The parents maintain that school officials "knew or should have known of the recurring nature of the challenged field trips, the foreseeable risk that students would be exposed to religious activity and ideological messaging during those events, and the risk that student images would be captured and publicly disseminated in a religious context."

What imagined "risk" exists from First Amendment protected free exercise of Speech and Religion?

I agree that sharing pictures of the students without consent is wrong, but children don't have rights in our society so I'm not sure it matters, and when you're in a public place you have no expectation of privacy (see: Flock).

Schools have no right to use tax dollars to bring students to these events.
#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds

^
Conservatives can always figure out a way to make themselves a victim.
#10 | Posted by ClownShack

So you like to watch?
#15 | Posted by fortfisher

There's a word for men who are keenly interested in other men's sexual preferences. Men who ask about other men's sexual practices frequently, publicly, out loud.

That word is homosexual.