Thursday, December 18, 2025

Plans to Strip Americans of Citizenship

The Trump Administration has plans to greatly increase the number of naturalized Americans to be stripped of their citizenship. Officials will attempt to denaturalize 100 to 200 American citizens each month.

Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 10:53 AM | 85 COMMENTS | permalink

More

Breaking News: The Trump administration plans to ramp up efforts to strip some naturalized Americans of their citizenship, internal documents obtained by The New York Times show, marking an aggressive new phase in President Trump's immigration crackdown. www.nytimes.com/2025/12/17/u...[image or embed]

" The New York Times (@nytimes.com) Dec 17, 2025 at 5:33 PM

Comments

Under federal law, American citizenship can be revoked only in limited cases, mainly when it was obtained through fraud or false information. However, immigrant rights groups warn that a broader push could affect people who made minor or unintentional errors on their paperwork, creating fear among naturalized citizens.

The draconian USCIS quota comes as Dummkopf Trumpf has tightened immigration rules, restricted asylum, and imposed entry bans on travelers from several African and Middle Eastern countries. Junta officials are blatantly lying when they bleat these steps are meant to improve safety and protect national values.

Meanwhile Chinese oligarchs are siring anchor babies in the US at an industrial scale and the sinister Trumpf junta is promoting the mass immigration of filthy foreign oligarchs to America through his corrupt Trumpf Gold Card program.


#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-12-18 01:05 AM

Watch out, Boricuas. Seriously.

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-12-18 08:07 AM

We need to stop this fascist, bawling ape from doing this.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2025-12-18 10:53 AM

via GIPHY

#4 | Posted by fortfisher at 2025-12-18 10:53 AM

So THIS is what Trumpy wants his future punishment to be?

Alrighty then!

So many Cosmic traps ahead for tired old sleepy Trumpy once he leaves office. And he is setting and baiting them all.

Careful what you wish for ... Karma.. what goes around comes around.. and do until others as you would want others to do unto you.. etc.

#5 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-18 10:59 AM

So when does Melanoma lose citizenship?

#6 | Posted by DarkVader at 2025-12-18 11:09 AM

"as the agency targets individuals who unlawfully obtained citizenship through misrepresentation."

The horror!

#7 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-12-18 11:10 AM

Meanwhile Chinese oligarchs are siring anchor babies in the US at an industrial scale

So then I take it you are for ending birthright citizenship that was intended for black slaves, right?

#8 | Posted by boaz at 2025-12-18 11:10 AM

Camps ain't gonna fill themselves!
--Republicans

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-18 11:12 AM

So then I take it you are for ending birthright citizenship that was intended for black slaves, right?
#8 | Posted by boaz

hmmm. does it end your citizenship?

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-18 11:15 AM

If they are allowed to strip any citizen of their status on a whim then they can do it to you. Totally unamerican.

#11 | Posted by qcp at 2025-12-18 11:23 AM

"Under federal law, citizenship can be revoked only in limited cases, mainly when it was obtained through fraud or false information"

#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-12-18 11:24 AM


"as the agency targets individuals who unlawfully obtained citizenship through misrepresentation."

The horror!
#7 | POSTED BY THEBULL

This is what happens when you go after someone for "misrepresentation".


Meanwhile Chinese oligarchs are siring anchor babies in the US at an industrial scale and the sinister Trumpf junta is promoting the mass immigration of filthy foreign oligarchs to America through his corrupt Trumpf Gold Card program.

Winning!


If they are allowed to strip any citizen of their status on a whim then they can do it to you. Totally unamerican.
#11 | POSTED BY QCP

Read the article or some of the posts. Then comment again, reframing it with some reality of whats being discussed.

#13 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-12-18 11:27 AM

That's how it starts. I love how MAGA think they are somehow immune to trump if they keep kissing his ass.

How's the food prices and the economy working out for you ------- idiots?

#14 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:27 AM

"Under federal law, citizenship can be revoked only in limited cases, mainly when it was obtained through fraud or false information"
#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-12-18 11:24 AM | Reply | Flag:

Check fraud 30 years ago?

Trump can't be trusted to do the right thing. Period. Yet, you still trust there are guardrails. Stupid.

#15 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:28 AM

Eggs 1.50 Dozen. Gas 1.50 a gallon.

#16 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-12-18 11:29 AM

Sorry gas 2.50 a gallon.

#17 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-12-18 11:29 AM

We're moving into a recession. The ACA credits are ending December 31st. People are not going to be able to afford insurance, and if they get sick they will lose their homes.

ANd you're posting about ------- eggs.

#18 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:33 AM

Gas is almost 3 dollars here. It aint a buck fifty.

#19 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:34 AM

-ANd you're posting about ------- eggs.

Did you or did you not just ask about food prices?

#20 | Posted by eberly at 2025-12-18 11:35 AM

#15 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:28 AM | Reply | Flag:

The fraudsters are going to be deported. I voted for that. I also voted to remove every last person who came to this country illegally.

If they cant knock at the front door and apply legally, they have no right to be here. Because whole premise of them being here was built on breaking the law.

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-12-18 11:36 AM

Beef prices show no sign of cooling, even as the Trump administration tries to rein in costs by boosting imports and support for domestic ranchers.
The average price for ground beef was $6.781 a pound in November, up 2.1% from September and 15% from a year earlier

finance.yahoo.com

Nice going, pedo 47.

#22 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-12-18 11:38 AM

The fraudsters are going to be deported.

Melania? Her parents? Barron?

No. Poor brown people that wrote a bad check three decades ago. If you trust the trump administration to be fair or competent you haven't been paying attention.

#23 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:38 AM

Melania Trump violated the terms of her visa. She getting deported? Or are the rules suddenly unimportant when it's one of yours?

#24 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:41 AM

"We need to stop this fascist, bawling ape from doing this."

I'm not optimistic you'll be able to, especially since much of the opposition consists of people posting memes on the internet rehashing many of the same things that no one cared about in 2016.

#25 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-12-18 11:41 AM

thanks magat scum

#26 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-12-18 11:43 AM

Bullets not Arguments.

Violence is Not a Monopoly of the State.

2nd Amendment Cuts both ways. It Gaurantees Bloodshed if the PTB go TOO far.

That's Ostensibly why it Exists.

Rule by the Governed.

Or Else...

#27 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-12-18 11:47 AM

"If they cant knock at the front door and apply legally, they have no right to be here."

Okay but why is that worth blowing a trillion bucks?

Why is this worth a $10B Federal spend to buy a 1% drop in GDP to you?

Tell us any actual benefit for Americans will get, spending ten billion dollars to shrink the economy by a trillion dollars.

#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-18 11:47 AM

Aggressive immigration enforcement by ICE in June 2025 is projected to significantly reduce U.S. GDP due to labor shortages and economic disruptions. A Penn Wharton analysis estimates that a four-year policy removing 10% of unauthorized immigrants annually would reduce GDP by 1% and increase federal deficits by $350 billion.
Over a decade, the same policy could shrink GDP by 3.3% and reduce wages by 1.7%.
The American Immigration Council estimates that a long-term deportation plan could result in a 4.2% to 6.8% loss in GDP, totaling $1.1 to $1.7 trillion in losses.
These impacts stem from reduced labor supply in agriculture, construction, hospitality, and elder care, leading to job site abandonments, production slowdowns, and increased automation.
The Federal Reserve has warned that sharp drops in immigrant labor supply are constraining economic growth and contributing to inflation, describing the effect as a supply-side disruption.
Even if only 1.3 million immigrants are deported, GDP could drop by 1.2% by 2028.
The economic strain is further amplified by a $20"25 billion annual loss in federal and state tax revenue due to worker departures and business closures.
--AI Summary
search.brave.com

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-18 11:51 AM

-Okay but why is that worth blowing a trillion bucks?

Show your math and do include a deduction for all the services and entitlements they total up every year.

#30 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-12-18 11:53 AM

While you're at it tally the number of self deportations since the last presidential election.

#31 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-12-18 11:54 AM

visitor conveniently forgets the price of beef.

I guess he only eats eggs and gasoline.

#32 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 11:57 AM

Trump can't be trusted to do the right thing.

Krusty Gnome, the woman who said under oath that she did not deport a military veteran only to run away from the hearing when fact checked by a veteran who was deported is going to do the right thing?

#33 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-12-18 12:23 PM

Sorry gas 2.50 a gallon.

#17 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Stolen gas is generally cheaper.

So.. Steal baby steal!

#34 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-18 12:34 PM

"as the agency targets individuals who unlawfully obtained citizenship through misrepresentation."

The horror!

#7 | Posted by THEBULL

Does that include melania?

Or do you think she legitimately qualified for a "GENIUS" visa?

#35 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 12:42 PM

What about those that dodged the draft through misrepresentation?

#36 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 12:42 PM

What about those that attempted a coup through misrepresentation?

#37 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 12:42 PM

-Okay but why is that worth blowing a trillion bucks?
Show your math and do include a deduction for all the services and entitlements they total up every year.
#30 | Posted by lfthndthrds

It's all at the link, but you're too ----------- to read it, and too dumb to discuss it.

#38 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-18 12:43 PM

What about those that cheated on their taxes through misrepresentation?

#39 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 12:43 PM

Sorry gas 2.50 a gallon.

#17 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Yes economic collapse is a great way to lower gas prices.

Maybe we could have another pandemic to lower it further. Wouldn't that be great?

#40 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 12:43 PM

While you're at it tally the number of self deportations since the last presidential election.
#31 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Tally what, the economic losses?

You're so dumb you don't think the economy suffers when workers leave their jobs.

So. Dumb.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-18 12:44 PM

Wait for Jeffries becomes Speaker and then impeach both Trump and Vance.

Then all this MEGA ------- will be reversed and we can go back to living normal again.

What say everybody?

#42 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-18 12:46 PM

Wait for Jeffries becomes Speaker and then impeach both Trump and Vance.

Then all this MEGA ------- will be reversed and we can go back to living normal again.

What say everybody?

#42 | Posted by Twinpac

Jeffries is a useless corporate stooge like pelosi and biden. He'll do nothing to fight fascism just like they didn't.

#43 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 12:52 PM

Is this to get rid of Melania on the cheap for the next younger wife?

#44 | Posted by MBlue at 2025-12-18 01:04 PM

Wait for Jeffries becomes Speaker and then impeach both Trump and Vance.
Then all this MEGA ------- will be reversed and we can go back to living normal again.
What say everybody?
#42 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-18 12:46 PM

AIPAC monies do not legislate on our behalf.

Corporate candidates need to prepare for a spectacular booting, imo.

#45 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-18 01:08 PM

"Under federal law, citizenship can be revoked only in limited cases, mainly when it was obtained through fraud or false information"
#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds

"When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal" - The Supreme Court, basically

#46 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-12-18 01:28 PM

SPEAKS

"Jeffries is a useless corporate stooge like pelosi and biden. He'll do nothing to fight fascism just like they didn'

I think you need to take your crystal ball in for a tuneup.

Jus' sayin'

#47 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-18 02:03 PM

"as the agency targets individuals who unlawfully obtained citizenship through misrepresentation."
The horror!

#7 | Posted by THEBULL

Then Melania and Musk should both leave.

#49 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2025-12-18 02:52 PM

Rumor?

It's a stated goal.

"Under President Trump's leadership, we are looking to set a goal of a minimum of 3,000 arrests for ICE every day," Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said in an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News in May.

#50 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-18 02:56 PM

#4 | Posted by fortfisher

Meanwhile, pieces of s*&^ like this are left to do their part decreasing the overall IQ of the American population.

#51 | Posted by jpw at 2025-12-18 02:59 PM

#7 | Posted by THEBULL

Add another name to the list.

#52 | Posted by jpw at 2025-12-18 03:00 PM

So then I take it you are for ending birthright citizenship that was intended for black slaves, right?

#8 | Posted by boaz

So, you're all about interpreting the constitution when it advances your anti-immigrant bigotry, otherwise it must be explicit language or bust?

Name number 3 for the list.

#53 | Posted by jpw at 2025-12-18 03:01 PM

Eggs 1.50 Dozen. Gas 1.50 a gallon.

#16 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-12-18 11:29 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Sorry gas 2.50 a gallon.

#17 | Posted by visitor_

Gee couldn't be because avian flu is no longer decimating flocks and the economy is in the sh*&^er, could it?

STFU idiot.

Name 4 for the list.

#54 | Posted by jpw at 2025-12-18 03:03 PM

Show your math and do include a deduction for all the services and entitlements they total up every year.

#30 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Ahhhh yes the ever present stupid f*&^ assertion that illegals are partaking in programs they can't legally partake in.

Name 5.

#55 | Posted by jpw at 2025-12-18 03:05 PM

SPEAKS

"Jeffries is a useless corporate stooge like pelosi and biden. He'll do nothing to fight fascism just like they didn'

I think you need to take your crystal ball in for a tuneup.

Jus' sayin'

#47 | Posted by Twinpac

Jeffries = DNC.

Meanwhile...
www.nytimes.com
"The D.N.C. Is Scrapping Its Report on What Went Wrong in 2024"

#56 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 03:17 PM

SPEAKS

"What Went Wrong in 2024"

#57 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-18 03:50 PM

"What Went Wrong in 2024"

The price of eggs???

That's when Trump promised to lay the biggest egg the world has ever seen.

Then by golly, he went and did it.

#58 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-18 03:57 PM

" Ahhhh yes the ever present stupid f*&^ assertion that illegals are partaking in programs they can't legally partake in.

