More from the article ...

... That's the conclusion many former government officials and legal scholars are reaching. They point not only to Trump's anti-ICC campaign but also his administration's broader efforts to defund, abandon or otherwise damage a range of global mechanisms that enforce human rights laws, from treaties to United Nations organizations.

Those moves come as the Trump administration is accused of a series of abuses, from killing Iranian schoolchildren to deporting asylum-seekers. At the same time, Trump is going to great lengths to protect his backers from domestic justice, including through his extensive use of pardons.

"They're doing everything they can to evade accountability as they attack the very institutions and advocates charged with holding rights abusers to account," said Uzra Zeya, a former Biden administration official who is now president of Human Rights First.

Spokespeople for the White House and the State Department deny such assertions. In statements to me, they reiterated complaints that the ICC threatens U.S. sovereignty and cast their campaign against it as squarely within Trump's America First agenda. ...

@#3 ... 24 years the US has not accepted the ICC. ...

That's correct.

But then there are countries that do accept the ICC and its decisions.

And, if the ICC finds against a fmr Pres Trump, he would do well to avoid those countries.

@#9 ... There is NO living president who isn't guilty of war crimes ...

Guilty in public opinion, or convicted of war crimes by the ICC?

There's a significant difference.