Vance Mocked for WWII History Blunder

Sunday, August 24, 2025

Speaking to Kristen Welker on Meet the Press Sunday, the vice president vigorously defended Trump's push to end the war through give-and-take negotiations -- rather than the sanctions and ceasefire demands he once leveled at Vladimir Putin. Using the Second World War to illustrate his point, Vance claimed concessions and diplomacy are vital to end major conflicts -- but seemingly forgot that the war ended due to unconditional surrender.

Posted by reinheitsgebot at 07:30 PM | 89 COMMENTS | permalink

"If you go back to World War II, if you go back to World War I. If you go back to every major conflict in human history, they all end with some kind of negotiation," said Vance, who was deployed in the Marines as a combat correspondent. Unfortunately for Vance, World War II not brought to an end, but came to a close with the unconditional surrender of Germany on May 7, 1945, and Japan on September 2, 1945. "Vance says WWII ended in negotiation -someone tell that to Hiroshima," one user wrote on X.

Comments

There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action.
- - - Johann Goethe

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-24 03:05 PM

Vance isn't worried.

Most Deplorable Trumping MAGAts are absolutely ignorant of history.

Most will actually recreate history to correspond with what Vance said.

Like Sarah Palin and Paul Revere.

#2 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-08-24 03:09 PM

Clearly, it's not just the MAGAt voter who is, generally speaking and simplifying matters here, an informational moron.

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-08-24 03:14 PM

I loved the movie OPPENHEIMER about the race to build that world-changing negotiation.

~ Patton Oswalt ~

#4 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-08-24 03:23 PM

imo, VP Vance is indicative of the incompetent people Pres trump has selected to populated his administration.

Unfortunately for Pres Trump, however, VP Vance (or whatever his name is this year) seems to be more prominent in seeking news attention than other of his appointees.

As I stated in an earlier message, maybe Pres trump dumped the whole Ukraine peace negotiations upon VP Vance because Pres Trump realized the negotiations were likely to go nowhere.

I dunno.

Time will tell.

#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-24 07:44 PM

Vance Mocked for...

Being Vance?

#6 | Posted by billy_boy at 2025-08-24 08:18 PM

@#6 ... Being Vance? ...

That depends upon what you mean be that comment.

If you mean, by that comment, apparent incompetence, I'd agree.

#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-24 08:24 PM

Republicans are going to mansplain to America how nuking Japan twice was an act of negotiation.

So when Russia nukes Ukraine, that's just part of the peace process.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-24 09:21 PM

Y'all leave VP Jethro alone!

His heart is in the right place. Right next to his brain, in Putin's front pocket.

Trump's mouth spends a lot of quality time near there, about an inch from both.

#9 | Posted by censored at 2025-08-25 08:33 AM

I'm more worried it will be the Civil War 2.0 blunders that cement Vance's name in the history books.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 08:36 AM

Republicans are going to mansplain to America how nuking Japan twice was an act of negotiation.

War is diplomacy by other means.
~ Carl

Every war I have ever read about war in some form of a negotiation.

Unfortunately for Vance, World War II not brought to an end, but came to a close with the unconditional surrender of Germany on May 7, 1945,

But there were negotiations going on before it ended.

Following Adolf Hitler's death, German President Karl Dnitz ordered General Alfred Jodl to negotiate a surrender. Jodl initially offered a surrender only in the West, hoping to continue fighting against the Soviets.

The worse the situation for one side the less it had to bargain with, but still trying to negotiate favorable terms given the conditions on the battlefield.

Its immature and ignorant to proclaim hostilities just ended without some negotiation.

#11 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 10:33 AM

I agree in principle with OneLumperTwo. Hirohito was allowed the remain as emperor and Japan got to keep its sovereignty although it was subject to the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers.

Now I gotta go lie down.

#12 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-08-25 10:56 AM

This is how Americans negotiated with the Nazis and how we should negotiate with Russian Orcs.

youtu.be

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 11:02 AM

The brain dead------------- would've rolled out the red carpet for Hitler.

#14 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-08-25 11:06 AM

To say that Germany negotiated with the Allies during their last pitiful days of existence in World War II is to dishonesty elastics the meaning of negotiation,

#15 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-25 11:20 AM

There was communication between Germany and the Allies at the end but it was all just really Eisenhower giving orders to them .

#16 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-25 11:22 AM

"World War II not brought to an end, but came to a close with the unconditional surrender of Germany on May 7, 1945, and Japan on September 2, 1945"

I'm not putting words in Vance's mouth or interpreting what he meant but when I hear that....I'm thinking we negotiated with all the stakeholders.

England
Russia
France
Italy
etc.

maybe to a very small extent Japan and Germany because there was a lot of work out afterward.

#17 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 11:25 AM

JD Vance is an ignorant, incompetent, feckless surrender monkey. Like Trump, he's eager to roll over for stronger personalities. Like Chamberlain, he's eager to give away what does not belong to him.

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-25 11:26 AM

I'm not putting words in Vance's mouth or interpreting what he meant but when I hear that...

Why not?

No normal person, with an education, would conclude otherwise, all wars end in some negotiation. His statement is perfectly reasonable.

Lumpers are REALLY complaining because it erodes their position that Ukraine and Russia must negotiate to end their war.

#19 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 11:31 AM

Now I gotta go lie down.
#12 | POSTED BY LEE_THE_AGENT

Go easy Willy, its only monday. :)

#20 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 11:33 AM

Because when JD Vance says "wars all end with negotiation," what he's really saying is that America should push Ukraine to cut a deal with Vladimir Putin. He's soft-selling a Russian military dismantling and the concomitant genocide of Ukraine. He's auditioning for the Neville Chamberlain fan club. And he's advertising, loudly, that he neither understands history nor the stakes of the present fight.

Let's start with the obvious: World War II did not end in a negotiation. We did not allow the Nazis to continue to govern a few of their seized territories. We did not allow Imperial Japan to hold Manchuria or the Philippines.

It ended when the Allies marched across Europe, bombed Germany flat, and forced an unconditional surrender in 1945.

It ended when the United States island-hopped across the Pacific, sank the Japanese fleet, unleashed wholesale killing machines in the form of United State Marines and the U.S. Army Air Corps, firebombed the Japanese homeland to cinders, and when the message wasn't getting through, we invented a portable sun and nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

therickwilson.substack.com

#21 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-08-25 11:37 AM

To say that Germany negotiated with the Allies during their last pitiful days of existence in World War II is to dishonesty elastics the meaning of negotiation,

#15 | POSTED BY ZED

Hitler negotiated with his dog just before he shot it. He negotiated with his concubine just before he poisoned her. Then he negotiated a bullet to his own head. Apparently.

#22 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 11:47 AM

-His statement is perfectly reasonable.

I agree.

Unconditional surrender is about laying down arms and cease the conflict.

But there are hundreds and hundreds of steps taken after it. And yes...those steps include negotiation between the surrendered party and everyone else.

#23 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 11:48 AM

Ukraine and Russia must negotiate to end their war.
#19 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Why?

Russia can end its war of aggression right now.

If your neighbor moves his fence way into your property what is to negotiate? How much of your land would YOU offer your neighbor to move the fence back a little? Or would you insist the fence go back to its original location and THEN you maybe can talk about your boundary issues?

#24 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 11:54 AM

Oh I forgot to mention that your neighbor is also killing all your pets and kidnapping your children and raping your wife while asking if you want to "negotiate".

Still feel like negotiating?

#25 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 12:09 PM

Didn't think so.

#26 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 12:31 PM

It's not a blunder.

Anyone with a 4th grade education knows WWII history.

He was just blatantly lying his ass off.

Report it as such.

#27 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-08-25 12:44 PM

-Anyone with a 4th grade education knows WWII history.

Apparently you're unaware of the status of public education in this country.

#28 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 12:47 PM

seemingly forgot that the war ended due to unconditional surrender.

After the second atomic bomb, the Japanese emperor accepted the terms of surrender that the allies issued in the Potsdam Conference by the US, UK and Soviet Union.

#29 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-08-25 12:55 PM

Truman: Our latest offer - the Allies take control of Germany and you kill yourself.

Hitler: Deal!

Truman: How about if we bomb two of your largest cities back to the stone age and then you surrender?

Hirohito: Sounds fair.

#30 | Posted by Derek_Wildstar at 2025-08-25 01:00 PM

Despite these cute little jabs...nobody has an issue with Vance's comment.

They don't like Vance. Period.

But the comment is fine with them.

"While publicly stating their intent to fight on to the bitter end, Japan's leaders (the Supreme Council for the Direction of the War, also known as the "Big Six") were privately making entreaties to the publicly neutral Soviet Union to mediate peace on terms more favorable to the Japanese. While maintaining a sufficient level of diplomatic engagement with the Japanese to give them the impression they might be willing to mediate, the Soviets were covertly preparing to attack Japanese forces in Manchuria and Korea (in addition to South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands) in fulfillment of promises they had secretly made to the US and the UK at the Tehran and Yalta Conferences."

-4th grade educated

#31 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 01:09 PM

Anyone with a 4th grade education knows WWII history.

I thought I did. But when to this day I keep finding stories I have never heard about.

Have any of you ever heard of Gunnar Sonsteby?

Wow. What an amazing WWII story that I had never heard before about one man's decision to fight back against tyranny.

en.m.wikipedia.org

It's on Netflix. Well worth the time.

#32 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 01:16 PM

#30 | POSTED BY DEREK_WILDSTAR Flag: TikTok Educated

#33 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 01:19 PM

Oh I forgot to mention that your neighbor is also killing all your pets and kidnapping your children and raping your wife while asking if you want to "negotiate".
Still feel like negotiating?
#25 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY

Too bad you remembered, what a sorry analogy to whats happening in Ukraine.

#34 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 01:21 PM

Russia can end its war of aggression right now.

Why should it? What leverage does Ukraine have to make it stop?

See you think Russia in the wrong, Russia thinks its right.
Now where are you?
Millions of people have to die, Billions spent and lost to the war merchants. Because in reality no one cares about your moral stance.

Right now its a stale mate, a meat grinder, so long as you're not one getting grinded you come up with pithy saying with emotional requests.

The reality is much darker. End it, start negotiating and perhaps you can save whats left of Ukraine, and the Ukrainian people.

#35 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 01:24 PM

Re 34

That's almost exactly what's happening in Ukraine.

Key events from 2025 that illustrate this pattern:

August: The most recent instances of this behavior occurred in August 2025.

As Russia's Foreign Minister claimed Moscow proposed a peaceful resolution, Russia launched a major barrage of drones and missiles into Ukrainian cities like Kharkiv, killing and injuring civilians.

An NPR report on August 21, 2025, noted that Russian airstrikes followed just days after diplomatic meetings involving US and Ukrainian officials.

June: During the G7 summit in Canada, Russia launched one of its largest bombardments on Kyiv, targeting residential areas.

May: President Donald Trump's announcement of a phone call with Putin about negotiations in May 2025 was followed by Russia's largest air assault on Ukraine's civilians in the war's three-year history.

April: In April 2025, during US-led diplomatic efforts, Russian shelling of the city of Sumy killed over 30 civilians. Ukrainian officials noted that Russia had launched thousands of missiles and drones, mostly at civilians, since agreeing to a limited pause in strikes.

#36 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 01:25 PM

Anyone with a 4th grade education knows WWII history.

Only someone that tapped out at 6th grade would say this.

#37 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 01:25 PM

#36 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY

Hardly, in your pathetic analogy, the invader of the home wasn't getting attacked by the home owner.

Russia is suffering losses as well, its a war of attrition, not something your analogy mentions AT ALL.

#38 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 01:27 PM

See you think Russia in the wrong, Russia thinks its right.
Now where are you?

Russia is wrong everyone knows they are wrong even Russia knows it's wrong but that does not matter.

Now it is might makes right and Trumpy approves!

And I am in America. Where we used to know the difference between right and wrong. And where we used to be able to do something about it.

Now. Where are you commie agitator?

#39 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 01:29 PM

"Hardly, in your pathetic analogy, the invader of the home wasn't getting attacked by the home owner."

Liar. Ukraine did not attack Russians on Russian soil. They are DEFENDING themselves.

Russia is suffering losses because they did not win their war of aggression outright like they thought they would. Because Ukraine fought back. .

Your propaganda is weak comrade.

#40 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 01:32 PM

Russia is suffering losses as well, its a war of attrition, not something your analogy mentions AT ALL.
#38 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

It is NOW a war of attrition. It wouldn't be a war of attrition if my neighbor tried to steal my land. It would be a fight between lawyers. Yes there the analogy falls apart. But the fact is you would fight to protect your land.

Russians would lose a war of attrition if American leaders had any balls. They have already lost one against America. They know they would lose again if they had to face American weapons American might and the American economy. Hence all the time and effort to divide Americans and groom Trumpy.

#41 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 01:39 PM

Confucius say, "Man with mosquito on --------- learn that violence not always the answer.".

#42 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-25 01:49 PM

End it, start negotiating and perhaps you can save whats left of Ukraine, and the Ukrainian people.
#35 | Posted by oneironaut

"End it, start negotiating "
You want Ukraine to stop defending itself as a precondition to negotiations. That's not negotiation, that's capitulation.

"perhaps you can save whats left of Ukraine"
What you are describing is not an end, but rather, the beginning of the end of Ukraine.
Why couldn't it end with Crimea? It did, for a few years. The Putin wanted the rest.

Everybody here knows you support Putin.
Everybody here knows you want Ukraine to fall to Russia.
Why do you keep pretending to be impartial?
You are not fooling anybody.

#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 01:50 PM

Despite these cute little jabs...nobody has an issue with Vance's comment.
They don't like Vance.
#31 | Posted by eberly

Despite your cute little jab,
The two are not mutually exclusive.

#44 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 01:52 PM

The comment... it's part and parcel of why people don't like Vance,

You don't like Vance either, so it's unclear what you're swinging your purse at today.

Only that you are trained to do so, whenever Republicans do something stupid.

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 01:54 PM

Why should it? What leverage does Ukraine have to make it stop?

During Mr Toads Wild Ride (ver 2.0)?

No reason to stop. None at all. Apparently.

#46 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 01:55 PM

I'm thinking we negotiated with all the stakeholders.
England
Russia
France
Italy
etc.
maybe to a very small extent Japan and Germany because there was a lot of work out afterward.
#17 | Posted by eberly

Hey Eberly,
You're actually a lot dumber than you let on.
You might be JeffJ level dumb, which is sad for you.

#47 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 01:58 PM

because there was a lot of work out afterward.
#17 | Posted by eberly

You mean there was a lot of land and loot to divvy up afterwards.

#48 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-25 02:06 PM

because there was a lot of work out afterward.
#17 | Posted by eberly

By the victors, not by the losers.
How do you not know that Japan surrendered unconditionally?
Did you go to public school or private school?

#49 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 02:08 PM

If your ignorance is because you went to Kansas public schools, well, hopefully Republicans have fixed that by now, LOL!
If your ignorance is because you went to Private school, well, I hope you picked a better private school for your kids.
Or maybe you just weren't much of a student and there's no school your parents could have sent you to that would have gotten through to you.

#50 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 02:14 PM

-You mean there was a lot of land and loot to divvy up afterwards.

Many resources.

Minerals, scientists, technology, etc

And who takes them?

And and how much of it is retained by the loser.

How much do the losers pay?

Sooner or later we resumed trade with Japan and Germany.

Ground rules had to be established.

#51 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 02:47 PM

Ground rules had to be established.
#51 | Posted by eberly

Trump ran on a policy of eliminating those ground rules, and millions of Americans agreed with him.
Why didn't you agree with him?

#52 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 02:53 PM

It wasn't exactly unconditional. The Nips got to keep their emperor.

#53 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-08-25 02:55 PM

It wasn't exactly unconditional. The Nips got to keep their emperor.
#53 | Posted by visitor_

My, my.
Look at the fine company you keep, Eberly!
It's another one who shouldn't have graduated grade school.

The Emperor stayed because MacArthur said so, you ignorant fool.

#54 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 03:23 PM

"Apparently you're unaware of the status of public education in this country."

Indeed.

We see your idiotic posts on a regular basis.

#55 | Posted by Angrydad at 2025-08-25 04:00 PM

An unconditional surrender is one where your enemy gets to physically occupy your national territory.

You can't have a negotiation if one of the parties no longer exists.

Wiping fecal material from JD and Trump's rear ends the way you MAGA do is a pathetic self castration.

#56 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-25 04:13 PM

An unconditional surrender is one where your enemy gets to physically occupy your national territory.

You can't have a negotiation if one of the parties no longer exists.

Wiping fecal material from JD and Trump's rear ends the way you MAGA do is a pathetic self castration.

#57 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-25 04:13 PM

oh.....poor wittle angwydaddy is upset with me.

Too bad for those who argue that "unconditional surrender" means there was no negotiating between various parties during the end of WWII.

en.wikipedia.org

sorry, that should have been my link in 31 to argue with anyone who pretended to disagree with Vance's comments.

as I said, nobody disagrees with his contextual point about the existence of negotiations at the end of WW 2.

#58 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 04:16 PM

"Too bad for those who argue that "unconditional surrender" means there was no negotiating between various parties during the end of WWII."

Who argued that?
I want names.

#59 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 04:23 PM

When Zed has literally nothing to argue with, he runs right into Trump's ass....and then talks about castration.

Asses and castration.

#60 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 04:24 PM

Harry Truman's messages to allied leaders May 8, 1945:

To Prime Minister Churchill:

With the unconditional surrender of all the armies of Nazidom and the liberation of the
oppressed people of Europe from the evils of barbarism, I wish to express to you...

To Marshal Stalin:

Now that the Nazi armies of aggression have been forced by the coordinated efforts of
Soviet-Anglo-American forces to an unconditional surrender, I wish to express to you..

To General Eisenhower:

In recognition of the unconditional and abject surrender of the Nazi barbarians, please
accept the fervent congratulations and appreciation...

To General de Gaulle:

The Nazi forces of barbarian aggression having now been driven into an unconditional
surrender by our allied armies, this is an appropriate time to send...

#61 | Posted by schifferbrains at 2025-08-25 04:26 PM

"Using the Second World War to illustrate his point, Vance claimed concessions and diplomacy are vital to end major conflicts -- but seemingly forgot that the war ended due to unconditional surrender."

^
So Eberly says that's not true.
The entire "unconditional surrender" thing is a Liberal Hoax,
Created by Liberals, after Meet The Press, to smear upstanding citizen J.D. Vance.
And time travelled back into the history everybody was supposed to learn in grade school.

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 04:28 PM

"When Zed has literally nothing to argue with,"

Zed knows he can't argue with the facts.
Eberly doesn't know that, and is still trying to.

#63 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 04:29 PM

Ya know, just getting it wrong the first time is not so bad, Eberly.
It's getting it wrong in your next sixteen posts.
That's where you keep making an ass of yourself.

#64 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 04:32 PM

#65 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-08-25 05:02 PM

JD Vance Hit With Community Note Over WWII Claim

meidasnews.com

#66 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-08-25 07:13 PM

The entire "unconditional surrender" thing is a Liberal Hoax,
Created by Liberals, after Meet The Press, to smear upstanding citizen J.D. Vance.
- snoofy

No no, it's to support the idea that Ukraine shouldn't negotiate with Russia.

The Emperor stayed because MacArthur said so, you ignorant fool.
#54 | Posted by snoofy

They still negotiated...

As Emperor Hirohito and his cabinet accepted the surrender terms on August 14.

With our the negotiation they would have kept fighting.

It's not complicated.

#67 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-25 10:35 PM

"They still negotiated..."

You're such a sicko.

They negotiated like Trump and ten year old Ivanka negotiated that Ivanka would sit on daddy's lap.

#68 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-25 10:41 PM

eberly vs zed on WWII is like Scotts vs Danforth on taxes.

Laughable, but entertaining.

#69 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-25 10:44 PM

"Eberly vs zed on WWII"

Not really. Or any other subject. Zed talks to himself.

But stay on the porch where you belong, boy.

#70 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-25 10:58 PM

JD Vance admitted during the campaign telling lies is just not a big problem for him.
In fact, quite the opposite.
If a lie serves him, wheel it out.
Nasty, pathetic excuse for a human.

#71 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-08-26 06:37 AM

there was a lot of land and loot to divvy up afterwards.

Yeah, like Churchill going to war over Poland and then giving up Poland.

#72 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-08-26 08:00 AM

JD Vance admitted during the campaign telling lies is just not a big problem for him.
#71 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Best comment on the thread.

To a man, every Republican on this thread has defended Vance's lies.

Because they're in a cult.

#73 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-26 08:18 AM

Its immature and ignorant to proclaim hostilities just ended without some negotiation.
#11 | Posted by oneironaut

No, it's pedantic, stupid and on par with your general level of abject idiocy to say ATTEMPTS at negotiation meant negotiation played a role.

Because it didn't. The allies told Germany that unless it was total surrender, they should stuff it.

So, as usual, just STFU you idiot.

#74 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-26 09:43 AM

Lumpers are REALLY complaining because it erodes their position that Ukraine and Russia must negotiate to end their war.
#19 | Posted by oneironaut

Duhhhh LUMpErZ!!

STFU you stupid piece of s(*&.

#75 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-26 09:45 AM

But there are hundreds and hundreds of steps taken after it. And yes...those steps include negotiation between the surrendered party and everyone else.

#23 | Posted by eberly

You're reaching.

Hostilities (ie war) end when the fighting stops. Which stops because arms are laid down.

In the case of WWII in Europe, when the arms were surrendered to allied units.

Everything else is ancillary to the war actually ending and was more about dividing spoils and setting up post-war administration.

#76 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-26 10:16 AM

Anyone with a 4th grade education knows WWII history.
He was just blatantly lying his ass off.
Report it as such.

#27 | Posted by Nixon

Yup. I'm tired of these people being treated as bumbling fools when they're actin in very deliberate ways with specific goals.

#77 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-26 10:17 AM

STFU you stupid piece of s(*&.

#75 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-26 09:45 AM | Reply | Flag

Hey Scooter, you voted for "Weekend At Bernie's", in the previous election. The whole world watched as Serial Sniffer - Inappropriate Shower Daddy fell up the stairs, fell down the stairs, fell off bicycles, fell on stages, had to change trousers at the Vatican, couldn't read a teleprompter without saying "end of text" ran our country via auto pen. You should probably sit this one out.

#78 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-26 12:13 PM

You voted for a corpulent, rapist con man that's even worse off dementia wise than Joe ever was.

Trump is disintegrating before our eyes and you're talking about the 2020 election. Moron.

#79 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-26 12:14 PM

Everyone knows that Trump is in peak intellectual and physical shape and will, of course, live forever.

Therefore, investigate his sudden death as a murder the way Epstein's should have been.

The list of suspects will run into the millions.

#80 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-26 12:26 PM

"Serial Sniffer - Inappropriate Shower Daddy"

What a riot.

Against sniffing long hair, but okay with grabbing the short hairs.

If Republicans didn't have double-standards, they'd have no standards at all.

#81 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-08-26 12:33 PM

And, yes ... ..For as long as Trump provides friction and deceit in regards to releasing the Epstein files ... .He is the leading suspect in Jeffrey's assasination.

#82 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-26 12:34 PM

You should probably sit this one out.

#78 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Oh look, the most worthless piece of s(*& on this site shows up to chime in.

F*&^ off, terard.

#83 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-26 01:03 PM

you're talking about the 2020 election.

#79 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-26 12:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

No fkkin kidding.. what gave it away for you? You hit like a girl.

#84 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-26 04:20 PM

Oh look, the most worthless piece of s(*& on this site shows up to chime in.

F*&^ off, terard.

#83 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-26 01:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

What a profound response from a the resident pDh... Fkkin raetard.

#85 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-08-26 04:22 PM

"Hey Scooter, you voted for "Weekend At Bernie's", in the previous election."

It was a damn good weekend.
Strongest economic recovery of any modern nation.

And now, we get what you voted for:
Trump ----- the bed.

#86 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-26 04:40 PM

Like any good socialist, Hillbilly Republican JD Vance eagerly took a free and generous handout to attend Yale Law School. But perish forbid anybody else in the US should get a free handout for an education, right JD?

Source: Hillbilly Hypocrite

"I got mine! Screw the rest of you!"

#87 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-08-26 05:00 PM

@#85 ... What a profound response ...

I remain to be convinced that your current alias is able to render a "profound" judgment on any comments here. I mean, really.

But I hope to be shown to be incorrect in that view.

#88 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-26 07:15 PM

Putin's war will end just as our wars in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan ended. He can win the war nut not the occupation. His army will occupy much of Ukraine but the Ukrainians will continue killing the for years; eventually Ukrainians will want it to stop and they will pull out and go back home but it will be a very long list of deaths and wounded Russians.

#89 | Posted by danni at 2025-08-26 09:53 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

'Civil War' Being Mentioned on Social Media (183 comments)

No, C.J. Stroud did not make a Public Statement about Charlie Kirk (26 comments)

Fox News' Host Brian Kilmeade on Mentally Ill Homeless: 'just kill 'em' (23 comments)

Asked How to Fix the Nation, Trump: 'I Couldn't Care Less' (20 comments)

Trump Boat Bombing Takes Darker Turn as Damning New Info Emerges (18 comments)

Pentagon to Hunt for Negative Charlie Kirk Posts by Service Members (16 comments)

WSJ Walks Back False Claim About Charlie Kirk Shooter (16 comments)

Trump: Memphis Next US City to See National Guard Troops (14 comments)

Putin Takes Trump's Weird Drone Response as Green Light to Escalate (14 comments)

Korean Workers Rounded Up Immigration Raid Reject Trump's Offer to Stay (14 comments)