Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Mark Joseph Stern: Donald Trump issued a patently unconstitutional executive order purporting to abolish birthright citizenship to children of millions of immigrants.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

President Trump announced an executive order that attempts to deny citizenship for countless children born on U.S. soil. Tell Congress: Protect birthright citizenship.

[image or embed]

-- ACLU (@aclu.org) January 21, 2025 at 5:35 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

So when does Barron get deported along wiyj his Slovenian mother.
She wasn't born here and he is an anchor baby along with his sister Princess sparkle pony, Eric the dumber, and Cocaine junior.

#1 | Posted by a_monson at 2025-01-22 04:32 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Repeating what I posted yesterday:

I want to point out a couple of things:

1. The plain language of the 3rd section of the 14th says Shitler should not be allowed to be president. This SC said otherwise

2. This SC created, out of whole cloth, immunity from prosecution for any and all crimes that fall under his core powers, whatever those are deemed to be, by his DoJ.

3. This SC created, out of whole cloth, justification for overturning RvW.

4. This SC disregarded the clear constitutional requirements and ruled on the Student Debt relief case.

5. This SC manufactured evidence to justify a clear violation of the doctrine of separation of church and state in the Bremerton Washington case.

It is HIGHLY likely that this SC will find justification for to approve Shitler's EO in some form or another. Or Shitler will simply ignore their decision.

Shitler has spent a decade arguing (without merit mind you) that the undocumented immigrants are an invading army. He and the SC will use that as justification to redefine birthright citizenship

What now seems absurd will become dreaded reality.

Mark My Words

#2 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-22 05:12 PM | Reply

While SCOTUS may agree with their king, the arguments presented to counter King Dotard II's point of view will be so forceful and comprehensive that the phony 'originalists' on the court will be twisted up so tightly in faulty logic that their open bias toward the king will be plain. They may as well say so: "Trump said it. I believe it. That ends it." Hell, if getting rid of the entire amendment were asked for and slavery reinstated, Clarence Thomas would vote to concur...

#3 | Posted by catdog at 2025-01-22 05:30 PM | Reply

Excellent analysis by Slate. I concur.

#4 | Posted by Miranda7 at 2025-01-22 05:45 PM | Reply

5-4 decision breaking for Hair Furor.

Republicans have a democracy to undermine. They're not about to let a minor detail like 126 years of precedent, the plain meaning of words, legislative history, or compassion for others stop them.

#5 | Posted by censored at 2025-01-22 05:51 PM | Reply

patently unconstitutional

The 14th amendment was already reduced to rubble when Trump was allowed to run for office after his insurrection.

#6 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-22 05:53 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable

Drudge Retort