Name 5.

#55 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2025-12-18 03:05 PM | FLAG: "

You are a dumb ----. A dumb ----!!!

#60 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-12-18 05:11 PM

The D.N.C. Is Scrapping Its Report on What Went Wrong in 2024

No mystery whatsoever.

The Trump campaign spent $300,000,000.00+ on advertising on NCAA & NFL games throughout September and October in every single swing state ("All 7 of them!")...

... an investment that went answered by the Harris campaign by $0.00 spending.

The focus of the $300,000,000.00+ on advertising?

So-called "trans" issues.

That's what went wrong in 2024.

#61 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-18 05:52 PM

Gaza is what went wrong.

Harris had no articulated policy beyond "i can't say bad things about Joe" on the Palestinian massacre. The left hated that.

#62 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 06:10 PM

Ahhhh yes the ever present stupid f*&^ assertion that illegals are partaking in programs they can't legally partake in.
Name 5.

#55 | Posted by jpw at 2025-12-18 03:05 PM | Reply | Flag

Jeff can't name 2 let alone 5. He just KNOWS what he knows.

#63 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 06:11 PM

That's what went wrong in 2024.

#61 | Posted by A_Friend

How do you know? The DNC is hiding the report. How come?

#64 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 06:11 PM

They're hiding the report because the old guard doesn't want to change anything and lose power.

#65 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 06:12 PM

#62 Nope.

That was at the edges.

Look at the underlying issues.

"Gaza" might have had an effect in Michigan.

Might.

Unanswered "anti-trans" ads?

That's what went wrong in 2024.

#66 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-18 06:13 PM

Go on threads, A friend. The standard leftist there has been calling Gaza a genocide for years. Years.
Harris refused to take a coherent position on that.
Most American voters won't vote for the lesser of two evils, they just stay home (because they're idiots)

Also, I don't think it's ONE thing that cost Harris the election. It's a lot of bumbling.

#67 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 06:15 PM

... an investment that went answered by the Harris campaign by $0.00 spending.

However, your example is definitely a factor, just not the sole reason IMHO.

#68 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-18 06:16 PM

#64 I listen.

I learn.

Trump's Anti-Trans Ads Were Expensive and Unpopular. So Why Were They His Key Strategy?

Trump's campaign spent more than five times as much on anti-trans ads than on ads focused on the economy.

3. Airing Ads About Trans Sports During Football

GOP ads targeting the transgender community aired more than 30,000 times, according to data from AdImpact, with a particular focus on NFL and college football broadcast audiences in swing states.

One ad, which included the slogan, "Kamala is for they/them, Trump is for you," focused on trans women in sports, saying, "Kamala even supports letting biological men compete against our girls in their sports."


If you want further clarification, I suggest contacting Rick Wilson, who first introduced the idea of the un-answered $300,000,000.00+ spending on trans issues on televised sports games in September/October 2024 that went unanswered by the Harris campaign ...

...more than three months ago.

#69 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-18 06:27 PM

" Most American voters won't vote for the lesser of two evils,"

Yes they will, but only up to a certain threshold where both of the two evils annoy them.

Harris, like Mrs Clinton, probably annoyed more people by coming across as wishy washy rather then taking a clear position either way that would have offended one group or the other.

" they just stay home (because they're idiots)"

Stupid comments like this also annoy voters when they're made on behalf of certain candidate. Well done on helping get your opposition elected, twice.

#70 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-12-18 06:49 PM

#67 What do you suppose is the general population participation on Threads?

Or even know what is going on, on Threads?

Sorry, my friend Alexandrite.

$300,000,000.00+ anti-trans/anti-Harris/pro-Trump spending in September/October, in all seven swing states - on NFL/NCAA broadcast games - and completely unanswered by the Harris campaign, was political malpractice of the highest order.

Gaza, immigrants, inflation, Biden, Harris ... none of these things caused voters of color, Hispanics, and others to vote for Trump, in all 7 swing states. Or just stay home.

It was the vile attacks on trans people.

#71 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-18 07:17 PM

#64 I listen.

I learn.

#69 | Posted by A_Friend

Then you couldnt work at the DNC. They listened and then they buried the results so they wouldnt have to learn from them.

#72 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-18 07:24 PM

"Unanswered "anti-trans" ads?
That's what went wrong in 2024."

what were they supposed to answer with?

#73 | Posted by eberly at 2025-12-18 07:26 PM

#72 Indeed.

They wouldn't like what I would say.

#74 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-18 07:48 PM

#73 Oh, I don't know.

Perhaps at least point out, matching $ for $, that the "pro-trans Harris ad" was, in fact, a response by CA AG Harris to the Trump administration dictate for trans care in federal prisons.

Perhaps.

#75 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-18 07:51 PM

75

You wanted that message to go out to NFL and college football fans?

I think you may be right in that ad campaign may have been by far the single biggest reason for the Harris defeat but it's was a lock to work in trumps favor.

Easy to Monday morning quarterback it now but the Trans issue was a total loser for the democrats at the time.

#76 | Posted by eberly at 2025-12-18 08:33 PM

Easy to Monday morning quarterback it now but the Trans issue was a total loser for the democrats at the time.

#76 | Posted by eberly

Every issue is a loser issue for democrats when the billionaire oligarchs who control the media and the algorithms support the fascist dictator.

#77 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-19 03:39 PM

At least when they're being stripped of citizenship they can be high legally while it happens

#78 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2025-12-19 04:07 PM

Every issue is a loser issue for democrats when the billionaire oligarchs who control the media and the algorithms support the fascist dictator.

#77 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-12-19 03:39 PM | Reply | Flag: Yup

"2.8 million people ages 13 and older in the US identify as transgender. This represents about 1.0% of the population aged 13 and older. Among adults (18 and older), about 0.8%, or over 2.1 million people, identify as transgender."

What an existential threat to America these transgender people pose!

No wait, that's the Muslims!

"4.5 million Muslims live in the US, or approximately 1.3% of the total US population."

Let's bomb the Somalis and kick them all out!

An estimated 169,000 to 221,000 Somalis live in the US or 0.07% to 0.09% of the US population.

Just look at all these existential threats to 348,134,938 Americans!


#79 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-12-19 04:18 PM

Easy to Monday morning quarterback it now but the Trans issue was a total loser for the democrats at the time.

Helping oppressed minorities is rarely a winning issue for any party. It apparently takes a long time for Americans to be reasonable and come to terms with these kinds of changes.

Unfortunately the changes like these are not waiting for Americans to catch up to happen. If you think things will remain the same forever then you just aren't paying attention. Changes are coming faster than ever.

Democrats were very brave to even try and take it on. And yes they paid for it. In the short term.

And now we know what kind of country America is today.

Individually we can be wonderful people but as a nation we are not a very nice people.

Sadly.

We live in Dark Times.

#80 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-19 04:33 PM

-Helping oppressed minorities is rarely a winning issue for any party

Agreed

Slavery
Suffrage
Civil Rights

Political parties have a hard time getting ahead of public opinion.

But I respect the effort. It's hard not to.

#81 | Posted by eberly at 2025-12-19 04:58 PM

Every issue is a loser issue for democrats when the billionaire oligarchs who control the media and the algorithms support the fascist dictator.

That doesn't help. I agree....but Donner's point is better said.....

#82 | Posted by eberly at 2025-12-19 04:59 PM

"Political parties have a hard time getting ahead of public opinion."

That's why they manufacture public opinion through propaganda.

And now you know ... the rest of the story.

(Hoping you're old enough to remember Paul Harvey.)

#83 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-19 07:18 PM

Who the ---- cares? A quisling is a quisling is a quisling.

#84 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-12-20 01:21 AM

visitor conveniently forgets the price of beef.

I guess he only eats eggs and gasoline.

#32 | Posted by Alexandrite

I went shopping last week at Publix for my elderly aunt while visiting her in Florida:

Coffee is through the roof (up to $21 for name brands, even their off brand was $14), store brand paper towels were $11 for 3 rolls (WTF!), a can of Chunky soup @ $3.49, hamburger @ $10 a pound, bread over $5, etc etc etc.

Hardware items I've purchased before and after the tariffs began have doubled in price.

Trump has royally f'ed up our economy

#85 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-12-20 10:02 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

ICE Agent Shoots, Kills Woman (790 comments)

Videos Contradict Trump Administration Account of ICE Shooting (237 comments)

GOP: 'This isn't rocket science' (45 comments)

Trump Taking Control of Money Sold from Venezuelan Oil (34 comments)

Trump's New US Mission Statement: Strength, Force, Power (20 comments)

Trump to Freeze Children's Programs in Blue States (18 comments)

Senate Republican: Greenland Invasion Would be 'weapons-grade stupid' (16 comments)

Professor Fired for Charlie Kirk Post Gets $500K, is Reinstated (15 comments)

ICE Shooting Leaves 6 Year Old an Orphan (14 comments)

Trump: US Military Budget for 2027 Should Be $1.5 Trillion (13 comments)