JPW. From your comments it sounds like you just don't have any awareness of the sit-ins and building takeovers that students did to fight Apartheid.

But, it also sounds like you think the universities were probably wrong to divest, in response to student uprisings.

Am I close?

"There's no need to out it in context of if anything other than the context it's already in.
The fact you feel the need to do so should tell you something."

Earlier you compared them to civil rights protesters

I'm doing the same thing.

Now you balk, from what you just did.

"Both are ---- logic that willfully ignores the criminal elements that are actually the root cause of LEO action."

Again,
For the third time:
Put it in the context of anti Apartheid campus protests.

LEO action is predicated on the University declaring the students are engaged in an unlawful protest. That is the root cause of police involvement. It's because the university can't figure out what to do, so they punt to the cops.

To your point, Violent criminal action or targeted individuals, or blocking Jews but not others, crosses a line that mere occupation of a building does not.

Finally, as we saw in the 2020 Civil Rights protests, violence is often instigated by police (here, counter-protesters), to justify the need for police to "restore order."

Who says they approve of that?
I want names.

"The Islamic Resistance should call on its supporters to lay down their arms and stop fighting.

No more dead kids."

That doesn't track.

The roughly 13,000 kids killed by Israel generally weren't armed.

If you are saying Israel will keep killing children until their political goals are achieved, you are saying Israel is a terror regime.

"But, illegal immigration is the cure to America's ailments, amirite Dems?"

Here's what you should try to understand:

Your plans to fix illegal immigration do more harm than illegal immigration does.

"Only a Democrat could push an unpopular agenda to increase the number of children"

That's the Republican abortion policy, though.

"They're fake because they think they can just hit a pause button and stop the situation when it suits them, especially when it's a predictable consequence of their actions they don't want."

That just makes them sound young.

"They don't seem to have an issue with Palestinians writ-large"

They don't?

Why do they keep driving Palestinians out of their homes in the West Bank?

"20% of Israeli citizens are Palestinian."

Yeah and 1.3% of Americans are Natives.

Doesn't mean we didn't ethnically cleanse America.

"They want to be "revolutionaries," but only the positive parts that make them feel righteous."

And the Civil Rights Era is different? They wanted to get sprayed with the fire hose and have the dogs turned loose on them?

Maybe just try explaining it without the anger and the contemptuous attitude.

Especially explain how it's different from the student anti Apartheid actions when you were a kid. Or if that was phony too, just say it was phony.

"If the Islamic resistance terminates their fight tomorrow and lays down their arms, the fighting stops tomorrow."

You're completely clueless.

Zionist ethnic cleansing of the West Bank won't ever stop.

"Being disingenuous and making it sound like the universities are squelching the protests"

The universities are squelching protests.
You're telling us they are not?

"Israel CREATED Hamas in the 1970's as a violent, militant counterweight to the left, secularist, and far less violent PLO and Fatah parties."

I've been saying this for what feels like two years now.

Some people just never pick up the clue phone.

"Protesters from the civil rights era...did they whine about the fire hoses, dogs, beatings, ect ect?"

Huh?

They have to not complain about getting harassed, or they're fake?

You sound like a cop who knows the black suspect is faking it when he says "I can't breathe."

"The people who inhabit the territory formerly known as the German Democratic Republic would disagree."

If they disagreed, they wouldn't be Germany's strongest supporters of fascism.

"The universities have to walk a fine line between respecting their student's 1A rights while responding properly to things that go beyond 1A."

What's your take on the very similar college protests against Apartheid? You were a kid at the time, maybe you didn't even hear about them. Maybe you heard the song I I I I I I, Ain't Gonna Play Sun City.

Was it wrong for schools to divest? Yes or no.

Looks like everyone is obtuse except for you, as usual.

Gonna tell us what they're protesting, or just keep shadow boxing?

Mass starvation was the norm many centuries ago.

Starvation has been a political construct for the past 200 years. There's more than enough food for everyone. But it's politically useful for certain people to die. Like when we tried to starve out the Indians by killing all the Buffalo.

Whereas pesticides achieved widespread adoption just 75 years ago. They're completely unnecessary.

Article says they tested and found chopped up bits of flu virus in 20% of milk, killed by pasteurization.

Industrial farming practices effectively guarantee this kind of thing will happen sooner or later.

Samuel Sheinbein. Not sure who Michael is.
Jewish names all look the same to me. Oops is that anti-Semitic too...

This bill puts this IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism into law:

"Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities."

The F does that mean? It's sooo vague. Can I oppose Yigal Amir and Michael Sheinbein assassins or is that anti-Semitic?