but sure...go ahead...

#15 | POSTED BY SHRIMPTACODAN

I agree and thanks for your permission Shemp (like Brandon needs your permission)

Anyway ... Like Nike says.

Just do it!

I'd sleep better with one of those in my pocket.

#25 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Especially since you posted online that you did not vote for Trumpy.

When they start offering rewards for us to turn in the "enemy within" remember that. I know I will if the reward is high enough.

If offered a blanket pardon, I'd take it. Stupid not to.

#77 | POSTED BY ZED

Especially with this particular incoming administration.

If Trump is stupid enough to threaten his political rivals and make a public enemies list and have them repeat it over and over and brag about it on Fixed News then just pardon everyone on that list so Trumpy has to just move on. And maybe actually do his job as spelled out in the constitution. There are some serious decisions about to be made and things that need to be done.

None of which include Revenge and Retribution on Americans.

Are you not curious as to why the hunter pardon goes back to 2014, OR, do you already know but are unwilling to acknowledge that....

#82 | POSTED BY MSGT

We already know and are willing to acknowledge that Trumpy would have not stopped digging to find something to harass private citizen Hunter with in his quest and promise of Revenge and Retribution.

I am curious how it is YOU don't understand. I am assuming it is denial. Like denying who won the last presidential election for four years.

When you are investigating a person and not a crime then your intent is not Justice but Revenge.

The reason I disagree, is because the language used wasn't as definitive as you are trying to make it out to be. His words were: "I need you to find" votes. Not "go make up some votes, invent them" whatever. It could very easily be him meaning " you sure there aren't any that you haven't counted, or should not have discounted ... ."

But combine that with the fake electors case and you have a conspiracy.

And never forget Jan 6th.

Everything was related to that attempt at overturning the election.

There was plenty of evidence. There is only one reason Trumpy was not held accountable. For whatever reason (and there were numerous apparently) Democrats let the clock run out.

It WAS an attempt to overthrow the government. But the people that perpetrated it, are appropriately in jail.

#98 | POSTED BY ABH

The first sentence is true.

The second sentence is not.

One of the biggest mistakes the DOJ made was prosecuting from the bottom up thinking THAT would be the way to root out the leaders. It was not.

" There are credible witnesses ... "

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

#99 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Well.. it's true ... most of them were republicans.

If I'm missing something, please point it out to me, is love to ready me information I've missed.

POSTED BY ABH

I am so sorry you missed it. Donald J Trump was directly involved in the conspiracy.

You must have missed the 98-page criminal indictment that laid out 161 actions and details the conspiracy and which tells a very clear story:

Donald Trump and his allies attempted to undermine the will of the American people in an effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

should tell you something.

#107 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Oh it does.

It tells me that Trumpy is vindictive ----- (like you) that would do anything he can to hurt anyone who dares stand against him.
He has even threatened to use the military on the enemy from within' the U.S. if he's reelected.

And you've elected him.

Cry harder. This administration went after Trump and those loyal to him, not the other way around.

#110 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

There you go lying again.

"This administration" did nothing of the sort.

If there was no evidence of a crime Trumpy could never have been charged.

Which is, of course, exactly why Joe Biden has never been charged. No evidence. No evidence no matter how much money republicans wasted investigating him.

That must make you very mad.

So mad that you want revenge and retribution.

So ... Blanket pardons for everyone!

And then you can go duck yourself.

And those who engaged in the election interference need to be prosecuted.

#112 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

So. You really want to prosecute Elon Musk?

That's a bold move.

Re 118

You can pretend there was no evidence but obviously there was.

And it's a little ridiculous for us to argue a case that has been dismissed but I will leave you with this:

Trump was inducted by a grand jury. Because there was probable cause to believe the had committed crimes.

A grand jury cannot indict someone without any evidence. (Hence no criminal charges can be brought against Joe Biden because there is no evidence of a crime)

A grand jury may issue an indictment for a crime, also known as a "true bill," only if it verifies that those presenting had probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by a criminal suspect.

If you have ever been part of a grand jury, getting a true bill is almost a formality. It's the easiest thing in the world. Only one side is presented, there are almost zero rules of evidence.

You are starting to sound desperate.

If it is that easy to get a true bill where are all the grand jury indictments against Joe Biden?

After years and tens of millions of dollars spent investigating President Joe Biden and his family, Republicans have substantial evidence from agencies across the Administration, including the White House, DOJ, FBI, and IRS; banks; and private citizens, so ... why no grand jury indictments?

Because all of it shows no wrongdoing by President Biden, let alone any indictable offenses.

What I said was, the evidence presented in the indictment was seriously weak.

I am not going to debate any of the multiple charges in the indictment.

So you agree there WAS enough evidence to indict but, in your opinion, it was too weak. Lots of evidence and enough to convince a grand jury but was there was not enough evidence to convince you.

We can argue about that until the cows come home to no avail because now we will never know.

Because Trumpy will NOT be held accountable for his actions and it will NOT be presented in a court of law under oath.

My argument was never that there was no evidence. It was always that the case was too weak and political overreach that only served to ignite his base and actually sway people on the fence to his side.

And my argument that is just your opinion and complete nonsense.

There is no way they would go after the president of the U.S. without convincing evidence.

Especially the Revenge and Retribution Guy.

...

I have no idea why you world bring up Biden. There is less than zero evidence of his "corruption" and "wrong doing."

I brought it up as an example. If you could indict the President of the U.S. with weak evidence or no evidence or evidence that would not stand up under scrutiny in a court of law under oath then Biden would be under a thousand indictments.

Re 126

Should have been "President or former President".

Or maybe they are just waiting to indict Biden because Biden is currently immune.

I guess time tell.