#3

"I'm the first Indian person to suck at their job!"

#9

NW

I just don't know who to believe, Rwing Justice and Nixon Appointee Warren Burger or LeftHoldingTurds....

- Which part? Hate the rich for being rich?
#64 | Posted by oneironaut

School the rich for paying politicians to make them Super Citizens that have their own Laws written for them, and bribe the politicians to cut their taxes on the backs of the poor and middle class.

I bet most Chinese aren't this dense. Hopefully.

I did ask... and I never said, "fully functional":

"AI Overview

Being born with both male and female genitalia is a variation of sex characteristics known as intersex, affecting about 1.7% of people.

It is not a disease, but rather a natural variation where anatomy, chromosomes, or hormones do not fit typical binary definitions. While individuals may have ambiguous genitalia, it is rare to have fully developed, functioning reproductive systems of both sexes."

- shadowbox

Is that what you are doing... jajajaja!

- I don't claim to know.

Ah, so when you ridicule people who disagree with you, that's you shadowboxing... good to know.

It's always hilarious when the people who for decades commit by far the most Domestic Terrorism in this country, according to the FBI and DHS, Rwing white nationalists... try to blame the violence on Dems.

Funny and stupid.

And there's this bit of history:

"Expert Brief
How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment

"A fraud on the American public." That's how former Chief Justice Warren Burger described the idea that the Second Amendment gives an unfettered individual right to a gun.

When he spoke these words to PBS in 1990, the rock-ribbed conservative appointed by Richard Nixon was expressing the longtime consensus of historians and judges across the political spectrum."

"But that's not necessarily the case, according to Janet Carter, a Second Amendment litigator with Everytown Law.

"The Second Amendment is not a blank check for gun rights advocates," Carter said. "It has always allowed for the regulation of particularly dangerous weapons and for weapons that are not in common use for self-defense.

That's why efforts to challenge these laws have failed all across the country.

Courts applying the new history and tradition test that was established in the Supreme Court's 2022 Bruen decision have overwhelmingly agreed that banning assault weapons is constitutional."

from the article

So what?

1Nut is a direct descendent of Tank Man:

What will you call your next child when they are born with both a penis and a vagina?

Something just under 2 percent of people are... what will you do with them?

(which is symbolic language, as much of the bible is, for the nurturing nature of God)

She loves you, Clowny!

One of God's names is, El Shaddai, The Many-Breasted One.

- Clearly, must be God then...

Could be, we don't know... oh, excuse me... we don't know, but you obviously do know.

#150

More descriptive claims, no arguments.

I'm sorry, terribly sorry, that you take everything so personally.... really, you aren't all that important in the scheme of things.

You do get to have your own opinions, everyone does, but you don't get your own facts.

Fact is that Brian Cox is right, and you are wrong, inmnsho.

"Physicist Brian Cox takes a scientific, agnostic stance, stating he does not have personal faith but rejects "atheist" labels as divisive.

He believes science does not rule out a creator but finds no evidence for one, arguing that the universe's origin is still unknown and "guessing" is pointless."

"He believes science does not rule out a creator", you opine that it does.

Here take a couple mins, and he'll explain where you are wrong: