More from the article ...

... A report from the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University found that 62 percent of adults aged 18-29 said that the design and structure of our nation's government needs significant changes, no matter which party is elected. Additionally, 58 percent said the party they identify with needs to dramatically change.

The study's conclusions pointed out that older generations have longer histories with politics (duh) and have lived through a mix of both steady and unstable leadership.

They have been able to ground themselves in the political framework produced by prominent leaders, like former Presidents Reagan and Obama, the study cites.

Gen Z, in contrast, grew up or continues to grow up through volatility with fewer frames of political reference, which makes it harder to feel anchored by today's politicians and system overall. ...

Apropos?

@#4 ... Explain how Capitalism, as currently practiced here, makes any sense for them. ...

Good point.

For example ...

@#8 ... The DSA platform describes what? ...

As I have stated in prior comments, I remain to be convinced that the DSA platform is the new target for Democrats.

Only that DSA-friendly candidates seems to be more of the views of ~throw the bums out.~

So, in my view, it is less of an endorsement of the DSA, and more of a need for change within the Democratic Party.

Sadly, imo, the DNC has not been at all responsive to this change of tide ...

@#8 ... Voters will have to decide which laws and the Constitution they want. ...

Yeah.

But if they vote MAGA, they are voting against the Constitution and in favor of adulation of an autocrat.

@#11 ... Does Drano actually come in 1 gallon bottles? ...

Apparently it does.

... and back to the topic at hand ... :)

@#9 ... So, in my view, it is less of an endorsement of the DSA, and more of a need for change within the Democratic Party.

Sadly, imo, the DNC has not been at all responsive to this change of tide ... ...

What might ye say?

@#16 ... It seems that a singular faction of one particular party is actually serious about completely removing foreign interference from American foreign policy; ...

I do not fully agree.

imo, we should work with our Allies to determine, in part, how we interact with the world. That's a big part of having Allies.

Having said that, I'll also add, which allies?

Well, of late, Israel and PM Netyanahu seem to be more of a negative than a positive to achieving that end aim.

But our European Allies? And Canada?

I mean really. Why the apparent sustained effort of late to push them away?