Again, this is all really simple, ----------.
Don't declare yourself morally superior as a qualification for office and you won't have so far to fall.
Not sure why you're expending so much energy arguing against such an obvious truism.

Wrong tab...

Is this where visitor is pretending to care about child abuse and sex trafficking?

Again, this is all really simple, ----------.

Don't declare yourself morally superior as a qualification for office and you won't have so far to fall.

Not sure why you're expending so much energy arguing against such an obvious truism.

You believe they all deserve some extra scrutiny because YOU declared it so.

I stated my opinion that I don't give benefit of the doubt anymore because of the high frequency whereby loud and proud "chreestians" turn out to be complete s*&^bags.

Sorry, that stings a bit. Are you getting that nagging feeling that you fall into that category? You steppin' out with the farmer's wives after you sell them insurance?

"the people". Incorrect. You declared they're all that way. All of them. They're all rapists, infidels, etc.

Oh, you're so close yet so far...

Yes, ----------. It's their insistence on their own morality and virtue that is the flag that they're full of s*&^.

Jesus do you kids have to walk you by the hand through updating your phone and s*&^ too, grandpa?

That's poli sci 101 stuff.
Minimum Differentiation, Hotelling (1929)
Median Voter Theorm, Black (1948)

#101 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Yet this is a constant stumbling block for Dems.

I was repeating what was said in media articles by prominent Dems following the wins.

No, we have a spending problem, always have. And a big part of it are NGOs when the funding gets approved but doesn't get to the actual need. Democrats steal it.

#3 | Posted by fishpaw

This stupid f*&^ will mime this BS line until his dying days.

Guess what, s*&^bag, we do have a spending problem, but we also have an income problem. There are always input and output parts of the equation no matter how hard you cling to your talking points.

Colbert and Talarico are the ones engaged in propaganda.

#124 | Posted by BellRinger

Good ol' Gutes Deutsch never ceases to disappoint.

Against censorship and "Pravda" right up until it's the righties doing it. Then it's the evil Dems who are actually the propagandists!

What a f*&^ing stooge.

IOW, they are exactly the same as you.

There's your sticking point, sport.

Incorrect.

If I were to run for office, I wouldn't remotely address me being special or righteous or moral or look at me I'm a Chreestian nonsense. Not that I'd be caught having an affair with a staffer who then goes to light herself on fire, but I wouldn't set myself up for that kind of fall by not putting myself up on a pedestal to begin with.

The people who do that are people who have stuff to hide or try to explain away.

It all goes back to my hypothesis that hypocrisy doesn't matter to "chreestians" because they're not going through the act for outsiders. It's entirely to convince themselves they're good, decent people and to justify or rationalize ignoring their own indiscretions and poor behavior.

Let's just stick to our roles here. You stick to being a drama queen and I'll stick to laughing at it.

Poor ----------. Has to tie logical pretzels to squeeze a little qu*&f of a thought into the thread.

That wasn't the question, idiot.

If people are supposed to just leave if they think things are so bad, why are you still here through all the caterwauling from 2020 through 2024 as it being the worst years of US history evuh!?!?!

N.Y. is a circus; no wonder they elected a Clown.

#2 | Posted by fortfisher

You should be grateful.

That circus probably provides a significant amount of tax dollars for your s*&^hole to mooch off of.

Republicans are such pathetically spineless sacks of s*&^.

I figured. I wanted to know if I could sleep on it.

Or it's theater to justify coming changes to capitol accessibility or transparency.

This is so comically bad that I can't view this as anything but an unserious attempt at...I don't even know what because it's so comically bad.

The extra shells on the side saddle appear to be low brass shells, meaning they're bird shot. Hunting or target practice rounds.

Nothing that is going to do serious damage to anybody wearing any level of protection.

And given the readily available nature of ARs and 5.56 ammo, why would someone just run at the capital carrying an entry level pump shotgun?

The only way this is a serious attempt at something is it's a probe. Inducing a response for the response to be studied.

I'm sure someone in Cuba will let you sleep on their dirt floor really cheap. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

#75 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Serious question - if Biden was so bad, why didn't you take your own advice during his administration?