Seems like they're throwing a nuclear level tantrum because they're cash flow days are numbered.

There's no brinkmanship, they've been making empty nuke threats all along.
#3 | POSTED BY DARKVADER

You're probably the same type of idiot that thought Russia would never invade Ukraine," they've been making empty threats all along".

Not to worry, when the war actually starts, you can blame Trump.

In the mean time, 100 of thousands have died because of your childish perspective.

Lets say it leads to a response Ukraine can't handle. Is it the US job to go fight for them?

Ukraine is making these choices and they should have to live with them.

Russia has had so many Red Lines on Nukes it isn't funny.

Until it isn't. Their mistake for not drawing a line, our mistake thinking they never will.

Russia's vaunted military has been broken by the lowly Ukrainians who had something like the 52 ranked military coming into this conflict.

Then why is NATO giving the Ukrainians arms, supplies and money?

What a stupid statement, ignoring all reality.

#38 | POSTED BY DIBBLDA

If its going so well why the need to allow Ukraine to use ATACMS deep into Russia and risk nuclear response?

Lots of lives Biden is playing politics with.

#37 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

You have a simple view of the world, hence why I doubt anything you say about your "career".

How is a computer software system built? Does it happen all at once, or is it the consequence of many decisions made over time?

If one line breaks the software, is it the fault of that one line or the process that wrote, reviewed, tested and released the software.

You live in the world believing historic events occur in what probability theory calls a set of atomic events, each one without consequence beyond the event epoch.

Just look at your questions, its a wonder you get can turn on the computer much less post here. Perhaps you do this to get ad dollars up, nooner wasn't working out, so RCade enlisted you to troll with poorly thought out questions. Its a hunch.

Russia and North Korea are actively attacking Ukrainians.

After decades of encroachment and lies from the west.

It was bound to happen, Washington wanted it to happen.

WATCH: Jeffrey Sachs tells the cold, hard truth how the US and NATO provoked war in Ukraine in 4 minutes

"It started in 1990, when US Secretary of State James Baker said to Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch eastward...

The US then cheated on this, starting in 1994, when Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine.

The expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic.

Then, the US led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was the use of NATO to bomb a European capital for 78 straight days to break the country apart.

The Russians didn't like that very much, but even Putin started out pro-European and pro-American. He considered whether to join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship.

In 2002, the US unilaterally walked out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. What it did was trigger the US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire, direct threat to national security, by making possible a decapitation strike of missiles that are a few minutes away from Moscow.

In 2004-2005, the US engaged in a soft regime change in Ukraine, the so-called First Color Revolution.

In 2009, Yanukovych won the election and became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality in Ukraine.

In 2014, the US participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych. Nuland and the US Ambassador to Ukraine...talked about regime change. So they made the new government!

The US then said 'now NATO's really going to enlarge.' Putin kept saying 'stop, you promised no NATO enlargement.'

Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, seven more countries in the 'not one inch eastward.'

In 2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russian-US security agreement. The basis of it was no NATO enlargement.

The special military operations started, and five days later Zelenskyy said 'okay, okay, neutrality.'

And then the US and Britain said no way, you guys fight on. We've got your back. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave. Absolutely ghastly.

We're not dealing with, as we're told every day, this madman like Hitler. This is complete bogus, fake history that is a purely PR narrative of the US government.

#76 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER

This is true.

Nazis were 2 percent of the vote, as you've been shown ad infinitum.
#77 | POSTED BY CORKY

One in 50, wow thats scary. Do you know why they are Nazis Corky? Not because they subscribed to the Nazi ideology. But because the Nazi's saved their asses from Communism, and the Soviet Union. Thats how bad Communism is, people actually remember the glory days the Nazis saved them.

What would have happened to all the Ukrainians who did not want to become Russians?

I believe Russia would have created a puppet government. Not make them "russians"

Refugees flooding your borders create hate violence and chaos on your borders.

What kind of racists doesn't want refugees flooding your border?

What happens in all those surrounding countries AFTER the war if Russia takes all of Ukraine?

Welcome them to the US to seek asylum.

Russia is welcome to take a shot at America we have no qualms about leveling their provincial military.
#2 | POSTED BY TOR

My guess is Russia would take a shot at military bases that might cause China problems.

It might also attack the factory for the StormShadow in Ireland if I am not mistaken.