Corky,
Regarding your #189 link.
I looked at the study.
It was a legitimate, large randomized trial in Bangladesh, but its findings were far more modest than Yale's promotional headline suggests.
The mask promotion program nearly tripled proper mask usage from about 13% to 42%, yet symptomatic, antibody-confirmed infection declined from 0.76% to 0.68%.
That is an absolute difference of only 0.08 percent or roughly eight fewer cases per 10,000 people.
Most importantly, the Cochrane review included this Bangladesh trial and still concluded that the overall randomized evidence showed little or no clearly detectable community benefit.
So yes, the Yale study is evidence of a modest possible benefit.
It is not the sweeping scientific proof of mask mandates that you are presenting it as, and it does not contradict my use of the word "minimal."
Remonstrance by individuals is very dangerous in a Facist state.
It can get you shot in the streets.