Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, May 16, 2026

Exclusive: DHS made social media posts out of a protester's arrest at gunpoint. Christian Cerna speaks out about the lengthy prosecution that derailed his life

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Christian Cerna, 28, was driving with his partner and their two young children through Los Angeles, when two vehicles rammed his car and a group of men jumped out and trained their guns on them.

It was 11 June 2025, and as Cerna exited his vehicle with his hands raised, he realized the masked men weren't street criminals as he initially feared. They were Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

Cerna, a carpenter, is a US citizen and southern California native.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"The agents, court records show, were also filming high-quality footage of the arrest operation, which they would later post to social media.

The tactics, a federal judge later said, were part of ICE's "vindictive effort" to "impose extrajudicial punishment".

"It was like they were trying to make a movie," Cerna said in a recent interview, speaking publicly for the first time about his arrest.

"They were like the bullies in high school taking photos to humiliate me ... and to prove a point " to say, if you say anything against what we're doing, there will be consequences."

;;

Examples are necessary to intimidate protestors into submission.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 02:43 PM | Reply

The next non-Republican POTUS and Congress must dismantle DHS and ICE immediately, starting with Executive Orders on 20 Jan 2029, followed by Congressional legislation.

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-16 04:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#2 !00% spot-on target, Coriolanus.

The "next non-Republican POTUS and Congress" would be a Democratic POTUS and a Democratic Congress.

That's my Eye on the Prize I keep repeating.

I am supporting each and every candidate running on the Democratic ticket, from the local mosquito control board to US Congress.

Yeah, VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO, because in 2026, that's the only way to achieve, as YOU put it ...

The next non-Republican POTUS and Congress must dismantle DHS and ICE immediately, starting with Executive Orders on 20 Jan 2029, followed by Congressional legislation.
That's my message for 2026, 2027 and 2028.

#3 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 06:35 PM | Reply

#3

Yellow Dogs Rule!

("Both Siders Drool!")

I'm going to go with there's no way that most Americans feel like even a flawed Dem candidate, Harris or anyone else, from whatever perspective one views 'flawed'... could possibly have been worse for America's People, Economy, or Security than IS the Criminal, Rapist, Fraud, and Traitor that is Donald Adolph Drumpf.

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 08:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

ICE is out of control, or has been.

However, we don't need criminals being out of control, either.

ICE exists for a legitimate reason.

I would never support the idea of eliminating ICE, just reforming its tactics and objectives.

#5 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 08:48 PM | Reply

" ICE is out of control, or has been. However, we don't need criminals being out of control, either."

Where were you when Trump promised to go after the worst of the worst?

Instead, ICE has been grabbing janitors, day-laborers, and abuelas.

When will they start arresting gang members?

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-16 09:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Dan,

"When will they start arresting gang members?"

I didn't know they haven't been.

Are you claiming ICE has only been arresting janitors and grandmothers?

#7 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 09:12 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Where were you when Trump promised to go after the worst of the worst?"

I thought that was what was going on in the beginning.

Did Trump say "only"?

#8 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 09:16 PM | Reply

"I didn't know they haven't been."

That's because you frequent "news" outlets who believe you can't handle the truth.

For example, did you know that ICE gets a bonus if they arrest somebody, even if it's falsely?

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-16 09:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#6 So, he meant the best of the best after the worst of the worst on day one ("at the beginning")?

Is that your rationalization today, bj boi?

#10 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 09:20 PM | Reply

Dan,

I heard about the bonuses.

Didn't I already agree ICE is in need of reform.

#11 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 09:21 PM | Reply

#11 Mighty white of you, bj boi.

#12 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 09:22 PM | Reply

Fiend,

"#11 Mighty white of you, bj boi."

Isn't that literally considered racist?

Who still says that?

#13 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 09:29 PM | Reply

" Didn't I already agree ICE is in need of reform."

No need to clutch pearls; we all know you're going to vote to further enable them in November.

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-16 09:30 PM | Reply

Dan,

"No need to clutch pearls; we all know you're going to vote to further enable them in November."

I might even convince someone here to vote with me, too.

#15 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 09:33 PM | Reply

#13

mighty white of you

Used to describe someone who thinks they've done a great deed, charitable action or sacrifice, but in reality they've done very little to help the human condition.

Earl: I gave that homeless man my half eaten apple.
Roger: Wow, thats mighty white of you.
You're welcome, little boi.

#16 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 09:34 PM | Reply

#6 So, he meant the best of the best after the worst of the worst on day one ("at the beginning")?

Is that your rationalization today, bj boi?

#17 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 09:36 PM | Reply

Fiend,

I knew what it meant.

It's still racist.

#18 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 09:38 PM | Reply

#15 "I might even convince someone here to vote with me, too."

Flag:

It is the ultimate disconnect: someone passionately digging their heels in, entirely convinced they are winning people over, completely oblivious to the fact that they are just the butt of the joke.

#19 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 09:42 PM | Reply

#18 If you knew what it meant, you wouldn't have asked, bj boi.

#20 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 09:42 PM | Reply

#18 Language evolves, bj boi, like your supposed "Christianity" evolved enormously over time..

You, obviously, have never evolved.

#21 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-16 09:48 PM | Reply

Isn't that literally considered racist?
Who still says that?

Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 09:29 PM | Reply

No actually it isn't racist. Oopsie Daisy

#22 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-05-16 09:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"I thought that was what was going on in the beginning."

No, that was the "deny Due Process" part.

"Did Trump say "only"?"

He said the worst of the worst. Instead, ICE has gone after the easiest of the easy.

It's behavior you'll be enabling in five months.

#23 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-16 10:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Laura,

"No actually it isn't racist. Oopsie Daisy"

I believe it is.

Saying "that's mighty white of you" sounds like an implication of racial superiority or moral superiority tied to being white.

#24 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 10:07 PM | Reply

I believe it is.

Mighty white of you.

#25 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-16 10:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Dan,

"Instead, ICE has gone after the easiest of the easy."

How do you know that?

Have you been traveling embedded with them?

You have any earthly idea how dangerous their jobs are?

You're talking as though every ICE operation is simple and risk-free when you really don't know what they deal with.

Every day they go into situations most people would never willingly walk into, and they never know exactly what they're about to face.

#26 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 10:16 PM | Reply

Saying "that's mighty white of you" sounds like an implication of racial superiority or moral superiority tied to being white.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 10:07 PM | Reply

Well considering that if you weren't a WASP back in the day You were considered a second class person. It's a factual statement. If you have a problem with that. You should look internally for the reason why. Just sayin

#27 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-05-16 10:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" You have any earthly idea how dangerous their jobs are?"

Clearly, not as dangerous as protesting near them, or attempting to help a defenseless victim of theirs.

Zero ICE deaths, and at least a pair of murders.

#28 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-16 10:24 PM | Reply

Fiend,

"entirely convinced they are winning people over"

No...you have me all wrong about what I believe.

I appreciate people like you and Dan and Laura and others.

I frame my thoughts here that I use in the rest of my life.

#29 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 10:25 PM | Reply

"How do you know that?"

If they were dangerous, they would've been paraded publicly.

Instead, ICE won't even meet standards routinely employed by judges, DAs, and beat cops.

They hide their faces and their badges, because people like you enable them.

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-16 10:30 PM | Reply

BullJohnson is fine with Donald Trump raping children.

Thats who you're talking to.

Someone who believes he's morally superior to everyone here and his opinions mean more than facts.

The fact any of you continue to engage him in a civil discussion makes him feel like his opinions are worth merit.

#31 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-16 10:31 PM | Reply

Dan,

I won't discuss the specifics of those 2 deaths.

Who I believe is responsible and how they could have been prevented.

I will say I believe they died for their cause and their deaths were not in vain.

They both pushed the envelope and actually accomplished what they wanted to do.

#32 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 10:32 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

they died for their cause

----.

You.

#33 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-16 10:36 PM | Reply

Bill:
"You're talking as though every ICE operation is simple and risk-free when you really don't know what they deal with."

You're sounding like the type of person who made excuses for and objected to any criticisms of the military in the wake of the Abu Ghraib scandal. But I'm guessing you probably didn't have any problem with federal law enforcement being attacked as "jack-booted thugs" under different presidents. (I remember G Gordon Liddy and others using that phrase under Clinton in the '90s.)

Laura:
"No actually it isn't racist. Oopsie Daisy"

You're not any more credible than Bill here. We all know the person who said it was being racist, just like certain posters here regularly troll with antisemitic stuff and least one other regularly uses a anti-Chinese slur without consequence.

#34 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-05-16 10:41 PM | Reply

they died for their cause

More like they died because of their cause.

Mess with ICE, get the horns.

#35 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-05-16 10:41 PM | Reply

Dan,

"They hide their faces and their badges"

Be honest with yourself for a moment.

You know good and well why they feel they must protect their identities.

If you can't show any compassion for them and their families, I'm really sorry.

#36 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 10:47 PM | Reply

We all know the person who said it was being racist

The person who originally said it is White.

Can a person be racist against their own race?

Black people using the N-word prove that it's OK.

#37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-16 10:48 PM | Reply

- uses a anti-Chinese slur without consequence.

The are the potential consequences of getting serious cooties from that poster whenever addressing him.

And #12 wasn't racist at all; it was complementary.

Just like wearing a swastika is cool, right?

It ALWAYS means one is contemplating their navel, not gassing Jew. Right?

#38 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 10:49 PM | Reply


they died for their cause

----.
You.
#33 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

Are you saying they didn't?


More like they died because of their cause.
Mess with ICE, get the horns.
#35 | POSTED BY REDIAL

A distinction without a difference. American LEO are too lenient as it is, thats what causes these issues.

If they weren't so lenient they wouldn't be behaving so poorly. Sure you can protest, but interfere and screaming in the face of LEO's isn't protesting.

#39 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-05-16 10:49 PM | Reply

Not all Nazis wore uniforms and marched in the streets.

A lot of them spent a good deal of time justifying their actions.

The loser Trumpers who visit the DR are the latter version of Nazis.

#40 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-16 10:52 PM | Reply

Redial,

No...you aren't getting it at all.

They died for a cause.

I don't approve of their actions. That is what got them in the wrong place at the wrong time.

But, their deaths were not in vain, like so many are every day.

#41 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 10:52 PM | Reply

Are you saying they didn't?

You should consider killing yourself.

The water you waste would be better used by a data center.

Do it for your cause!

#42 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-16 10:54 PM | Reply

POSTED BY BULLJOHNSON

The sooner you and people like you die off.

The sooner the world will be a better place.

#43 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-16 10:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

- interfere and screaming in the face of LEO's isn't protesting.

SO... is that like a Legal Mandatory Street Execution Offense in China that you want to import here?

Or are you just talking out of your ass as per usual?

#44 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 10:56 PM | Reply

"Can a person be racist against their own race?"

Of course you can.

