Why on god's green earth do people think the courts are going to save us?

This SC gave him full unquestionable immunity.

This SC has stripped women of their rights

This SC has laid the ground work for further stripping of their rights.

This SC has hinted it will allow a gutting of birthright citizenship and naturalization-that is one of the ------- reasons ------- is calling this an emergency. this is why he has spent years claiming an invasion by violent gang members

So, the SC can deny birthright citizenship to "invaders"

And this SC will do that.

FOR ---- SAKE WAKE THE ---- UP. THIS NATION IS AT THE BEGINNING OF MASSIVE CHANGE.

I have good ------- friends who are naturalized citizens and are under threat of being deported or having their citizenship revoked.

---- this magat scum --------

The point of calling this a national emergency is to justify denying birthright citizenship and naturalization to invaders!!!!!!!!!!!

FFS this argument is already being made in lower courts

WAKE THE ---- UP

No you stupid ----, democrats are rightly terrified of what you magat scum have unleashed on us. this is far far more than progressive-conservative. You're just too ------- stupid to realize it.

Your magat scum leader is in the process of destroying our country and establishing a one man rule.

He is gutting the Senate's power, Mike Johnson is an empty suit that will do anything ------- says.

He is putting in grossly horrible people in charge of incredibly vital government operations.

An alleged former military person should be appalled at putting an obvious Russian asset in charge of intelligence. Other countries will not share intelligence, our own intelligence agents will be put in impossible situations-give the head of the DNI intelligence that is guaranteed to go to our adversaries.

But you are either too stupid or to evil to understand the danger.

The SC said he was immune to everything.

The Senate is bowing to him on their most important power

The house is a non-entity under Republican rule

He is building up to destroy core constitutional principles like birthright citizenship and naturalization.

He is claiming impoundment power where he and he alone is in charge of disbursing money allocated by Congress.

He has a grossly conflicted billionaire setting government policy and performing diplomacy

He is putting the SC in a no-win situation, either do what he says or be ignored.

He is going to pardon people who tried to violently overthrow the government and these will be his own private army

You're going to stupidly claim I am being hyperbolic. But you are simply wrong Most of what I point out has already been done-what do you think the whole recess appointments thing is all about-to destroy Senate power. ---- if he disbands congress he may never reinstate it.

You have to be incredibly stupid not to see this for what it is.

That's not our fault. It's our Republic (notice I didnt say Democracy, which we arent).

#26 | Posted by boaz at

You voted for a rapist you ------- ----.

And if you had half a ------- brain you would look at his appointees and see what he intends.

Sycophants and the most vile human beings possible.

LOOK AT WHO AND WHAT THEY ARE TARGETTING-HIS ENEMIES
His commerce secretary's lips are permanently attached to -------- ass-means massive and corrupt tariffs are coming.

Toman and Miller appointments mean the deportation ---- will NOT be a token measure

The business community will NOT stand up to him, he is making his economic policies clear-he dgaf about what it will do he thinks he is the smartest man in the room and tariffs should replace taxation.

His AG shows he is dead set on turning the DoJ into his own personal attack dogs

His HHS is going to cause millions to catch communicable diseases

He is putting Gabbard in to destroy our intelligence agencies.

The DoJ, the intelligence agencies, his political rivals-all targeted

He is going to destroy education.

And the worst is yet to come with the 2nd and 3rd tier appointments where the REALLY bad people will be appointed

You voted for a rapist you ------- ----.

Trump hasnt raped anyone you ------- bitch. You need to stop saying that lie.

#30 | Posted by boaz

The question that this brings up.

Are you stupid or evil?

No need to trust me.

Are you man enough to admit your error or defend your position.

BTW, as an aside, please explain why I NEED to stop saying that.

Bitch ass ---- runs away

Morons think the criminal to good guy ratio for immigrants is like 90-1 when in reality it is like 1-1,000,000

but magat scum are moronic

uck you cuck..

So I was proven right. So YOU need to SHUT THE ---- UP calling Trump a rapist, because he is not. But you lie anyway, you are a progressive and that's all you have.

Bitch.

#39 | Posted by boaz a

Kiss my ass magat scum

The ------- judge in the case said it was rape

You're a ------- rapist apologist you scumbag

LOLLLL

OF ---- that is too ------- funny

boaz, dear little ----, are you threatening me?

You know more than the judge

You're a ------- piece of ----. the worst of the worst.

You are a rapist apologist

The man was found to have forcibly inserted his fingers into a woman's vagina

You support him

This was and is rape

You support him

The woman also claimed he stuck is penis inside her

You support him

You're scum boaz, the worst of the worst

And the ---- is coming for you.

How do you feel about losing your VA healthcare? That make you feel good about supporting a rapist.

When you lose it I will point and laugh at you, you filth, you magat scum

May you get everything you voted for and choke on the ashes of your misery.

May you find yourself wandering the halls of a hospital begging for a doctor to help a loved one-I will point and laugh

I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. I would point and laugh at you you bucket of ----

I will never forgive nor will I ever forget you vile ----

"You want it, I'm going to give it to you. ---- you. You lost. I'm happy you did. ---- you."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

All I have to do is sit and wait you bag of ----.

----ler is in the process of destroying this country. And it you that will hurt.

You think federalism and state's rights are going to save you? ------- too ------- funny

Boaz, here is a little secret you may not understand. The literal instant that the 2nd Amendment threatens ----ler's power he will come for your guns. And you will give them up, freely.

----ler does not care about you. He is setting up one man rule. He is dismantling the government. He has already perverted the courts, he has shown that the CJS can't stop him, he has defanged the House and is one step away from doing the same to the Senate. Who will stand in opposition to him then? the DoJ HA! the Military? He is going to court martial anyone not sufficiently cowed. What other powers are there? the press? HA he is targeting them-MSNBC for ---- sake bent the knee, business interests? HA they already cowed. You should consider (if you weren't a moron) what his choice for Treasury Secretary says about his plans-he don't give a ---- about Wall street-he will implement his insane tariffs. And no one will stop him. Who else is there to stop him? MAYBE, just POSSIBLY some blue state governors. But that will be a minimal and narrow victory

Congrats you now Live in the United States of Trump.

We tried to warn you. I am trying to warn you now.

YOU DIDN'T WIN. ----ler did and he has little interest in you

You're so far behind you think you're winning.

The SC said he was immune to everything.
- truth hurts

No they didn't. The SC said that a President is immune from prosecution when exercising the 'core powers' of the presidency.

#44 | Posted by oneironaut

Do me a favor and define "core powers" of the presidency, I'll wait.

While you're at that, I want you to explain to the class what you think ------- would claim as his core powers.

After THAT, I want you to explain WHO will decide what a "core power" of the presidency is.

While you're at it, define "outer limits" of his powers, I'll wait.

ALSO, I'd ask you to consider how one can investigate, let alone, prosecute a president, when you can't use his actions as evidence against him.

Then come back and claim that I was wrong.

My god, this is the level of deliberate stupidity we have to deal with.

Let me state this perfectly clear

------- could walk into a kindergarten bathroom and rape a child and he would be immune from prosecution.

So, ummm ---- you magat scum

Boaz,

"RCADE better start reigning you in, because you are lying on OUR President."

Come on.

Isn't it obvious Cadenhead turns a blind eye to the sick posters here who hate Trump?

#58 | Posted by BillJohnson

Yeah bitch ----, actions have consequences.

You bitch ass magat scum elected a rapist

I will never forget nor will I ever forgive.

Rcade, seems to be fine with me saying ---- you scumbags

See Action (elect a rapist) result is Consequences (be treated like scum for electing a rapist)

So, TL:DR? ---- YOU MAGAT SCUM

As an aside, Bill, I will ask with respect, why don't you hate trump like I do? He is an adjudicated rapist. Isn't that like the worst of the worst?

Bill, I will ask again, why don't you hate an adjudicated rapist?

Boaz, claims he isn't one, despite a court finding him one.

What is your excuse?

I am HONESTLY curious

And I will remind you again

President is a Rapist
VP is a Closeted Homosexual
AG is a------------
Sec. of HHS-Sexual Predator
Def Sec. is a Sexual Predator
Veterans' Affairs Director-Voted against Violence Against Women Act

What is there, NOT to hate (though I'll give Vance a pass on the gay part, nothing wrong with being gay, it is the self hating policies that emerge)?

Boaz chooses denial.

LOL

Do you know what a tariff is?

Sure I do. It's what China does to our goods when they are sold in their country.

But we shouldnt return the favor, right?

#74 | Posted by boaz a

So, you DON'T know what a tariff is.

Ok, let me explain.

A tariff is paid by the COMPANY that imports something from another country.

So, say Company A makes widgets and to make widget they need flungs from IDK, say -------------.

If a tariff is put on imports from ------------- then the flungs cost is increased by the tariff.

This cost is now part of the price to build a widget, which is generally passed on to the consumer

So, you see, that is decidedly NOT something paid by -------------.

So, either Company stops making widgets OR raises the price as finding flungs is not possible elsewhere (as flungs are not made here and the tariff applies to everyone).

NOW ALSO consider ------------- is unhappy as they cannot export flungs. So they put a tariff on doohickeys imported from the good old USA. So, fewer doohickeys from the US are exported.

You see this is what happened last time when ------- was relatively restrained with tarriffs.

American soybean farmers (IIRC) lost a BOATLOAD of money as china stopped importing (they went to Canada or Australia IIRC)

So, ------- had to use tax payer money to reimburse the farmers

Sooooo, American paid MORE for chinese goods AND had to reimburse farmers

I know, I know you are too stupid to understand.

but, truth hurts bitch

Does anyone else find it funny, that "truthhurts" is the only one hurt by the "truth" that Trump got elected again?

#76 | Posted by boaz

Boaz, let me make this perfectly clear.

------- is going to unleash devastation on our nation that even YOU won't be able to deny.

I am telling you it is going to happen.

Believe me or don't believe me, I care not.

I WILL point and laugh at you when you are suffering though, that I promise.

I will not forgive, nor will I ever forget.

LOL, you actually think you are explaining something? LOL...

A tariff war would hurt China 10 times more than it would hurt us..

#82 | Posted by boaz

Christ, you're ------- stupid.

You realize the goal of economic policies should be to not inflict hurt on yourself.

You mean this Tara Reade?

I mean, I am honestly curious, as this is a big issue with me-i.e. how many Americans can vote for a rapist.

Boaz is one example-he simply denies (though I can't fathom how one draws that conclusion).

I guess there might be a significant number who are unaware-but the grab em by the P**** thing is pretty common knowledge.

I am curious about you.

You aren't denying the claim, clearly his behavior makes it a possibility.

So, you, don't disbelieve it, you likely believe it true.

You voted for him anyway???

Because.....

I am honestly curious. And I PROMISE not to attack you in immediate response-though I hold the right to be harsh later on.

@93

All of that is simply excuses.

Even leaving the rape aside (which one shouldn't), the man is simply a bad human being.

He mimed oral sex in front of children FFS.

He mocked a disabled person

And did you give ANY thought or consideration to what he has stated he wants to do, like be a dictator?

Have you not given ANY consideration to the people he surrounds himself with?

Have you not even considered his appointments?

He stole nuclear secrets.

He stole state secrets and months later our intelligence assets around the world were being killed in rapid session, like someone was giving intelligence away.

He has promised to get rid of literal Amendments to the Constitution.

Christ the list of his unfitness for the office is legion.

He ------- sold bibles FFS.

Yet, "I voted because he said "Promises made, Promises KEPT". No one else said that."

You voted for a man who is a legendary liar, cause he said something.

No one else said that. I just can't....

Jesus wept.

I see Bill ran away.

I can't imagine living a life where I couldn't defend my choices.

----, even boaz, came up with some nonsense.

Except all Boaz could come up with is he is going to show us liberals. That is all, that is the sum total of who and what boaz is-to not be liberal.

What a pathetic excuse for a human being.

So, Bill

How come you don't hate --------- adjudicated rapist? And I will even allow you hating both if that is how you see the Biden case.

Her answers to questions. Her not taking the hard interviews.

Her being the "border czar" and doing nothing. Americans arent stupid.

She couldnt say she was going to do something about the border because she never did anything while she was in office.

She was coasting along as a government employee and everyone, especially those who are government employees could see that.

#112 | Posted by boaz

Her answers to questions... like discussion of Hannibal Lector, sharks vs electrocution and 40 minutes of dancing?
Hard interviews....like Hannity or Kristi Noem?
She wasn't the "border czar"
Americans ARE stupid-case in point=you
She and Biden came up with a bipartisan border security bill which ------- tanked, She and Biden have cut border crossings to a trickle.
Coasting? As DA, AG, Senator and VP

Seriously, magat scum are stupid beyond measure.

I wish, I really and truly wish magat scum could offer something, anything approaching reality as a defense of their actions beyond lies, half truths and denial of reality. [See Boaz]

Bill, I am more man than any magat scum.

I just wish he would answer one simple question

How come you don't hate --------- adjudicated rapist?

Like this has been bothering me for months and especially since the election.

Take everything else away, ------- is a rapist.

How can American vote for him?

Like I get the Bro culture and the woman haters and the religious nuts, I get that. I get the white supremacists and the christian nationalists. I can understand ignorant denialists like Boaz, to a degree

But that doesn't account for nearly 50% of the voters.

I wish I could get my head around it.

I mean it is not like it wasn't a basic fact of the man.

Like how can ANY man who is the son of a mother or the husband to a wife or the father of a daughter or the brother to a sister vote for a rapist. Any man who has a woman or girl in their life that they hold feelings for (paternal, romantic, fatherly, brotherly) like aren't their primal instincts to protect and defend them?

I simply don't get it.

BTW, just a reminder that the US Economy, which is the envy of the world, is, in many ways, built on the back of these low wage workers.

Oh, and here is another short-sighted side effect to keep an eye out for.

Many of the Central and South American countries where the immigrants are coming from have economies that are, in many ways, propped up by the money that the immigrants send back home. That is WHY the seasonal workers come here, they work for a few weeks/months and send their paychecks home where that money goes a long way to providing sustenance (by this is a topic I am quite familiar with as my niece studied this phenomenon in Europe and Africa.

We cut off that revenue stream, those economy suffer and guess what, that destabilizes those countries resulting in more violence, more cartel power and more impetus to push immigrants to America.

No one ever said Republicans are smart though.

I am not sure why I am bothering responding to you-you are certainly not worth the bother, unfortunately I saw your post when i looked at my phone where I was signed out

He was adjudicated a rapist, just ask the judge.

I do think it quite obvious that it fits neatly with the rest of his behavior.

You, of course, don't answer the question, (not surprising), except MAYBE to hint at denialism?

Other than that to say he was "better than the alternative" is a moron's response. It says absolutely nothing.

More pablum from the idiot brigade

Oh and don't bother to respond, I have you plonked as you never add anything to any conversation

I have had onewhatever plonked for ever; he is not worth engaging.

I think you inadvertently found a truth.

First of all, it is not my perception. He IS a rapist. He was found to be a rapist in a court of law. That MAKES him a rapist under the law.

He was not found guilty criminally because the statute of limitations was up. But a court found him a rapist. That is a simple fact.

So, it is true, you may not like it, but it is reality.

You may disagree with the verdict, but that simply makes you uninformed.

You may claim his isn't a rapist, but that makes you objectively wrong.

And you take that with ALL of his other misogyny and the words actually from his own mouth and it is clear what he is.

But, you're right, many Americans (I won't agree most) don't think he is.

And they are wrong.

Because objective fact still exists. And a court found him to be a rapist.

That is an objective fact.

But, I get it, many Americans don't think he is.

And you right here when faced with objective facts, deny reality

And THAT is the problem.

I would be honestly curious of a poll of ------- voters as to whether they think he is a rapist.

Would that number approach zero?

Is denialism that strong?

Don't deflect.

Do you accept that he was found liable for the actions he inflicted on E. Jean Carroll?

He IS a rapist. He was found to be a rapist in a court of law.

I dont agree. Whatever.

And you right here when faced with objective facts, deny reality

Again, I dont agree.

#133 | Posted by boaz

I would argue this is the heart of the matter. Far more broadly than ------- being a rapist.

Harris didn't lose because of her message or how she communicated or who the messenger was or in what venues the message was given, it was not Biden's fault, or Obama's fault, or never trumpers fault, or Liz Cheney's fault, it's not she was to left leaning or too right leaning or too centrist...

it was this simple fact.

Magat scum live in unreality. They simply deny reality as it is presented. Nothing can break through that rock of disbelief.

I have no idea how to fix that, having lived in reality all my life, well accept for a stint in college but that was another life.

on't deflect.

Why not? You do.

Harris didn't lose because of her message or how she communicated or who the messenger was or in what venues the message was given,

Um, yes she did. And that's your problem.

In July 2023, Judge Kaplan clarified that the jury had found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word.

No they didnt. If they did, then Trump would be in jail. He is not. And I bet that "judge" is of the liberal type.

And it was a civilian trial, not a criminal one, where you can say almost anything, with no proof and get a "conviction".

#139 | Posted by boaz a

I simply do not deflect, but your, I know you are but what am I defense is noted

the message that ------- is a rapist is a. clear, b. true, c. nearly universally known and SHOULD be disqualifying.

I get it, you don't believe he is a rapist, but he was found liable for his assault, which the judge described as rape.

He does not have to be found criminally guilty to be a rapist. OJ is a murderer which was confirmed when he was held liable for the 2 deaths.

You just can't whatever that away. that is objective reality. This is what I mean by you don't live in reality. He was found liable for what the judge called substantially rape and yes i admit there is a bit of pedantic but the definition is the clearest and most accurate definition of his actions.

You can't say almost anything, you must have proof and it is not a "conviction" you get. You get held liable for your actions

Thank you Alex for that clear and concise post. I wish I could have said it so succinctly and accurately.

I have no idea how to fix that, having lived in reality all my life

If you lived in reality, you could type, "Boaz, trans woman are not real women, just men in dresses".

But you will never write that. Because like most liberals, you live in fantasy land.

#140 | Posted by boaz

And I am not going to have the same fight for the 1000th time but you are again OBJECTIVELY wrong.

I, get it, you don't agree, but there are objective definitions to words like gender, and men and women

And a trans woman is a woman, She is NOT biologically female and never can be, but she is still a woman.

It is a simple concept, which for SOME reason bothers you to an incredible degree as it shouldn't impact your life one way or another.

But I will NOT argue this point with you. You are wrong and that is that

I wonder what ever happened to people like him to make them so hateful of strangers humanity who are doing no one harm and live in danger

#157. Correct. And it speaks to my point of Congress ceding it's powers to the Executive.

#158 | Posted by BellRinger

Which you denied the senate was doing now for -------

You're a piece of ---- jeff.

#157. Correct. And it speaks to my point of Congress ceding it's powers to the Executive.

#158 | Posted by BellRinger

Jeff thinks that congress should be reviewing HUD applications and EPA permit applications.

Jeff isn't too bright.

Do not put words in my mouth you ------- -------.

The answer is simple.

Nearly 50% of American voters made a choice. They are either evil or stupid.

I know which one you are, magat scum.

The answer is he was none of that.

He was found liable for sexual assault that the judge state, unequivocally means rape.

He had literally hundreds of documents that he was not entitled to possess

I just can't with the campaign fraudster and oh dear god vote stealing conspirator. I am curious my dear turd, was ------- lying when he said the 2020 election was stolen, given the results of the 2024 election?

You unamerican ------- ----

CIA admits to losing dozens of informants around the world: NYT
by Monique Beals - 10/05/21 2:24 PM ET