Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, November 10, 2026

The Agriculture Department is reviving a plan that will require low-income people to take additional steps to qualify for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

NEWS: USDA is proposing to further tighten eligibility for the nation's largest anti-hunger program, a change that could remove 6M+ people currently receiving benefits from SNAP. USDA says the change will ensure benefits only go to "the truly needy." www.politico.com/news/2026/11 ...

[image or embed]

-- Marcia Brown (@marciabrown.bsky.social) 3:59 PM · Nov 9, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

USDA says the change will ensure benefits only go to "the truly needy."

It's about time.

#1 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-11-10 12:20 PM | Reply

Were it not for the election, the MAGA folk in the administration would now be about two steps from requiring all recipients of SNAP benefits to perform a few months of farm labor to continue to receive those benefits. The administration may well still try it, but there are now enough opponents to such policies so as to stop them...

#2 | Posted by catdog at 2026-11-10 12:30 PM | Reply

"requiring all recipients of SNAP benefits to perform a few months of farm labor to continue to receive those benefits."

love the idea but no chance. Get the freeloaders in the cites out to a farm?

That's a great reality TV show idea......but no chance it actually works. They'd be worthless on a farm.

Okay....I'm kidding......I don't mean to call them freeloaders.....except that I did.

But........they would be worthless on a farm.

#3 | Posted by eberly at 2026-11-10 12:37 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

-That's a great reality TV show idea

LOL, yes...

#4 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-11-10 01:15 PM | Reply

USDA says the change will ensure benefits only go to "the truly needy."

It's about time.

#1 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Trump saddled you with higher interest rates so billionaires could have tax cuts.

#5 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-11-10 01:18 PM | Reply

#1 | Posted by lfthndthrds

LOL!!!

Fug off, maggot brain.

#6 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-11-10 01:21 PM | Reply

"But........they would be worthless on a farm."

Much like you, ass face.

#7 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-11-10 01:23 PM | Reply

Maybe they can pick cotton.

#8 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2026-11-10 01:26 PM | Reply

"An' we could have a few pigs. I could build a smoke house like the one gran'pa had, an' when we kill a pig we can smoke the bacon and the hams, and make sausage an' all like that."

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-11-10 01:54 PM | Reply

As a homeless person, I qualified for SNAP in TX.
I got a temporary contract job. I made too much, so they took away my SNAP.
Now I don't qualify for SNAP because I don't have a job.

They figure anyone can just go get a job when employers really aren't hiring anyone who isn't, in their opinion, the "cream of the crop". Employers also won't touch anyone with employment gaps*, or who have experience in any another proffession, whether or not that other proffession is hiring, or overwhelmed with candidates**. Or any sign that you're experienced enough to know your worth.

Therefore, able-bodied men under 65(!) don't qualify unless they are highly-desired workers in a high-demand, low-competition region, and therefore likely wouldn't need SNAP.

*They assume workers have control over temporary jobs and availability of work.
**They assume you'll be a "flight risk".

So, the only way to get SNAP now is if you thread the needle, earning just SO much but not a penny more.
Or you deceive TXHHS. Or you're a full-time single parent, or profoundly handicapped.

Sure, it's always the recipient's fault.

#10 | Posted by AustinTX at 2026-11-10 02:04 PM | Reply

#7 | Posted by Angrylittlefella at 2026-11-10 01:23 PM | Reply | Flag: Freeloader

#11 | Posted by eberly at 2026-11-10 02:16 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort