Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, February 23, 2026

The DNC says Biden ignoring the genocide in Gaza cost Harris the election. See link...

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Keep repeating it. It still won't make it true.

#1 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-02-23 02:54 PM | Reply

FWIW: drudge.com

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-23 03:07 PM | Reply

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-23 04:13 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Speaking of genocide facilitators, British Israel asset Peter Mandelson has been arrested.

#4 | Posted by pumpkinhead at 2026-02-23 04:51 PM | Reply

It For Sure IS True.

Keep Denying it, that doesn't make it less True.

It just shows that the Democratic party can't learn from it's mistakes.

But that's been obvious for Decades.

#5 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-24 08:10 AM | Reply

------- lied about ending it during the campaign and now is stealing $10 BILLION in US taxpayer money that could be used to pay for health insurance for US Taxpayers to fund luxury condos in Gaza while Bibi is continuing to slaughter Palestinian children.

"I LOVE THE POORLY EDUCATED!"

#6 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-24 10:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

A lack of appreciation of the full scale and importance of the election is what cost the Dems.

When the self righteous idiot "progressives" took their ball and went home over a single issue the not only guaranteed the violence in Gaza would continue but also that our republic would be destroyed as well.

Self righteous lefties are utterly lacking in self awareness, the intelligence they so desperately want to have and any leg to stand on to speak up and criticize anyone.

Yet they chirp about the middle being the problem and how they're actually the ones we should be listening to.

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-24 10:51 AM | Reply

The "middle" is a bunch of wishy washy stand for Nothing Genocide Enablers. They have No values and inspire no Passions. They just give Israel whatever they want. Trump is no worse on Gaza than Biden,he's just more Outspoken about his LOVE. For Killers.

Watered down MAGA is what they are, with a Tranny love garnish.

Not Electable.

People say "Never Again", it doesn't just mean Jews.

Try convincing AIPAC of that.

#8 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-24 11:02 AM | Reply

Hi JPW

How is the Democratic Party going to get these millions of "self-righteous idiot progressives" to vote on Tuesday 3 Nov 2026 for candidates that support ethnic cleansing in Gaza and military aggression against Muslim countries in the Middle East?

There are millions of people in the antiwar bloc, a movement as old as the American Revolution itself, that need convincing to see things your way.

These Samaritans of all faiths, as well as atheists, belong to these groups: en.wikipedia.org

I was unable to join one of these associations because I would have to sign a declaration renouncing all war.

In good conscience, I couldn't do that because Palestinians and Ukrainians have a right to defend themselves from aggression.

#9 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-24 11:12 AM | Reply

"You'd have NO IDEA who Kamala Harris is without Willie Brown!" ~ Gavin Newsom

#10 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-02-24 01:51 PM | Reply

#8 the middle tend to be grownups who can look at the situation as a whole and realize self preservation is more important than taking your ball and going home because you're "passionate."

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-24 02:55 PM | Reply

#9 it's sad and depressing to me that people need to be convinced at this point.

The toxic effects of Trump and his people are no longer theoretical (they weren't in 2024 either, but anyways ... ) and if you still choose to let them run rampant over a single issue then I have no use for you and you're too far up your own self righteous a%^ to likely be reachable anyway.

Staying home and allowing this administration to control both houses of Congress guarantees the end result you're griping about. Probably to a worse extent than if the Dems were in control. Voting to ensure Congressional control changes hands gives you a chance to fight another day.

It basically boils down to growing up and being an adult or continue being Veruca Salt throwing a tantrum because you don't get what you want now now now.

#12 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-24 03:00 PM | Reply

Oh, and the fact she was a black woman....

#13 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-24 07:34 PM | Reply

Jeff is a cock-gargling MAGAT FAGAT

#14 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-24 07:35 PM | Reply

#13

Yer right....

Making the Perfect the Enemy of the damn well good enough in a pinch... is a terrible stategery.

Especially with an Electoral College that no longer represents the wishes of the majority of the voters.

Dems should be paying relocation for some of their own out to those Western states.

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 08:02 PM | Reply

"Oh, and the fact she was a black woman...."

Being half Asian was probably a bigger impediment than either of those qualifiers.

Playing the black victim card doesn't wash post-Obama.
Playing the woman victim card doesn't wash either, when so many other countries have managed to elect female candidates. It's more likely that Harris, like Clinton, was just a crap candidate, rather than assuming your country is one of the worst in the world.

#16 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-02-24 08:13 PM | Reply

@#16 ... Playing the woman victim card doesn't wash either, when so many other countries have managed to elect female ...

Possibly.

However, ~so many other countries~ do not have to deal with the White Christians Nationalists who think that women should be barefoot, pregnant and cooking dinner in the kitchen.



#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-24 09:16 PM | Reply

@12

Hi JPW:

As I advised you in a previous comment several weeks ago, my entire family and I voted for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz on Tuesday 5 Nov 2024.

But how is the Democratic Party going to get millions of "self-righteous idiot progressives" who you have no use for to vote on Tuesday 3 Nov 2026 for AIPAC-funded candidates that support ethnic cleansing in Gaza and military aggression against Muslim countries in the Middle East?

Insulting and disparaging the millions of pacifists in the US won't convince them that you're right.

While some Americans can live with massive body counts of Muslims, Somalis, Arabs, and the Vietnamese (in 1968), all paid for by their tax dollars, these millions of Samaritans can't live with that.

The pacifists and antiwar Samaritans I know are neither self-righteous nor are they idiots--- they are humanitarians.


#18 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-24 10:51 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

As I advised you in a previous comment several weeks ago, my entire family and I voted for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz on Tuesday 5 Nov 2024.

Cool. Then there's no need to respond, eh?

Insulting and disparaging the millions of pacifists in the US won't convince them that you're right.

Calling a spade a spade isn't the problem, it's that they don't like the implications of being a spade.

Which brings us back to my original statement-I have no use for them and they can shove their demands for "convincing" up their a&&.

The pacifists and antiwar Samaritans I know are neither self-righteous nor are they idiots--- they are humanitarians.

Sorry, but they are self-righteous and idiots if they will let the current administration maintain complete power if they're not placated.

Nothing will change that fact.

#19 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 10:12 AM | Reply

Democrats could "Placate" them.

That's a fact too.

The Fact is Democrats care more about placating Corporations and Oligarchs, and pandering to Israeli Vainglory than they care about winning elections.

They have dismissed the left for many years thinking they have No where else to turn for representation so they can be ignored and marginalized without any real consequences.

WRONG.

Building coalitions is part of the Game and the "Center" isn't even trying to address the demands of their "constituents".

So those constituents don't vote for them.

It's really that simple.

How about the Democratic leadership trying to "placate" them for a change?

They Placate Mass Murderers every day. AIPAC even Grades their performances.

What Trump and MAGA do is irrelevant.

I'm talking about the so called "Opposition".

A Parliamentary system of extensive Coalition building is looking far better than disenfranchising huge portions of the Electorate by ignoring them Forever because they have no other options in a two party winner take all system.

I dint vote for people who Support Genocide and Aggressive Wars.

Period.

No Compromise, No Apologies.

You can stick yore self righteous crap where the Sun don't Shine.

#20 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 10:42 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Certainly not the ratched reaction of a racist society.

I'm, sorry, continue to absolve yourself.

#21 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-02-25 10:59 AM | Reply

The DNC is saying this was the largest issue with swing voters in swing states?

Ohio, North Carolina, Wisconsin, etc.....those states have voters who cared that much about that issue?

#22 | Posted by eberly at 2026-02-25 11:00 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

How about the Democratic leadership trying to "placate" them for a change?

Because, I hate to tell you, what you bring to the table isn't as valuable to a national winning strategy.

And your response to this is a prime example of why dealing with you is a giant pain in the a&&.

You can stick yore self righteous crap where the Sun don't Shine.

#20 | Posted by Effeteposer

Except your post drips self-righteousness, idiot.

Jesus and you wonder why people don't want to engage you in a serious manner?

#23 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 11:09 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#22 Eb, I believe that there's a much simpler explanation for the Harris/Walz loss in 2024:

Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,00.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates.

And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?

Zero dollars

The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.

Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

Either way, mission accomplished.

#24 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-02-25 11:13 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

BTW I don't disagree with you regarding the level of influence AIPAC and other foreign lobbyist groups have. I agree with you regarding the destruction of Gaza and the continued belligerence of Israel on the world stage.

But yet I still dismiss you because you're so stupid and short sighted, you'd rather believe you made a statement and confirm your self-righteousness without making a single impact on what's happening in Gaza, guaranteeing what is happening in Gaza will continue unabated and also guaranteeing people like Trump turn Gaza into a seaside resort town.

You'd look at a fake gold Trump Tower shining in the Gaza sunlight and still pat yourself on the back because 'yeah! take that dems!'

In other words, you have your entitled, self-righteous head so far up your entitled, self-righteous a&& you can't even see your actions are entirely self-centered and self-serving while making things WORSE for the people you claim to care about.

So, f*&^ off with your pompous whining.

#25 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 11:15 AM | Reply

-They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

I agree with that a hundred times over the notion this was impacted by Harris's stance on Gaza.

Why is the DNC saying this? Is this a better excuse than the truth? The truth that they were outplayed strategically by Trump over the trans issue?

Effete is simply applying his passionate stance on Gaza to everyone else. He believes people care more about it than they do.

#26 | Posted by eberly at 2026-02-25 11:24 AM | Reply

I refuse to Vote for Anyone who "loves" Israel. I refuse to vote for anyone who Funds Genocide.

Of Whatever Party.

AIPAC grades politicans. Nobody has much to say about that even though they are Foreign Meddlers in American Government.

So I as a Native Born American do likewise.

I don't Vote for people who support Ethnic Cleansing and Mass Murder.

If that's self righteous and a pain in the Ass... Placate me.

The Democratic Party handles AIPAC by Placating Them.

#27 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 11:27 AM | Reply

If that's self righteous and a pain in the Ass... Placate me.

Entitled, self-righteous nonsense.

Grow up, dips*&^.

Or just STFU about a topic you're clearly just virtue signaling on as you allow Trump to do 10x the damage in a fraction of the time.

#28 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 11:29 AM | Reply

Having to choose the Lesser Evil is hard werk.

But not choosing at all is no strategery at all, and pleases the worst evil.

www.truthdig.com

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-25 11:35 AM | Reply

Why is it so easy for so many to dismiss people Caring About what happens in Palestine on our Dime? Is Israel an American State?

Minnesota is and the Administration is at War with them. Over Immigration and Civil Rights.

Vietnam destroyed Johnson and he was a good president otherwise.

More people care about MASS MURDER and Ethnic Vainglory than you "Centrists" think.

Its very easy for Me to believe Harris lost over her stance on Israel/Palestine.

It's one thing to not vote,its quite another to put your active support behind someone who DOESN'T represent you at all because the choices presented are SO Lame.

Blame the two party winner take all system.

I'm not voting for Someone who Doesn't Represent Me, At All.

#30 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 11:39 AM | Reply

Coalitions are hard work. Getting people to support you takes compromise and I haven't seen much from the Center.

They say they're "Mainstream" and left wing votes are not numerous enough to care about,they chase after mythological wishy washy Republicans and "Independent" voters, they spurn people like myself who vote consistently for Democratic candidates as having no Chioce but to Vote for them no matter how idiotic and malicious their support for Israel gets.

I'm Done. If they support Israel I will Never vote for them, no matter who they are.

I'm my own little one man Anti-AIPAC.

I grade their performances Too.

#31 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 11:48 AM | Reply

More eligible voters didn't vote than voted for either Party in 2024. More than 100,000,000 failed to vote. I'm hardly alone.

Our System is as broken as Venezuela.

Will someone come and Kidnap the Illegal winner of our "illegitimate" Elections?

#32 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 11:52 AM | Reply

-More people care about MASS MURDER and Ethnic Vainglory than you "Centrists" think.

we're gonna agree to disagree. In a conflict where the hero and the villain aren't clearly spelled out........folks struggle to find a side to take.

#33 | Posted by eberly at 2026-02-25 11:53 AM | Reply

-Vietnam destroyed Johnson and he was a good president otherwise.

You're dismissing how much passing Civil Rights hurt him and the entire Democratic party in the South.

#34 | Posted by eberly at 2026-02-25 11:55 AM | Reply

Why is it so easy for so many to dismiss people Caring About what happens in Palestine on our Dime? Is Israel an American State?

Because it doesn't appear to be genuine when the overall outcome of your inaction is a worse outcome for Palestine.

Does that make sense yet? It can't really be simplified any further than that.

#35 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 12:36 PM | Reply

put your active support behind someone who DOESN'T represent you at all because the choices presented are SO Lame.

Then kindly STFU about the outcome of your inaction.

You just want to spout off and sound all concerned and interested but, really, you're just concerned with the appearance than the actual goal.

And that is entirely indicated by the childish level of engagement you demonstrate on the topic.

#36 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 12:37 PM | Reply

It's not childish, it's Consistent.

I don't Vote FOR Trump or any Republicans.

They don't get my support. Ever.

I just don't vote for people who don't represent my interests. I don't try to stop others from participating.

I'm sitting it out because nothing changes on the things that matter to me.

Nobody wants my input, only my support.

I don't have any left for people who exalt murder. For people who aid and abet crimes against Humanity.

I'm Rigid that way.

No apology.

#37 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 01:03 PM | Reply

I'm sitting it out because nothing changes on the things that matter to me.

No, instead you take your ball and go home and allow destructive policy that hurts everyone on multiple fronts.

Like I said, childish.

#38 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 01:51 PM | Reply

Maybe.

If I think about it.

Man doesn't live alone.

Social life is our element, even when we don't think things through.

Like fish in water don't understand that water is their Element.

Isolation creates blindness to Social bonds,that's why the wide open spaces create --------.

That's why Oligarchs lose their Humanity.

Computers create Drones without Agency.

The Future is Atomisation.

#39 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 02:01 PM | Reply

As long as Democrats ignore progressives, the party will keep losing.

We want more Mamdanis and Bernies, less Cuomos and Adams.

Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer are garbage. As long as the DNC keeps foisting these kinds of candidates upon America the party will keep losing.

Also, Newsom isn't the candidate for president anyone wants.

#40 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 02:06 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

A wonderful young lady named Hannah Shvets beat a good-for-nothing Republican landlord for a seat on the Ithaca city council.

A member of the Communist Party, Hannah ran on the Democratic Party ticket.

Result: One less status quo dinosaur to deal with in upstate NY.

Link: hannahforithaca.com

#41 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-25 02:33 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Ithica is a small city that is home to a large university.

Not exactly grounds for a broad brushed conclusion of progressive political potential.

#42 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 03:27 PM | Reply

Let's just keep ignoring all the progressive wins because clearly progressives can't win in America.

Just keep lying to yourself about how progressivism can't succeed in America, because you've been fully programmed to believe it.

#43 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 03:31 PM | Reply

"That progressive candidate only won because ________."

Is such a stupid mentality.

They won because Americans want politicians who will fight for them.

Stop providing safe candidates moderates will vote for, republicans feel no such obligations.

#44 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 03:35 PM | Reply

That's why Republicans win Elections.

Show me an anti Gun Republican?

Show me a pro Tranny in Women's sports Republican?

I'm sure they exist but they don't vote their convictions. They Toe the line.

They at least pretend to listen to Some of their constituents.

Dems do too. But it doesn't help them because the Tent is Too Big. They can't please enough varying factions in their diverse and disorganized coalition.

Perhaps we need more than two parties?

Three, Four, or more sharing power.

Its called Parliamentary Government and most Democratic Nations are organized this way.

America is an Outlier of Almost Monarchical government.

The American Presidentcy is a Bizarre, almost King like thing.

Trump didn't create that.

He Used it.

#45 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 03:55 PM | Reply

A "socialist" won in Seattle and in NYC last year.

US Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is described as a "socialist."

James Talarico in Texas sounds like a "socialist" in his speeches about the "Top versus the Bottom."

I call them Democrats, but the mainstream media (MSM) and status quo dinosaurs deride them as "socialists" or "communists."

In 2025, triple-loser sexual predator Andrew Cuomo betrayed the NYS Democratic Party of his three-time governor father Mario Cuomo by gracelessly running as an Independent after losing the Democratic Party primary to Zohran Mamdani. This good-for-nothing Judas Iscariot took millions of dollars in dark money from the oligarchs, like Michael Bloomberg, to try and defeat the NYC DEMOCRATIC PARTY nominee for NYC Mayor.

One AI snapshot:

"In the 2025 US elections, socialist, and communist candidates made significant gains, especially at the local level. The Communist Party saw a notable increase in elected officials, doubling the number of open Communist Party members ever elected in the US after a long hiatus of about 40 years. Additionally, over 100 democratic socialists were elected across various municipal and state positions, reflecting a growing influence of democratic socialism within the political landscape.

Prominent figures such as Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist mayor, gained attention for reforming the Democratic Party from within, distinguishing democratic socialism from communism in public discourse. This trend indicates a surge in progressive and left-wing candidates winning elections, though the numbers are more concentrated in local and state offices rather than federal positions.

Overall, the 2025 election cycle marked a resurgence of socialist and communist representation, with the Communist Party and democratic socialists making historic gains in elected offices."


#46 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-25 03:56 PM | Reply

If a Nazi can Win Twice?

Why can't a Commie Win?

That's a serious question.

Americans have No Ideology,only self interests.

The internet assures maximum siloing of people; who never interact with others unlike themselves.

Commies see the Community. They look for human cooperation.

Nazis are Predators,they are looking for Victims.

Self interest is a powerful thing.

#47 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 04:02 PM | Reply

If a Nazi can Win Twice?
Why can't a Commie Win?
That's a serious question.

Because fascism is compatible with capitalism.

If anything, fascism enforces capitalism.

The wealthy will not be challenged.

That's why they attack liberals and progressives.

Conservatives are much more willing to fall in line.

#48 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 04:09 PM | Reply

If a Nazi can Win Twice?
Why can't a Commie Win?
That's a serious question.

You don't know?
Go study history.
You'll get your answer.

Fascism supports moneyed interests.
Communism threatens moneyed interests.

#49 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-25 04:14 PM | Reply

More People are Poor than Rich.

By the numbers.

Many Poors Worship the Rich.

It's like a Religion.

I see it Every day.

Trump is a Pied Piper to them..

Luring them to their Doom...

Everyone Else will be caught in the Maelstrom...

Even Overseas.

WAR.

#50 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 04:49 PM | Reply

More People are Poor than Rich.

Unfortunately too many poor people believe rich people have their best interests at heart.

#51 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 05:07 PM | Reply

Let's just keep ignoring all the progressive wins because clearly progressives can't win in America.
Just keep lying to yourself about how progressivism can't succeed in America, because you've been fully programmed to believe it.

#43 | Posted by ClownShack

It can't, not broadly.

The faster "progressives" stop believing their relevant beyond the coastal urban areas the better it will be for Dems.

If ya'll actually joined with the middle and pushed for things like Medicare for all, education reform and funding, decreased DoD budgets ect ect you'd be much better off.

Instead, you ride your purity ponies, insist on pushing niche social issues into everything and take even the slight win as "proof" that your agenda at large is accepted and should be immediately implemented RIGHT NOW or else everyone is bigoted ------ and terrible people.

It has nothing to do with programming and everything to do with being a sentient adult who's been following politics for several decades.

The real people who need to stop lying to themselves are people like you who think progressivism stands a chance on its own because you've clung to a small number of exceptions to give you comfort in ignoring the norms.

#52 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 05:11 PM | Reply

Is such a stupid mentality.
They won because Americans want politicians who will fight for them.
Stop providing safe candidates moderates will vote for, republicans feel no such obligations.

#44 | Posted by ClownShack

LOL you're the kind of person who's to blame for the Dems never being able to hold on to wins and power past one election cycle.

#53 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 05:12 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Only -------- can have Nice Things.

Got It.

Americans are -------- by Definition.

Got It.

#54 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-02-25 05:24 PM | Reply

you're the kind of person who's to blame for the Dems never being able to hold on to wins and power past one election cycle.
#53 | POSTED BY JPW

Of course I'm to blame. That's much easier for you than introspection.

Trump ran on hurting Americans and enriching himself and he won.

Democrats are too afraid to suggest raising taxes on the rich or universal healthcare because that's too progressive.

If only progressives would just shut up and blindly vote for democrats. That would fix everything.

But here's the truth, democrats chasing moderates has only helped republicans push this nation further to the right.

Democrats need to stand for progressive policies and push for progress in our nation, let moderates decide whether they prefer Trump's America or an America where our taxes pay for us and don't go to the wealthy.

Stop begging for mediocrity.

#55 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 06:02 PM | Reply

Pragmatism versus Principles.

Some people are more pragmatic, some people are more principled.

One of the few books I didn't read but saw the film was The Boys from Brazil (1978).

At the end of the movie, the pragmatic young Nazi hunter wants the list of cloned Adolf Hitlers from the elderly Simon Wiesenthal-type Nazi hunter who painstakingly compiled it.

When the elderly man played (by the immortal Laurence Olivier) asks the younger man what he was going to do with the list of 88 or so clones, the younger man says he and his organization will eliminate them one at a time to prevent another Holocaust (AKA XJK).

The principled elderly Nazi hunter asks, "What, no trial, no examination, no mercy?" [sic]

"Nope."

Please fast forward to 1:58 for the hospital scene and exact wording: www.youtube.com

I always feel like lighting up myself watching this scene (like right now).

"Pragmatism versus Principles," albeit in a fictional setting.



#56 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-25 06:04 PM | Reply

Of course I'm to blame. That's much easier for you than introspection.

You know how I can tell progressives are equally as extreme as maga in many ways?

You're just as lacking in self-awareness.

You're to blame because it's happened. I didn't make up that statement or the rationale for it.

Democrats are too afraid to suggest raising taxes on the rich or universal healthcare because that's too progressive.

Yeah! Those are never talked about by anyone but pink haired, septum pierced libruls! lol *facepalm*

#57 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 06:05 PM | Reply

Stop begging for mediocrity.

#55 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

If this were true id vote for "progressives."

Seriously, it's been the same cycle my entire adult life. The GOP has control the majority of the time, people get sick of them because they're s*^# and vote more Dems in. The Dems take this as a "mandate" to force all their ideas in one fell swoop then get their ass handed to them the next cycle because it turns out people don't like being chastised for refusing to call someone a "birthing person."

And the cycle starts anew.

(BTW that's why this country drifts right, it's the prolonged periods of GOP power punctuated by occasional Dem power, not the lack of progressives in power because they can't win elections broadly)

#58 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 06:09 PM | Reply

It can't, not broadly.

The faster "progressives" stop believing their relevant beyond the coastal urban areas the better it will be for Dems.

Are you arguing there are no Progressive people in middle America?

If democrats shouldn't be promoting progressive policies, then what's the point of the Democratic Party?

What do democrats stand for in your opinion?

You know weekends and social security and civil rights and Medicare and public education were all Progressive policies, right?

Moderates haven't accomplished anything and do nothing but hurt progress in this nation.

#59 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 06:12 PM | Reply

You know how I can tell progressives are equally as extreme as maga in many ways?

You're just as lacking in self-awareness.

I'm proud to be a progressive. It's why my marriage is legal.

What do you stand for?

Telling me where my place should be?

Find a mirror.

#60 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 06:13 PM | Reply

You're to blame because it's happened. I didn't make up that statement or the rationale for it.

Democrats have abandoned working class Americans to chase after billionaires because the Supreme Court legalized buying elections and they feel like they need billionaires to win elections.

Something that Sanders, Mamdani and Talarico are proving wrong.

Americans are desperate for representation and feel like they're not getting it from either party.

#61 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 06:23 PM | Reply

lol you're as dumb as lfthndcuck and fistedp^%%*.

Why? You're equally as sure of your superiority but equally as bereft of actual proof and a supportive reality.

#62 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 06:24 PM | Reply

Democrats need to remember who their voters are if they want to win.

#63 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 06:24 PM | Reply

You're equally as sure of your superiority but equally as bereft of actual proof and a supportive reality.
#62 | POSTED BY JPW

The irony of your statement couldn't be more lost on you.

Again, do you believe Democrats should fight for anything? Or simply be the "not Trump" party and hope that's good enough so they can continue to do nothing to help working class Americans?

#64 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 06:27 PM | Reply

lol you're shadow boxing because literally none of what you're saying reflects my views.

The statement in 64 is my primary reason for explaining Harris' loss.

#65 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 07:27 PM | Reply

Harris lost for a lot of reasons, but one of them is that she was definitely not ready for prime time.

Biden should have kept his word and not run again, but here we are.

#66 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-02-25 07:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Americans are desperate for representation and feel like they're not getting it from either party.
#61 | Posted by ClownShack

Which is why the Trump thing is so awful.

Republicans have all three branches of federal Government and a solid majority of States, and they're more miserable than ever.

The more they win, the angrier they get.

#67 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-25 07:34 PM | Reply

You have yet to figure out what Democrats should stand for.

If not progress, then what?

The whole, "let's not ----- middle America" is insane.

Middle America needs progressive reform more than ever.

This country has remained stagnant for decades, some places are still stuck with infrastructure from the 1950s, because instead of using our tax dollars to build a better America, we're giving it all to the wealthy and arguing over trans rights.

This entire nation could be solar powered and connected by public transportation.

#68 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 07:36 PM | Reply

Trump is insane.

www.rawstory.com

But this country does not want a woman president. Only Biden beat trump, and Hillary Clinton was 1000X more qualified than Kamala Harris. She also beat trump in three debates.

#69 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-02-25 07:37 PM | Reply

Republicans have all three branches of federal Government and a solid majority of States, and they're more miserable than ever.
The more they win, the angrier they get.

Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-25 07:34 PM | Reply

They have to gain empowerment through victimhood, because their lives suck. (clearly someone else's fault)

And being a victim 24/7 carries a lot of anger with it.

#70 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-02-25 07:39 PM | Reply

Democrats don't have the brains or the balls to say

"Vote for us and we will release the full unredacted Epstein files."

And that exemplifies why the Democrats lose.

Democrats are better on the issues that affect people's lives everyday, but they're not good at showcasing those achievements.

People liked Obama, they didn't much care for "Democrats." Nobody but policy nerds would want to bump into John Kerry at a cocktail party.

#71 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-25 07:44 PM | Reply

this country does not want a woman president.

I wouldn't say that.

Hillary actually won the popular vote.

She got screwed by the EC - and her over confidence.

Harris should never have been the candidate. At that point - with 4 months left until election - Biden should have stayed the candidate and won or lost it himself, instead of letting the DNC convince him to step aside and allowing Harris to fail.

I do agree, Biden should have kept his promise to only run for one term.

#72 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 07:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Harris should never have been the candidate.

Agreed.

#73 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-02-25 07:46 PM | Reply

But this country does not want a woman president.

They certainly don't want Hillary, I think for Kamala to have a chance Biden needed to step down 18 months before the election so buyers would know what they're getting. And Democrats are too indecisive to figure those kinds of things out in time.

Because they're trying to be leaders.

Whereas Trump is trying to be a ruler.

#74 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-25 07:47 PM | Reply

Hillary was imminently qualified to be POTUS and Trump is the worst person to ever run.

America's not ready for a woman president.

#75 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-02-25 07:47 PM | Reply

Hilary was robbed, she won the popular vote and I believe she only lost the EC because of James Comey and the email BS. Kamala was a bad candidate and I agree with Clown that Biden waited too long and should have stayed in at that point.

#76 | Posted by justagirl_idaho at 2026-02-25 07:50 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Democrats are too worried about alienating moderates.

Republicans don't give a ---- about the moderates.

If democrats had the balls to implement progressive policies, Americans would notice their lives are better under democratic leadership.

#77 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 07:51 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

#73. Cause trump is so much better.

The most unqualified POTUS of my lifetime.

Mf pls.

#78 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-02-25 07:51 PM | Reply

Hillary got more votes than Trump, so it looks close-ish. But because of the Electoral College, we are further away than it seems.

I agree we are not ready. But I remember believing America will never have a Black President.

#79 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-25 07:56 PM | Reply

#79 | Posted by snoofy

Yes but she got more votes than Trump and it was that close after the FBI director came out and said she was still part of an active investigation. I wont discount the affect that had on the voters, how many decided to stay home?

#80 | Posted by justagirl_idaho at 2026-02-25 07:58 PM | Reply

Cause trump is so much better.

Trump isn't better. No one is slightly suggesting that.

My point was Harris was set up to fail.

All other potential factors aside.

She was given 4 months to campaign against Trump.

Right after Biden froze on stage in front of America.

After a difficult 4 years by the Biden administration.

Biden should have faced the consequences of his decision to run for reelection.

#81 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 08:04 PM | Reply

Harris lost for a lot of reasons, but one of them is that she was definitely not ready for prime time.

Which is a sad statement given she was VP for four years.

That was her time to make a name for herself and earn the on deck status she had been handed.

But she didn't.

So when it came time for her to be installed in Biden's place, she was the same last place primary candidate she was four years prior.

#82 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 08:15 PM | Reply

Americans are desperate for representation and feel like they're not getting it from either party.

#61 | Posted by ClownShack

Yet we still don't see widespread voting for progressives...

#83 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-25 08:16 PM | Reply

Yet we still don't see widespread voting for progressives...

Progressives who survive the DNC do quite well with American voters.

#84 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 08:33 PM | Reply

Now we have 3 more years of "prime time".

#85 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-02-25 08:37 PM | Reply

You realize Mamdani's biggest challenge didn't come from republicans who did nothing but smear him, it came from democrats who ran two candidates against him and spent millions to sink him.

They would have been happier with a Republican mayor rather than a progressive socialist democrat who is showing the country what a mayor should be doing for their city.

#86 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-25 08:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" it was that close after the FBI director came out and said she was still part of an active investigation."

While not mentioning the Republican nominee was ALSO under investigation.

Can anyone say thumb on the scale?!?

#87 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-25 09:31 PM | Reply

Remember when Comey was on wait wait, don't tell me?

The coverup is in fact bipartisan.

#88 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-25 10:11 PM | Reply

Can anyone say thumb on the scale?!?

There is no question Comey cost Hillary the election.

#89 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-02-25 10:55 PM | Reply

Progressives who survive the DNC do quite well with American voters.

#84 | Posted by ClownShack

All 3 of them?

It's funny how you think it's just the DNC and not primary voters...

#90 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-26 12:06 AM | Reply

One AI snapshot:

"In the 2025 US elections, socialist, and communist candidates made significant gains, especially at the local level. The Communist Party saw a notable increase in elected officials, doubling the number of open Communist Party members ever elected in the US after a long hiatus of about 40 years. Additionally, over 100 democratic socialists were elected across various municipal and state positions, reflecting a growing influence of democratic socialism within the political landscape.

Prominent figures such as Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist mayor, gained attention for reforming the Democratic Party from within, distinguishing democratic socialism from communism in public discourse. This trend indicates a surge in progressive and left-wing candidates winning elections, though the numbers are more concentrated in local and state offices rather than federal positions.

Overall, the 2025 election cycle marked a resurgence of socialist and communist representation, with the Communist Party and democratic socialists making historic gains in elected offices."

Democratic Socialists of America:


#91 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-26 12:39 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort