Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

www.google.com

JS may have an inferiority complex... that would explain a lot!

@#1 ... And then comes the punchline: the Department of Justice says, "We've complied."

That's it. That's the proof. Trust us. ...

You'd think that the DoJ would know when they might be violating a Federal law.

Let's see, At the top of the DoJ is AG Bondi.

en.wikipedia.org

... In 2020, Bondi was one of President Donald Trump's defense lawyers during his first impeachment trial. ...

In August 2018, while still serving as Florida attorney general, Bondi co-hosted The Five on Fox News three days in a row while also appearing on Sean Hannity's Fox News show.[33] Fox News claimed that the Florida Commission on Ethics had approved Bondi's appearance on the program; however, the spokeswoman for the commission denied that, telling the Tampa Bay Times that no decision was made by the commission and that the commission's general counsel did not make a determination whether or not Bondi's appearance as a host violated the Florida Code of Ethics. The Tampa Bay Times described it as "unprecedented" for a sitting elected official to host a TV show.[33] ...

In 2013, Bondi received scrutiny following a campaign donation from Donald Trump.[34] Prior to the donation, Bondi had received at least 22 fraud complaints regarding Trump University. A spokesperson for Bondi announced that her office was considering joining a lawsuit initiated by Eric Schneiderman, the attorney general of New York, regarding potential tax fraud charges against Trump.[35][36] Four days later, And Justice for All, a political action committee established by Bondi to support her re-election, received a $25,000 donation from the Donald J. Trump Foundation. Bondi subsequently declined to join the lawsuit against Trump University. Both Bondi and Trump have defended the propriety of the donation.[37][38] ...


OK, a possible conflict of interest there.

So, who is the Dep AG?

Oh, Dep AG Blanche.

en.wikipedia.org

... Blanche was later employed by the law firm WilmerHale,[8] where he represented clients including Igor Fruman and Paul Manafort during the latter's 2016 fraud trial.[8][13][14] ...

Blanche left the Cadwalader firm in 2023[8] and founded Blanche Law to represent former U.S. president Donald Trump[13][8] during his 2024 criminal trial in New York City.[8] ...


Pres Trump's personal lawyer? Is there a conflict of interest there?


Now let's slow this down and really chew it.

First, let's get something straight. This wasn't some accidental paperwork snafu or clerical oopsie. Congress explicitly ordered the Epstein records to be released. Not summarized. Not selectively redacted into legal Mad Libs. Released. The public was told, You're going to see what happened, who was involved, and how deep this thing went.

What they got instead was a stack of documents that look like they were edited by a Sharpie-happy raccoon.

Names gone. Connections erased. Timelines fuzzy. Accountability floating somewhere out there like Bigfoot: rumored, blurry, never quite caught on camera.

And then comes the punchline: the Department of Justice says, "We've complied."

That's it. That's the proof. Trust us.

Trust.
From the same institution that somehow lost track of a high-profile sex trafficker in federal custody.
Trust.
From the people who decide what you're allowed to see and what you're not allowed to even know exists.

Here's the trick: you cannot independently verify a cover-up when the people accused of covering it up are the sole custodians of the evidence. That's not paranoia, that's basic logic. That's kindergarten epistemology.

If the government releases documents and says, "That's everything," there is no referee. No outside audit. No neutral party counting pages and saying, "Yep, all here." The Justice Department grades its own homework and hands itself an A-minus for effort.

And notice how carefully everyone dances around the phrase cover-up. Journalists hesitate. Officials bristle. Because to prove a cover-up, you'd need access to the very material being withheld. It's a perfect loop. A bureaucratic ouroboros eating its own tail while asking you to applaud its transparency.

Meanwhile, the redactions aren't protecting victims; that excuse collapses fast. They're protecting reputations. Powerful ones. The kind that don't enjoy daylight. The kind that get nervous when names, dates, and flight logs start lining up like dominoes.

And here's the real damage. This isn't just about Epstein anymore. This is about institutional trust. When the government says "believe us" while actively limiting what can be believed, it trains the public to assume deception as the default setting.

That's how cynicism becomes rational.

So no, you don't need a secret memo labeled COVER-UP PLAN. You don't need a villain twirling a mustache in a DOJ conference room. All you need is power, opacity, and a system that says, "If you can't see it, you can't prove it."

And that's the quiet brilliance of the con.

Because in the end, the public is left holding a bag full of black ink, empty of answers, while being told this is what accountability looks like.

Which is funny.
Not ha-ha funny.
More like "Jesus Christ, are you kidding me?" funny.

And that's the way it is when the people in charge decide truth is need-to-know, and you don't need to know.

Surprised the Drudge Retort is needed the way Drudge reports today.

law.stanford.edu

"The site was launched by Cadenhead around 10 years ago as a parody site to the conservative Drudge Report. Around 5 years ago, it became a social news site, where members can post links and comments"

It's more a mirror than a parody.

[sanctuarystatesmap.jpg]

#28 | Posted by john_savage2

Trump border czar dismisses Democratic demands to reform ICE
www.reuters.com

... White House border czar Tom Homan on Sunday brushed off Democratic demands to reform ICE amid mounting backlash over the agency's tactics and a partisan deadlock over homeland security funding. ...

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy