 2025. ...

Driving the news: The analysis, and chart shown above, was generated by the Treasury Department and has been promoted on the White House website, the president's Truth Social feed, and amplified in certain media.

- - - "We've seen real wages for hourly workers, non-supervisory workers, rise almost 2% in the first five months," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told the New York Post. "No president has done that before."

By the numbers: The data in question is average hourly earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers -- a good proxy for private-sector working-class wages -- deflated by the Consumer Price Index.

- - - From December through May, that wage measure rose by 1.7%, comfortably outstripping the 0.9% increase in consumer prices. Treasury converted that improvement in real wages over five months to an annual rate.

- - - It works out to a 1.7% annual rate of real wage increases, which compares favorably with the first five months of the Biden administration (when inflation significantly outstripped wage hikes), and all other comparable periods in a presidential term dating back at least to Richard Nixon. ...

Lots of sourcing links in that article, unlike the cited article for this thread.

"#27 | Posted by LampLighter"

The sources SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED (AGAIN) as we already debated these points (there is only about 20 of you smooth brained liberals on this site) when that article was freshly posted. You -------- just need to develop a memory better than a goldfish.

"#28 | Posted by LampLighter"

And again - they 100% support my statements.

So, how about you take the time to admit that EVERYTHING I POSTED was correct?

#26 what a sad, sad little man.

You think I'm offering an unsupported statistic?

www.clevelandfed.org

Here. I'll help you out even without your validation.

AGAIN. Facts are Facts - and I always bring them.

As I pointed out in #9.

LOL.

"You think I'm offering an unsupported statistic?
#31 | Posted by jpw"

No - I KNOW that you are too stupid to understand the statistic you are posting and how it is totally unresponsive to the statement I made. I already explained this within the last 2 weeks on this website. Can you spot your stupidity on your own or do you need my help?

President Trump Approval - Economy
www.realclearpolling.com

...
RCP Average 5/28 - 7/7 --
Approve: 42.1
Disapprove: 55.1
Spread: -13.0
...

... and from that same link ...

...
FOX News 6/13 - 6/16
Approve: 40
Disapprove: 58
Spread: -18