Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

__________
#15 - #18 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-15
In the late 2010s and early 2020s, Israeli officials encouraged Qatar to support Hamas,[8] especially by approving the transfer of large sums of financial aid by Qatar to the organization.

I addressed that but you ignored it, as usual - it wasn't support of Hamas, it was humanitarian aid for Gaza via Qatar:

FTA: Israel has allowed suitcases holding millions in Qatari cash to enter Gaza...
Letting UN's Humanitarian Cash Assistance to Gaza program pass through Qatar has been a long-standing negotiated policy.

From 2014 to 2020, U.N. agencies spent nearly $4.5 billion in Gaza, including $600 million in 2020 alone... With Israel's approval, Qatar has provided over $1 billion in reconstruction funds and humanitarian aid for poor Palestinians in the Gaza Strip... **


So, humanitarian aid is a "policy of propping up Hamas"?

You've been peddling this nonsense here for years, despite clear rebuttals.


[9] Several Israeli intelligence officials have cited Qatari money as a contributing factor to the success of Hamas in leading the October 7 attacks in 2023;[10]
en.wikipedia.org

Money is fungible ("money is money"). Hamas, being the Highest Governing Authority in Gaza, was the receiver of any "humanitarian aid" from the USA and EU indirectly (because Hamas is a designated terrorist entity) through UNRWA and UN and was in position to [mis]use the money for any purpose...

Does that mean that USA and EU have a policy of "propping up Hamas" or "making Hamas stronger"? You understand now how ridiculous that line of thought is?

Unless your argument is that Gaza had to be deprived of all humanitarian aid because they are governed by Hamas (BTW, all Arab countries finally ended aid **), it still is absolutely contrary to "policy of making Hamas stronger" - anyone but you understands that.


Netanyahu admits Israel backing 'criminal' groups, rivals of Hamas, in Gaza
www.aljazeera.com

You are again undermining your own argument by providing the article that directly contradicts your assertion that Netanyahu had a policy of "strengthening Hamas" - even al-Jazeera proves you wrong.


Netanyahu doesn't even deny it.

Why would he deny that he wants to weaken Hamas by "supporting" its rivals? Again, that is exactly opposite of "propping up Hamas"!


How come there aren't any articles saying Netanyahu didn't support Hamas?

Because writing one would be stupid and journalists need to at least seem credible... as opposed to posters on blog sites.

Your arguments are now reduced to a challenge of proving the negative. What kind of "logic" is that?


You are such a time-toilet... but I am clarifying your posts here so those reading the thread understood that.

Keep the "faith"!


** www.gatestoneinstitute.org - Why Arabs Are Fed up With the Palestinians - by Khaled Abu Toameh, July 12, 2022 (even before October 7, 2023)

|------- ... The Palestinians are disappointed: their Arab brothers have stopped providing them with financial aid. ... The Arabs are apparently not only fed up with the Palestinian leadership, but also with international organizations and agencies that help the Palestinians. Arab financial aid to the UNRWA has dropped by 90% in the past few years... -------|
__________

Obama administration denies Iran cash payment was a ransom (2016)
www.reuters.com

... The Obama administration said on Wednesday that $400 million in cash paid to Iran soon after the release of five Americans detained by Tehran was not ransom as some Republicans have charged.

The five, including Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian, were released on Jan. 16 in exchange for seven Iranians held in the United States for sanctions violations. The prisoner deal coincided with the lifting of international sanctions against Tehran.

At the time, the United States said it had settled a longstanding Iranian claim at the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal in The Hague, releasing $400 million in funds frozen since 1981, plus $1.3 billion in interest that was owed to Iran.

The funds were part of a trust fund Iran used before its 1979 Islamic Revolution to buy U.S. military equipment that was tied up for decades in litigation at the tribunal. ...


... Trump had pledged to target the "worst of the worst" criminal offenders. ...

Pres Trump [shamefully] lies a lot and oh too frequently.

But the MAGA cult still seems to stand with him.

The rest of the Country, well ...

President Trump Job Approval - Immigration
www.realclearpolling.com

...
RCP Average 5/9 - 6/8
Approve: 44.7
Disapprove: 51.9
Spread: -7.2
...

But one of Pres Trump's main campaign points, beside the economy (and I won't go there for the nonce), was immigration.

And now he seems to be underwater on the immigration issue?


But what is the disparity in the length of time served for black vs white perps?

#91 | POSTED BY JPW

Country - 4.7% probably within the margin of error.
www.ussc.gov

Collin County in general.
policescorecard.org

Seems like Blacks and Hispanics commit way more crime than their population would warrant.

Capital felonies are the most serious felony crimes in the state of Texas. Convictions for a capital offense require a sentence of either imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for life, life without parole or by death. The only situation in Texas state law in which someone is eligible for a life sentence with a chance of parole is if the state's attorneys do not seek the death penalty and the person was younger than 18 at the time of the arrest.
saputo.law

Doctors Without Borders (MSF) reports that Israel uses water as a collective punishment against Palestinians in Gaza. Source: The IDF are inhuman war criminals

The Israeli Death Forces (IDF), like an unstoppable serial killer in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria, have now callously liquidated 73,054 Muslims in the Gaza Strip, a closed-in abattoir of misery, anguish, disease, and human suffering, with no escape for the beleaguered Palestinians.

Several studies have found that 73,054 is likely a significant undercount, and the true violent death toll may be as high as 100,000, as the bodies of many Palestinians lie under the rubble or were vaporized by US-provided thermobaric bombs.

The peace-loving, hard-working American taxpayer is sick and tired of funding the serial killers of the IDF with billions of dollars every year while they get to enjoy world class universal healthcare and we're stuck with the "BBB."

US midterm elections are scheduled for Tuesday 3 Nov 2026.

@#7 ... Politico has broken the story that Newsom put his chief of staff on leave due to a criminal investigation A YEAR AGO! Never disclosed it. ...

Here's that Politico article (why didn't your current trolling alias even bother to cite it?)

Newsom put then-chief on leave last year amid criminal probe
www.politico.com

... Gov. Gavin Newsom put his former chief on leave when he learned a year ago that she was under criminal investigation, according to his office.

Dana Williamson, who was indicted on public corruption charges Wednesday, was interviewed by the FBI in November 2024, while still working as Newsom's top aide. She left the governor's office a month later.

At the time, Williamson was hailed by her allies as the governor's "political assassin" in the state Capitol for her bare-knuckled approach. In a send-off statement, Newsom lauded "her insight, tenacity, and big heart."

Newsom had known for a month that Williamson had been questioned by the FBI. When she informed him in November, he immediately placed her on leave, and she officially left the administration in December. ...


More from the OpEd ...

... Several trends are now converging that threaten to pit tech companies against the general public.

Miniaturization has finally enabled companies to build AI glasses that look and function like normal glasses, but with microphones and cameras. People are increasingly talking to AI, rather than typing. And multimodal input, especially video, is on the rise.

Put all of these trends together and you get a nascent industry pushing toward all-day, everyday AI glasses with cameras -- and a worried public already pushing back at the idea.

Let's look at how we got here.

Meta started it with a surprise hit: its second-generation Ray-Ban Meta glasses, which later gained multimodal AI capability. Its Meta Ray-Ban Display glasses add one in-lens screen " but both versions of the glasses have cameras. (The company is working on a third generation that will probably ship next year.)

Google provides the AI and software platform through Android XR and Gemini, partnering with hardware makers to put its AI on other companies' glasses. At Google I/O last month, Google unveiled frames from Gentle Monster and Warby Parker running Android XR with Gemini AI; they're scheduled to launch this fall. Google is working on two types of AI glasses, one with screens and one that is audio-focused. Both types have cameras, though.

Samsung is working to launch AI-powered smart glasses, too, code-named "Jinju." The company offered up details at Google I/O alongside Google. The glasses feature a 12-megapixel camera with autofocus; run on Android XR with Gemini AI; are co-designed with Gentle Monster and Warby Parker; and are slated to launch in July at the Samsung Unpacked event.

(As with Meta and Google, Samsung is working on AI glasses with and without screens, but both of its models have cameras.) ...




Gee, remember the Moynihan Report?

en.wikipedia.org

I've hit a slew of books in my work that talk about how the humanitarian left globally has been influencing policies, building institutions based on those policies, and soaking up a lot of available funds with little to show for it.

That's research from liberal/balanced university presses. Not opinion pieces or internet clippings.

A willing people and a willing government. I don't think the US will have that for a long time.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy