Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Jenny O'Connell-Nowain was ready to go to jail. She had been prepared to spend six months in the custody of the Shasta county sheriff's office. One of the top prosecutors in this part of far northern California had presented the evidence against her in a weeklong trial, and a jury had delivered a guilty verdict. A judge offered probation, but O'Connell-Nowain did not agree to the terms. Her crime? Sitting on the floor in front of the dais of the board of supervisors with a sign, silently protesting an official who had criticized the county elections office. The case of a former preschool teacher with no criminal history tried and convicted for a peaceful demonstration was shocking even for Shasta county, which has drawn international attention for its rowdy and radical brand of conservative politics.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Easy money.

#1 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-03-10 01:56 PM | Reply

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-10 03:36 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

I get their position. The pursuit of charges seems like persecution in this case. I mean seriously - 6 months in jail is mind blowing. Punishment did not fit the crime at all.

#3 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2026-03-10 05:43 PM | Reply

. I mean seriously - 6 months in jail is mind blowing.
- galaxy

Thought it was house arrest?

Seems reasonable if J6 is to be used as an argument, she was obstructing a governmental proceeding.

I think if she stood back where citizens are, or protested out side it would be fine.

But sitting up there is intimidating for people to speak there peace at a council meeting.

#4 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-10 06:24 PM | Reply

Fuck off idiot. Nobody cares what you think

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-10 07:47 PM | Reply

" Seems reasonable if J6 is to be used as an argument, she was obstructing a governmental proceeding."

Seems reasonable?!?

Seems ludicrous.

Stupid, really.

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-10 10:03 PM | Reply

Seems reasonable?!?

He means he thinks she should be pardoned.

#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-03-10 10:12 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort