" Would you agree to such a blanket statement before something has even happened?"

Fat talk from someone who still has no evidence of a corrupted election, almost four years later.

"Even the Obamas know the Biden's are dirty."

Yet Jordan and Comer couldn't come up with a single thing. Or at least nothing which wasn't praised when the Trump family was making bank.

Are the Bidens that amazing as arch-criminals? Or are the Republicans the most inept prosecutorial bunch in American history?

I mean...there's no third possibility, right?

"The liberal posters on this site will stay in denial."

What a riot.

According to the guy you're about to vote for, Bill, who won the 2020 Presidential election?

" The 2020 election was laddened with unanswered and yet unexplained voting statistics. "

No, everything got explained. Either you didn't accept the multitude of full explanations, or you weren't paying attention.

Again, it's four years later, and ZERO people have come forward bearing ANY of your theories. After a close election, where so many people were so involved with the results, if your theories were true, folks will be coming out of the woodwork. And if you had any actual evidence, you would present it in court.

Instead, zero, in four years. Zero.

" unexplained voting statistics likely due to main-in ballots being used untried on such a large scale."

No, they were fully explained. Why weren't you listening?

" Collecting and transporting uncounted ballots ... "

... DIDN'T happen.

Are you referring to one person legally mailing another's ballot after getting permission? Or mail-in ballots which had to pro-actively be requested? Or, by chance, the long-time mail-in states, like Oregon or Utah?

Four years later. Zero evidence in court.

" Only unexplained voting statistics likely due to main-in ballots"

Unexplained?!?

There was a pandemic going on, and standing in line with other humans increased the possibility of contagion.

So more folk requested, and got, a mail-in ballot.

The second part is your candidate tried to depress mail-in voting by jawbowning. Had he encouraged vote-by-mail, he might've won. Instead, Dems won ... which, of course, is the real reason you're against mail-in voting: it makes voting as easy for others as it is for you.

Pretty easily explained.

"They decided, literally just a few months before the election, because of covid to come up with a plan for larger scale implentation of mail-in ballots without the safe guards of absentee voting.

Manure. Total manure. The EXACT SAME SAFEGUARDS. Same serialization, same watermarks, same matching as absentee voting. You're forwarding a lie.
Why are you bearing false witness?

"the 2024 election will provide a dataset and help provide more proof the 2020 results were either fair or not."

We already have datasets. They've been analyzed by humans to supercomputers. Four years later, ZERO evidence of your theories.

When were you hoping the first person claiming any your theories would come forward? Where's a single person claiming someone else took their requested ballot and voted in their stead, against their will? Where's ONE?

"I don't blame Trump for putting conditions on agreeing to accept the 2024 results."

Oh, ffs, "his conditions" are HE WINS, period. Even if he loses in an obvious landslide, he'll never accept it.

"Handing off uncounted ballots"

Did not happen and does not happen.

More bearing false witness.