Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, February 17, 2026

"The Rev. Jesse Jackson, whose impassioned oratory and populist vision of a "rainbow coalition" of the poor and forgotten made him the nation's most influential Black figure in the years between the civil rights crusades of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the election of Barack Obama, died on Tuesday. He was 84."

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Jesse Jackson, civil rights icon, dies aged 84

[image or embed]

-- The Guardian (@theguardian.com) Feb 17, 2026 at 4:56 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-17 06:17 AM | Reply

Rest in peace.

#2 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-17 07:09 AM | Reply

Occasionally a clown, but an important figure in late-20th-century America.

Religion applied to politics can work.

RIP.

#3 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-02-17 08:12 AM | Reply

Too bad it wasn't Reverend Al Sharpton.

#4 | Posted by fortfisher at 2026-02-17 08:40 AM | Reply

I remember the way Rush Limbaugh would say his name.........I'm starting to feel old.

#5 | Posted by eberly at 2026-02-17 08:52 AM | Reply

My guess is he will be remembered as a transitional figure with the balance on the positive side. Not bad at all, considering some bumps along the way (like all of us). RIP.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-02-17 09:06 AM | Reply

"Never give up, never surrender, and rise up against the odds."

I Caucused for Jesse Jackson and the Rainbow Coalition in Austin in '84... and was very happy to do so.

He wasn't going to win, but he was going to push for needed change.

RIP

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-17 09:35 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

After Tito, Jesse was my favorite Jackson.

#8 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2026-02-17 11:33 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Get out the Bushes!

#9 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2026-02-17 11:33 AM | Reply

#5

Jacks-un.

Limbo said it the way WF Buckley did. Made me laugh.

#10 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2026-02-17 11:35 AM | Reply

- Funny: 1

The good Rev was running to win the Dem primary for Pres, and came in a respectable 3rd to Hart and Mondale.

Stein was running as a Spoiler to raise money for the Green Party.

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-17 11:45 AM | Reply

P. J. O'Rourke described Jackson's convention speech in 1988:

He is the only living American politician with a mastery of classical rhetoric. Assonance, alliteration, litotes, pleonasm, parallelism, exclamation, climax and epigram " to listen to Jesse Jackson is to hear everything mankind has learned about public speaking since Demosthenes. Thus Jackson, the advocate for people who believe themselves to be excluded from Western culture, was the only 1988 presidential candidate to exhibit any of it.

#12 | Posted by visitor_ at 2026-02-17 12:36 PM | Reply

Jackson may be gone so now it's our job to..

"Keep Hope Alive!"

RIP Jesse.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-17 12:49 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Was he really THE Reverend?

#14 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-17 05:21 PM | Reply

Has the racist------------------- posted any Jesse Jackson ape pics yet?

#15 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-17 06:41 PM | Reply

Condolences to his loved ones. I hope he's at peace.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-18 01:03 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

He was indeed a powerful speaker.

www.youtube.com

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 05:12 PM | Reply

Speech unedited.

https://www.tiktok.com/@rerunproductions/video/7553699294147087630

#18 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 05:17 PM | Reply

Try this one...

www.instagram.com

#19 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 05:28 PM | Reply

Personally, I wonder what Jesse Jackson thought of today's Democratic Party.

He was loyal to the party. That doesn't mean he agreed with everything being done.

I defended Democrats for 20 years but changed.

Jackson believed in building people up.

From what I see, Democrats today believe in propping people up.

There is a substantial difference.

#20 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 05:50 PM | Reply

"Reverend Jesse Jackson, who passed away on February 17, 2026, viewed the modern Democratic Party as the fulfillment of his lifelong work to build a "Rainbow Coalition".

He generally saw today's party not as an entity he belonged to, but as one he remade through his historic 1984 and 1988 presidential campaigns.

Key aspects of his perspective on the contemporary party included:"

www.google.com

#21 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 05:55 PM | Reply

From what I see, Democrats today believe in propping people up.

#20 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

So did Jesus, BILL.

#22 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-18 05:56 PM | Reply

From what I see, Democrats today believe in propping people up.

#20 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

We will make note that not once, but twice, Jesus multiplied the loaves and the fishes for thousands of people he did not know.

He DIDN'T decide to condemn them for not bringing their own sack lunches.

He PROPPED them up, because that's what you do when you care about someone.

#23 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-18 05:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

From what I see, Democrats today believe in propping people up.

#20 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

So did Jesus, BILL.
#22 | POSTED BY ZED

Bill doesn't know anything about the Real Jesus and what he stood for.

But he does know a lot about the Fake Plastic one with a bobbling head bobbling around in HIS head like the Fake Plastic one bobbling around on the dash of his car.

#24 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-18 06:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Zed,

"So did Jesus, BILL."

Totally not true...feeding them on that particular day with the fish is not a total lifestyle of feeding people daily.

Jesus met a temporary need.

Jesus believed in personal accountability even to the point you are responsible for your own soul.

#25 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 06:05 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Yeshua set up a commune where his followers shared food, lodging, and expenses.

He had two rules, as James Talafino likes to point out... he said this when a lawyer asked him the question; these are know as the Two Commandments:

"You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and great commandment.

And the second is like unto it, You shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." "Matthew 22:37"39

He went on to explain who your neighbor is... everyone else.

#26 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 06:24 PM | Reply

Zed,

Jesus would NOT want people looking to the government for their support and help.

He would NOT want people putting their faith and trust in the government, instead of God.

Jesus would want you looking to God for your support and help. Put your trust in Him, not the government.

But if a person denies the existence of God or has never witnessed those kind of blessings in their life, this concept will be foreign.

#27 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 06:24 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Corky,

The problem today is that many Democrats push for a permanent lifestyle of government aid.

God would not want you dependent on the government and beholden to anyone or anything but Him.

The government may be a vessel God uses but it is not the source.

Where does your faith lie? With the government, or with Him?

#28 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 06:30 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#27

Same tired old Rwing nonsense... we are a "Christian Nation", until it comes to acting like one.

There is no admonition anywhere in scripture against a gov of by and for the People NOT TO POOL THEIR MONEY to help one another... and we do it in all sorts of ways from highways to schools to Police Fire and EMT plus dozens of others.

Other Christian and non-Christian nations actually do a lot more than we do with Education and Health Care, among other things.

The early Church often lived together, ate together and, shared expenses together just as Yeshua and the Disciples did.

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 06:31 PM | Reply

- many Democrats push for a permanent lifestyle of government aid

Same BS, different words. You have a bad case of Reaganism.

#28

Lying about me and or God just to try to keep your taxes low is pretty low itself.

You've fallen for every ignorant rwing canard that's ever been thrown out there for you to swallow.

#30 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 06:35 PM | Reply

Corky,

Christian people and Christian Nation are not the same.

If you truly want a "Christian Nation" bound by Biblical scripture and principles....you will not like it.

You'll get a lot more than you bargained for.

#31 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 06:36 PM | Reply

I'm outta here...

#32 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 06:37 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#31

I'm sorry you aren't smart enough to follow this conversation, truly I am.

One supposes that when you ditched Dems for Reagan, it was whole heartedly, because you vomit up all their old self-serving sayings like a sick dog.

Next you'll be talking about all those 'Black Welfare Queens Driving Cadillacs".... who turned out to be mostly poor white women with chidren.

#33 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 06:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Next you'll be talking about all those 'Black Welfare Queens Driving Cadillacs"....

That tends to be Boaz's shtick.

BullJohnson is a submissive coward who decided to hate himself for who he is and everyone who reminds him of himself.

#34 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-18 06:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#34

Yes... but is he good in bed?

His wife?

Asking for Visitor.

#35 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 07:11 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#28 BJ boi says, "Where does your faith lie? With the government, or with Him?"

You Ask God For Help And I'll Stop The Moment He Shows Up

#36 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-02-18 07:17 PM | Reply

He (Jesus) would NOT want people putting their faith and trust in the government, instead of God.

#27 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

No one's even talking about something like that.

Life will always be hard. You, for reasons that are strange for me, want it to be harder than it need be.

BILL JOHNSON did not raise himself out of the slime on his own. He had help, and part of that help was societal/governmental.

As it should be.

#37 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-18 07:51 PM | Reply

If you truly want a "Christian Nation" bound by Biblical scripture and principles....you will not like it.

#31 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Are you threatening me with women who wear longer skirts?

If the world were full of Red Letter Christians, we would all be better off.

Let us know when you get on board.

#38 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-18 07:53 PM | Reply

"The poor will always be with you" (Matthew 26:11) is a biblical phrase frequently misinterpreted as a justification for inaction or resignation toward poverty.

In context, Jesus was likely quoting Deuteronomy 15:11, reminding his followers of their ongoing,, duty to care for the needy, rather than condoning poverty.

Key Contextual Interpretations:
A Call to Action: It is not a fatalistic statement but a command for continuous, and, consistent generosity.

The Context of Giving:
Jesus made this statement while defending a woman who anointed him with expensive oil, arguing that loving acts toward him and the poor can coexist, rather than dismissing care for the poor.

A Reminder of Human Failure:
The phrase highlights that poverty exists due to a failure to follow God's law of community care, making it a rebuke against hardheartedness, rather than a prediction of unavoidable suffering.

Solidarity with the Poor:
Jesus often identified himself with the poor; therefore, this statement is meant to remind followers that serving the poor is a way to serve him.

Ultimately, the phrase is a challenge to open one's hand to those in need at all times, rather than a justification for neglecting them."

www.google.com

Message in a bottle, BJ. Repent while you still can.

#39 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 08:25 PM | Reply

Corky,

Are you prepared to repent?

Do you understand how that comes into play with Christianity?

Do you think Christianity is just about how to treat your fellowman?

That wouldn't make Christianity any different than an secular "do good" philosophy.

#40 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 09:10 PM | Reply

Christianity is far far worse than secular do good moral philosophy

#41 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-02-18 09:20 PM | Reply

- secular "do good" philosophy.

Dragging Yeshua's message, the meaning of which is the opposite as documented in #9, of your rwing nonsense, isn't a good look, BJ.

- secular do good moral philosophy

In Western Culture is basically the result of centuries of, "Christian weathering", resulting in some atheists who follow Yeshua's well recognized good moral philosophy better than do most white nationalist 'Christians'... apparently including the former gay Democrat ones.

drudge.com

#42 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 09:33 PM | Reply

Corky,

"In Western Culture is basically the result of centuries of, "Christian weathering", resulting in some atheists who follow Yeshua's well recognized good moral philosophy better than do most white nationalist 'Christians'"

You seem to be awfully concerned about how everyone else behaves.

Is your soul right with God?

It doesn't matter that you point out everyone else and judge according to what you believe about them.

On judgement day, all that will matter for you is the decisions you made in your life.

You couldn't possible know me well enough to determine my fate.

#43 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 09:54 PM | Reply

Is your soul right with God?
It doesn't matter that you point out everyone else and judge according to what you believe about them.
On judgement day, all that will matter for you is the decisions you made in your life.
You couldn't possible know me well enough to determine my fate.

#43 | Posted by BillJohnson

You voted for a Pedophile to terrorize and hurt immigrants, the poor, the left and anyone who isn't a straight fake Christian like yourself.

You can't repent because you think you did the right thing.

What did Saint Augustine say about fake Christians, Bill?

You'll be extra crispy.

#44 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-02-18 10:00 PM | Reply

Sy,

Any vote for a Democrat is supporting the murder of unborn children.

Let's not act self-righteous.

#45 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 10:03 PM | Reply

Any vote for a Democrat is supporting the murder of unborn children.
Let's not act self-righteous.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 10:03 PM | Reply

As if Republicans don't get abortions. Spare me BillJohnson

#46 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-02-18 10:11 PM | Reply

#43 |

Well, I have an advantage, BJ... I can read, and I understand what I read, especially when I've seen it from the same rwing white nationalist Trump diddling source for literally years.

The analysis in #39 as to Yeshua's meaning and intent is theologically and doctrinally sound.

And it wasn't to give tax cuts to billionaires on the backs of the poor, downtrodden, and immigrant... all of which he also said that when we, individually or as a group; a church or a country, showed love and compassion for others... we also did those things for him.

Your lame Reaganisms notwithstanding.

#47 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 10:12 PM | Reply

Yes, Republican women do get abortions. Data from a 2024 KFF survey shows that 12% of Republican women report having had an abortion, a rate similar to Democratic (14%) and independent (15%) women, indicating that personal decisions on abortion transcend party lines.
KFF
KFF
+1
Prevalence: About one in 10 women who identify as "pro-life" report having had an abortion.
Ideological Variance: While many Republicans identify as "pro-life," polling shows that approximately half of Republican women believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases.
Reasons: Reasons for abortions are diverse, often involving medical emergencies, financial issues, or personal circumstances, regardless of political ideology.
Politico
Politico
+4
Although the Republican Party platform generally advocates for restrictions on abortion, personal, medical, and situational factors lead women from all political backgrounds to seek this care.

#48 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-02-18 10:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Sy,
Any vote for a Democrat is supporting the murder of unborn children.
Let's not act self-righteous.

#45 | Posted by BillJohnson

I get it. You only want to kill them AFTER they are born, right?

Ah. So no abortions ever is the Biblical rule? Let them mothers die, right Bill?

Since I've read the Bible, I know it mentions abortion. Never describes it as a sin. Instead forced abortion was just a punishment.

And because I know history and Christianity, I know abortion was not considered a sin at the time the Bible was put together. Augustine, Aquinas and even Pope Innocent III thought it was acceptable.

It wasn't until the 70's, that you Bible Thumpers decided murdering the mother to divide Christians and win elections was a solid strategy.

It's a shame you are such a fake Christian, Bill. You might have actual read the Bible and know something of Christian history.

Now should I go through and list the sins you DO commit that ARE in the Bible?

#49 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-02-18 10:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#48

Thanks for posting that, Laura... most rwingers here prolly 'think' over half of women get abortions... 90 percent of Dems, lol.

Facts like that almost all a abortions for a long time have been done sooner than the 15 weeks the GOP settled on for a proposed law... they were already 93 percent at 13 weeks or less.

Trumpers don't care about facts and figures, though; they've got their self sanctimonious hate and Trump's lies to keep them warm.

#50 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 10:29 PM | Reply

Laura,

"Yes, Republican women do get abortions"

I've seen statistics.

But it's the Democrats who are fighting for wider open legalization.

That's my point.

#51 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 10:41 PM | Reply

Laura,
"Yes, Republican women do get abortions"
I've seen statistics.
But it's the Democrats who are fighting for wider open legalization.
That's my point.
Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 10:41 PM | Reply

You mean that Democrats want to leave the decision to abort or not with the woman and her Dr. That's what they are fighting for.

#52 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-02-18 10:45 PM | Reply

Laura,

The problem is Democrats won't even admit it's a human life being killed.

That's the primary difference between pro-choice and pro-life from what I can tell.

Democrats stay in denial because they refuse to see it as a life.

Acknowledge it's a human life.

Forget all the rest of decision this or decision that...how many months...and so on.

Admit it's a human life.

#53 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-18 10:52 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

BJ hits the Abortion! button... can the Trans! button and the Immigrants Eating Cats! buttons be far behind?

These are Fringe Issues that rwing politicians and their patsies use to divide us; Trans are less than 2 percent of the population, women have abortions 93 percent of the time at 13 weeks or less...

... and immigrants, especially undocumented ones, are less likely to commit crimes, especially violent crimes. than are US citizens per capita.

These are LIES meant to divide us, nothing more.

#54 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-18 11:07 PM | Reply

The problem is Democrats won't even admit it's a human life being killed.
That's the primary difference between pro-choice and pro-life from what I can tell.
Democrats stay in denial because they refuse to see it as a life.

#53 | Posted by BillJohnson

Odd. Early Christians didn't see it as a life either. You know, the guys who LITERALLY PUT THE FUCKING BIBLE TOGETHER.

But Bill knows better than them! That's why he supports Pedophiles.

#55 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-02-18 11:09 PM | Reply

According to the Bible life begins at first breath and not before that. Just sayin BillJohnson.

#56 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-02-18 11:11 PM | Reply

The concept that human life begins at the first breath is primarily derived from Genesis 2:7, where God breathes "the breath of life" into Adam, making him a "living soul" or "living creature". This perspective emphasizes breath as the defining factor of independent life, supported by descriptions of life ending when breathing stops.
Answers in Genesis
Answers in Genesis
+3
Key biblical and theological points regarding this view include:
Genesis 2:7: The text describes the creation of the first man, with many interpreting this as the model for when human life begins.
Definition of Life: Some argue that the Bible defines life by the presence of breath, meaning a fetus (dependent on the mother) is not yet considered a fully independent living soul.
Interpretation Debate: Others argue this passage describes a specific, unique event (the creation of Adam) and is not intended as a universal rule for all human life, citing other verses that sug

#57 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-02-18 11:16 PM | Reply

According to the Bible life begins at first breath and not before that. Just sayin BillJohnson.

#56 | Posted by LauraMohr

You and I both know Bill has never read the Bible.

He just repeats what his MAGA Pastor says to fit in and be accepted.

He's one of the Fake Christians that Saint Augustine talked about.

#58 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-02-18 11:31 PM | Reply

You and I both know Bill has never read the Bible.
He just repeats what his MAGA Pastor says to fit in and be accepted.
He's one of the Fake Christians that Saint Augustine talked about.

Posted by Sycophant at 2026-02-18 11:31 PM | Reply

You got it. Spot on accurate.

#59 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-02-18 11:37 PM | Reply

Sychopant and Laura,

this is a highly intellectual, but very interesting and fast moving conversation on the clash of Christianity with the totally different Greco-Roman World by two top authors/scholars

the worldviews of the warlike slaveholders and the passionate peaceniks clashing

NT Wright & Tom Holland How St Paul changed the world (Full Show)

www.youtube.com

#60 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-19 12:10 AM | Reply

Laura,

"According to the Bible life begins at first breath and not before that"

If you are referring to Adam, he was fully formed when he became a "living being".

#61 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-19 12:36 AM | Reply

Laura,

"You and I both know Bill has never read the Bible.
He just repeats what his MAGA Pastor says to fit in and be accepted.
He's one of the Fake Christians that Saint Augustine talked about."

At least I claim to be one.

No one's going to accuse you of being a Christian...not even a fake one.

#62 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-19 12:45 AM | Reply

At least I claim to be one.
No one's going to accuse you of being a Christian...not even a fake one.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-19 12:45 AM | Reply

Actions speak louder than words.

#63 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-02-19 12:51 AM | Reply

@#61 ... "According to the Bible life begins at first breath and not before that"

If you are referring to Adam, he was fully formed when he became a "living being". ...

So, your alias seems to admit that he was not a living being until that first breath.

#64 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-19 01:12 AM | Reply

Hey Bill, when you squeak "I'm out of here" in your most forceful swish, do us a favor and stay the fuck out, you worthless lying imbecile.

#65 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-19 01:13 AM | Reply

Lamp,

"So, your alias seems to admit that he was not a living being until that first breath"

No...that's not what I meant.

I was pointing out to Laura if first breath is the criteria, here it wouldn't apply because Adam was fully formed when he came into existence according to the Bible.

You can't use Adam to prove "first breath" is indicative of anything regarding the unborn.

#66 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-19 01:43 AM | Reply

Legal,

I meant, something came up and I wouldn't be responding.

#67 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-02-19 01:47 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort