Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign accused former President Donald Trump of being "scared" to face the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee after Trump said Monday that he could "make a case" to not debate her.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Trump has refused to commit to a debate since the vice president entered the 2024 presidential race. The former president had previously agreed to face President Joe Biden, who stepped aside as the Democratic nominee last week, in a debate hosted by ABC News on September 10.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Fox News host Laura Ingraham pressed Trump on committing to debate Harris during an interview airing on The Ingraham Angle Monday night. The former president told the conservative commentator that he'll "probably end up debating" but that he "can also make a case for not doing it."

Harris spokesperson Ammar Moussa released a statement to X, formerly Twitter, later in the night, writing, "Why won't Donald Trump give a straight answer on debating Vice President Harris?"

"It's clear from tonight's question-dodging: he's scared he'll have to defend his running mate's weird attacks on women, or his own calls to end elections in America in a debate against the vice president," Moussa said, referring to the controversy surrounding Trump's running mate, Ohio Senator JD Vance.

Moussa added that Harris "will be on the debate stage September 10th" and that Trump "can show up, or not."

Orange Tabby is a scaredy cat... afraid Harris might grab his P!

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-07-30 01:56 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

Kamala for President

The Lincoln Project

www.youtube.com

1:36 secs

Maybe the best ad yet for the Harris campaign

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2024-07-30 04:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

SAY IT TO HER FACE!

#3 | Posted by fresno500 at 2024-07-30 08:36 PM | Reply

SAY. HER. NAME.

#4 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-07-30 09:07 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Harris might grab his P!
#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-07-30 01:56 AM | Reply HAHA

He's all "P" ... where to begin?

#5 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2024-07-31 01:15 PM | Reply

If the DNC had the jewels, they'd make her the official nominee and there would be a debate. I don't think most of you posting here would like the outcome, but there would be a debate.

#6 | Posted by linedrive at 2024-07-31 01:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

#6 | POSTED BY LINEDRIVE

Donald not showing will speak for itself.

You can't play the man if you won't even show up.

#7 | Posted by Zed at 2024-07-31 02:05 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

----------- old demented ----.

Put that loser in a home.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-07-31 02:07 PM | Reply

#6 | POSTED BY LINEDRIVE

You're a new ---------, aren't ya'?

#9 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-07-31 02:08 PM | Reply

The old boy's terrified of debating Harris. You can tell he's really sweating it; his makeup runs.

#10 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-07-31 02:09 PM | Reply

If the DNC had the jewels, they'd make her the official nominee and there would be a debate.

You may need to breathe slowly, regularly into a small paper bag for this. Harris will be the nominee, so check that box. Harris is ready to debate; Trump, terrified of her, is waffling. Ready with the paper bag? In ... out ... in ... out ... good ...

#11 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-07-31 02:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Trumpy is too busy losing debates with himself to debate Kamala.

In an interview with Fox News that aired Monday night, the former president gave noncommittal answers when asked whether he would debate the presumptive Democratic nominee.

"I want to do a debate. But I also can say this. Everybody knows who I am. And now people know who she is," Trump said, adding the he would "probably end up debating."
"The answer is yes, but I can also make a case for not doing it," he added.

After playing clips of those remarks, Chieng commented, "It sounds like Trump just lost a debate with himself?"

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-07-31 02:26 PM | Reply

Trump is such a coward. Such a pathological liar. He cons so many who just believe what he states, it's crazy. Harris will CREAM him in any debate, which is why he is backing out. Problem is, she has committed to being there regardless, and it will be aired with Trumps empty podium if he doesn't show. He is stuck now. If he does it, his lies will not stick as Harris has the facts that can be proven. He has no facts. He is scared. afraid and not just of the debate...of losing this election. When he does, and he will (in a landslide victory for Harris) he will cry foul again, saying the dems cheated and he will tut to rile his base up again. They will not follow his lead this time and he will fade away and live the rest of his days spending the money he has left to pay his legal bills. He's the oldest candidate ever, has serious cognitive issues and lies non stop. People, most of them, are tired of his con.

So let's circle back after Election Day. Harris will be the winner, trump will moan and groan and he will be the 5 time loser that he is.

#13 | Posted by NOTGOINGBACK at 2024-07-31 02:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

If the DNC had the jewels, they'd make her the official nominee and there would be a debate. I don't think most of you posting here would like the outcome, but there would be a debate.

#6 | Posted by linedrive at 2024-07-31 01:53 PM | Reply | Flag

You're not real bright.

Even Biden wouldn't be the official nominee until the convention and Orange Chicken had not problem debating him back in June when NEITHER OF THEM WERE THE OFFICIAL NOMINEE.

#14 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-07-31 03:45 PM | Reply

Sadly, if he does debate her, 45 will act just as he did today with those three female journalists.

He will talk over her, never answer any question before rambling about something else, and crow afterwards that he won the debate.

#15 | Posted by Judity at 2024-07-31 03:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

You're a new ---------, aren't ya'?

#9 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-07-31 02:08 PM | Reply | Flag

You're a new ----------, aren't you?

#16 | Posted by linedrive at 2024-07-31 04:28 PM | Reply

You may need to breathe slowly, regularly into a small paper bag for this. Harris will be the nominee, so check that box. Harris is ready to debate; Trump, terrified of her, is waffling. Ready with the paper bag? In ... out ... in ... out ... good ...

#11 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-07-31 02:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

The last candidate your party placed in a debate with Trump quit his job on Twitter a few days later. You people are the laughing stock of the world.

#17 | Posted by linedrive at 2024-07-31 04:30 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Everyone is my ----------.

Get in my Shack!

#18 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-07-31 04:34 PM | Reply

You people are the laughing stock of the world.
#17 | POSTED BY LINEDRIVE

Everyone loves a clown.

That's why you're such a devoted Deplorable Trumping MAGAt.

#19 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-07-31 04:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The last candidate your party placed in a debate with Trump quit his job

#17 | POSTED BY LINEDRIVE

Then I'm really confused about why Trump is avoiding Kamala.

#20 | Posted by Zed at 2024-07-31 05:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

When non-Americans around the world ask "what the hell is wrong with America?!?", it's in response to Trump and MAGA

#21 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-07-31 07:02 PM | Reply

Then I'm really confused

#20 | Posted by Zed at 2024-07-31 05:35 PM | Reply | Flag

surprising no one.....ever....

#22 | Posted by linedrive at 2024-08-01 02:54 AM | Reply

He's not going to agree to a debate until she's the actual nominee. Nor should he.

#23 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 02:26 PM | Reply

So weird how the non Trump supporters like Jeff always seem to have an explanation for every single thing Trump does. Just a total massive coincidence.

#24 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 02:44 PM | Reply

He's not going to agree to a debate until she's the actual nominee. Nor should he.

Biden wasn't the "actual nominee" yet Trump agreed to debate him and Trump wasn't the "actual nominee" when Biden agreed to debate him. Neither of them were "actual nominees" when they debated in June.

Your metric is meaningless, as is your selective point heretofore wholly irrelevant. Harris is the presumptive nominee because no one is running against her. She received the same amount of primary votes as did Biden. Her party election is a simple formality. Her position is as solid as Trump's was before the RNC.

You're not very bright, dim bulb. Stupidity is as stupidity does.

#25 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-08-01 02:48 PM | Reply

#24. It's very simple, Joe.

She's not the nominee. Not yet. If some major negative story about her were to come out and she started dropping like a stone in water in the polls it's highly likely the Dems would drop her and insert someone else.

#26 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 02:50 PM | Reply

" Biden wasn't the "actual nominee" yet Trump agreed to debate him and Trump wasn't the "actual nominee" when Biden agreed to debate him. Neither of them were "actual nominees" when they debated in June."

The difference being they both already won their primaries. Harris never received a single primary vote.

#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 02:51 PM | Reply

#26

Wow! SO clever.

And IF that happened.... the Debate would be between Trump and someone else.

So what?

#28 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-01 02:52 PM | Reply

If some major negative story about her were to come out and she started dropping like a stone in water in the polls it's highly likely the Dems would drop her and insert someone else.

So WHO the Democratic nominee is determines whether Trump will debate them, or has our history of nominees debating each other come to an end because Trump says so?

Do you realize how idiotic you sound making up flaccid excuses for Trump's inanity?

#29 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-08-01 02:53 PM | Reply

The DNC convention is less than 2 weeks away. If Trump refuses to agree to a debate after she secures the nomination I will join you in calling him out.

#30 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 02:54 PM | Reply

- flaccid excuses

BellTroll is hard up.

#31 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-01 02:54 PM | Reply

Harris never received a single primary vote.

Harris was on Biden's ticket as VP - you know, the constitutionally mandated person to replace the President should he step down or become unable to perform his duties. She received every single vote that Joe did. VPs are in place to replace Presidents, this is not some new invention. Joe eventually felt that his growing visible feebleness was harming not only his chances at victory, but the entire country's fight against Trump's fascist authoritarianism.

So his VP stepped in to replace him at the 11th hour. Just what VPs are supposed to do.

#32 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-08-01 02:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" Joe eventually felt"

You make it sound like he made a choice. He was unwillingly forced out.

#33 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 03:09 PM | Reply

He was unwillingly forced out.

#33 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Yeah. You keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.

#34 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-01 03:17 PM | Reply

If Trump refuses to agree to a debate after she secures the nomination I will join you in calling him out.

#30 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

This where I remind you again that Biden had not yet secured the nomination and was only the "presumptive nominee" when Trumpy "debated" him.

#35 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-01 03:19 PM | Reply

If some major negative story about her were to come out and she started dropping like a stone in water in the polls it's highly likely the Dems would drop her and insert someone else.

Hey now!

Stop giving away our secret plans!

Well now that it out in the open we can tell you. We plan on "inserting" a new nominee every couple of weeks until we get the "poll" numbers where we want them and drive Trumpy even more cra cra.

Then at the last moment we will say Psych! And reveal Biden is actually still the nominee!

#36 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-01 03:27 PM | Reply

" Biden had not yet secured the nomination and was only the "presumptive nominee" when Trumpy "debated" him.

#35 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY AT 2024-08-01 03:19 PM | FLAG: "

He won the primary with 14 million votes. Harris didn't receive a single vote for president in the primary.

#37 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 03:44 PM | Reply

#26 I'm not even talking about the merits of your comment. Just noting that, day in and day out, non-Trump supporters seem to be parroting the Trump lines and excuses, 100% of the time, without fail. Why?

#38 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 03:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

you're a partisan gaslighter, jeff. you spent months calling biden senile and when he dropped out you complain about the process.

theres no pleasing you. and youre still defending trumps overt racism. you should be ashamed.

#39 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 03:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

" Harris didn't receive a single vote for president in the primary."

The team is a given.

Just like it would've been for Trump, had he not tried to get his running mate lynched.

#40 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-08-01 03:47 PM | Reply

Being a Trump Troll is hard these days... especially when you could be a Lincoln Project Republican who at least respect the Constitution and the law.

#41 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-01 03:49 PM | Reply

He won the primary with 14 million votes

The 2020 primaries were thrown into disarray due to Covid.

Biden was handed the nomination.

Harris was handed the VP nomination and they won't the election.

Cry more about it.

#42 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-08-01 03:52 PM | Reply

" Harris didn't receive a single vote for president in the primary."

To continue to ignore the main constitutional role of the VP is to immediately replace the President who chose them should the need arrive is to live in a world where voters aren't fully cognizant of this fact when they cast their ballot for BOTH individuals comprising the ticket.

Voters have the choice not to support the presidential nominee's choice to replace them, and my stance that given these circumstances the outpouring of unprecedented support and campaign donations tells anyone paying attention that the voters are speaking outside of their primary ballots on just who their preference moving forward is very loudly and clearly: The current Vice President.

#43 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-08-01 03:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Does this mean he's agreeing to debate her?

x.com

#44 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 04:27 PM | Reply

" To continue to ignore the main constitutional role of the VP is to immediately replace the President"

He hasn't died nor has he resigned from office. If he'd done either I'd 100% agree with you on this. He would actually strengthen her chances if he were to resign IMO

#45 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 04:28 PM | Reply

#45 An inherent extension of the dynamic you acknowledge is that if the candidate resigns, the VP is presumed to be next in line for that too. It's not in the Constitution but almost nobody would disagree with that, and virtually no Dem voters oppose it as evidenced by the massive surge in support for Harris. So who are you complaining on behalf of?

#46 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 04:56 PM | Reply

He won the primary with 14 million votes. Harris didn't receive a single vote for president in the primary.

#37 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

She is now the presumptive nominee. Just like Biden was at a time.

#47 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-01 04:58 PM | Reply

#46. I'm not complaining at all. Once Biden was forced out Harris is easily the most beatable of the other Democrat names being tossed around.

#48 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 05:09 PM | Reply

"I'm not complaining at all." He complained.

#49 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-08-01 05:17 PM | Reply

#48 So when you regurgitate the rightwing talking point that Harris "received no votes," you aren't saying she doesn't deserve the candidacy? Interesting, tell me more.

As far as Harris being the most beatable, two weeks ago i would have agreed, but watching Republicans flail and embarrass themselves with some kind if bizarre racial purity test makes me wonder if Harris supporters are onto something big.

#50 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 05:29 PM | Reply


It's not in the Constitution
#46 | POSTED BY JOE

True.

and virtually no Dem voters oppose it as evidenced by the massive surge in support for Harris.

Who would go against the machine? Who in their right mind would say "hey you know what, perhaps she isn't the best we got".

You want an audit? Jail time? Lawyers in your face?

So who are you complaining on behalf of?

I am complaining on behalf of myself.

I am a big Bernie fan, but not him I believe that Pete Buttigieg would run rings around Trump, Vance and Harris at the same time. The party would rally around anyone of his caliber.

Going with Harris will be a mistake. I also believe much of her "fanbase" is manufactured, it wasn't even there a few weeks ago.

For the country's sake, Vice President Harris should step aside
www.washingtonpost.com

Enjoy living another Biden fiasco. I for one won't put up with this fantasy.

#51 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-08-01 05:29 PM | Reply


So when you regurgitate the rightwing talking point that Harris "received no votes," you aren't saying she doesn't deserve the candidacy?

What does this even mean?

Of course she deserves it, the elites give it to her.

Such a silly question.

#52 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-08-01 05:30 PM | Reply

A bunch of whiny racist white males incessantly gatekeeping who is "actually black" and who is a "good jew" should go over great in November. I encourage you to keep up the good work!

#53 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 05:33 PM | Reply

I am a big Bernie fan

51 | POSTED BY IAMRUNT

Runt, the------------------- is more believable.

#54 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-08-01 05:34 PM | Reply

Pete Buttigieg
@PeteButtigieg
Remember that all of this is a strategy. The politics of outrage and insult are the last refuge of a politician who cannot defend his own plans.
8:41 AM Aug 1, 2024

#55 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-08-01 05:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Who would go against the machine? Who in their right mind would say "hey you know what, perhaps she isn't the best we got".

Perhaps other democrats who wanted the nomination.

It's not like democrats hesitated to call for Biden to step aside due to his age.

It's only republicans who dare not go against the will of the cult.

Liz Cheney learned that fast.

That RINO couldn't even retake her district. She dared question MAGA. She dared challenge Trump.

#56 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-08-01 06:07 PM | Reply

The politics of outrage and insult are the last refuge of a politician who cannot defend his own plans.

Seems like it's the first refuge for Republicans.

But I guess that's because their plans are to eliminate civil rights and personal freedoms.

#57 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-08-01 06:08 PM | Reply

@#55 ... The politics of outrage and insult are the last refuge of a politician who cannot defend his own plans. ...

Truth doesn't mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged.
- - - Nietzsche

#58 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 06:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The last candidate your party placed in a debate with Trump quit his job

He just stopped campaigning, he didn't quit his job. In the meantime, he is doing more stuff that DJT was unable to accomplish in the few months he has left. Should be epic watching you clowns whine about all the progress and success while trying to justify voting for a convicted felon, rapist, Epstein frequent flyer and malignant narcissist. Enjoy the tire fire!

#59 | Posted by chuffy at 2024-08-01 10:52 PM | Reply

" #48 So when you regurgitate the rightwing talking point that Harris "received no votes," you aren't saying she doesn't deserve the candidacy? Interesting, tell me more."

Once Biden was forced out his replacement was always going to be decided by the party elites. They had far better options than Harris but by going with her they had a relatively easy path to transferring Biden's war chest.

His debate performance exposed his condition in a way that could no longer keep hidden or spun away. They were planning on riding him through the election. They all knew his condition and that he hasn't been capable of doing the job probably since he was inaugurated (he's definitely gotten worse since then). They didn't care. It was all about winning by any means necessary. To have an incumbent announce he's not running for a second term this late in the process is without precedent.

He was ditched and Harris was the only option due to donor money transference.

#60 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 10:59 PM | Reply

They miscalculated. They challenged Trump to a debate and set all of the terms thinking that Trump would try to negotiate more equitable terms and they could then call him a coward and blame Trump for no debate. Trump's team was savvy enough to recognize a debate which didn't allow for preprepared notes, ear pieces and was just about an actual debate, even if the conditions were in Biden's favor, that it would be a disaster for Biden. And it was.

#61 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:02 PM | Reply

7 other presidents have dropped out, jeff. the last was in 1968.

#62 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:05 PM | Reply

a couple of presidents were not chosen at the convention, and thats later than biden dropped out.

its not "unprecedented" its rare.

#63 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:08 PM | Reply

It took jeffyjbell four paragraphs of gibberish to only say the GOP was outmaneuvered

I hope they pay his sad ass by the word

#64 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2024-08-01 11:15 PM | Reply

Jeffj : Biden should drop out!

*Biden drops out*

Jeffj: but not like that!

#65 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:17 PM | Reply

" Harris was the only option"

She's the VP! its a package deal. JFC.

#66 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:18 PM | Reply

Alex, why are you arguing with this dip based on his -------- terms
Fact is, Biden was the presumptive nominee. A presidential nominee, aka Trump has been selected by the delegates at the party's convention.

Biden was only presumed the nominee, end of story
No rationale or discussion need be given

Belljeffringer is only pounding sand into dust because he and his cult of miscreants have again been outwitted by someone they claim to be incapacitated

Ridicule is all these people deserve

#67 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2024-08-01 11:26 PM | Reply

Im merely pointing out that once again jeff is abusing the english language.

"unprecedented" would be him using a big word correctly.

#68 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:29 PM | Reply

" Jeffj : Biden should drop out!

*Biden drops out*

Jeffj: but not like that!

#65 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE AT 2024-08-01 11:17 PM | FLAG: "

I'm happy he dropped out. He's physically and mentally infirm and while I think Harris would be a disaster for different reasons, at least she has her full mental faculties and can move around normally.

#69 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:29 PM | Reply

@#60 ... Once Biden was forced out ...

Pres Biden stepped down voluntarily.

He did not have to.

But he did it nonetheless.

#70 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:30 PM | Reply

Biden's out, Harris is in. Harris has all of the delegates. Harris has all of the money (she doubled it in a few days). What any DJT apologist and MAGA supporter says about it is irrelevant. Harris is the presumptive nominee, the convention will be considerably less chaotic and bizarre than that sh**show the Repubicans put on a few weeks ago.

Losers gotta keep up appearances, after all.

#71 | Posted by chuffy at 2024-08-01 11:31 PM | Reply

You're missing my point entirely.

Biden wasn't forced out because he's infirm. He was forced out because he got exposed as being infirm in a manner that couldn't be hidden or spun away.

#72 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:31 PM | Reply

You don't sound happy, jeff. it sounds like you're kvetching.

#73 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:32 PM | Reply

He was ditched and Harris was the only option due to donor money transference.

You're a dumbass. Harris raised more than Biden's "war chest" in 24 hours. Pritzker could have also easily self-funded a campaign.

Harris was the natural successor for several reasons. Republicans' inability to resist a super creepy racial spaz attack was probably one of them.

#74 | Posted by Joe at 2024-08-01 11:32 PM | Reply

Alexandrite,

Putting it another way, he had no business being POTUS given his condition. The fact that he hasn't been forced out for the remainder of his term leaves this country rudderless. And at a point where things are escalating in the ME to a potential war between Biden-enabled Iran and Israel.

This isn't quaint, cute or funny.

#75 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:34 PM | Reply

Biden wasnt forced out.

He quit.

add "forced" to the ever growing list of words you abuse. like groomer, projection, strawman, and unprecedented. Buy a dictionary, dude.

#76 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:34 PM | Reply

I'm happy he dropped out. He's physically and mentally infirm and while I think Harris would be a disaster for different reasons, at least she has her full mental faculties and can move around normally.

...continues to argue in favor of the Demented------------- who can't walk down a ramp and needs a golf cart to walk 100 yards (the guy who fell asleep at his own convention AND his criminal trial, LOL)...

The clown is strong with this one.

#77 | Posted by chuffy at 2024-08-01 11:34 PM | Reply

Trump's team was savvy enough to recognize a debate which didn't allow for preprepared notes, ear pieces and was just about an actual debate, even if the conditions were in Biden's favor, that it would be a disaster for Biden. And it was.

Yeah, their master plan worked so well that the historically unpopular and doomed Dem candidate was run out of the race and replaced by someone with far greater odds of winning. What a bunch of geniuses.

#78 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 11:34 PM | Reply

Joe,

Biden hadn't nearly burned through his war chest. Anyone successor not named Harris would have faced serious legal and electoral claims to that money. No way Dems we're going to risk that.

#79 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:35 PM | Reply

" leaves this country rudderless."

Theres a few people just released from russian prison that think you're full of it.

Biden doesn't have the energy to run the country AND campaign vigorously. apparently he can still run the country just fine.

#80 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#61 ... They miscalculated. They challenged Trump to a debate and set all of the terms thinking that Trump would try to negotiate more equitable terms and they could then call him a coward and blame Trump for no debate. Trump's team was savvy enough to recognize a debate which didn't allow for preprepared notes, ear pieces and was just about an actual debate, even if the conditions were in Biden's favor, that it would be a disaster for Biden. And it was. ...

Tactics vs Strategy.

Yeah, Pres Biden's performance at the debate was less than helpful to his campaign. (I'm being kind)

But that is a tactical advantage.

But, then there is tactics vs strategy.

Pres Biden is a strategic thinker. Fmr Pres Trump is a tranactional (i.e., tactical) thinker.

So...

Pres Biden waited until after the RNC to announce he would be stepping down.

And now the Trump campaign appears to be in a state of ~wow, what happened~ in response.

Pres Biden owned the Trump campaign.

The Trump campaign was caught totally off-guard and unaware.


#81 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:37 PM | Reply

" Yeah, their master plan worked so well that the historically unpopular and doomed Dem candidate was run out of the race and replaced by someone with far greater odds of winning. What a bunch of geniuses.

#78 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2024-08-01 11:34 PM | REPLY | FLAG:"

From what I've seen is she's polling about where Biden was at pre-debate.

Hitler the debate he still had a real chance of winning.

#82 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:37 PM | Reply

So far, Harris is repeating Biden's 2020 bunker strategy. With so little time left, it just might work.

#83 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:38 PM | Reply

@#79 ... Anyone successor not named Harris would have faced serious legal and electoral claims to that money. ...

And... your current alias' point is?


#84 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:39 PM | Reply

#82. Hitler = until. I hate auto correct and I hate my fingers. And I'm on my iPad, not my phone.

#85 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:39 PM | Reply

#79 Biden had $95M left at the end of June. Harris raised $100M in about a day after launching her campaign. Inheriting Biden's piddly warchest was not the driving factor. JB Pritzker, an actual billionaire, could stroke a check for that in a heartbeat.

#86 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 11:40 PM | Reply

" And... your current alias' point is?

#84 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER AT 2024-08-01 11:39 PM | FLAG: "

It's the primary reason the elites anointed her over better candidates.

#87 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:40 PM | Reply

So far, Harris is repeating Biden's 2020 bunker strategy. With so little time left, it just might work.

Where do you get your information dude? Serious question. She's been holding rallies everywhere and is about to tour every swing state with her VP next week. What is wrong with your brain? Why are you marinating in such a toxic stew of bad information?

#88 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 11:42 PM | Reply

add "anointed" to the list.

#89 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:42 PM | Reply

@#83 ... So far, Harris is repeating Biden's 2020 bunker strategy. ...

How so?

Please be specific.

thx.

#90 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:42 PM | Reply

" better candidates."

you weren't gonna ever vote for. spare me the concern trolling.

#91 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#86. Losing $95 million is a substantial loss.

" JB Pritzker, an actual billionaire, could stroke a check for that in a heartbeat.

#86 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2024-08-01 11:40 PM | FLAG: "

Pritzker still could ON TOP OF THE $95 million.

#92 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:43 PM | Reply

From what I've seen is she's polling about where Biden was at pre-debate.

Okay? We live in a post-debate world, of course Biden was doing better before he proved he was a corpse. What's your point?

#93 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 11:43 PM | Reply

joe is right, kamala has been all over. She's coming to detroit on wednesday ffs.

#94 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-08-01 11:43 PM | Reply

@#82 ... Hitler the debate he still had a real chance of winning. ...

Huh?


#95 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:44 PM | Reply

#92 A major political party isn't going to go with a loser just so they can spend a little money losing. You have no political acumen whatsoever.

#96 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 11:44 PM | Reply

Lamp,

And they are stuck with JD Vance as their VP candidate. I can't wait for PO1135809's sentencing in September for the crimes his incompetent lawyers were unable to defend him against. Maybe we'll see him campaigning from a prison cell, where he belongs.

#97 | Posted by chuffy at 2024-08-01 11:44 PM | Reply

she's polling about where Biden was at pre-debate

You might wanna look at those polls again. She's ahead of the casino-bankrupter and teen beauty contest peeper in all of the swing States now.

#98 | Posted by chuffy at 2024-08-01 11:47 PM | Reply

" #88 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2024-08-01 11:42 PM | FLAG: "

I'll clarify. Yes, she's doing tightly scripted things to a greater extent that Biden did four years ago.

She hasn't done much off the cuff. At least not yet.

No pressers and no interviews so far.

Maybe that willl change. I hope it does and it absolutely should. I have very little faith in corporate media to pay anything other than lip-service to it.

#99 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:48 PM | Reply

@#82 ... From what I've seen is she's polling about where Biden was at pre-debate. ...

Yeah, I agree.

However, as I have mentioned many times in the past....

At this time in the polling cycle, trends are more important that the granular results, especially when those results seem to be wallowing in the margin of error.

So, along those lines I see fmr Pres Trump going from a 3.1% lead in general election polling to a now 1.2% lead.

Does your current alias think that is a good trend?

#100 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:50 PM | Reply

She hasn't done much off the cuff. At least not yet.

No pressers and no interviews so far.

Lmao. Rallies aren't events now? Tell that to your bullseye of a candidate, it's all he ever does. Well that and tell black people who is and isn't black.

#101 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-01 11:51 PM | Reply

" 92 A major political party isn't going to go with a loser just so they can spend a little money losing. You have no political acumen whatsoe
#96 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2024-08-01 11:44 PM | FLAG: "

That is correct. You raise a point I havent addressed. Harris is also convenient because she was plausibly inserted without a mini primary. That process would have been potentially ugly and would have likely resulted in a brokered convention.

Hiding Biden's condition with media colluding put democrats into a spot where Harris was the only choice. It's further exacerbated by their DEI obsession and her being a woman of color checked off too many boxes.

#102 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-01 11:54 PM | Reply

@#99 ... I'll clarify. Yes, she's doing tightly scripted things to a greater extent that Biden did four years ago. ...

So, she seems to have a goal and looks to be espousing that goal.

OK, let's go with that, and apply it to what fmr Pres Trump, has said....

For starters, I'd look at fmr Pres trump appearing before the NABJ, and what he said.

Your current alias seems to think that unscripted commented are good.

So, my first question would be, were fmr Pres Trump's comments at the NABJ good?

If so, why did his campaign seem to cut that interview short of the scheduled hour?

#103 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:55 PM | Reply

@#102 ...That is correct. You raise a point I havent addressed. Harris is also convenient because she was plausibly inserted without a mini primary. ...

Why would a mini-primary be needed?

Links would be helpful to your current alias' assertion.

thx.


#104 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-01 11:59 PM | Reply

their DEI obsession

You've lose touch with reality. I sincerely hope you find a way back. Doesn't seem likely. Good night.

#105 | Posted by JOE at 2024-08-02 12:00 AM | Reply

" Lmao. Rallies aren't events now? Tell that to your bullseye of a candidate, it's all he ever does. Well that and tell black people who is and isn't black.

#101 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2024-08-01 11:51 PM | FLAG: "

Trump does all sorts of rallies. For all of his faults he's an entertainer and is good at feeding off a crowd.

I didnt say she doesn't do events. She does. And so far they are all tightly controlled and scripted. Trump just went into a hostile environment and fielded questions where he had to respond off the cuff. His performance was mixed and he notably stepped in manure as you referenced with who is and isn't black. Pretty big eff up IMO.

Having said that, let's rewind 4 years:

www.youtube.com

Biden: if you don't vote for me, you ain't black.

Look at how the media reacted to that vs how Harris emphasized her Indian heritage 4 years ago and black heritage in this election and Trump pointing it out.

Trump absolutely stepped in it. The media hack double standard is glaring.

#106 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-02 12:03 AM | Reply

" Good night.

#105 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2024-08-02 12:00 AM | FLAG: "

Good night. And thank you for the discussion.

#107 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-02 12:04 AM | Reply

Harris is also convenient because she was plausibly inserted without a mini primary.

Don't stress over it. Vote for Lewzer as you are obviously going to, and wait for the results.

#108 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-08-02 12:05 AM | Reply

@#107 ... Good night. And thank you for the discussion. ...

To your current alias too.

#109 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-02 12:08 AM | Reply

His performance was mixed...

If he was on the other team you would have called it a (D)isaster.

#110 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-08-02 12:12 AM | Reply

" Your current alias seems to think that unscripted commented are good."

Correct. Unscripted candidates have to think on their feet. Further, the more committed they are to their policy planks, the more evident it is when challenged, off script.
****

So, my first question would be, were fmr Pres Trump's comments at the NABJ good?

A mixed bag. He stepped in it a few times. At other times he did fine. He and Harris were both invited. It was an event that was inherently hostile to him and friendly to her. And she chose not to attend. IMO a huge missed opportunity for her.

"If so, why did his campaign seem to cut that interview short of the scheduled hour?

#103 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER AT 2024-08-01 11:55 PM | REPLY | FLAG"

Well, it started about 30 minutes late. It's a strange criticism for you to make given Harris declined the invitation altogether. :

#111 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-02 12:14 AM | Reply

" If he was on the other team you would have called it a (D)isaster.

#110 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2024-08-02 12:12 AM | FLAG: "

The projection is strong in this one.

#112 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-02 12:16 AM | Reply

" Why would a mini-primary be needed?"

The primary theme of the DNC is that they are trying to save democracy.

Then through back- channels they force out the candidate who won their primary.

It looks unseemly but doesn't appear to have hurt them in the polls.

#113 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-02 12:19 AM | Reply

Jeff's child-raping hero bailed as soon as Project 2025 was mentioned.

#114 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-08-02 12:22 AM | Reply

@#112 ... The projection is strong in this one. ...

So... no answer to my question of @103...

Why did his campaign seem to cut that interview short of the scheduled hour?


#115 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-02 12:27 AM | Reply

@#113 ... The primary theme of the DNC is that they are trying to save democracy.

Then through back- channels they force out the candidate who won their primary. ...

Yeah, that seems to be a major taling point in the Trump cult.

But I ask, it is important, why?

Yer up.

#116 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-02 12:30 AM | Reply

So... no answer to my question of @103...

Trolls don't answer questions.

#117 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-08-02 12:30 AM | Reply

@#111 ... Well, it started about 30 minutes late. ...

But it did not last for the scheduled hour.

Why?

I doubt if the journalists present were looking to go elsewhere.

So, why was it ended short of the scheduled time?

OK, that one aside...

I asked in #103 ...So, my first question would be, were fmr Pres Trump's comments at the NABJ good?

And I noticed your current alias' reply totally bypassed that question

So I ask that same question again...

were fmr Pres Trump's comments at the NABJ good?

If so, why does your current alias think they may be good?



#118 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-02 12:37 AM | Reply

@#117 ... Trolls don't answer questions. ...

As I posted on a different thread...

Truth doesn't mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged.
- - -- Nietzsche

#119 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-02 12:40 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Harris beating trump by 5 in latest Rasmussen poll out today. It will not expand over the next few weeks.

#120 | Posted by NOTGOINGBACK at 2024-08-02 12:20 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort