Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Unable to afford to buy diapers in the dystopic US, a Woman of Color and an accomplice allegedly shoplifted them from a Wal-Mart in Senatobia, MS. During their escape, local police officers opened fire on the car, critically wounding an adult and killing a one-year-old child named Kohen Wiley.

Death Sentence for Infant of Color in the Impoverished Feudal States of Amerikkka

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

White police officers shooting unarmed or fleeing People of Color-- a legalized form of modern-day lynching, like below -- is a horrible and unacceptable fact of life in the US.

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-16 01:59 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

What possible reason could they have for shooting at a fleeing car that stole diapers? If that cop has a shred of humanity, they'll never be able to even look at a gun again.

#2 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2026-06-16 08:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Property am people.

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-06-16 08:23 AM | Reply

On the bright side she won't have to steal diapers for him anymore.

#4 | Posted by fortfisher at 2026-06-16 08:44 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

Proportionality only applys to POC.

#5 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-06-16 11:05 AM | Reply

This Country Sucks Ass.

In a Sane country they could be assisted with buying diapers, not Killed for stealing them.

#6 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-06-16 11:33 AM | Reply

Russia sucks worse, loser

#7 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-06-16 12:46 PM | Reply

If you see someone stealing food, diapers or any other necessity. No you didn't.

#8 | Posted by qcp at 2026-06-16 12:59 PM | Reply

I've posted it recently, but if you've not yet enjoyed: Nina Simone, "Mississippi Goddam."

youtu.be

#9 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-06-16 04:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

If that cop has a shred of humanity, they'll never be able to even look at a gun again.
#2 | Posted by TFDNihilist

That cop is getting a noose tattoo to celebrate. He's in the gang now.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-16 04:14 PM | Reply

Auditioning to be an ICEHOLE?

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-06-16 04:17 PM | Reply

So the link connects to a Miss. Dept of Public Safety bulletin which gives a brief overview of the event, and that an investigation is underway.

In the bulletin in infers the vehicle may have been used as a weapon by driving at the police. Which answers why they would have fired at the car if this is accurate.

Until actual details are released, there seems to be a quick jump to assign motives to the office based solely on the race of the suspects. I'll wait for actual facts.

#12 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-06-17 11:20 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"In the bulletin in infers the vehicle may have been used as a weapon by driving at the police"

^
That's pathetically lazy thinking.
Any car "may" be used as a weapon.
That is also escalation of violence by the police without any true evidence to support escalation.
And that's why it makes sense to you. You think the police should be the first to escalate violence. That's what it means to support Law and order.

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-17 11:26 AM | Reply

I swear to god you read looking for the one clip to latch on the rail against.

The question was raised above "why fire at the fleeing car?", and a POSSIBLE answer was in the briefing AND I added IF ACCURATE.

You already have this entire incident in your head, how it happened, who was wrong, and why. When in reality you have NO facts to go on. You also then extrapolate out my supposed position on this incident and ALL police related incidents based on me posting a simple fact answering a question above.

You live in a miserable world of your own imagination, have fun there.

#14 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-06-17 11:47 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

Never fear. The credibility of the stalwart investigative agency the "Mississippi Bureau of Investigation" is on the case. Lol.

Just have David Duke investigate.

#15 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-06-17 04:30 PM | Reply

Or the the now-defunct, but thoroughly odious, Mississippi Sovereignty Commission.


#16 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-17 04:46 PM | Reply

...the bulletin...infers the vehicle...used as a weapon by driving at the police.
#12 | Posted by kwrx25

What I read is that the woman was already moving and the cop put himself in front of the car to stop her.
That makes more sense to me as that is the modern Fascist playbook, ala Geo. Forman and Kyle Rittenhouse. Create the danger then cry self defense when you kill.

#17 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2026-06-17 07:55 PM | Reply

You already have this entire incident in your head, how it happened, who was wrong, and why.
#14 | Posted by kwrx25

And you don't?
Think about what you're doing here.
You're justifying the cops shooting an infant.

Do you even know why you're justifying the cops shooting an infant? You're capable of introspection. Tell me.

Then, tell me, who do you think bears responsibility when a police officer discharges their weapon and kills an innocent bystander?

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-17 08:02 PM | Reply

I'll wait for actual facts.
#12 | Posted by kwrx25

Cops shot an infant.

What additional facts could you possibly be waiting for, before you decide if that's okay?

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-17 08:08 PM | Reply

19. Depends on what they were brandishing menacingly.

#20 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-06-17 09:08 PM | Reply

19. Depends on what they were brandishing menacingly.
#20 | Posted by Dbt2

Fair point.
Maybe the infant has a sawed-off pacifier.
Best to wait for "the facts."

#21 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-17 09:11 PM | Reply

Not funny. Ban this ------- will you?

#22 | Posted by South_American at 2026-06-17 09:30 PM | Reply

That's #4 --------...

#23 | Posted by South_American at 2026-06-17 09:33 PM | Reply

If the little wog's head wasn't so big the bullet might have missed.

#24 | Posted by fortfisher at 2026-06-17 10:12 PM | Reply

This was not an armed robbery but a case of alleged shoplifting the local police were responding to.

Lots of rounds were fired at the vehicle from different angles, through the windshield and the passenger side window, like it drove through an ambush in Iraqistan or Pashtunistan.

Why all the gunplay?

If the fleeing car nearly swiped one of the cops, did he take it personal and get pissed?

Police could have simply recorded the license plates and then followed the suspects home without a firefight.

Last century, LAPD followed murder suspect OJ Simpson for hours on the highway-- no gunplay or violence.


#25 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-18 12:29 AM | Reply

Qasim Rashid, Esq.
@qasimrashid.com
2h
10 years ago today Cops took Dylan Roof to Burger King after he killed 9 Black people

This week Cops killed a 1-year-old Black child named Kohen Wiley on lies that his mother stole diapers

A 1-year-old Black baby is more threatening to Cops than an armed white supremacist who killed 9 Black people

#26 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-06-18 12:36 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#27 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-18 12:57 AM | Reply

"You're justifying the cops shooting an infant."

where did I justify anything?

and yes, I'll wait for more of the story beyond the briefing before deciding if the shooting were justified. The shooting at the vehicle and not the infant to clarify, that is a horrible result of all this. It will be a HIGH bar for me think the cops were justified here. But at the moment there are no facts other than the surface level version of the incident. Unless more have come out, and I haven't seen them yet.

You're chomping at the bit for me to defend the cops on your assumption they came in itching to shoot. I won't defend that. We don't know yet if that was what happened though. The whole story will come out though, and I'll react fully then.

#28 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-06-18 09:46 AM | Reply

"where did I justify anything?"

Over here:
"In the bulletin in infers the vehicle may have been used as a weapon by driving at the police. Which answers why they would have fired at the car if this is accurate."

^
If accurate: Justified.

Or an I misunderstanding your intent?

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-18 09:54 AM | Reply

You're misunderstanding my intent.

The question above asked why would they fire at a fleeing car. If the car were being used as a weapon against them it would answer why, the question if that is a reasonable response would still be open.

Every inference beyond that is outside my intent. I'm not saying firing was right or wrong, I'm certainly not justifying the death of an infant with it. Merely answering the why would they fire. If it read that they emptied their clips into the car as it pulled away, I wouldn't have posted it at all as it wouldn't answer anything about why, and on the surface without further information would certainly not be justifiable.

#30 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-06-18 03:18 PM | Reply

I'll wait for actual facts.
#12 | POSTED BY KWRX25

The mother paid for the diapers.

They murdered a one year old, because his mother was Black while shopping.

People like you defended them.

You always will.

#31 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-06-18 03:22 PM | Reply

So, the shoplifting was an allegation. The woman paid for the diapers.

The woman tried to tell the cops there was an infant in the car.

And whether she stole them or not is moot, there was no call for violence or gunplay by the bosch.

These People of Color were mercilessly shot at as if they were Palestinians in Gaza.

#32 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-18 03:31 PM | Reply

It says a lot about today's society when people are more willing to believe a Black woman stole some diapers and then tried to run over a police officer.

Than condemning the police officer for killing a one year-old baby.

Innocent proven guilty if you're white, otherwise it's death on site.

#33 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-06-18 03:52 PM | Reply

Also, since when did a pack of diapers become so valuable that a police officer was necessary?

#34 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-06-18 03:53 PM | Reply

And two jurisdictions responded to this national security crisis: The city PD and the county deputy sheriffs.

I can just imagine the call:

"All units. All units. Crime in progress. Black woman stealing diapers from Wal-Mart at Noose and Lynch Shopping Center." Please respond."

"Hey, Cyrus! We got a damn n****r stealing at Wal-Marts. Lock and load!"

"Yee-haw!"

#35 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-18 04:06 PM | Reply

Title should be: "MS: Woman of Color Wrongly Accused of Stealing Diapers, Police Kill Infant"

#36 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-18 04:07 PM | Reply

Since you all seem to have more information beyond the initial media bulletin; where are you seeing this?

#37 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-06-18 04:40 PM | Reply

Walmart is only viable because Costco concedes that retail space. Walmart should kiss Costco's ass.

Once there's a viable alternative............. Standby!

#38 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-06-18 04:41 PM | Reply

Found a few news articles with a bit more information, only one mentions that the mother didn't shoplift. She however was not the driver. If I extrapolate out with the best of intentions given, it sounds like she was possibly unknowingly with someone who caused the situation and took them along on their attempt to leave. If this is true, it's even more tragic. The body cam will be telling.

Based on a lot of reactions here though, you have what you need. A minority involved in an incident so you immediately jump to the police are wrong.

#39 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-06-18 04:59 PM | Reply

A minority involved in an incident.
#39 | Posted by kwrx25

It's the dead baby.
The dead baby killed by police is what the police did wrong here.
It's fascinating you're still trying to find ways a dead baby killed by police isn't wrong.

But keep going with the race baiting. Obviously that's where your heart is.

#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-18 05:05 PM | Reply

Police look where they're shooting, right?

So they saw a baby and shot it. Right?

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-18 05:08 PM | Reply

I have never said it was right. But until facts, actual facts, are known and not heresay and Ben Crump based... You don't know how it happened.

If it turns out the police were actually attempted to be run down, and they didn't know a kid was in the car then it is a horrible tragedy, but I won't blame the police.

If it turn out they knew there was kid, and weren't actually in danger, fry them.

If it turns out they knew there was a kid, but were actually in danger and felt the community are large was in danger... Then damn I wouldn't want to be in that position, and a cops job sucks... I'm not sure what I would say in that situation and the very very nitty gritty specifics will decide my opinion.

But no, I'm not going to damn the officers without the whole story, even if there are heart wrenching aspects of it on the surface.

And where the F did I race bait? This whole thread is race baiting, I haven't mentioned it once outside of quoting a poster or an article on it.

This whole thread is race baiting in the opposite direction and that's where this whole site is, Black person involve? Cops are wrong!! You're so race obsessed you lose all reason.

#42 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-06-18 05:13 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort