and is hands down the worst president in modern history.

Well, if anybody didn't think you were an idiot yet, this certainly stakes a giant flag on that territory that is unmistakable to interpret.

That's a reality. You can preach about how you're looking down on them for not sharing your exact standards, but then you're coming across a lot like the purity ponies.

#20 | Posted by sentinel

That's not what a purity pony is.

In any case, it's hilarious watching people argue for apathy and ignorance in voting without apparently realizing that that's what they're arguing for.

I absolutely do not lower my expectations because she is a woman, and AOC is too liberal for my taste. However, there have been MANY men in the primary with less experience than she currently has and so I will not discredit her simply for that.

#19 | Posted by justagirl_idaho

I'm not "discrediting" her for entering the primary.

I'm saying she doesn't have what it will take to be POTUS and we'd be incredibly foolish to elect her to that position.

BTW would you say Pete Aguilar is a good candidate for POTUS?

The fact that is never even a portion of their methods or rationale speaks volumes.

#210 | Posted by redlightrobot

The fact that your views rely on a political reality that is DOA is why you're not taken seriously.

Without gaining significant support beyond a single election cycle, you'll never get the political capital to push through meaningful tax increases.

But "progressives" make the same mistake every single time the Dems take a majority - they try to cram everything through while acting as if you're immoral and the devil if you don't agree 1,000%.

So you wanted someone else?

Not Bernie, not Harris, option 3?

Who the hell is that?

So because I don't have a specific candidate in mind at this point (I've stated two or three already in the other joke of an AOC thread, your inability to comprehend isn't my problem) means AOC is qualified? You tried that last time and it only belies your happy participation in the race to the bottom.

It's an expression, look it up.

I'm aware. I laughed because I remember what progressives "fighting for it" looks like - it looks like a GOP takeover of both houses of congress in midterms.

Lfthndpedo thinks decades of participating in an international child trafficking/sex ring is a-OK because he can point to a misrepresented narrative the person who is the subject of it says isn't real but it's a Dem so...

Stop and think about it, lfthndpedo, and try to objectively see what a disgusting pile of s*&^ you look like.

Funny how you not only give Biden a pass for what he did to his own daughter,

Ashley Biden herself disputes your representation of her private thoughts.

Like the idiot you are, you've bought a narrative intentionally crafted to cover the right's actual pedos.

you also think Trump is a pedo and Biden did nothing about it. Raetards - the whole lot of you.

#23 | Posted by lfthndthrds

This nonsense has been rebutted over and over and over.

If you're going to call someone a terard, at least say something that isn't itself terarded.

F*&^ig idiot.

Both Hilary and Kamala had more of a record to run on and they still couldn't beat Trump, who shouldn't have even stood a chance after the mess of his first term.

Hillary was one of the most qualified POTUS candidates of the past two decades. She had the Clinton baggage, though, and played the woman card to heavily instead of running on her extensive, and often unique, experience and accomplishments.

Kamala was simply a bad candidate that the progressives tried to ram through to get a woman POTUS because they thought anyone could win against Trump. It was a colossal miscalculation by people who now think they should be taken seriously when they claim to know what's best moving forward (yet another way they're very similar to MAGA morons).

And no, her experience is not sufficient if you have any level of standards or expectations. The funny thing is people like you and clownshart see woman and go light on her because she's a woman. You condescendingly lower your expectations.

Your statement is true.

But some of us have actual standards.

And given how trying these times are and the amount of work that will be needed once (or if) Trump is out of office, electing someone with little accomplishment is foolish beyond words.

In fact, it will, I'm willing to bet, swing the pendulum back to the right and we'll get someone like Trump again.

The fact that the previous administration could have spilled the goods on Trump being a pedo - if it were true - tells me everything I need to know about the left.

#15 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Awww look at lefthndpedo trying to pound a blame Biden shaped peg into a Trump is a pedo shaped hole.

Just face it, s*&^bag, you're fine with kids being sexually assaulted so long as gas is cheap.