Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, February 29, 2024

The country [House Speaker Mike] Johnson has the power to save is Ukraine, two years after Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded, decreeing that it didn't have the right to exist.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Mikey is the Chief of the Keystone Kops House... who are the results of a decade long effort by the Republican Party to recruit the best of the best pliable dunces and buffoons as Representatives from around the country.

Thanks, GOP and Trumpism!

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-02-28 10:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Thanks, GOP and Trumpism!" Yrumpism = Putinism.

#2 | Posted by danni at 2024-02-28 11:18 AM | Reply

Honest question: what makes Ukraine our ally?

#3 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-28 07:15 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

#3 an enemy of my enemy is my ally.
Just like great Britain was when fighting Nazis while you conservatives kept us out of the war.
Russia has been our enemy since Stalin cuddled up with Hitler.
I think it's generally agreed that Truman's is mistake was not using the nuclear monopoly to vaporize Russia after WW2.
For the price of a couple dozen bombs we could have had global peace and prosperity.

#4 | Posted by northguy3 at 2024-02-28 08:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"#3 an enemy of my enemy is my ally.
#4 | POSTED BY NORTHGUY3"

That is ------ thinking. An enemy or my enemy can just as easily still be an enemy - no need to support them. Do you -------- ever think that maybe the US should not be involved in every war? Seems like this thought never crossed your minds.

#5 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-28 11:47 PM | Reply

...maybe the US should not be involved in every war?

The Pentagon provides for a substantial chunk of the US GDP. Staying out of wars would make it hard to justify their unlimited budget.

#6 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-02-29 12:26 AM | Reply

The Pentagon provides for a substantial chunk of the US GDP
- Redial

Not as much as servicing the US debt.

Staying out of wars would make it hard to justify their unlimited budget.
- Redial

Not really. In fact it would justify the expense if they spared the US from actually fighting wars.

#7 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 01:45 AM | Reply

LOL.

#8 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-02-29 01:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Not really. In fact it would justify the expense if they spared the US from actually fighting wars.
#7 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT"

At this point, they have instigate wars along with the Deep State to justify their existence. Frankly, I don't believe in Global Warming - but, I would 100% be in favor of cutting military spending (outside of salaries) to $0 and using the money to build out the greatest solar and wind farm in history so that the US could be permanently decoupled by the Middle East. That would save us countless trillions in the long run.

#9 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-29 02:31 AM | Reply

Mike Johnson doesn't have the power to save Ukraine. The trial balloon of sending troops was sent up by Macron. Lead balloon..

#10 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-02-29 10:20 AM | Reply

Re 10

Yeah. That idea was sunk like a rock.

But whether we want to or not we will be sending troops. Maybe not now maybe not even a year from now. But if Ukraine falls we will eventually be sending our troops to defend some another country. Who really knows how a win for Russia will change the world? What will it embolden him or others to do next?

If you think Russia will stop with Ukraine you haven't been paying attention. I believe the next country on his list of countries that "belong" to Russia is Belarus.

" Belarus was retaken by Stalin's Russia in 1944 and remained under Soviet control until declaring its sovereignty on July 27, 1990 and independence from the Soviet Union on August 25, 1991."

And let's not forget China is watching. (And dictators across the globe) A loss in Ukraine increases the odds of American soldiers dying to protect Taiwan or somewhere else in the world. Maybe even in Europe eventually.

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-02-29 10:35 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

We had Republicans in the 1930's trying to convince us that Hitler wasn't our problem, today change the name to Putin and the same fools are selling the same lies. Freedom isn't free I've heard Republicans say in the past but apparently today they think it is. Traitors like Trump and his moronic followers are intentionally hurting America. If I see another Trump flag I promise you I will spit on it!

#12 | Posted by danni at 2024-02-29 10:36 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#s 11 and 12: 2nd those responses.

#13 | Posted by Yodagirl at 2024-02-29 11:13 AM | Reply

@#10 ... The trial balloon of sending troops was sent up by Macron. ...

Yesterday Pres Putin said it NATO sends troops into Ukraine, he would use nuclear weapons and the result would be the end of civilization.

So, Pres Putin thinks it is OK for him to send troops into Ukraine, but NATO cannot?


#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-29 12:00 PM | Reply

@#14

said it NATO

-should be -

said if NATO

#15 | Posted by lamplighter at 2024-02-29 12:56 PM | Reply

Honest question: what makes Ukraine our ally?

#3 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

If it were just about Ukraine, I might agree. But this has long term security implications FAR beyond Ukraine. And, Ukraine DOES have as much right to sovereignty as anyone else.

#16 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-02-29 01:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Honest question: what makes Ukraine our ally?
#3 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

Honest question:
Are you too young to remember the Cold War?

#17 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-29 01:41 PM | Reply

Honest question for Claudio. Since when does the United States turn our backs on democratic nations struggling yo defend their sobereign territories from murdering Communist dictators? Is that what you really want our nation to do? The Ukrainians are battling against one of the most oowerful militaries in the world and doing it with no American troops whie Republicans here in the US oppose military assisstance for no real reason other than the belief that Joe Biden might benefit in the polls if Ukraine is able to use American weapons to defeat the Russians who are murdering thousands of civillians. If this were an honest debate about money the trillions of tax dollars lost in tax cuts for the 1% would be central to the discussion but it isn't really about money. It's really just about helping Donald Trump AND EVERYONE, INCLUDING YOU, KWOWS THAT! No real patriot ever put a candidate before the good of the nation but that is what you and the rest of the GQP are doing. It is the most disgusting political move,ent that I have seen in my entire life. No one would have ever thought that the Republican Party would be taking orders from a Russian Communist dictator but that is what is happening today. You can deny it all you want but we all KNOW it is true. Carry on comrade!

#18 | Posted by danni at 2024-02-29 02:43 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

I'm not so sure Johnson sees himself in a dilemma or under the thumb of the extremists.

He has only one choice to make and that's to do what Trump tells him to do. Do you really think he's going to make the same mistake McCarthy made? That would take some backbone that Johnson doesn't possess.

Trump is in charge of the House, not Johnson. And neither one of them have a single moral fiber to their name.

Of course, the House is still going to agree to another short term extension of federal the budget. The GOP needs a little more time to make sure a shutdown is going to help Trump win in November.

#19 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-02-29 04:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#19 They're waiting until July or August to crash the economy so that Low Information Voters which is 2/3 of Republicans will blame it on Biden.

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-29 04:26 PM | Reply

Apparently Claudio won't respond to my post. Probably waiting for orders from the Kremlin.

#21 | Posted by danni at 2024-02-29 04:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

DANNI

CLAUDIO/Robson can't do anything but Copy & Paste what's on his bullet points memo for the week. He has a limited subscription.

#22 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-02-29 05:03 PM | Reply

Yesterday Pres Putin said it NATO sends troops into Ukraine, he would use nuclear weapons and the result would be the end of civilization.
So, Pres Putin thinks it is OK for him to send troops into Ukraine, but NATO cannot?

#14 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER AT 2024-02-29 12:00 PM | FLAG:

Yes. He didn't go to war on NATO.

#23 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-02-29 05:03 PM | Reply

#11 Donnerboy Putin actually said he was thinking of going for Poland.

#24 | Posted by Ronnie68 at 2024-02-29 05:39 PM | Reply

" Frankly, I don't believe in Global Warming "

Frankly, I think you are a moron. There isn't even a debate about the existence of global warming any more. It has shifted to what can we do to mitigate the effects of it.

#25 | Posted by danni at 2024-02-29 06:23 PM | Reply

#11 Donnerboy Putin actually said he was thinking of going for Poland.

#24 | POSTED BY RONNIE68 AT 2024-02-29 05:39 PM | FLAG:

He also said he wasn't thinking of going for Poland.

Feb 8 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said in an interview aired on Thursday that Moscow had no interest in invading "Poland, Latvia or anywhere else" and said talk that Moscow might do so was threat mongering,

#26 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-02-29 07:03 PM | Reply

MikeJohnson faces no dilemma.

He will do what Trump tells him to.

#27 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-29 07:13 PM | Reply

MikeJohnson faces no dilemma.
He will do what Trump tells him to.
#27 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

How f-upped is it that a man, who has a pact with his teenage son to make sure they don't watch porn, is willing to do whatever another man, who paid hush money to a porn star during the 2016 election, tells him to do?

#28 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-29 07:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#28 | POSTED BY GAL_HOLIDAY

What?

#29 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 07:33 PM | Reply

So, Pres Putin thinks it is OK for him to send troops into Ukraine, but NATO cannot?
#14 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

What do you think the war is about GasLighter?

#30 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 07:35 PM | Reply

Since when does the United States turn our backs on democratic nations struggling yo defend their sobereign territories from murdering Communist dictators?

Ukraine isn't a Democratic nation, its cancelled its elections.

#31 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 07:35 PM | Reply

thehill.com
^^^^^^^^^^
This is what IAMRUNT supports.

#32 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-02-29 07:40 PM | Reply

Mike Johnson Admits He and His Son Monitor Each Other's Porn Intake in Resurfaced Video

"I'm proud to tell ya, my son has got a clean slate," Speaker of the House says of his "accountability partner"
www.rollingstone.com

#33 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-29 07:43 PM | Reply

I think we should keep in mind that when Putin talks about the "nuclear option,"

he probably means aiming a missile at the nuclear power plant in Ukraine.

It wouldn't be the end of civilization, but it would certainly put one hell of a crater hole in it.

Sad part is, Putin is crazy enough to do it and Trump is crazy enough to join in the celebration.

All of Europe will be taking iodide pills.

#34 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-02-29 08:16 PM | Reply

#34 idk I would imagine the worst.

And hope for the best.


Putin is crazy enough to do it and Trump is crazy enough to join in the celebration.

Wager, Lumpers here would be estatic if Putin used nukes.

Biden would also feel vindicated, the secret celebrations wouldn't end.

#35 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 08:36 PM | Reply

#33

How's Hunter doing?

#36 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 08:37 PM | Reply

How's Hunter doing?

#36 | POSTED BY IAMRUNT

Has the demented------------ figured out his wife's name yet?

#37 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-02-29 08:54 PM | Reply

"He didn't go to war on NATO."

But he did invade Ukraine, without provocation and did murder thousands of people and destroyed their infrastructure. But hey, Donald Trump still likes him as his mentor in his quest to turn America into a Russian style oligarchy as President for ife and Republicans do whatever he says no matter if it's good for the nation or not because truthfully Trump doesn't give a crap one way or the other, he only cares about himself.

#38 | Posted by danni at 2024-02-29 09:33 PM | Reply

"How's Hunter doing?" Probably better than the Republicans who tried to build an impeachment based on the testimony of a Russian asset. They now look dishonest and totally incompetent. Mike Johnson looks just plain stupid.

#39 | Posted by danni at 2024-02-29 09:39 PM | Reply

How's Hunter doing?
#36 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

He's working hard on his sobriety. I wish him continued success:

Hunter: "I will answer it this way: I have been absolutely transparent about my drug use. Again, I spoke to you all earlier this morning about that. I'm sorry; I'm an addict. I was an addict. I have been in recovery for over 4-and-a-half years now, Mr. Gaetz. I work really, really hard at it. Let me answer. I work really hard at it, under an enormous amount of pressure. Was I an addict? Yes, I was an addict. What does that have to do with whether or not you're going to go forward with an impeachment of my father other than to simply try to embarrass me?"

twitter.com

#40 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-29 10:32 PM | Reply

@#36 ... How's Hunter doing? ...

Why your current alias' concern?

I mean, really, does your current alias really care?

Or is it just trying to raise disruption-oriented talking point?

Why ask?

Serious question.

What's yer current alias got?

#41 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-29 10:43 PM | Reply

__________
Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-28 07:15 PM
Honest question: what makes Ukraine our ally?

If this question is really honest, then this is your brain on "TrumPutin" - IOW, your brain has too much of "TrumPutin" in it.

For one, we are fulfilling an obligation under 1994 Budapest Memorandum that USA, UK, Russian Federation and Ukraine signed on December 5, 1994 as part of relinquishing and transferring nuclear weapons as part of Ukraine's accession into NPT (Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty), and which Putin violated under several stupid, unlikely pretenses ***.

Better questions:

What makes many other democracies our allies, even if sometimes we don't like the way they do some things and they don't like they way we do some things (and both/all may be correct in their opinions)?

Why do so many countries (32 after long-"neutral" Finland and Sweden joined) in Western and Eastern Europe (formerly aligned with Soviet Union/Russia in Warsaw Pact) decided to join NATO (military defense alliance with the USA) instead of simply staying neutral or even joining Russia or some other alliance?

What makes Putin, hell-bent on reconstructing "Russian Union of former Soviet Republics," our "friend"? If it's his / Russia's "Christian values" then :

1. Ukraine has larger percentage of Christians than Russia - pre-war data showed nearly 90% of Ukraine's population were Christians, compared to 60% of Christians and 10% Muslims in Russia - and Ukrainians have not been looting the Russian churches of religious, cultural valuables, arts and artifacts ("by February 2023 "Industrial-scale Russian looting destroys Ukraine's historical sites and artifacts - museums, historical buildings, churches...").

2. Look at allies and supporters of Putin's Russia :
Communist dictatorship of North Korea,
Ayatollah and mullahs of Islamic Republic of Iran,
various Iran-backed Arab terrorist groups and factions in the Middle East (working to destabilize region even more, open new fronts and jack up price of oil) and
Xi's Communist / fascist China

.

Much better questions:

Why do you think Russia attacked Ukraine and not much weaker militarily former Soviet states of Baltic region (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania)? Hint: Is it because they are under Article 5 of NATO charter?

Why do you think famously "neutral" Finland and Sweden decided to become members of NATO immediately upon Russian invasion into Ukraine?

Why do you think Putin just now openly threatens to "annex" Transnistria in Moldova... after essentially securing a tacit support from "Trump-enabled" Mike Johnson?

Why do you think that Russian "mini-NATO" (CSTO formed in 2022 - Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) is falling apart (Feb 26, 2024 - "Russia Presses Armenia Over Exit From Putin's 'Mini-NATO'") and Russian southern neighbors are looking for "diversification" of their economies away from Russia and closer to the West - EU and USA - and, like Republic of Georgia, are aspiring NATO members. Why are they all looking for protection from Russia, which apparently just being a NATO member affords them? Do you think you know better than Russia's neighbors and long-time "allies" or "involuntary members of the club" whose friends they want to be... and why?

Do you think that Russians getting their hands on second largest landmass in Europe (after Russia's European part itself) and rich natural and agricultural resources and products (which Russia is trying to prevent Ukraine from selling to poor countries in Africa) as well as two largest nuclear plants in Europe that are located in Ukraine, is a good thing for us and our allies and partners in EU?
__________

#42 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-02-29 11:06 PM | Reply

__________
*** Tucker Carlson throws Putin under the bus
The former Fox News host dismissed part of Putin's justification for invading Ukraine as "one of the dumbest things" he's ever heard.

Russian neo-Nazi unit defying Putin's orders to cover up "war crimes"
Russian paramilitary group Task Force Rusich published a post "about the execution of prisoners."

A Russian neo-Nazi paramilitary group says it has defied President Vladimir Putin's order to delete a social media post that called for the execution of Ukrainian prisoners of war. The group... had links to the now-dissolved paramilitary outfit the Wagner Group, whose late chief, Yevgeny Prigozhin, was killed after his private jet crashed in Russia's Tver region in August 2023.

Russia is deploying former Wagner mercenaries near the Donetsk town of Avdiivka, which was recently seized by Moscow's forces, taking the same approach they used in their brutal assaults elsewhere in the region. "Russia was forming a volunteer corps of 18,000 troops, including all former Wagner mercenaries... managed by the (Russian) Ministry of Defense."

Ukraine is negotiating a security agreement with U.S. ally Japan as the Kremlin's war against Kyiv continues
"The agreement with Japan is being negotiated as with any other. ... we have concluded several agreements... There is a clear understanding between G7 and Ukraine that those security guarantee agreements will be concluded by each country," said Ukrainian ambassador to Japan.

NATO ally tells Ukraine to cross Putin's red line
Finland approved a new $205 million military aid package for Ukraine earlier this month.

Ukraine gets defense boost from Israel
Israel's ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan, called Kyiv an "ally" and compared Russian aggression with Hamas attacks.

Russia forced to cut exports amid Ukraine strikes on oil hubs
__________

#43 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-02-29 11:08 PM | Reply

@#42 ... they are under Article 5 of NATO charter ...

Has NATO ever invoked Article 5? Or is it just something that is thrown around?

Collective defence and Article 5
www.nato.int

... NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States. ...

Wait, what?

The only time the NATO collective defense agreement was ever invoked was to protect the United States?



#44 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-29 11:17 PM | Reply

Has NATO ever invoked Article 5? Or is it just something that is thrown around?

Yes 9/11

#45 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 11:21 PM | Reply

@#42 ... Why do you think Putin just now openly threatens to "annex" Transnistria in Moldova... after essentially securing a tacit support from "Trump-enabled" Mike Johnson? ...

I was planning to post a thread on that, after seeing the reports on DW News each evening.


Yeah, Pres Putin it does look like is an expansionist.

Probably why Finland and Sweden (the latter, after 300 years of neutrality) want to join or have joined NATO.


thx for your comments...

#46 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-29 11:21 PM | Reply

@#45

So your current alias seems to admit it did not even read my entire post before it replied?


#47 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-29 11:24 PM | Reply

__________
#31 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-29 07:35 PM
Ukraine isn't a Democratic nation, its cancelled its elections.

There are many reasons for that, the main being that holding elections while "at war" and "under martial law" would be unconstitutional according to 2015 law, well before Zelensky was elected.

Moreover, no one was exactly pining for the "job" though I am sure they could find few opportunists like Dean Phillips, Robert Kennedy Jr, Cornell West.

Even if Rada changed the rules / Constitution to make one legal and possible, there would also be tremendous logistical, security and financial funding problems associated with trying to hold "free and fair elections" in the middle of the hot war, with a large part of population outside of Ukraine in many foreign countries, and many displaced in Ukraine or at the fronts... All just for show, as Lindsey Graham suggested?

|------- Zelensky responded, saying that "according to the legislation, it is forbidden to hold elections" and also said that Ukraine would not be able to finance elections: "I will not hold elections on credit. I will not take money from weapons and allocate it to elections, either." -------|

Do you think that Putin holding fake elections makes Russia "democratic" or you are just parroting Tucker Carlson who accused Zelensky of "... canceling the elections to create a dictatorship"?

Or do you enjoy looking unserious and uncredible?
__________

#48 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-03-01 01:19 AM | Reply

Since when does the United States turn our backs on democratic nations struggling yo defend their sobereign territories from murdering Communist dictators?

#31 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT AT 2024-02-29 07:35 PM | FLAG:

There's this place called Vietnam. Great food. I don't know if you've heard of it, but at one point it fell to Communism. It took some time, but nobody really likes being communist poor and now it's a single-party capitalist state with Harley dealerships.

#49 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-01 08:31 AM | Reply

But he did invade Ukraine, without provocation

#38 | POSTED BY DANNI AT 2024-02-29 09:33 PM | FLAG:

He invaded Ukraine after a CIA assisted coup ejected his puppet government to turn to the EU.

How provoked was the US when we invaded Grenada and instituted regime change?

#50 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-01 08:35 AM | Reply

George Washington (and Thomas Jefferson) said it best.....stay the fx-away from entangling alliances. The simple reality is schemers and alliances will play and control us and harm us. Ukraine was a ploy used by certain elites as a proxy to confront Russia. Ukraine was never an ally. Actually Russia was not a foe and somewhat friendly until the schemers like Obama and Hillary and Nuland saw an opportunity to create friction by using our intel agencies and changing the government of Ukraine as pro EU that could eventually be used against Russia. The intel agencies are to often schemers that subvert our national interests into something they believe they should control and outside of public visibility.

#51 | Posted by Robson at 2024-03-01 11:10 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Ukraine was a ploy used by certain elites as a proxy to confront Russia."

The stupid, it burns.

"schemers that subvert our national interests into something they believe they should control and outside of public visibility."

But enough about the politicians you support demanding to interview Hunter Biden in private.

#52 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-03-01 11:15 AM | Reply

Ukraine was a ploy used by certain elites as a proxy to confront Russia.

Elites forced Russia to invade Ukraine?

Which ones?

#53 | Posted by JOE at 2024-03-01 11:16 AM | Reply

"George Washington (and Thomas Jefferson) said it best.....stay the fx-away from entangling alliances."

George also said stay away from two party political systems too.

When President George Washington left public office, he cautioned the nation not to divide themselves into political parties.

In his farewell address, he stated that the spirit of the party, "serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection."

We didn't listen to that sage advice either.

#54 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-01 11:21 AM | Reply

51

Is Bizarro World history.

We would likely still be an English Colony had not France interfered on our behalf... in a Revolution that was definitely against the Empire that created the Colony.

Vlad invaded his neighbor, and America Firster isolationists like Robotson, who would have sat on their hands while the Axis Powers took over the rest of the World, then came for America... have little to no standing when it comes to giving advise on world affairs.

#55 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-01 11:31 AM | Reply

The EU is ramping up drastically to support Ukraine, assuming that US aid will dry up. It may work in time, it may not.

#56 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-01 12:01 PM | Reply

How's Hunter doing?
#36 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Why are Hunter's vices any of yours or congresses business?

#57 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-03-01 01:52 PM | Reply

Ukraine is not officially our ally. They've never helped the USA.
We gave them 200 Billion and may give them more of which ??? goes to insiders.
When Democrats are obsessed giving away billions of our money to other counterspies be wary.
Zelensky is a leftist entertainer not really an effective leader with military experience.
He takes care of only his own instead of all the people. We saw that in the beginning when ambulances were hired to escape the few.
We need to defend America and our borders and country first and foremost.
This war was allowed to take off instead of being negotiated to an end.
Zelensky was never in the military even if he consistently wore an OD t-shirt.
Our giveaway to Ukraine was never monitored in detail.
Ultimately we must secure our country and its borders, not Ukraine or the Middle East.
The entire concept of more Dem sponsored war needs to be investigated by political opposition.

#58 | Posted by Robson at 2024-03-01 07:38 PM | Reply

__________
#58 | Posted by Robson at 2024-03-01 07:38 PM
Ukraine is not officially our ally. They've never helped the USA.

Ukraine was involved in the Operation Iraqi Freedom shortly after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Ukrainian troops were limited to a peacekeeping role, as part of the Multi-National Force, but they engaged in combat with Iraqi insurgents. Mission - at the time largest ever military operation ever undertaken by the Armed Forces of Ukraine - ended on December 9, 2008.

More than 6,000 Ukrainians performed military service in Iraq and Kuwait, including a permanent presence of 1,600. 18 Ukrainian soldiers were killed - only below US, UK (179), Italy (33) and Poland (30) coalition forces.

France and Germany (NATO members) didn't participate due to no explicit authorization of use of force by UNSC, which would be met with Russia's veto.

One of the big reasons for the war was that Saddam Hussein relied on explicit promise of Russian (our "new friend" Putin's) veto of any UNSC resolution of military involvement, and Saddam didn't heed the multiple public and private warnings, so he ignored more than 17 UN resolutions to allow inspections (Hans Blix later described his experience in Iraq's "sham inspection" as "cat and mouse games" where he was not allowed to go where he requested and/or even take photos of places which were shown to him) and stop corruption of UN Food-For-Oil*** program from which Russia, China and France benefited:

In 2003 Iraq was under UN, US and IAEA sanctions and was violating and not cooperating with at least 17 UN resolutions and kept refusing inspections, while sending caravans of trucks to Syria

Russia also has been supplying Saddam with then-advanced military weaponry (like MiG-31 planes, many of which were blown up before they could take off, and some were later found in the underground/under-sand warehouses) and worked to get UN sanctions and "no-fly-zones."

So it was essentially first proxy war between USA's "Coalition Of the Willing" and Putin's Russia. Ukraine was part of our coalition.

On December 19 2003 (6 days after Saddam was pulled out of the "spider hole") Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi asked the US and UK to dismantle his WMD nuclear program and oversee the destruction of his chemical weapons stockpile.

This war was allowed to take off instead of being negotiated to an end.

The only "end" and "negotiation" Putin understands is military defeat (like USSR in Afghanistan) - anything else is "All this land is Russia (mine)"
___

*** The corrupt UN's Oil-For-Food-Programme (OFF) allowed Saddam, his henchmen and various crooks within the UN and around the program, like Benon Sevan, Nadhmi Auchi, to skim billions of USDollars from the program that was supposed to provide food to Iraqi people. The evidence uncovered after Iraq was taken under Coalition's control showed that "less than 2/3 of $64B went to food aid" and "much of the food aid supplied... was unfit for human consumption." Various entities involved in the corrupt program included French TotalFina/Total oil company, many Russian firms and individuals, even Russian Orthodox Church were on al Mada list of illegal oil trading.

Top 3 violators that paid kickbacks to UNOFF to receive Iraq's oil were Russia (30%), France (15%), and China (10%) - all were strongly against Iraq war.
__________

#59 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-03-01 10:06 PM | Reply

"Zelensky was never in the military even if he consistently wore an OD t-shirt."

Hahahaha!

I bet Zelenskyy would look great in a Tan Suit.

#60 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-01 10:11 PM | Reply

#59 and worked to get UN sanctions and "no-fly-zones"
s/b and worked to get UN sanctions and "no-fly-zones" removed.

#61 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-03-01 10:16 PM | Reply

"One of the big reasons for the war was that Saddam Hussein"

LMFAO.

There is literally nothing Saddam Hussein could have done to prevent the United States from invading Iraq, from that moment in recorded history when Donald Rumsfeld jotted down, in the hours after 9/11,

Go Big
Roll it all up
Things related and not

From that moment war was inevitable. Just like they drew it up, in PNAC.

And everybody reading this knows it. Including you. So can it.

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-01 10:20 PM | Reply

Top 3 violators that paid kickbacks to UNOFF to receive Iraq's oil were Russia (30%), France (15%), and China (10%) - all were strongly against Iraq war.
__________

#59 | Posted by CutiePie

Everyone who was against the iraq war turned out to be right.

Everyone who was for the iraq war was gullible or corrupt.

#63 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-01 10:22 PM | Reply

__________
#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-01 10:20 PM
And everybody reading this knows it. Including you. So can it.

I presented facts that are not in dispute and are not controversial, which you couldn't refute, so instead you responded with the usual non sequitur and non-responsive opinion not related to the facts presented (i.e., invitation to typical deep and long "Snoofy's rabbit hole" of ignoring the stated facts and presenting own opinions as facts, conjectures, moving goalposts, changing subjects etc.) ... so, no thanks, I decline to follow.

As for your usual projection and displacement (which I was hoping not having to discuss or mention again) and obvious shades of PTSD - I would ask you to "can it" but everybody reading this, including you, knows you "can't"... so, you do you and have the last word(s).
__________

#64 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-03-02 03:30 AM | Reply

"I presented facts that are not in dispute and are not controversial"

Me too.

The reason you're not denying what I said is quite simple: You know it's true.

Last words we can all agree with.

#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-02 10:02 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort