Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

#24 "We are discussing why the dems lost in 2024."

Ya think?

Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response

By Bill Barrow and Marc Levy

NOV. 14, 2024

-----

ATLANTA (AP) " After losing the White House and both houses of Congress, Democrats are grappling with how to handle transgender politics and policy following a campaign that featured withering and often misleading GOP attacks on the issue.

There is plenty of second-guessing after President-elect Donald Trump anchored his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris with sweeping promises on the economy and immigration. But Democrats also will not soon forget the punchline in anti-transgender Trump ads that became ubiquitous by Election Day: "Kamala is for they/them; President Trump is for you."

#24 "We are discussing why the dems lost in 2024."

Ya think?

Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates


click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad

And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?

Zero dollars

The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.

Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

Either way, mission accomplished.

Since the OP loves AI, I asked it to analyze the article. Here's what it said:

Analyzing the Daily Kos article reveals several critical flaws in its reasoning, logical structure, and interpretation of scientific data:

1. Hasty Generalization
The author applies a specific statistical finding to an entire demographic group.
Broad brush: The headline claims "White Americans" oppose programs out of spite.
Lack of nuance: It ignores vast political, regional, and socioeconomic differences among white individuals.

2. Confirmation Bias
The author openly admits to looking for data that validates a pre-existing belief.
Prejudged outcome: This mindset often leads to cherry-picking data.
Uncritical acceptance: The author accepts the conclusion without questioning the underlying data.

3. Relying on Secondary Sources
The author did not review the original scientific study directly.
Filtered information: The author relies on an article from Alternet describing the study.
Compounded bias: This introduces multiple layers of potential media distortion or oversimplification.

4. Oversimplification of Complex Issues
The article attributes opposition to social safety nets entirely to racial resentment.
Ignored factors: It dismisses legitimate ideological debates on fiscal conservatism.
Omitted views: It leaves out debates over government efficiency, taxation, and individual responsibility.

5. Hyperbolic and Inflammatory Language
The argument uses extreme, emotionally charged rhetoric to describe political opponents.
Extreme labels: It conflates general safety net opposition with "White Nationalist" hatred.
Sensationalized claims: It asserts that a third of Americans "would rather be poor and homeless" to spite others.

Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates


click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad

And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?

Zero dollars

The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.

Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

Either way, mission accomplished.

Trump Effect: American Manufacturing Is Roaring Back as Factory Activity Hits Four-Year High (April 2026)
www.whitehouse.gov

... Under President Donald J. Trump's strong leadership, American manufacturing is surging. After years of career politicians selling out American workers for cheap foreign labor, the American manufacturing comeback is gaining speed in every part of the country. ...


The WHO has been criticized by SoS (et al) Rubio.

After a critique from Rubio, WHO defends work on Ebola response
www.statnews.com

... Countries have the responsibility to detect outbreaks, agency officials noted

World Health Organization officials on Wednesday mounted a defense of their response to the new and worrisome Ebola outbreak centered in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the agency was "a little late" in identifying infections.

WHO authorities stressed that their role is to offer technical and operational help to national health agencies, which have primary responsibility for detecting the spread of diseases under international rules.

"We don't replace the country's work," Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO's director-general, said at a press briefing. "We only support them."

Tedros said Rubio's remarks "could be from lack of understanding of how IHR works, and the responsibilities of WHO and other entities," referring to the International Health Regulations, which set out countries' obligations during health emergencies. ...


'I'm not greedy': January 6 rioters and Trump allies eye $1.8 billion 'weaponization' fund
www.reuters.com

... Since President Donald Trump's administration announced the creation of a $1.776 billion fund for Americans deemed to be victims of political "weaponization," January 6 Capitol riot defendants and other Trump allies have scrambled to figure out how to get their share.

Enrique Tarrio, the Proud Boys leader sentenced to 22 years for seditious conspiracy over the January 6, 2021 riot, said he planned to apply to the fund, assuming he could get between $2 and $5 million.

"I'm not greedy," Tarrio said. "But my life was all f!cked up because of this."

Trump pardoned more than 1,500 January 6 defendants last year. Some have now begun to calculate the cost of their prosecution, jail time and businesses lost in the hope of compensation for what they regard as abuses by the Justice Department under former President Joe Biden. ...

emphasis mine]


The Zulu warriors handed Colonel Mustard and his horde of white colonists a terrible loss in 1879.

For the British, this was their Battle of Little Bighorn (June 1876), lost by brevet General Custer.


The Palestinian raid against Israel (7 Oct 2023) or Ukraine's spectacular Operation Spiderweb (June 2025), which crippled Russia's strategic bomber fleet, are other examples of the underdog fighting back against a superior invader.

Some argue that 9/11 was a counter-attack to American imperialism and Wall Street hegemony.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy