If that cop has a shred of humanity, they'll never be able to even look at a gun again.
#2 | Posted by TFDNihilist

That cop is getting a noose tattoo to celebrate. He's in the gang now.

"In the bulletin in infers the vehicle may have been used as a weapon by driving at the police"

^
That's pathetically lazy thinking.
Any car "may" be used as a weapon.
That is also escalation of violence by the police without any true evidence to support escalation.
And that's why it makes sense to you. You think the police should be the first to escalate violence. That's what it means to support Law and order.

You already have this entire incident in your head, how it happened, who was wrong, and why.
#14 | Posted by kwrx25

And you don't?
Think about what you're doing here.
You're justifying the cops shooting an infant.

Do you even know why you're justifying the cops shooting an infant? You're capable of introspection. Tell me.

Then, tell me, who do you think bears responsibility when a police officer discharges their weapon and kills an innocent bystander?

I'll wait for actual facts.
#12 | Posted by kwrx25

Cops shot an infant.

What additional facts could you possibly be waiting for, before you decide if that's okay?

19. Depends on what they were brandishing menacingly.
#20 | Posted by Dbt2

Fair point.
Maybe the infant has a sawed-off pacifier.
Best to wait for "the facts."