"Who do you think is right, you or Exxon in 1982?"

^
You couldn't answer because you're afraid to.

And no Democrat had both houses and the Executive branch since? STFU loser... go back on sabbatical. maybe hit the sweat lodge for a week or two.
#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And Democrats rolled out a lot of green energy policies.
And then your boy Trump has been actively cancelling them.
Killing projects already approved and already poured billions of dollars into them.

What's up with that?
Why is alternative energy bad, do you think windmills cause cancer too, like Trump says?

Obama was the biggest friend oil companies as they started fracking operations.
#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Until Trump.

Did Obama do anything that was likewise friendly to alternative energy sources that aren't fossil fuel based?
Did Trump?

"Never heard the term cinnamon ring"

He wants to spend the rest of his life
He could be happy the rest of his life
With a cinnamon ring
--LftHndThrds Young

Imagine how convoluted your "morals" must be when you're saying OJ didn't murder Nicole, all just to protect Trump.

"Is the world supposed to blind to the fact OJ is a black man?"

No more that the world supposed to be blind to the fact that OJ murdered Nicole and Ron.
You, by your own choice, have chosed to embrace that blindness.

It's largely because you're just not very smart.
Which is why your mental defensive postures are usually pretty easy to overcome.

The only defense which really serves you any more is when you flee the DR.

-You brought race into this discussion
Where?
#56 | Posted by lfthndthrds

black man
#53 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And no democrat did anything!?!?
#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Reagan was President at the time.
Al Gore's movie came later.
You didn't believe Al Gore, even though Exxon did in 1982.
Who do you think is right, you or Exxon in 1982?

"He knew the risks when he signed up."
--President Donald J. TRUMP

and apparently racist
#53 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You brought race into this discussion, because you're looking for anything to distract from the 28 sexual misconduct allegations that Trump settled out of court.

If Trump isn't guilty, why did he settle out of court? That's the type of question you think is a real "gotcha." So what's your answer?

Their governor you tried to pencil in also pardons child rapists
#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Yeah and Trump deported him anyway. I'm curious how you think Walz's pardon actually harmed anyone.

Would you like to talk about your feelings?
It's a personal thing, because you were raped as a child, right?

Am I doing this right?
#49 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Are you?
"OJ didn't kill Nicole" is you doing it right.
And you actually believe it, too.
You pick and choose facts like Trump and Epstein picking fourteen year old girls.

Ok we can go with assaulted. But she wasnt raped
#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Oh I see. What an important distinction!
Does that make it okay for you to receive financial benefits from a man who sexually assaulted a woman, and lied about it so badly he was found guilty of defamation?

That's okay, but if she had been under 18, that would have crossed a lie for you?
Nobody believes that. You especially don't believe that.
There's nothing Trump could do to lose your love.

Rape is criminal. She was adamant that she wasn't raped.
#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You said a minute ago that a jury verdict construes proof. Now you're saying it doesn't.
The jury must not have believed her, since they agreed with her that Trump defamed her when he lied about sexually assaulting her.
Now you disagree with the jury.

You're desperate and flailing, and the reason you don't notice it, is because desperate and flailing is how you go through life.

Trump pardoned child rapists when he pardoned the J6 rioters.
LMAO
No he didn't.
#41 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Meanwhile, back in reality:

Even Carroll was very clear that he didn't rape her. She wanted a civil trial.

#37 | Posted by lfthndthrds

LOL!!!
Defamation is a civil tort.

The civil trial is merely a reflection of the fact that Trump's freedom of speech to lie about not raping her does not constitute a criminal act.

Trump did rape E. Jean Carroll, right?
#33 | Posted by snoofy

Not according to the jury.
#35 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I didn't ask the jury.
I asked you.
You're not man enough to answer.
You're not man enough to have your own opinions.

"You idiots voted for Walz - a guy who pardons child rapists"

Trump pardoned child rapists when he pardoned the J6 rioters.
And you gladly voted for him, in no small part because those pardons were so well-deserved in your mind.

So your "truth" is a verdict. Proof can only happen when a jury says so.

Thus, you absolutely believe OJ didn't kill Nicole!

You're not looking for proof.
You're looking for ways to stay hidden from the truth.

"Can you prove Trump is a Pedo?"

Maybe.
But you probably wouldn't accept as "proof" things you know to be true.

OJ did kill Nicole and Ron Goldman, right?
Trump did rape E. Jean Carroll, right?
Right?

You know those things are true, but they're not proven to be true in your mind, right?

Okay. By that logic, a pedo contributed to you when you got your Trump tax breaks.

"Apparently not too specific. Seems they'd already be filing the lawsuits."

Lawsuits for what?
It's illegal to warm the globe now?

The same liberal terrorists who damaged the reflecting pool are draining the water from Lake Mead to perpetuate the Global Warming hoax.
--Visitor_, probably

Minneapolis, you say.
ICE has been stationed in Minneapolis all year.

ICE didn't fix any of this?
What a surprise!

"That's what I'd do if a pedo contributed to me."

No you wouldn't.
You voted for Pedophile Trump, and you're proud of it.

"Talarico could always break the silence and tell everyone he doesn't want any of their support."

He already did.
You quoted him saying "the Epstein class has no place in Texas."

You know single issue voters?
He's a single genocide voter.

Annoying? Sure.
But it's probably less annoying than getting genocided.

I regularly advise young people to move out of Texas because of this.
#91 | Posted by Zed

Texas is only bad if you want to be a flamboyantly gay man.
But if you want to live the Pinche Life, it's the place to be!

"attempting to kill an HSI agent by ripping off her body armor, slamming her head into the ground, and choking her. "

^
Trump pardoned the people who did that on J6.

But... it's not a colony!

In what way has Trump punished "men attracted to men?"
#90 | Posted by BillJohnson

Trump has repealed over 78 Biden-era executive orders protecting racial equity and prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation, while banning the use of federal funds to promote "gender ideology."
Schools face threats of withheld federal funding for LGBTQ-inclusive education
--AI Summary

"MAGA doesn't like queers, to be blunt."

They don't like openly gay men like Barney Frank.

Republicans are tolerant of gays, so long as they stay closeted and Know Their Place
Republicans want their gays like BillJohnson, masquerading through life, with his Beard by his side, condemning men who are openly gay.

Exhibit A: Lindsay Graham

You don't think that millions of acres forest burning could possibly offset some of the CO2 reduction made so far?
#26 | Posted by visitor_

Why would we be doing CO2 reduction if global warming is a hoax?

The numbers are public if you're willing to look. I won't bother post a link that you won't use anyway. You don't want to learn inconvenient facts.
#24 | Posted by visitor_

You're not a good liar.
You are so dumb, you don't even know you're lying.
You're one of those morons who says volcanoes emit more CO2 than cars.

Is there any data that demonstrates soldiers with lower levels are at greater risk or put others at greater risk? At risk for death or injury?
#5 | Posted by eberly

^
What a pathetic question.
Begging for data to validate how stupid and bigoted Republicans are.