Censored is there a number of Palestinian children killed by Israel bombs that would change your opinion? Like say 2,000,000 dead Palestinian children. Would you say at that point Israel went too far? #17 | Posted by truthhurts"
I've been asked this question before, I thought by you. Might have been one of the other pro-Hamasers here.
I'll give the same answer again: "the position of the United States Department of Defense (as well as the United Kingdom and some scholars) that attackers may discount or disregard collateral harm in determining proportionality." en.wikipedia.org
I'll add to that: "Military necessity permits a belligerent, subject to the laws of war, to apply any amount and kind of force to compel the complete submission of the enemy with the least possible expenditure of time, life, and money ... it permits the destruction of life, of armed enemies and other persons whose destruction is incidentally unavoidable [...]." United States v. List en.wikipedia.org
Israel could have at least evacuated the hospitals first. That's what I call indiscriminate. [...] #19 | Posted by Twinpac
Israel could have done all sorts of things. Unfortunately Hamas wasn't feeling cooperative. Because civilian deaths, Jewish and Palestinian, is what Hamas dearly desires. Sort of a one-trick pony, those guys.
October 13, 2023: "Hamas tells Gaza residents not to leave their homes after IDF warns civilians to evacuate" edition.cnn.com
If Israel has given up on the safety of their own hostages, it seems only rational to assume that Israel won't care too much for the safety of the Palestinians that Hamas is holding hostage.