#45 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-05-16 11:01 PM | Reply

#45

True. See Boaz(Reformed).

He gets to be racist against Asians AND Blacks!

#46 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 11:04 PM | Reply

"The are the potential consequences of getting serious cooties from that poster whenever addressing him."

Many have speculated that that poster is someone with admin privileges on this site. I've also seen some people speculate the same thing about yourself...

#47 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-05-16 11:04 PM | Reply

#47

What a gossipy old woman!

I have about as much admin privilege here as does Matt Drudge.

#48 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 11:07 PM | Reply

It actually wouldn't surprise me if Matt has privileges here.

#49 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-05-16 11:20 PM | Reply

Clown,

"The sooner you and people like you die off."

You're making a pretty strong argument for bringing back asylums.

#50 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-16 11:48 PM | Reply

"I won't discuss the specifics of those 2 deaths."

That's because they both undercut your bulllllschittt narrative.

ICE is conducting itself as if they're above the law.

And you can't bring yourself to actually address the issue.

"You know good and well why they feel they must protect their identities."

Yeah ... because they're committing crimes.

But if they need to hide to protect themselves, then why don't regular cops, judges, and prosecutors???

#51 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-17 12:42 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" Who I believe is responsible and how they could have been prevented."

Tell us you drink the Kool-Aid without using those specific words.

You're LITERALLY blaming the victims.

#52 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-17 12:47 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

MAGA needs their own version of the Nuremberg trials.

Hang all of them.

#53 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 12:53 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"You know good and well why they feel they must protect their identities."

I believe it is because they are cowards.

#54 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-17 05:34 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#24 Even after being shown its genesis, bj boi (and, apparently, others) cannot read:

mighty white of you

Used to describe someone who thinks they've done a great deed, charitable action or sacrifice, but in reality they've done very little to help the human condition.

Earl: I gave that homeless man my half eaten apple.
Roger: Wow, thats mighty white of you.
mighty white of you

Originally used under colonialism and before civil rights, this phrase expressed appreciation for honorable or gracious behavior, under the assumption that white people were inherently more virtuous. Today, it is generally used sarcastically in reference to underwhelming acts of generosity.

In Jamaica in 1765:

A: I built the slaves a church to hang out in on Sundays, even though I didn't have to.
B: Well, that's mighty white of you.

In Harlem in 2010:

A: I'm feeling so generous, I'm gonna eat my food right next to you so you can enjoy the smell.
B: Well God damn, that's mighty white of you - How could I ever repay you for such a selfless act?

'Tis always amazing to me how some people are illiterate, humorless and faux-outraged ... even after shown differently.

#55 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 11:27 AM | Reply

Didn't I already agree ICE is in need of reform.
#11 | Posted by BillJohnson

What reforms did you agree to:
Stop wearing masks? Yes or no.
Stop detaining citizens without charges? Yes or no.

#56 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-17 11:30 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"You have any earthly idea how dangerous their jobs are?"

Tell us how dangerous their jobs are, and tell is what makes it dangerous.

Like when ICE deliberately rams their police car into a civilian car, I can agree that's dangerous.

But it's dangerous only because ICE creates the danger.

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-17 11:34 AM | Reply

If you can't show any compassion for them and their families, I'm really sorry.
#36 | Posted by BillJohnson

Why should we feel compassion for the people who are killing American citizens?

How much compassion should we feel for the American citizens they killed?

#58 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-17 11:36 AM | Reply

Snoofy,

Referring to my earlier post.

Maybe you and Clown could share a room.

I suspect you're both certifiable.

#59 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 12:29 PM | Reply

#32 bj boi says, about Renee Nichole Good and Alex Pretti ... "I won't discuss the specifics of those 2 deaths."

That's because they were indefensible murders...

Let's start with Renee, who you seem to particularly hate. You know, Renee, a 37-year-old woman, a daughter, a wife, a mother...



click image above for larger view

Seriously, bj boi, if you can't show any compassion for them and their families, I'm really sorry.

No, the real reason why bj boi won't "discuss the specifics" of these murders is because bj boi is a lying, whimpering, shell-of-what-should-be-a-compassionate-human-being ...

#60 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 12:43 PM | Reply

"You know good and well why they feel they must protect their identities."

But why should we let them hide, is the question you haven't ever thought about. What are the trade-offs there? You can't name any.
Should we let all police hide their identities, and if so, why stop there? Should we let all public workers hide their identities?
Should we let people hide their identities too, or should people be required to provide ID to the police upon request?

You don't think. You just react. Then you rationalize a reason afterwards.
And I don't think you've ever wondered why you do that.

#61 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-17 02:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#61 Snoofy hits the nail on the head with his comment, "You don't think. You just react. Then you rationalize a reason afterwards."

Bravo!

#62 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 02:38 PM | Reply

Fiend,

The reason I don't always discuss specifics is because it's not the point of a post.

I mean....you start out by accusing me of hating Renee. Why would I hate her? Actually, it appears to me Renee was likely going to follow directions but her girlfriend standing there urged her on to takeoff.

And Alex, there were several men over him and they were surprised to see a gun. The man who reached into the huddle and grabbed the weapon did so in such a way reaching between arms, they may have thought the gun was still in Alex's possession. Alex had a long standing history of using physical force.

In both cases it was unnecessary to kill them and ICE overreacted. Of course we know that now. Hindsight makes everyone an expert.

Two things happened as a result of these shootings. First, ICE has likely been given additional training and the anti-ICE protestors don't appear to be so forcefully aggressive interfering with ICE agents.

That's my opinion.

#63 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 03:08 PM | Reply

That's my opinion.
POSTED BY BULLJOHNSON

You support raping children.

No one gives a ---- about your opinions.

But you think they matter.

Mighty white of you.

#64 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#63 Can't even make it into your shriek until this obvious lie: ...but her girlfriend standing there urged her on to takeoff."

#65 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 03:11 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

These ICE agents are hiding their identities for their families sake.

These men don't need to feel threatened at home by some crazies who are obsessed.

#66 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 03:14 PM | Reply

All he does is blindly parrot Trump.

I hope the misery he causes others is busted upon him a hundred fold.

#67 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

These ICE agents are hiding their identities for their families sake.

May the ICE agents and their family have horrific deaths.

Amen.

#68 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:18 PM | Reply

This is the person murdered by ICE that bj boi seems intent on blaming...

Video shows ICU nurse Alex Pretti honoring veteran in final salute in 2024

Mighty white of you, bj boi, for pissing on the memory of a truly good, decent man.

#69 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 03:18 PM | Reply

ICE agents and their supporters are the --------- people in America.

Miserable people who blame others for their failed lives.

#70 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Fiend,

#65
www.primetimer.com

Per CNN Becca urged Renee to pull out.

#71 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 03:20 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

that bj boi seems intent on blaming...

That's because all BullBringer does is spread hate.

He has his agenda.

It's to destroy what America has become because he believes people have too much freedom.

And there's too many black and brown people.

#72 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:21 PM | Reply

I'm agnostic and even I know BullJohnson is going to hell for smearing the names of innocent dead people and supporting their murderers.

BullJohnson is a pedophile.

He supports raping children.

#73 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:22 PM | Reply

#66 bj boi incredibility says, "These ICE agents are hiding their identities for their families sake."

Oh, aren't they proud of what they're doing, bj boi ? ? ? ?

Aren't every one of their actions legal and lawful, all above-board, bj boi ? ? ? ?

Wouldn't they want their families to see them as America's heroes, instead of being seen as the masked thugs they behave exactly like, bj boi ? ? ? ?

And, for heaven's sake, America has had LEOs for its entire existence, and they generally have all been proud to have citizens see them as heroes.

But now a small subset of supposed law enforcement officers have to hide behind masks, bj boi ? ? ? ?

Is that about it, bj boi ? ? ? ?

#74 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 03:28 PM | Reply

#71 100% oops:

Absolute proof Rene Nicole Good was murdered

#75 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 03:28 PM | Reply

Absolute proof Rene Nicole Good was murdered - II

#76 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 03:30 PM | Reply

BullJohnson is a pedophile.

His opinion is worthless.

#77 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#72
MAGAts are generally not okay with people darker than Navajo White on their pocket color charts having the vote.

#78 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-05-17 03:39 PM | Reply

** BJ BOI's DEFINITION OF JUSTICE **

"Two things happened as a result of these shootings. First, ICE has likely been given additional training and the anti-ICE protestors don't appear to be so forcefully aggressive interfering with ICE agents.

"That's my opinion."

#63 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 03:08 PM

So, in a nutshell, if ICE MURDERS, then ...
  1. ICE agents will"likely" additional training; and

  2. Americans are further terrified of their government
And there you have it, boys and girls...

BJ BOI's DEFINITION OF JUSTICE

#79 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 03:40 PM | Reply

@#61 ... But why should we let them hide, is the question you haven't ever thought about. ...

Do local police departments wear masks all the time?

Perhaps the reason ICE wears masks is that they know the effects of their violent behavior against Americans.

#80 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-17 03:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

why should we let them hide

Because conservatives know if the shoe was on the other foot, they'd be doxxing agents and murdering them.

Liberals are pacifists and believe using intellect is the solution.

Unfortunately most conservatives are homeschooled dropouts who aren't socially adjusted and resort to violence to solve all their problems.

#81 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 03:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

These ICE agents are hiding their identities for their families sake.
These men don't need to feel threatened at home by some crazies who are obsessed.
#66 | Posted by BillJohnson

What sort of actions were taken against their families, prior to hiding their identities?

Why don't other law enforcement feel threatened by some crazies who are obsessed?

Were Good and Pretti some crazies who were obsessed?

#82 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-17 04:05 PM | Reply

These men don't need to feel threatened at home by some crazies who are obsessed.
#66 | Posted by BillJohnson

But all the other police need to feel threatened at home by some crazies who are obsessed?

Politicians, like the two murdered by a right-winger in Minnesota, they need to feel threatened at home by some crazies who are obsessed?

#83 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-17 04:07 PM | Reply

IDF rapists, ICE ruffians, and Russian OMON thugs have something in common:

#84 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-17 04:12 PM | Reply

Terrorists, in general, really go for the balaclava look.

#85 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-05-17 04:17 PM | Reply

My personal thanks ClownShack for his excellent contributions to this thread.

Thank you.

#86 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 04:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Anytime. :)

Hope you're having a wonderful weekend.

#87 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 04:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

By the way.

The censorship of information the Trump administration and his billionaire cohorts have inflicted upon America is outrageous.

All news about ICE has been silenced.

All news about Palestine has been completely silenced.

We're living in an era of unprecedented censorship.

We're living in a failed nation.

Republicans destroyed journalism.

#88 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 04:58 PM | Reply

#87 Indeed. And you as well, Clown: A great weekend to you!

"All news about ICE has been silenced."

The silence is deafening ...

"All news about Palestine has been completely silenced."

The silence is deafening ...

And, for all the nonsense about "24-Hour News," they can't find 5 minutes in a day to cover ICE and Palestein?

Really?

"Republicans destroyed journalism."

Yep.

It was all right there in the 1971 Powell Memorandum to the US Chamber of Commerce.

The blueprint, if you will.

#89 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 05:09 PM | Reply

"MAGAts are generally not okay with people darker than Navajo White on their pocket color charts having the vote."

Empirical evidence doesn't back this up. From what I've seen, they're perfectly OK with anyone who wears the red hat being able to vote, even if many wouldn't associate with them personally. Perceived money and power are often overriding factors to other prejudices.

#90 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-05-17 05:58 PM | Reply

"Republicans destroyed journalism."

The 24-hour news cycle and the shift to digital is what destroyed journalism.

#91 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-05-17 06:01 PM | Reply

It was chasing after ratings that killed televised news.

It was billionaires who killed printed news.

It was social media who provided everyone with unlimited confirmation bias.

It was Trump who killed journalistic integrity by suing anyone who published anything about him he didn't like.

#92 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 06:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

From what I've seen, they're perfectly OK with anyone who wears the red hat being able to vote

Tell that to all the Latins for Trump who have been deported.

#93 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 06:08 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" they may have thought the gun was still in Alex's possession. Alex had a long standing history of using physical force."

Risible.

The cops had no way of knowing ANY of his prior history ... but here you are, lying about the known facts at that moment.

What a good little fascist you turned out to be!

#94 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-17 06:09 PM | Reply

BullJohnson heard Trump raped children and decided he's okay with Trump raping children as long as Trump hurts Americans who have been living their lives in a manner he objects to.

#95 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-17 06:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

These ICE agents are hiding their identities for their families sake.
These men don't need to feel threatened at home by some crazies who are obsessed.

#66 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 03:14 PM | Reply

If their behavior was above board. They wouldn't need to hide their faces.

#96 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-05-17 06:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#98 Ms. Laura, straight on point, as always, says, "If their behavior was above board. They wouldn't need to hide their faces." Flag:

Bravo!

#97 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 06:32 PM | Reply

Laura,

Referring to my earlier post.

They could add a couple more beds for you and Fiend.

The four of you could make your plans to bring turmoil to the world eradicating all law enforcement.

You four could go by the name KAOS.

#98 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 06:44 PM | Reply

Referring to my earlier post.
They could add a couple more beds for you and Fiend.
The four of you could make your plans to bring turmoil to the world eradicating all law enforcement.
You four could go by the name KAOS.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 06:44 PM | Reply

GFY BILLJOHNSON Seriously.

#99 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-05-17 06:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#66 ... These men don't need to feel threatened at home by some crazies who are obsessed. ...

OK, now do ICE home invasions without a judicial warrant.

#100 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-17 07:55 PM | Reply

Lamp,

"OK, now do ICE home invasions without a judicial warrant."

I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law.

There are circumstances where ICE is allowed to enter.

And sometimes ICE must have a warrant.

#101 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 09:00 PM | Reply

"I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law"

You're missing the point: ICE AUTHORIZED the warrantless search.

Almost sounds as unconstitutional as denial of Due Process, doesn't it?

#102 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-05-17 09:27 PM | Reply

#101 bj boi displays his absolute love for Nazi Germany, circa 1933, when s/he says, "I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law."

#103 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 09:48 PM | Reply

@#101 ... I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law. ...

To be precise, my comment was speaking of judicial warrants.

I stated ..

... OK, now do ICE home invasions without a judicial warrant. ...

I notice you seemed to ignore the "judicial warrant" aspect.

Why?



#104 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-17 09:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#101 bj boi actually says, about the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, "I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law"

Constitutional search and seizure guidelines in the U.S. are governed by the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from "unreasonable searches and seizures" by the government. It requires law enforcement to obtain a specific warrant based on probable cause before conducting searches or making arrests.

#105 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-17 10:27 PM | Reply

I saw this article a couple days ago ..

DHS's Flawed Defense of Home Invasion Based on Administrative Warrants
www.lawfaremedia.org

... Amid images of masked agents assaulting protesters in Minneapolis and forcing a half-naked U.S. citizen grandfather out of his home at gunpoint, news leaked of a policy that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had secretly adopted months before.

This new policy -- implemented through an internal agency memorandum issued in May 2025 -- provided that immigration enforcement officers could forcibly enter people's homes without a warrant issued by a judge or a neutral entity of any kind.

That is, ICE disavowed its long-standing recognition that judicial warrants were required to invade a home; it authorized its agents to enter homes based on administrative "warrants" issued by enforcement officers alone.

And ICE empowered its officers to break down people's doors and enter their homes based only on administrative forms that -- though labeled "warrant" -- are issued by other ICE colleagues or the very ICE agents involved in the investigations or arrests. ...


#106 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-17 11:08 PM | Reply

I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law.
#101 | Posted by BillJohnson

They're not, according to ICE.

Who do you believe, ICE or your own eyes reading the Fourth Amendment?

My money's on ICE.

#107 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-18 10:20 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

ICE is out of control, or has been.

ICE was give their marching orders from the top down to violate the constitution and be as vindictive and cruel as possible.

The end result being the execution style murder of Alex Pretti on an American street.

The goons were given instructions to as violent as possible to terrorize american communitites.

Those orders came from the Oval Bordello.

#108 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-05-18 12:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

If their behavior was above board. They wouldn't need to hide their faces.

#96 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-05-17 06:17 PM | Reply | Flag

They hid their faces from DAY ONE. They knew what they were going to be. They knew they were going to be thugs.

