And, as usual, the opposing party's response just ensures both sides will continue to treat every incident like this in a silo and pretend they have no responsibility. To liberals, when a Dem politician is attacked, it's due to Rep vitriol. To cons, when a Rep politician is attacked, it's due to Dem vitriol.
And what happens after every attack? The opposing party spouts vitriol. Then, when confronted, they claim it's warranted and can give plenty of ideological reasons why.
The broken record doesn't stop skipping.
"Since you're a gullible dullard, let me explain to you how rational people approach this administration.
Distrust.
Always.
Until proven otherwise, assume the worst and assume it's driven by ulterior motives."
Makes sense. Problem is, since your rhetoric is exposing you as a gullible dullard, you approach any administration that you agree with as not having any faults and everything they do is perfect and for the betterment of society.
Since both sides react like the person you responded to AND like you, based on partisanship...you are just as bad as the person you resorted to name calling. Again, proving your just as much a gullible dullard to your own party.
" Nope. I've said many times here that violence is a no no and can only lead to worse conditions."
That's good to hear.