Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, July 11, 2026

The 21st Century Road to Housing Act, a bipartisan bill that aims to tackle housing affordability, officially became law early Saturday, despite a series of attempts by President Donald Trump to stall the legislation. Its passage signals that lawmakers recognize the frustration many Americans feel about the high cost of housing. At a time of elevated mortgage rates and near-record high home prices, many feel locked out of homeownership or struggle with monthly rent payments.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

... The 21st Century Road to Housing Act, a bipartisan bill that aims to tackle housing affordability, officially became law early Saturday, despite a series of attempts by President Donald Trump to stall the legislation. ...

Why in the world would Pres Trump be so against a bi-partisan bill that helps working Americans?

How has his billionaire-Cabinet been advising him on this topic?

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-07-11 01:53 AM | Reply

Why in the world would Pres Trump be so against a bi-partisan bill that helps working Americans?

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-07-11 01:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

If you actually read the article, you would know the answer to your own question.

"In a social media post on Friday, Trump said he refused to sign the bill in protest of the Senate's failure to pass the SAVE America Act, a voter ID measure he has argued should be Congress' top priority."

#2 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-11 10:25 AM | Reply

Trump has also claimed on numerous occasions that he would prefer to see housing prices go up. After all, he and his billionaire buddies, many of whom are heavily invested in real estate, and lower prices will not help them continue to make obscene amounts of money.

OCU

#3 | Posted by OCUser at 2026-07-11 04:59 PM | Reply

Why in the world would Pres Trump be so against a bi-partisan bill that helps working Americans?

He hates Americans.

Especially after losing two popular votes and only winning in 2024 because Elon Musk helped him

#4 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-07-11 05:13 PM | Reply

"In a social media post on Friday, Trump said he refused to sign the bill in protest of the Senate's failure to pass the SAVE America Act, a voter ID measure he has argued should be Congress' top priority." disenfranchise voters
#2 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTURDS

Yea.

We know.

#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-07-11 05:15 PM | Reply

Why in the world would Pres Trump be so against a bi-partisan bill that helps working Americans?

Maybe because its just a puff piece of legislation, much like Trump.

FTA: "The legislation can play an important role in encouraging states and localities to make changes to expand housing supply, but it doesn't require them to make those changes," Freemark said. "Congress has chosen not to preempt local and state governments and tell them what to do,"

I have said this multiple times, clearly people aren't able to read, but if you can read "Why Nothing Works"
www.amazon.com

I find it funny a Canadian posting problems with US housing supply when Canadian supply is in a crisis. See when I post about CALI problems, no other State has the issue CA does. But not ReDial, where he lives is in shambles so he has to complain about the US. Denial isn't just a river.

Here's why Canada's housing supply crisis is far worse than the US
www.mpamag.com

#6 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-11 05:16 PM | Reply

"Congress has chosen not to preempt local and state governments and tell them what to do,"

Probably because it would be unconstitutional. The feds can provide guidelines, standards, funding and assistance in implementing any new policies, but they must still be run by the states.

OCU

#7 | Posted by OCUser at 2026-07-11 05:39 PM | Reply

Now Washington can make some changes at the federal level but it would mostly be in terms of rules for banks and mortgages.

OCU

#8 | Posted by OCUser at 2026-07-11 05:42 PM | Reply

Hey! Looks like we don't need the fat bald child-raping fraud after all!

#9 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-11 07:32 PM | Reply

#6

I find it funny a complete fraud sock puppet still thinks anyone gives a fuck about anything she says.

#10 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-11 07:33 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort