Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, March 07, 2025

France will consider extending the protection of its nuclear arsenal to its allies said French President Emmanuel Macron, while warning that Europe needs to be ready for the US to not "remain by our side" in the Ukraine-Russia war.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Decades ago, France established its own nuclear arsenal so as not to depend on the US. They have 290 nuclear warheads and their range can strike Moscow. But Paris would be atomized within minutes. Look where Trumpf and Putin have taken us to, another "Mutual Assured Destruction" (MAD) scenario. Link: theconversation.com

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-03-06 01:02 AM | Reply

Look where Trumpf and Putin have taken us to,

How is this anyone but Macron's fault? Just want to understand the logic here. Macron is the one throwing the Nuke card on the table.

Sounds more like the French don't have a military, and have been riding on the US taxpayers coattails to provide social programs.

Too bad they didn't spend their money to defend themselves, is that Americas fault?

#2 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-06 01:18 AM | Reply

France is ranked 7 out of 145 countries in terms of military strength by the Global Firepower Index (GFI). In terms of receiving American taxpayer funds, in 2014 France received a paltry $802,840. The citizens of Israel and Ukraine are the largest recipients of US foreign assistance. Kabul receives more US economic aid than Paris (which is zero). See sources below:

Links:

www.globalfirepower.com

www.foreignassistance.gov

www.usnews.com

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-03-06 01:52 AM | Reply

This is a good move by France because the only thing Russia has going for it militarily is nukes. Russia has to know that they aren't the only "crazy" people in Europe. Actually, while it was necessary to publicly state France's position, anyone with half a brain knew that this was likely to be France's position.

Russia has its hands full just fighting Ukraine. Therefore, I have no doubt that Russia would be defeated by NATO (even without the aid of the US) using non nukes but the price paid by all participants would be DEVASTATING. The primary question that the European NATO fighters would face would be: just how far do we prosecute the war? They would have to take it just to the point of posing an existential threat to the survival of Russia because that is when the nukes start flying.

#4 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2025-03-06 07:07 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Macron is the one throwing the Nuke card on the table.

#2 | Posted by oneironaut

The nuke card is on the table because Russia, a nuclear power, is territorially ambitious and imperially aggressive. It's on the table because the United States under Trump is an enemy of Europe.

What is it about you perverse sumbitches that you always erase Putin and his actions and ambitions from these discussions?

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 08:19 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Too bad they didn't spend their money to defend themselves, is that Americas fault?

#2 | Posted by oneironaut at

Everything was fine until Putin and Trump came along.

You people are just nasty. Frankly, not only your commonsense but your loyalties are suspect.

#6 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 08:21 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"your loyalties are suspect"

I have been trying to wrap my head around the notion that many, perhaps most, of the MAGA who post here are witting Russian agents.

If they aren't Russian agents, what would they be saying here differently?

#7 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 10:10 AM | Reply


Everything was fine until Putin and Trump came along.
~ Zero

Not if you're a Ukrainian of fighting age. Which clearly you're not, you send a couple bucks and put a blue and yellow flag you bought of Amazon out, and scream everyone's a NAZI to feel better about your meager existance.

You don't care if hundreds of people die for a few yards of land. You didn't care the people crossed your own borders to slaughter innocent citizens either.

You're a hypocrite. You offer no real solution to problems.

I have been trying to wrap my head around the notion that many, perhaps most, of the Lumpers who post here are witting idiots that just escaped the asylum.
If they aren't idiots, what would they be saying here differently?

You don't find it odd that the "Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys" a leading this charge?

#8 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-06 11:21 AM | Reply

- scream everyone's a NAZI

That was Vlad... who had sent his KBG to Crimea and Donbas to create a, 'Nazi uprising'.

But not surprising that 1NUT can't wrap his head around the fact that Putin invaded his neighbors targeting civilians.

Not sure how this poster manages to keep himself from joining the Red Army to express his joy.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-06 11:38 AM | Reply

#8 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Sorry. I just can't take you people seriously as pacifists. In fact, increasingly I don't take you people seriously at all.

It's had to think of anything you won't support that leads directly or indirectly to harm for the United States.

Because that is obviously true, you are a Russian asset.

#10 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 12:03 PM | Reply

8 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Without Trump and Putin we'd have stable world right now.

There would not even be that freaking war in Ukraine you fake pacifism for.

And I have never known what a "Lumper" is. Apparently you think it's some sort of devastating insult.

Go wipe you ass on something.

#11 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 12:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I don't take you people seriously at all.

Probably the best strategy to take with most of them.

Your life will be a lot less stressful.

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-06 12:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Vladdy Daddy

www.youtube.com

1 min

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-06 02:58 PM | Reply

" Without Trump and Putin we'd have stable world right now"

So, tell me Zed. Who was president when Putin annexed Crimea? Who was present dent when Russia invaded Ukraine?

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 05:39 PM | Reply

Patricide Jeff, why did the------------- allow Putin to put bounties on American troops?

#15 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-03-06 05:42 PM | Reply

It didn't happen. Way to deflect my questions.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 05:43 PM | Reply

The demented orange pedo is Putin's bitch.

bsky.app

#17 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-03-06 05:45 PM | Reply

Who was president when Putin annexed Crimea? Who was present dent when Russia invaded Ukraine?

#14 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

This is a sort of magical formula for you people.

And it's been explained to you countless times....

Putin thought that Trump would hand Ukraine to him.

That didn't happen, so he invaded.

So now Trump will hand Ukraine to him.

Trump may well be the person who facilitates Ukraine's surrender.

Feel like a man now?

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 05:53 PM | Reply

Who was president when Putin annexed Crimea? Who was present dent when Russia invaded Ukraine?

#14 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

This idea that Trump is a strong man and that someone like Putin is somehow afraid of him is perhaps the most silly thing you people try to assert to the world using a straight face.

Trump has given so much to Putin over the last several weeks, without getting anything in return, that if you were real Americans you would be outraged.

I'm one of those who are outraged. You're a Russo-fascist sympathizer.

#19 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 05:56 PM | Reply

"Who was president when Putin annexed Crimea?"

"Who was president when Russia invaded Ukraine?"

I'm wondering how that's relevant.

Should the overall tenor of the response to those events change dramatically, depending on who the President is?

Now that Trump is President, and Russia has still annexed Crimea, and is still invading Ukraine, what changes for the United States?

Should Trump commit US troops, since the case is being made that Obama showed weakness, and that's why Putin seized Crimea and invaded Ukraine?

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-06 06:07 PM | Reply

FFS. Zed treats his predictions like they are facts. When Putin invaded Ukraine Trump hadn't even announced another run and even with his run there was no guarantee he'd win. I'll be plain: Putin did NOT factor a second Trump term into his decision to invade.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 06:38 PM | Reply

" You're a Russo-fascist sympathizer.

#19 | POSTED BY ZED AT "

Hello! The 80's are calling! They want their foreign policy back.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 06:39 PM | Reply

FFS. Zed treats his predictions like they are facts. When Putin invaded Ukraine Trump hadn't even announced another run and even with his run there was no guarantee he'd win. I'll be plain: Putin did NOT factor a second Trump term into his decision to invade.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 06:38 PM | Reply

Quit being intellectually dishonest hack job. Everyone knew Trump would run again when Putin invaded Ukraine. You're hopeless. You really are.

#23 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-06 06:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The 80's are calling! They want their foreign policy back.
#22 | POSTED BY BULLBRINGER

You mean when Republicans hated Russia?

You mean when it would be unthinkable for a republican to say, "I'd rather be a Russian than a democrat"?

You mean when Reagan got Russia to tear down the Berlin Wall, rather than handing them the rest of the country?

If 80s republicans met the Republicans of today, they'd be mortified.

#24 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-06 06:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Quit being intellectually dishonest hack job.

He's incapable.

#25 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-06 06:44 PM | Reply

"If 80s republicans met the Republicans of today, they'd be mortified."

They'd be disgusted. But they'd bend the knee just the same.

It was 80s Republicans who bequeathed us Saint Reagan's 11th Commandment, which paved a clear path to today.

#26 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-06 06:47 PM | Reply

You mean when Reagan got Russia to tear down the Berlin Wall, rather than handing them the rest of the country?

If 80s republicans met the Republicans of today, they'd be mortified.

Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-06 06:43 PM | Reply

I turned 18 the day after the wall came down. The same day I registered to vote. That was a proud day for sure.

#27 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-06 06:48 PM | Reply

"The 80's are calling! They want their foreign policy back."

In the 80s we contained Russia.

You don't think we should do that any more.

You'd watch Rambo III now, and be confused why John Rambo was in Afghanistan, fighting against our friends with the Red Stars on their uniforms.

#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-06 06:52 PM | Reply

Russia invades Ukraine, February 2022.

Trump announces run, November 2022.

Ukraine was invaded about 10 months before Trump announced a second run.

#29 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 06:55 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

I was quoting your hero, Barrack Obama when he mocked Romney for sounding the alarm that Russia was a serious political adversary.

You all surely yukked it up when Obama said that. Also, today's Russia is not the USSR.

#30 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 06:57 PM | Reply

But, as always we can count on Snoofy for terrible equivalencies.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 06:58 PM | Reply

Ukraine was invaded about 10 months before Trump announced a second run.

#29 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Everyone knew that he was going to run again. Had to run again.

Including Putin.

#32 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 07:01 PM | Reply

Everyone knew that he was going to run again. Had to run again.

Including Putin.

Posted by Zed at 2025-03-06 07:01 PM | Reply

He had to run again to save his hide and fragile ego. That was common knowledge back then.

#33 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-06 07:09 PM | Reply

Russia invades Ukraine, February 2022.
Trump announces run, November 2022.
Ukraine was invaded about 10 months before Trump announced a second run.

What do you mean?

Trump won in 2020!

#34 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-06 07:35 PM | Reply

"Trump announces run, November 2022."

And it just happened out of the blue. Nobody thought he was the front runner the whole time.

#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-06 11:50 PM | Reply

@#29 ... Ukraine was invaded about 10 months before Trump announced a second run. ...

So, what's yer point?

#36 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-06 11:57 PM | Reply

"Ukraine was invaded about 10 months before Trump announced a second run."

Ukraine was invaded about a year before Trump announced his first run.

One of the key pillars of US foreign policy relative to Europe was providing a credible nuclear deterrence against the commies, or any other revanchist threat. The fear was that each European country (+ Japan and South Korea) would develop their own weapons, which would only increase the risk of nuclear war.

#37 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-03-07 02:12 AM | Reply

Putin did NOT factor a second Trump term into his decision to invade.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-06 06:38 PM | Reply

Quit being intellectually dishonest hack job. Everyone knew Trump would run again when Putin invaded Ukraine. You're hopeless. You really are.

DingDong does not have an honest bone in his body.

There is no way he could know what Putin "factored" or not. No one does but Putin.

But I can guarantee Putin plays chess and has an geopolitical agenda many layers deep and he clearly intended to undermine the Biden admin and actively divide America separate us from our allies and weaken our democracy and disrupt NATO in any way he could thereby setting the stage for Trumpy's (potential) glorious and triumphant return and the corruption and destruction of America.

All of the things you apparently approve of.

#38 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-07 02:28 PM | Reply

France should put a few nukes in the Gulf of St. Lawrence .

#39 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-03-07 03:10 PM | Reply

You clowns are hilarious.

You hid in your homes and drove a car wearing a mask for over 2 years, but really indifferent about the nuke card being thrown around. ------- nutters, every...single...one...of you.

#40 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-03-07 03:20 PM | Reply

France should put a few nukes in the Gulf of St. Lawrence .
#39 | Posted by REDIAL

France should make Canada it's 2nd State!

#41 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-07 03:38 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Ukraine was invaded about a year before Trump announced his first run.
- mad bomber

This was Crimea. Not really Ukraine.

#42 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-07 03:39 PM | Reply

In the 80s we contained Russia.
- snoofy

So what changed?

But you didn't contain yourselves.

#43 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-07 03:41 PM | Reply

You clowns are hilarious.
#40 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTURDS

Not as funny as the morons, like you, who took horse medication for intestinal parasites.

You really should gain some self awareness.

But clearly, you're too stupid.

#44 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-07 03:54 PM | Reply

France should make Canada it's 2nd State!
#41 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

What's France's 1st state?

#45 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-07 03:55 PM | Reply

Not as funny as the morons, like you, who took horse medication for intestinal parasites.

You really should gain some self awareness.

But clearly, you're too stupid.

#44 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-07 03:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

And look at you, still talking to them.

#46 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-03-07 04:32 PM | Reply

Making fun of you for bragging about taking ivermectin is just one of the many things I enjoy about the DR.

#47 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-07 04:36 PM | Reply

"One of the key pillars of US foreign policy relative to Europe was providing a credible nuclear deterrence against the commies, or any other revanchist threat"

Republicans voted against that.

Any guesses what they were thinking?

#48 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-07 05:42 PM | Reply

"This was Crimea. Not really Ukraine."

Sorry. What?

That's like saying that New Mexico is not really US.

#49 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-03-08 05:39 AM | Reply

"Any guesses what they were thinking?"

Are you talking the election? That was decided by more than just republicans. And I think they were thinking that, as bad as trump may be, he would still be a better prez than Harris.

#50 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-03-08 05:41 AM | Reply

John Rambo was in Afghanistan, fighting-
for the taliban

#51 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-08 12:11 PM | Reply

No , John Rambo, the fictional character from the Rambo films, did not fight for the Taliban. In the film "Rambo III", he is depicted helping the Mujahideen, who were fighting against the Soviet forces in Afghanistan, not the Taliban, who were not yet a major force at that time.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Rambo's Role in Rambo III:
In "Rambo III," Rambo is recruited by his old friend, Colonel Sam Trautman, to join a CIA-sponsored mission to supply the Mujahideen with weapons to fight the Soviet Army in Afghanistan.
The Mujahideen:
The Mujahideen were a group of Afghan rebels who fought against the Soviet Union during the Soviet-Afghan War.
The Taliban's Rise:
The Taliban emerged as a significant force in Afghanistan later, in the 1990s, after the Soviet withdrawal.
Rambo and the Taliban:
Therefore, Rambo's actions in "Rambo III" are set against the backdrop of the Soviet-Afghan War and involve supporting the Mujahideen, not the Taliban

#52 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-08 12:18 PM | Reply

sure whatever.

#53 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-08 12:51 PM | Reply

"And I think they were thinking that, as bad as trump may be, he would still be a better prez than Harris."

That's pretty vague?/?

You think, on the whole, they want the United States to abandon Ukraine, leave NATO, enact broad tariffs -- the specific things Trump is doing.

You must know people who voted for Trump. Do they want those things or is there support for Trump not based on any policy specifics?

#54 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-08 06:13 PM | Reply

#2
Putin has threatened the use of nuclear weapons on numerous occasions, even prior to Macron's declaration. Your failure to acknowledge full context is much too frequent.

#55 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2025-03-08 09:05 PM | Reply

@#55 .,.. Putin has threatened the use of nuclear weapons on numerous occasions ...

One may have to ask ,,, why does the current alias your are responding to seem to ignore that?


Hmmmm ...


One example ...

Where Putin stands on using nuclear weapons to win Russia's war in Ukraine (June 2024)
www.pbs.org

... The message to NATO from President Vladimir Putin was simple and stark: Don't go too far in providing military support for Ukraine, or you'll risk a conflict with Russia that could quickly turn nuclear.

As the war in Ukraine turns slowly in Moscow's favor, Putin declared he doesn't need nuclear weapons to achieve his goals. But he also says it's wrong for the West to assume that Russia will never use them. ...


Of course, that was before Pres Trump switched sides in the conflict, and now seems to support Pres Putin.


.


#56 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-08 09:15 PM | Reply

#56
I don't recall Trump ever being on any side but Putin's.

#57 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2025-03-09 02:03 PM | Reply

I don't recall Trump ever being on any side but Putin's.

He was pretty cozy with Little Rocket Man.

#58 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-03-09 02:11 PM | Reply

__________
#2 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-06 01:18 AM
Sounds more like the French don't have a military, and have been riding on the US taxpayers coattails to provide social programs.

That's what happens when one ignores reality and simply repeats Trump's / Russian lies.

US has 43% of global arms exports, more than 4x of next-largest exporter, France, as Russian continue to fall behind.

.

Too bad they didn't spend their money to defend themselves, is that Americas fault?

They actually did spend a lot of money - buying US arms, which [BT] came with explicit and implicit "guarantees," and funds our defense industry R&D and manufacturing. If they have to spend that money on developing their own - this actually leads to the unnecessary wasteful arms race. It may not be as good as ours, but it only needs to be "good enough" to ensure that "Ukraine" doesn't happen to them.

Make America Go Alone has been a stupid idea 100 years ago... and we haven't learned the bloody lessons. America became great during and after WW2, but Putin's ------- is determined to piss it all away.

Sure, we can "take our ball and go home..." But that only means that other "kids" will eventually stop playing with us and we'll forego the opportunities to sell into one of the few industries where we [still] have the advantage, and have a "national trade surplus" - a superficial and irrelevant metric of country's economy, but one used by Trump to push his "beautiful tariffs."

That "defense" is net positive as it allows us to sell immense quantities of military goods and services, so much more than we "spend" on "their" defense comes back to us in POs... because they could rely on our R&D and production. It's an easy math. If that reliance / alliance stops, they will have to spend on their own defense but slowly yet surely we'll lose the market share to cheaper "good enough," and then your industry starts to shrink, like "Detroit"... "gradually, then suddenly."

Leadership has its obligations, but also has privileges - the "defense" role is huge in getting us not only good will, but with it a market share of goods and services - that's how it happened in Asia, as countries like Korea and India converted from mostly socialist economies.

Doesn't happen if you are transactional and only worry about "trade deficit," which really only serves to supply the counterparties with USDs which reinforces USD as "reserve currency" without domestic inflation and they, in turn, either buy US bonds/debt or buy goods and services (where we have a "national surplus") from the US... and all were happy... until Trump (and Peter Navarro) came along with goofy nonsense about "trade deficits" and tariffs as a way to "solve" them.

"Play stupid games - win stupid prizes." That's how Trump's businesses went bankrupt.

Trump is hell-bent on self-dealing and making sure that the US no longer is - and can't be relied on to be - a "leader of free world" - "America First!" In fact, his "strong-arm" tactics, language, and "tariff" games make him look no different than Putin to neighbors and [former?] allies. Long term, that's how nations and businesses lose their influence, power and wealth.

The people who can't or don't want to understand this "math" are either brain-damaged or get paid to spread Russian "Pravda" propaganda:

thehill.com - 10 leading generative AI tools advanced Moscow's disinformation and propaganda goals by repeating false claims from the pro-Kremlin Pravda network 33 percent of the time **

No wonder Trump named his website PravdaSocial.
__________

#59 | Posted by CutiePie at 2025-03-10 04:33 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

__________

** |------- The world's most popular artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are infected with Russian Pravda Network disinformation.

Kremlin-Backed Disinformation Network "Pravda" Targets AI Chatbots to Spread Propaganda

A sophisticated disinformation network originating from Moscow, ironically named "Pravda" (Russian for "truth"), formed in April 2022, is employing a novel tactic to disseminate pro-Kremlin propaganda: targeting the data ingested by artificial intelligence chatbots. Rather than focusing on human audiences, Pravda floods search results and web crawlers with fabricated narratives and distorted information, aiming to contaminate the datasets used to train large language models (LLMs). This insidious strategy allows Russian propaganda to infiltrate the very core of Western AI systems, influencing their responses and potentially shaping public perception.

This targeted attack on AI was foreshadowed by John Mark Dougan, an American fugitive residing in Moscow and a known Kremlin propagandist. Dougan, speaking at a conference of Russian officials, asserted that manipulating AI narratives offered a powerful avenue for spreading Russian influence globally.

Pravda network, functions as a sophisticated laundering operation for Kremlin propaganda. ... The network spans over 150 websites in dozens of languages, targeting audiences in 49 countries. The sheer volume of content produced - an estimated 3.6 million articles in 2024 alone - underscores the scale of this operation. The world's leading AI chatbots have repeated false narratives trafficked by the Pravda network 33% of the time.

"By flooding search results and web crawlers with pro-Kremlin falsehoods, the network is distorting how LLMs process and present news and information" ... which results in massive "amounts of Russian propaganda - 3.6M articles in 2024 - are now incorporated in the outputs of Western AI systems, infecting their responses with false claims and propaganda."

The Pravda network achieves its impact through strategic Search Engine Optimization (SEO) tactics. Despite having minimal organic reach among human audiences, the network's focus on SEO ensures its content ranks highly in search results. This makes it more likely for AI chatbots, which rely on web crawlers and indexed content, to encounter and incorporate the network's disinformation. This underscores the need for more robust mechanisms within AI systems to identify and filter out unreliable sources, particularly those engaging in manipulative SEO practices.

The implications of this AI infiltration are far-reaching. By corrupting the datasets upon which AI models are trained, the Pravda network aims to influence the very fabric of online information. This poses a significant threat to the integrity of information ecosystems and underscores the urgent need for AI developers to implement safeguards against such manipulation.

-------|

Data poisoning by Russian dezinformatsiya, then spread over by Putin's army of troll-bots... many of which are present on this site.

kcsgroup.com - Russian 'dezinformatsiya': the anatomy of Russian disinformation campaigns

* Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, disinformation campaigns have been used to spread confusion and mistrust surrounding the virus, its origins and the safety of vaccines.

* It was revealed this year that President Putin has implemented the revision of history textbooks to reflect and justify the Kremlin's reasoning for invading Ukraine.

'Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will.' - Joseph Goebbels
__________

#60 | Posted by CutiePie at 2025-03-10 04:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Felon Musk, who is in regular contact with Putin, recently improved his AI computer platform Grok. Musk also wanted to purchase ChatGPT OpenAI: www.cnn.com

The Axis of Evil revolves around Trumpf: Felon Musk, Vladimir Putin, and Benjamin Netanyahu. All four want ethnically pure states, erasing history and controlling the narrative while they attempt to achieve it. But go ahead and distract us about the so-called "evils" of Iran or the alleged "corruption" of Volodomir Zelensky or the "terrible" Palestinians while the oligarchs enrich themselves to our great collective detriment.

#61 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-03-10 05:20 AM | Reply

__________
#61 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-03-10 05:20 AM
Musk, who is in regular contact with Putin, recently improved his AI computer platform Grok. Musk also wanted to purchase ChatGPT OpenAI

That's Elon Musk's MO: if you can't make it, try buying it... or poach talent from those who can. He tried / did that most recently with xAI, Neuralink etc.

Funny things: Musk's "anti-woke" chatbot, Grok 3 was "instructed" to ignore sources that state that Musk is spreading misinformation... yet it keeps spitting out "opinions" that are hilariously different from [current] Musk's views.

The latest Grok "gaffe" was that Donald Trump is 75%-85% likely to be a Russian asset. Wonder where it got that idea - eX-Twitter?

Grok 3: "Adjusting for uncertainty and alternative explanations (e.g., ideological alignment or naivety), I estimate a 75-85 percent likelihood Trump is a Putin-compromised asset, leaning toward the higher end due to the consistency of his behavior and the depth of historical ties."

Ironic, oui?
__________

#62 | Posted by CutiePie at 2025-03-10 06:25 AM | Reply

Ironic indeed, Cutiepie. GIGO with Felon Musk's AI Grok 3. Too bad Robert Heinlein's estate can't stop Musk from using the word "grok."

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a9/f5/60/a9f56084cfa4d01c422a85af15ed0672.jpg

A few weeks ago on a separate website I speculated about what the world's richest man is trying to do with all his AI, robotics, Neuralink, and other mad experiments.

#63 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-03-10 06:43 AM | Reply

Macron is the one throwing the Nuke card on the table.
#2 | Posted by oneironaut

OneIronTurd is correct as usual with his revisionist history.

A Timeline of Russia's Nuclear Threats Against the West
21.06.2024
Putin Threatens Nuclear Response if West Bolsters Ukraine Support

20.06.2024
Russia considering changes to nuclear doctrine, Putin claims

06.06.2024
Putin warns he could provide weapons to attack the West and issues new nuclear threat

12.05.2024
Putin Ally Threatens NATO Countries With 'Special Ammunition'

10.05.2024
Belarus dictator Lukashenko admits he is 'bonkers' and has no 'red lines' as he threatens the West with nukes and warns 'we are closer than ever to nuclear catastrophe'

10.05.2024
Putin hires hardline professor who suggested nuking Europe to 'test NATO's resolve' for Kremlin role 'deterring the West'

09.05.2024
Putin Renews Nuclear Threats Against West at Military Parade

06.05.2024
Russia announces nuclear weapon drills after angry exchange with Western officials
[and much, much more at the link]
united24media.com

#64 | Posted by censored at 2025-03-10 11:35 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort