Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Jim Geraghty: The Chronically Underestimated Kamala Harris

Jim Geraghty - It is almost required in conservative circles to insist that Kamala Harris is stupid. But I do think the caricature of Kamala Harris as a bumbling dunce makes it easy to underestimate her, particularly in the closing weeks of an exceptionally close and high-stakes presidential campaign. Harris's past is littered with older and more experienced men who saw her as easy pickings and came up short on Election Day.

More

Comments

But there's this nagging complication - if Kamala Harris is as stupid as her critics claim, why does she have the Democratic presidential nomination and a roughly 50"50 shot of being the first female president in U.S. history? Do you know how many ruthlessly ambitious Democratic men and women have desperately yearned to get where she is? How many smart, tough, shrewd, often underhanded and cold-blooded pols have tried to claw their way up the greasy pole and fallen short?

And somehow this supposed dunce managed to do it?

The record indicates that whatever Harris's results are on an I.Q. test or other measure of intellect, she is particularly talented by another measuring stick, one that may be even more important in politics: She is exceptionally skilled at getting other people emotionally invested in her success.

Read on to learn how Harris's political career got started, her connection to Clint Eastwood, how she persuaded the wealthiest and most powerful elites of San Francisco to back her when she was a little-known underdog, the BMW she received as a gift, who ended her relationship with Willie Brown, and the speculation that Halle Berry would play her in a movie someday.

This is no puff piece coming from a National Review writer. I'd call it 'damning, with faint praise.' But what it is is a compendium of Harris' storied career - full of the same right wing sneering and dismissal we see everyday, as though the decompensating fry cook, Donald Trump is showing himself to be an intellectual heavyweight (Person, woman, man, camera, TV.' ).

At least Geraghty does present a factual recitation of Harris' rise even while pointing out every perceived misstep or utterance her critics obsess over compared to her presidential opponent, a man who can't even form coherent sentences above the 4th grade level. I guess they both are what they are.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-22 07:42 AM

Cannot open the link.

#2 | Posted by shoeless at 2024-10-22 07:49 AM

#2

Works for me, straight to Mediate. Try Googling.

#3 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-22 07:59 AM

www.nationalreview.com

Works better for me.

#4 | Posted by shoeless at 2024-10-22 08:17 AM

You can't create a thread linked to national review on this blog.

#5 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-22 08:26 AM

I read this article yesterday. It's at best a backhanded compliment. NR doesn't quite say they agree that KH is "stupid" but they don't say she isn't either. NR portrays her as a skilled manipulator and self-promoter who has a knack for getting powerful people on her side. They don't claim she "slept her way to the top," but I think it is implied.

I think that is all b.s. That's actually a more accurate description of Trump.

#6 | Posted by anton at 2024-10-22 10:00 AM

Sorry Tony, did not know that.

#7 | Posted by shoeless at 2024-10-22 10:10 AM

More like chronically underwhelming.

If the GOP had nominated DeSantis, she'd be getting crushed right now. She's only viable because it's Trump again.

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2024-10-22 10:18 AM

I'm not under estimating her. I'm fully expecting her to continue to fail upwards and win this election. She's not dumb, she's quite crafty at manipulating the game to put her into these positions to fail up. She was probably a pretty skilled prosecutor as well. When it comes to governing and policy though that is a skillset that she doesn't seem to think well on on her feet, and it's that inability that causes me to have my negative view of her.

#9 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-22 10:30 AM

"...and it's that inability that causes me to have my negative view of her." -

#9 | Posted by kwrx25

No reason.

Unlike the Kumquat Pol Pot, Kamala Harris, like Obama and Biden, surrounds herself with competent, dedicated public servants who will work with her.

Trump surrounds himself with sycophants.

#10 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-22 10:40 AM

I'm not under estimating her. I'm fully expecting her to continue to fail upwards and win this election.

#9 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-22 10:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Speaking of 'failing upward':

I assume you are aware Trump is a trust fund baby who inherited $413 million from his daddy, who managed to lose it, and whose career was in the tank until a TV network created a gameshow that (somehow) convinced morons he is some sort of "Captain of Industry."

#11 | Posted by anton at 2024-10-22 11:55 AM

#11 Thread isn't about Trump...

I am however in a social club that has elections for officers. The process is that an election committee brings forth a ballot with the officers they are nominating... Pres/VP/Sec/Treas. The club votes yes or no on the ballot as is. If it's a no the committee produces a new ballot completely or partially edited.

I wish this election were the same and we could vote no to both candidates, and the DNC and RNC had to start over with new choices.

#12 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-22 12:02 PM

"I wish this election were the same and we could vote no to both candidates"

You do realize you still have that option? You can always write in "NOTA" if you can't stomach either of them or anyone on the ballot.

#13 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-10-22 12:27 PM

#12

You can vote for anyone you want.
Roadkill Bob is an option, as is Kremlin Jill.
Or you can write in Jesus.

#14 | Posted by anton at 2024-10-22 12:32 PM

In order for a known figure to be chronically underestimated, he/she has to give the appearance, speech, or actions that make people underestimate him/her. So that person only has themself to blame.

"I wish this election were the same and we could vote no to both candidates, and the DNC and RNC had to start over with new choices."

Completely agree. That's been the case for at least the last 20 years, though. W and the ones prior to him while I've been alive at least had the political experience and connections to make things happen. Today the candidates can be anyone because it's not the person people are voting for, it's the party. Trump proved that, many Reps wouldn't vote for an idiot like him if there were a better option. Now Harris is proving the same thing. Biden at least had many years in politics; unfortunately, his lack of doing anything meaningful and then saying how much he can do now (what happened to the previous 40 years?) prevented most Reps from at least seeing him as a viable candidate. They wouldn't have voted for him anyway because votes are for the party now, not for who is best to lead our country.

#15 | Posted by humtake at 2024-10-22 12:33 PM

"I wish this election were the same and we could vote no to both candidates"

You don't get off that easy.

If you don't vote for either candidate then you are voting Trumpy.

If you don't vote then America will get the government it deserves.

#16 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-10-22 12:43 PM

"I wish this election were the same and we could vote no to both candidates"

I wish it was the law that you HAD to vote.

AND I wish that you had to do at least two years of public service.

But if I wish in one hand and take a crap in the other I know which one will fill up first.

#17 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-10-22 12:46 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Central Park 5 Sue Trump for Defamation (76 comments)

U.S. Infant Deaths Rose After Fall of Roe v. Wade (61 comments)

McDonald's Donald Trump Worked at Failed Last Health Inspection (39 comments)

Harris Leads Trump 2-1 Among the Earliest Voters (39 comments)

Trump Talking About Arnold Palmer's Private Parts is Just Weird (38 comments)

Trump's Social Security Plan: 33% Benefits Cuts (28 comments)

McDonald's Distancing itself from Donald Trump (24 comments)

Trump Calls Judge 'evil' for Releasing Files Before Election (24 comments)