Kamala Harris Agrees to Interview with Fox News

Monday, October 14, 2024

Kamala Harris will do a sit-down interview with the rightwing broadcaster Fox News on Wednesday, the news channel announced on Monday, in the most dramatic moment yet in a recent media blitz by the Democratic presidential nominee.

Posted by Corky at 09:14 PM | 105 COMMENTS | permalink

Comments

Bolding going where Trump is afraid to follow, lmao!

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-14 05:07 PM

Boldly... who's editing this?

@#1 ... where Trump is afraid to follow, lmao! ...

Yeah.

Fmr Pres Trump has shown himself to be all bravado in his words, but quite the coward in his actions.

I remember a supporter of fmr Pres Trump on this most august site once telling me, don't listen to fmr Pres Trump's words, watch his actions.

During this campaign season, fmr Pres Trump's actions seem to be more of a coward, not a leader.

He seems to be relying upon his vacuous words, rather than actions.

It IS a bold move for Harris.

A battle of the wits.

FOX will triple their viewers with this one.

Polling and the betting markets over the last couple of weeks have swung towards Trump. Harris campaign must be noticing and has decided to do this. Don't think they were interested when they were ahead.

She performed poorly on the friendliest platforms.

Baier will probably be fair but he will also probably ask her challenging questions and will likely push back on non-answers and ask follow ups to evasive answers.

@#6 ... She performed poorly on the friendliest platforms. ....

How so?

@#6 ... She performed poorly on the friendliest platforms. ....

How so?

#7 | Posted by LampLighter

Jeff only thinks it is a good appearance if you crap yourself or one of your supporters attempts to kill you.

Seems kinda desperate.

@#6 ... She performed poorly on the friendliest platforms. ....
How so?
#7 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

She's sliding in the polls after the friendlies

Also she's doing this interview, that's how you can tell. None of her support dudes (Obama, Clinton, Walz) were of any use, downright disappointing.

Don't think they were interested when they were ahead.

#5 | POSTED BY ROSEMOUNTBOMBER

Seems reasonable. But not sure how it helps her. Needs to get the middle ground, not the rabid righties that watch Fox.

It's not about trying to persaude the rabid righties who watch Fox. It's about showing that she isn't afraid to do an interview with Baier on Fox in contrast to Trump who won't even do a debate with Baier moderating it. Part of her closing argument is that Trump's team dosn't want him to debate or do ian nterview on 60 Minutes because he is too weak and unstable.

@#9 ... She's sliding in the polls after the friendlies ...

I've noted that in my comment.

But I do note your current alias' reply avoids the question I asked of your alter-alias.

Kamala Harris taunted Donald Trump at a rally in Greenville, North Carolina, on Sunday, calling him out for not releasing recent medical records, declining a 60 Minutes interview and rejecting a second presidential debate.

"It makes you wonder--why does his staff want him to hide away?" Harris said. "One must question--are they afraid that people will see that he is too weak and unstable to lead America? Is that what's going on?"

The new line of attack from Harris comes as she recently released her own personal medical records, sat for her own "60 Minutes" interview last week and accepted a CNN town hall, after Trump refused to participate in a second presidential debate with the vice president. In North Carolina, Harris accused Trump of "not being transparent" with voters, especially for not releasing more up-to-date medical information, which "every other presidential candidate in the modern era has done," she said.

www.politico.com

Internal polls are collapsing and she has no choice. Shockingly, Obama trying to shame black men into voting for the half Irish/half Indian woman raised in Canada didn't work as intended.

Fox News really doesn't have any credibility on the right any longer though. They are basically a centrist channel at this point.

If Fox has any integrity, they will play the video of the VA governor advocating for post birth abortion and the Ohio 911 call on the immigrants killing geese and ask for her to admit both stories were true. At the very least, they can ask her about her husband knocking up the nanny and knocking around his date as just revealed. They could also ask her when she realized that Joe Biden was so mentally impaired he needed to drop out of the race.

However, something tells me none of this will come up.

"The new line of attack from Harris comes as she ... realizes that her poll numbers are tanking and even trotting out the gay Kenyan to shame black men is not working"
#13 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

There, fixed it for you.

#11 Gal Tuesday,

You are cherry picking. Trump has done 2 interviews with Time, lasting about 90 minutes laying out his policy agenda. He had a 90 minute presser. He has gone on other outlets including Fox. Prior to this the closest thing Harris has done was her one 60 Minutes interview. Whitaker acted like a real journalist which was very refreshing. But instead of letting that stand CBS violated their own standards and considerably edited her answer about Israel to make her seem less incoherent.

And don't even get me started on Vance vs Walz.

"It makes you wonder--why does his staff want him to hide away?" Harris said.

"One must question--are they afraid that people will see that he is too weak and unstable to lead America? Is that what's going on?"

There's Kamy being weak, just for Jeffy and 1Nut, the Friends of Traitor Trump Co-Chairs.

"He had a 90 minute presser."

You call that a presser? Please.

"He has gone on other outlets including Fox."

Yeah, but only with the non-journalists. He nixed doing a debate with Baier and MacCallum.

"He had a 90 minute presser."
#18 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

Kamala would never do 90 minutes. You have to either pay for 2 hours or the overnight rate.

It's not a real Presser unless he fills his diapers loudly.

Between that and the constant Lies and Hate Speech, most of his rally 'crowds' have left long before it's over.

"But instead of letting that stand CBS violated their own standards and considerably edited her answer about Israel to make her seem less incoherent."

If you are outraged by that, this will certainly make you mad:

It Seems Fox News Edited Trump Interview to Help Him Sound Normal

A new Fox interview with Donald Trump has some obvious edit cuts.

newrepublic.com

Fox edits out Trump's criticism of one of their reporters

x.com

"He nixed doing a debate with Baier and MacCallum.
#19 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

Kamala had her chance to show up to a debate on Fox vs. Trump in September but her braindead handlers thought it would not be needed. So, we are where we are now.

NO ONE needs Trump to define himself. We have hours of tape of him explaining his policies and 4 years of prior experience of him doing it.

For Kamala, she needs the time to explain how the last 4 years are not her fault and what she will be doing different. Unfortunately for her, she has been completely unable to explain what she would do different than what the failed Biden/Harris administration did for the last 4 years and just used her time to explain how that was on Joe and not her.

@#18 ... You call that a presser? Please. ...

OK, the MAGA crowd had been most critical of VP Harris for not going out and doing interviews with the press.

Now that she seems to be doing exactly what the MAGA cult was so critical of, what else they got?

More criticism that she is doing an interview with lying (to the tune of $700+ million dollars) Fox News?

I mean, really.

Fox has a long history of helpfully editing Trump's remarks:

The Lincoln Project
@ProjectLincoln

Mar 9, 2023
Fox News has selectively edited Trump's interviews so he doesn't sound like he's siding with Putin to give away Ukraine. They're Trump's MAGA propaganda machine, even when that means concealing what he's actually saying.
x.com

In conclusion:

You knew it was out there, didn't you?

Fox News edited their Townhall with Donald Trump in June to make him sound normal.

In fact, the edits were so stark that @Acyn, @atrupar, and @BadFoxGraphics commented on them here on twitter.

But a Harris interview edit for time, while the full interview is posted online, has upset MAGA.

Cult.

x.com

#23

Who writes your material... Steven Bannon or Roger Stone?

Alex Jones, you say? Figures.

I have to admit though, finding that Trump speaks at a 4th Grade Level shows both improvement on his part, and explains his Base's utter stupidity.

"OK, the MAGA crowd had been most critical of VP Harris for not going out and doing interviews with the press.
Now that she seems to be doing exactly what the MAGA cult was so critical of, what else they got?
#24 | Posted by LampLighter"

NO ONE is criticizing her for doing an interview on Fox News. I think most of MAGA is happy she is doing it as the odds of her doing/saying something campaign ending is greater than zero and it will change precisely zero % of the vote barring the career ending slip-up.

@#16 ... But instead of letting that stand CBS violated their own standards and considerably edited her answer about Israel to make her seem less incoherent. ...

How, exactly did CBS violate their own standards?

Yer up ...

Trump's complaints about '60 Minutes' put a spotlight on editing at the nation's top newsmagazine
apnews.com

... Donald Trump skipped a "60 Minutes" interview this past week, but he's attacking CBS for how it handled its session with opponent Kamala Harris, calling it a "giant fake news scam" and suggesting the network was out to protect her.

Portions of the Harris interview ran Monday on the newsmagazine and on the Sunday morning political show "Face the Nation." On two occasions, it depicted Harris giving different answers to questions posed by correspondent Bill Whitaker on the Biden administration's efforts to stop the war in the Mideast.

For CBS News, it was considered part of the typical editing and cross-promotion process that takes place for a big interview. Yet to those unfamiliar with journalism and television production, the effect can be jarring.

How did Harris appear to give two answers?

Whitaker interviewed Harris on Saturday afternoon, Oct. 5, in Washington for the special broadcast that aired Monday, two days later. But "60 Minutes" offered a portion of that interview to colleagues at "Face the Nation," both to give the Sunday morning show some fresh news and to "tease" the longer interview.

At one point, Whitaker observed that it appeared Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, did not appear to be listening to the administration's suggestions.

"Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region," the vice president said in response, on the "Face the Nation" clip.

On "60 Minutes," after Whitaker said the same thing, Harris answered: "We're not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end."

After the differences were pointed out online, Trump said on his Truth Social feed that Harris' "REAL ANSWER WAS CRAZY, OR DUMB, so they actually REPLACED it with another answer in order to save her or, at least, to make her look better."

So what did Harris actually say to Whitaker?

Well, both things, according to CBS. Her full answer to the question was the two sentences put together " the first sentence used on "Face the Nation" and the second sentence on "60 Minutes."

CBS said the need to make the "60 Minutes" interview segment concise prompted the editing. The full interview with Harris took 45 minutes, and it was fit into a 20-minute slot on the broadcast. Yet the editing made it appear that the answer shown on "60 Minutes" was the first thing Harris said in response to the question. Having "Face the Nation" show Whitaker asking the question " instead of having someone paraphrase it -- added to the confusion and made CBS vulnerable to criticism. ...

"I have to admit though, finding that Trump speaks at a 4th Grade Level shows both improvement on his part, and explains his Base's utter stupidity.
#28 | Posted by Corky"

And yet, the average income of the GOP voters is higher than that of the Democrats. So much 'education' on the part of the Democrats and such poor economic outcomes. Yes, typically GOP voters are unable to name more than 2 genders unlike their Democrat "educated" peers. But, as Kamala and Dougie proved this week, the GOP do know how to use simple tools like a shovel while the Democrats can't seem to figure it out.

"Well, both things, according to CBS. Her full answer to the question was the two sentences put together " the first sentence used on "Face the Nation" and the second sentence on "60 Minutes."
#30 | Posted by LampLighter"

Wonderful! Then simply release the unedited clip and/or the transcript of the unedited clip.

I take it dead men prefer traitors as Presidents.

From what I read, you and he share a certain... aroma.

And you both lie like dogs:

"Rich and Split: Democrats Edge Out GOP For Affluent Voters

Among upper-income voters (based on an adjusted income of $215,400 or greater for a household of three in 2022), 53% lean Democratic, outpacing 46% of wealthy voters who lean Republican."

www.forbes.com

@#32 ... Wonderful! Then simply release the unedited clip and/or the transcript of the unedited clip. ...

They did.

So, what's yer point?

"Among upper-income voters (based on an adjusted income of $215,400 or greater for a household of three in 2022), 53% lean Democratic, outpacing 46% of wealthy voters who lean Republican."
#33 | Posted by Corky"

Now actually show a link the contradicts what I ACTUALLY SAID which was "the average income of the GOP voters is higher than that of the Democrats". We all know the Dems have the elites at the top controlling their welfare dependent slaves at the bottom. That is why the average Democrat has lower income tan the average GOP voter - because you have way more of the welfare dependent slaves at the bottom.

How does having more money equate with intelligence?

trump and musk inherited their money and theyre idiots.

No they certainly didn't Lamp. Please provide a link directly from CBS proving they did. I remember when Hillary had to go do ole FOX News, this interview isn't by choice ...

"They did.
So, what's yer point?
#34 | Posted by LampLighter"

I didn't see that. Can you link to it? I would like to watch/read it.

"trump and musk inherited their money and theyre idiots.
#36 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Calling Musk an idiot is probably the greatest sign of TDS available - even better than nose rings and pink hair.

Oh my:

Donald Trump abandons town hall Q&A to play James Brown and Pavarotti after two people taken ill

www.dailymail.co.uk

Okay (from above link):

The first casualty was an inconvenience that halted Donald Trump for a minute or two while midflight answering questions about home prices, the border and small business.

By the time the second person collapsed in the heat of the overcrowded exhibition hall, the former president knew he had a problem. A few people at the back of the hall were making for the exits and he knew he needed to pump up the crowd. It was time for plan B.

'Let's not do any more questions,' Trump said to his audience in suburban Philadelphia. 'Let's just listen to music.'

#35

Weasel words, lol. Your Cult Leader is a billionaire who's billionaire friends like Musk, Theil, and Leo Leonard have raped American workers; taking huge deficit spending tax cuts that working people can never pay back for them.

You must be SO proud!

Just as you must be so proud of Dear Leader for being the criminal traitor that, according to dozens of his own Top Aides under Oath, committed criminal acts trying to stay in office.

And the thousand plus people already convicted of following his illegal schemes.

"trump and musk inherited their money and theyre idiots.
#36 | Posted by Alexandrite"
Calling Musk an idiot is probably the greatest sign of TDS available - even better than nose rings and pink hair.
#39 | Posted by deadman

At least you didn't say calling Trump an idiot is probably the greatest sign of TDS available. Even you knew better than to say that. LOL

Musk buys companies actual geniuses worked on. He wasted 44 billion dollars buying twitter and destroyed it. He gets trolled and owned on his own site daily.

the guy is a ------- embarrassment.

If you want to see a sign of TDS here it is:

x.com

"He wasted 44 billion dollars buying twitter and destroyed it. He gets trolled and owned on his own site daily.
the guy is a ------- embarrassment.
#44 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Twitter engagement is at an all time high, meanwhile, traditional news is dying and laying off employees. On top of this, even your own braindead President used TWITTER, not the traditional MSM to announce he was dropping out. If that is your definition of failure, you need to be reset to factory settings. Twitter is the greatest free speech platform in the world today. But, keeping betting against Musk. Never worked in the past but maybe this time you will be right.

@#38 ... I didn't see that....

And whose fault is that?

I provided a link in the comment your current alias replied to

So, if I may ask, what, exactly is the concern being expressed?

"@#38 ... I didn't see that....
I provided a link in the comment your current alias replied to
#47 | Posted by LampLighter"

I clicked your link and did not see either the unedited transcript or unedited video. Maybe it is my version of chrome and blocking links or something. Can you provide the direct link to either?

New Data Shows X Is Losing Users in the US and UK
Published Sept. 23, 2024

Despite Elon Musk's claims that X is reaching new record highs in usage every other month, and that the app remains a critical connector, the latest data shows that Elon's X project is losing user interest, sparked, in many cases, by Musk's own divisive commentary in the app.

According to new insights, X has seen a significant decline in users in both the U.S. and U.K. in recent months, as Musk has continued to double down on his political stances.

www.socialmediatoday.com

" "But instead of letting that stand CBS violated their own standards and considerably edited her answer about Israel to make her seem less incoherent."

If you are outraged by that, this will certainly make you mad:

It Seems Fox News Edited Trump Interview to Help Him Sound Normal

A new Fox interview with Donald Trump has some obvious edit cuts.
newrepublic.com

Fox edits out Trump's criticism of one of their reporters

x.com

#22 | POSTED BY GAL_TUESDAY AT 2024-10-14 10:44 PM | REPLY | FLAG:"

That's every bit is terrible as what 60 Minutes did. No argument from me on that. I'm guessing we are in agreement that both are violating journalistic standards in these instances.

@#48 ... did not see either the unedited transcript or unedited video. ...

... and that surprises you ... why?

Why would (or should) a media organization release unedited video?

Stated differently, what is the real concern of you?

Aside from trying to make a mountain out of an ant hill?

Donald Trump abandons town hall Q&A to play James Brown and Pavarotti after two people taken ill
www.dailymail.co.uk
#40 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

Here's a description from a Fox News correspondent who was at the town hall turned concert that includes a videos of the songs Trump played, everything from Elvis to Streisand. Definitely weird:

Bryan Llenas
@BryanLlenas

Well, this is a very strange Trump Town Hall in Pennsylvania. It turned on a dime after two Trump supporters passed out/fainted/needed medical attention in back to back episodes that paused the Q and A format for a while.

x.com

@#50 ... That's every bit is terrible as what 60 Minutes did. ...

Please detail what, exactly 60 Minutes did, and how your current alias seems to equate that with what Fox did.

Or, is this just another false equivalency of your current alias?

Lamplighter,

Stop with your current alias's nonstop passive- aggressive trolling.

If you are THIS bored and starved for attention watch a movie a read a book or do some ------- thing.

Welp, this is certainly a first:

Republican Voters Against Trump
@AccountableGOP
Trump at his town hall: "Let's not do any more questions. Let's just listen to music. Who the hell wants to hear questions?"

Sarah Longwell
@SarahLongwell25
After multiple people passed out at this Trump Townhall, instead of taking questions, he just played the following songs while standing and swaying on stage:

Ave Maria
Time To Say Goodbye
It's A Man's World
YMCA
Hallelujah
Nothing Compares 2 U
An American Trilogy
Rich Men North of Richmond
November Rain
Memory from Cats

x.com

"#49 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

What is it that makes you liberal incapable to actually responding to the actual argument put forward? Linking to daily users in 2 selected markets to respond to my statement of 'engagement' is not responsive in the least when Twitter is completely transparent in how it measures engagement (hint: actual usage). It is attempting to cherry-pick data as you know you cannot respond to the actual argument in a truthful manner.

This was the same with Corky's totally non-responsive argument on the average income or GOP vs. Dem voters.

It is the same as Lamp still not linking to the unedited transcript or video from 60 minutes.

Why must you always resort to strawman arguments and avoid the actual argument being made? It this genetic? Diet/hormonal related or what?

@#54 ... Stop with your current alias's nonstop passive- aggressive trolling. ... ?

Methinks your current alias is projecting.

Do try harder.

"Why would (or should) a media organization release unedited video?
#51 | Posted by LampLighter"

You told me that they did in your prior link. So, was that an intentional lie or you were just too stupid to not know any better?

"(hint: actual usage)."

And how many of those are actual people? As opposed to bots from Russia, etc?

"Twitter is completely transparent in how it measures engagement"

I'll say the same thing I said to BR earlier. X is completely transparent? Please.

Why must you always resort to strawman arguments and avoid the actual argument being made? It this genetic? Diet/hormonal related or what?
#56 | Posted by deadman

You tell me since you are the one projecting.

"And how many of those are actual people? As opposed to bots from Russia, etc?
#59 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

No answering a question with a question. You are not making your case any stronger with this nonsense.

Why must you always resort to strawman arguments and avoid the actual argument being made? It this genetic? Diet/hormonal related or what?
#56 | Posted by deadman

PS You seem to like asking quesitons well enough. Good for the goose and gander and all that.

@#58 ... You told me that they did in your prior link. So, was that an intentional lie or you were just too stupid to not know any better? ...

Neither.

When I posted that comment, I had read the apnews.com link's explanation of what fmr Pres Trump had objected to.

That explanation made sense to me.

So yeah, I have no links to the unedited interview.

As I have stated many times in the past, thanks for correcting me on that.

" I'll say the same thing I said to BR earlier. X is completely transparent? Please.

#60 | POSTED BY GAL_TUESDAY AT 2024-10-15 12:13 AM | REPLY"

X is not "completely" transparent. Nor has it "completely" lived up to the open speech platform it was promised to become.

Having said that, it is FAR more transparent now than it was under prior ownership and is FAR more open speech than it was under prior ownership. Is it Utopia? Of course not. Have the stated objectives I just mentioned been a noticeable, if not considerable, improvement? Absolutely.

@#65 ... Having said that, it is FAR more transparent now than it was under prior ownership and is FAR more open speech than it was under prior ownership. ...

Yeah, if the goal is to promote hatred and violence, yeah, X is now more transparent.

Please explain why your current alias thinks that is a good thing.

"As I have stated many times in the past, thanks for correcting me on that.
#64 | Posted by LampLighter"

Well, at least you were man enough to admit that just being plain old stupid was the cause of your error. Most liberals just stick to lying or run away from the discussion so I give you credit for that.

"Yeah, if the goal is to promote hatred and violence, yeah, X is now more transparent.
#66 | Posted by LampLighter"

As the liberals have fled Twitter to their own safe spaces, it has become much less violent and less filled with racial slurs. Also, they finally stopped liberals from posting child porn. Now, if Elon can get rid of the liberal onlyfans girls, it will be an almost perfect platform.

@#68 ... As the liberals have fled Twitter to their own safe spaces, ...

I've not seen that.

Please be more specific.

Got links?

No they certainly didn't Lamp. Please provide a link directly from CBS proving they did. I remember when Hillary had to go do ole FOX News, this interview isn't by choice ...

#37 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Strange intrusion, corrected a minute later? Deadman's sounded caprine from the outset.

@#67 ... Well, at least you were man enough to admit ...

As I stated, I admit when I have made an error.

Though, I see nothing "man enough" in such an admission.

It is just me being honest about what I post..

But then I have to ask...

Why is being honest described as being "man enough" by you?

Oh, that raises so many questions.

Great tune that just popped up on a playlist here...

Stevie Wonder - Ngiculela-Es Una Historia-I Am Singing (1976)
www.youtube.com

Lyrics excerpt ...

genius.com

...
Ngiculela ikusasa
Ngiyacula ngo thando
Ngicula ngelinyi langa
Uthando luyobusa
Jikelele kulomhlaba wethu

Es una historia de mañana
Es una historia de amor
Es una historia que amor reinar
Por nuestro mundo
Es una historia de mi corazn

There's songs to make you smile
There's songs to make you sad
But with a happy song to sing
It never seems as bad
To me came this melody
So I've tried to put in words how I feel
Tomorrow will be for you and me

I am singing of tomorrow
I am singing of love
I am singing someday love will reign
Throughout this world of ours
I am singing of love from my heart

Let's all sing someday sweet love will reign
Throughout this world of ours
Let's start singing
Of love from our hearts
Let's start singing
Of love from our hearts
...blockquote>

On topic,

I believe this is a massive mistake doing this interview.

I can only guess that internal polling is worse than what we are seeing.

She has consistently proven to be terrible off the cuff. Further, even on friendly outlets (which comprise all but maybe one of her interviews) she bombed easily anticipated and friendly worded basic questions. " ... ..I was born middle class ... ."

Baier is pretty good at this. She's only been pushed for one flip flop that I recall - her push to ban fracking. Her answer was a non answer. A ton of questions that she has yet to face are out there. An amateur could string them together and press her. Baier is a professional.

I don't see a strategic path where this doesn't go poorly for her.

#73 | Posted by BellRinger

Compare that to a candidate (Trump) who yesterday said he'd even use the military to go after journalists, critics, and Democrats.

Posse Comitatus notwithstanding. Not that Trump actually knows the Constitution or the Posse Comitatus Act that bars using the U.S. military against our own citizens.

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes that limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States.

@#73 ... On topic, ...

Because your current alias' off-topic comments revealed an ignorance?

OK, that aside.

.... I believe this is a massive mistake doing this interview. ...

Time will tell.

... She has consistently proven to be terrible off the cuff. ...

You mean, telling the truth instead of "making up stories?"

Yeah, I do look forward to the interview.

Now, when will fmr Pres Trump agree to do a sit-down with 60-Minutes?

Trump backs out of a '60 Minutes' prime-time interview, CBS says (October 1, 2024)
www.npr.org

... The CBS news program 60 Minutes announced on Tuesday that former President Donald Trump has backed out of an interview he had agreed to do as part of its prime-time election special next week.

"For over half a century, 60 Minutes has invited the Democratic and Republican tickets to appear on our broadcast as Americans head to the polls," the newsmagazine posted on X. "This year, both the Harris and Trump campaigns agreed to sit down with 60 Minutes."

It went on to say that "after initially accepting 60 Minutes' request for an interview" with Scott Pelley, Trump's campaign "has decided not to participate." ...