#109 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-05-18 12:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Snoofy,

People often accuse Christians of treating the Bible like a menu.

"I'll take this verse, skip that one, and ignore the uncomfortable parts."

In other words, they accept the scriptures they like and disregard the rest.

I'm not a lawyer, but it appears people often do something similar with the Constitution.

Then you have the plethora of court rulings interpreting the Constitution, sometimes differently depending on the circumstances and legal arguments involved.

I don't claim to fully understand all the laws involving ICE.

But people can't honestly pretend they support the Constitution while selectively deciding which legal interpretations or court rulings they accept only when it benefits their side politically.

Regarding ICE specifically, sometimes judicial warrants are required and sometimes they aren't, depending on the situation and the laws involved.

That's simply the legal reality whether people like it or not.

#110 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 12:31 PM | Reply

#101 bj boi actually says, about the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, "I wasn't aware that warrants were always required by law"

This, from the same person who has this fuqed-up idea of justice in America:

** BJ BOI's DEFINITION OF JUSTICE **
"Two things happened as a result of these shootings. First, ICE has likely been given additional training and the anti-ICE protestors don't appear to be so forcefully aggressive interfering with ICE agents.

"That's my opinion."

#63 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-17 03:08 PM

So, in a nutshell, if an ICE agent MURDERS an American citizen in cold blood, then ...
  1. ICE agents will"likely" receive additional training; and

  2. Americans are further terrorized by their government
And there you have it, boys and girls...

** BJ BOI's DEFINITION OF JUSTICE **

#111 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-18 12:37 PM | Reply

#110 bj boi doubles-down on his hatred of American rights when he says, "...sometimes judicial warrants are required and sometimes they aren't, depending on the situation and the laws involved."

Oh? Is that right, bj boi ? ? ? ?

Do tell us, "Perry Mason," when are judicial warrants NOT required ? ? ? ?

When murdering Renee Nichole Good and Alex Pretti in cold blood ? ? ? ?

When a half-naked grandfather is forcibly removed from his home by ICE agents? ? ? ?

Just when, bj boi, are judicial warrants NOT required ? ? ? ?

#112 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-18 12:43 PM | Reply

"I don't claim to fully understand all the laws involving ICE."

^
Comments like this is how you dodge accountability.
You do not hold yourself accountable for your own beliefs, BillJohnson.

#113 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-18 01:25 PM | Reply

"But people can't honestly pretend they support the Constitution while selectively deciding which legal interpretations or court rulings they accept only when it benefits their side politically."

You do that, BillJohnson. You pretend to support the Constitution. And you've selectively decided to ignore the Fourth Amendment when you chose to "not fully understand all the laws involving ICE."

Do search warrants for our homes need to be signed by a judge to be legally enforceable, or does a search warrant allow police to enter and search our homes, even when it doesn't have a judge's signature?

If you support the Constitution, you know the answer to that question. What's the answer?

#114 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-18 01:32 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

Obviously you missed your calling.

Instead of trolling blogs, you should be a judge since you believe yourself qualified.

#115 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 03:14 PM | Reply

Fiend,

"Do tell us, "Perry Mason," when are judicial warrants NOT required ? ? ? ?"

I'm not the one who fancies themself on par with a lawyer.

You should be asking Snoofy. He's the legal expert.

#116 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 03:17 PM | Reply

you should be a judge since you believe yourself qualified.
#115 | Posted by BillJohnson

BillJohnson,

If it's true that you really don't think you're smart enough to understand the meaning of the Fourth Amendment,

That is because the #1 thing you have learned in life is: helplessness.

#117 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-18 03:49 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

How about the 2nd Amendment? What does it say?

#118 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 04:34 PM | Reply

#118 Frombthe peanut gallery: Probably not what you think it says.

#119 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-05-18 04:38 PM | Reply

Snoofy,
How about the 2nd Amendment? What does it say?
#118 | Posted by BillJohnson

We can buy and possess guns.

#120 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-18 05:00 PM | Reply

Doc,

"Probably not what you think it says."

No doubt neither does the 4th.

#121 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 05:05 PM | Reply

Many have speculated that that poster is someone with admin privileges on this site. I've also seen some people speculate the same thing about yourself...

#47 | Posted by sentinel.

Many. Some people.

Drama. Site has more hall monitors than participants.

#122 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-05-18 05:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Instead of trolling blogs, you should be a judge since you believe yourself qualified.

#115 | Posted by BillJohnson

Luke 4:23
www.biblegateway.com

#123 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-05-18 05:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#116 bj boi actually says, without a hint of embarrassment, "I'm not the one who fancies themself on par with a lawyer."

100% oops:

#110 "...sometimes judicial warrants are required and sometimes they aren't, depending on the situation and the laws involved."
So, once again, bj boi, when are judicial warrants NOT required ? ? ? ?

#124 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-18 05:28 PM | Reply

#122 May we please see your hall pass, DBT2! :-)

#125 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-18 05:29 PM | Reply

Db,

What does linking to scripture have anything to do with ICE, the Constitution or amendments?

#126 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 05:55 PM | Reply

Fiend,

I'm dropping out of this nonsense.

Let the experts talk among themselves.

#127 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 06:04 PM | Reply

Doc,
"Probably not what you think it says."
No doubt neither does the 4th.
#121 | Posted by BillJohnson

You hide behind your ignorance.

You can't name the legal experts who say Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant signed by a judge for police to execute said search warrant

But you're sure they're out there.

There could be any number of answers to a legal question, because you live in a post-truth mindset.

#128 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-18 06:04 PM | Reply

#127 But of course you're dropping out ... bj boi

That's because you're a ...


#129 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-18 07:58 PM | Reply

What does linking to scripture have anything to do with ICE, the Constitution or amendments?
#126 | Posted by BillJohnson

Luke 4:23

"Physician, heal thyself."

Lotsa threads you join end up being about you, because your logic is so stunningly twisted it's hard to ignore.

And your cut-and-run posting style isn't the most tedious around here, but we don't need to know every time you've entered and exited the chat room, and why, and who has offended you into doing some chores or watching a TV show rather than responding to questions you've prompted.

Got it now?

#130 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-05-18 09:17 PM | Reply

122. We're all hall monitors. It's part of the site's fun.

#131 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-05-18 09:32 PM | Reply

Db,

Good thing I'm not admin.

#132 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 09:54 PM | Reply

#132 No, bj boi, you're not an admin.

You're a coward.

#133 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-18 10:01 PM | Reply

Db,

"rather than responding to questions you've prompted."

I've been insulted all my life. Comes with being a gay person.

My parents rejected me and it was ugly crap.

The military was horrible and pushed me out for being gay. The process was awful.

My career I have helped so many companies with their accounting and endured so much from them. It was usually a few months so I just took it. Most of the time I'm finding stuff people do wrong.

May last job was hell. There was the usual owners son who is so often an a%%. I am really quite gifted doing the work I did.

So...I come on here and take crap from ------ who are so brain washed it's pathetic.

If I feel like leaving....I leave.

Here I don't have to put up with it.

#134 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 10:02 PM | Reply

#134 Thank you for sharing how miserable your life is, bj boi.

#135 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-18 10:04 PM | Reply

Fiend,

No. I took advantage of opportunities and with a spirit of helping others, I improved my life.

Not all people I worked for were Jenks.

Now I'm retired and have a peaceful life, I am grateful to God for.

God might provide opportunities, but I did the work.

#136 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 10:32 PM | Reply

jerks...so much for spell check.

#137 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-18 11:01 PM | Reply

I'm not a lawyer, but it appears people often do something similar with the Constitution.

I can agree with that.

Regarding ICE specifically, sometimes judicial warrants are required and sometimes they aren't, depending on the situation and the laws involved.

I can also agree with that until you hit every day Fourth Amendment stuff which is what this Buffoon stupid is about.

Where we diverge is your fundamental naive ignorance of Fourth Amendment doctrine. Regarding the topic, ICE, administrative and judicial warrants, any cop with "probable cause" can arrest anyone in any place where the cop has a right or permission to be. Period end of sentence. The problem with ICE administrative warrants, and this administrations policy, is it blatantly violates "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

It does not take legal training to discern the difference between "public and and permitted" and private "persons, houses, papers, and effects" that require a judicial warrant. The Buffoon's policy is just ignore the law and do what I want.

Your naivete supports it.

#138 | Posted by et_al at 2026-05-19 12:48 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Et,

There are active court cases right now over some ICE enforcement tactics and the use of administrative warrants.

Until the courts fully sort out where the constitutional limits are, ICE will likely continue operating under the government's current interpretation of the law.

You raise valid constitutional concerns, but those issues are ultimately going to be decided through the courts.

#139 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 02:22 AM | Reply

those issues are ultimately going to be decided through the courts.

#139 | Posted by BillJohnson

You don't have to wait for that to have an opinion.

#140 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 08:16 AM | Reply

Zed,

"You don't have to wait for that to have an opinion."

I do have an opinion, for whatever good it does.

I think it's sad how America effectively rolled out the red carpet for people to enter the country illegally.

The Biden administration encouraged it, and now many Democrats are angry about the consequences that followed.

We should have continued the wall Trump started during his first term and stayed the course on border enforcement.

By all means, come to America, but go through the proper legal channels.

And this has nothing to do with race. The Hispanic community includes many good, hardworking, God centered people.

So stop with "racist" label every time someone supports immigration enforcement.

There's my opinion.

#141 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 09:47 AM | Reply

"many Democrats are angry about the consequences that followed"

141 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

The consequences are desrtuctive and much worse than the problem.

#142 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 10:00 AM | Reply

And this has nothing to do with race.

1 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Just like MAGA has nothing to do with false gods.

#143 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 10:00 AM | Reply

Where we diverge is your fundamental naive ignorance of Fourth Amendment doctrine.
#138 | Posted by et_al

Everything you said about the legal landscape is correct.
But BillJohnson is not naive. BillJohnson is pantomiming naivete.
It's supplication to the Leader, presenting as a good-natured but harmless, bumbling fool.

"Those issues are ultimately going to be decided through the courts" is a statement of fact intended to absolve the perpetrator of the acts at issue from their responsibility for right and wrong.

Since it's the courts who will decide if it's okay for ICE to ignore the Fourth Amendment.
Trump's choice to instruct ICE to ignore the Fourth Amendment is neither here nor there.

Not that these extrajudicial ramblings matter to you.
But they are an important part of our national narrative nonetheless.

#144 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-19 10:35 AM | Reply

Zed,

"The consequences are desrtuctive and much worse than the problem."

Maybe you should have thought about that first before supporting a party that was flying people in from other countries.

#145 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 11:34 AM | Reply

Maybe you should have thought about that first before supporting a party that was flying people in from other countries.
#145 | Posted by BillJohnson

Let's think about it right now.
What harm was caused when this happened?

#146 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-19 11:46 AM | Reply

Snoofy,

Not feeling like a rambling conversation today.

I have screen door to work on.

#147 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 11:47 AM | Reply

Maybe you should have thought about that first before supporting a party that was flying people in from other countries.

#145 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Maybe I should have thought about the chances of fascist oppression against EVERYONE because people like BILL wet their panties over an issue that was never more than a mid-level problem?

#148 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 11:48 AM | Reply

I have screen door to work on.

#147 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Let me guess: It's unhinged.

#149 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 11:49 AM | Reply

Snoofy,
Not feeling like a rambling conversation today.
I have screen door to work on.
#147 | Posted by BillJohnson

Translation:
You can't think of a single harm that was caused by what you allege.

#150 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-19 11:54 AM | Reply

Zed,

"Let me guess: It's unhinged."

It's probably going on 70 years old and falling apart.

My wife likes it so I have to repair it.

#151 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 12:03 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

"You can't think of a single harm that was caused by what you allege."

I never said that.

There are all sorts of terrible consequences as a result of lax border enforcement.

I've said before I'd support a fast track to citizenship for vetted and qualified immigrants to expedite those who have lived here and are good contributing members of society.

I hate to hear some of the stories. It's terrible.

It's unfortunate this problem has been mismanaged for so long.

But the answer isn't to ignore the problem now which is essentially all I'm seeing from anti-ICE protestors who just want to continue the status quo of letting people live here without proper documentation.

Democrats even want them to be able to vote. Ridiculous.

#152 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 12:14 PM | Reply

Zed,

"Maybe I should have thought about the chances of fascist oppression against EVERYONE because people like BILL wet their panties over an issue that was never more than a mid-level problem?"

How crass.

Reducing opinions to "wet their panties" suggests you have nothing meaningful to add beyond insults.

#153 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 12:22 PM | Reply

#153 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

I merely suggested that your paranoia, and frank fear, got you and your friends stampeded like a herd of cows.

Cows led by a Golden Calf.

Surreal.

#154 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 12:46 PM | Reply

anti-ICE protestors who just want to continue the status quo of letting people live here without proper documentation.

#152 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

People are reacting to Trump's goons, BILL. The goons and the goonish behavior. The naked fascism. The false imprisonments; the murders.

We are reacting to the industrial scale gulags Trump is building. Prisons that will be glad to accept hundreds of thousands of people for not being whom Trump likes, immigrants or citizens.

Americans are not meant to live this way.

#155 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 12:57 PM | Reply

Zed,

Paranoia?

You'll have to explain that.

It doesn't apply to me, so do explain who you mean and what are they being paranoid about.

I see unrealistic fears, on both sides, being spread to manipulate society all the time.

You have to be more specific.

#156 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 01:01 PM | Reply

Zed,

"Americans are not meant to live this way."

I don't know how much exaggeration is in your last post.

Some is to be expected.

In any case, it's not like Trump will be in office like Castro or Putin year after year.

ICE has a legitimate mission.

Democrats didn't want to see how their open border policy was going to backfire.

Very unfortunate.

I understand why people would want to come here.

#157 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 01:16 PM | Reply

"Democrats didn't want to see how their open border policy was going to backfire."

I would love to see that.

How did you personally come to believe that immigration is bad for America?

#158 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-19 01:49 PM | Reply

"You can't think of a single harm that was caused by what you allege."
I never said that.
There are all sorts of terrible consequences as a result of lax border enforcement.
#152 | Posted by BillJohnson

But you cant' name any of these terrible consequences. Because they don't really exist.

#159 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-19 01:50 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

"How did you personally come to believe that immigration is bad for America?"

You stepped over the line and lied.

I never said "immigration is bad for America."

Me and you are done on this thread.

#160 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 01:51 PM | Reply

I never said "immigration is bad for America."
#160 | Posted by BillJohnson

You said: "There are all sorts of terrible consequences as a result of lax border enforcement."
Now you're saying those terrible consequences aren't bad for America?
You're lying.

#161 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-19 01:56 PM | Reply

I don't know how much exaggeration is in your last post.

#157 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Well, gee, BILL----

There's no exaggeration at all.

#162 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 01:59 PM | Reply

Zed,

What do I exaggerate about?

Be specific.

#163 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 02:01 PM | Reply

Paranoia?

You'll have to explain that.

#156 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

I thought that I had.

Immigration was never a crisis.

You were encouraged to believe that it was existential.

So that very bad men could take advantage of you.

#164 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 02:01 PM | Reply

Zed,

"Immigration was never a crisis."

It becomes one when border enforcement is lax for years while millions enter or remain illegally and we pretend the system can absorb it indefinitely.

It becomes one when sanctuary policies interfere with local and federal law enforcement.

It becomes one when cities begin struggling with overcrowded shelters, schools, overburdened healthcare systems and other financial stress.

It becomes one when people who followed the legal immigration process watch others just bypass it with little or no consequences.

It becomes one when criticism of immigration policy is automatically labeled racist just to shut down discussion.

And it becomes one when politicians use the issue for political advantage instead of creating realistic, enforceable solutions.

#165 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 02:26 PM | Reply

Zed,

Care to deny any of these are contributing to an immigration crisis?

#166 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 02:30 PM | Reply

Zed,

"You were encouraged to believe that it was existential."

No...you've been brainwashed into believing breaking the law is just fine and there should be no consequences.

Democratic leaders constantly use guilt, shame, and moral posturing to shape how people think about immigration.

And you fell for it.

#167 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-19 02:39 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort