"Price gouging" is the focus of Vice President Kamala Harris's economic agenda, her presidential campaign says. She'll crack down on "excessive prices" and "excessive corporate profits," particularly for groceries. So what level counts as "excessive," you might ask? TBD, but Harris will ban it. That's the thing about price gouging: As has been said of hardcore pornography, you know it when you see it. It's not hard to figure out where this proposal came from. Voters want to blame someone for high grocery bills, and the presidential candidates have apparently decided the choices are either the Biden administration or corporate greed. Harris has chosen the latter.
Yeah price controls are stupid!!!!!1one
President Trump pledges to cut energy prices IN HALF within one year of taking office " pic.twitter.com/bPZksiL9SD" Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) August 15, 2024
@#8 ... We saw it in the 70's with petrol. ...
Analysis: Background: What caused the 1970s oil price shock? (2011)
www.theguardian.com
... There were a series of energy crises between 1967 and 1979 caused by problems in the Middle East but the most significant started in 1973 when Arab oil producers imposed an embargo.
The decision to boycott America and punish the west in response to support for Israel in the Yom Kippur war against Egypt led the price of crude to rise from $3 per barrel to $12 by 1974.
The price of petrol rocketed, making all transport more expensive. There was even talk in Britain of rationing using coupons left over from the second world war. ...
1990: Interest rates continued to fall, ending the decade at 9.78%.
This is false.
www.macrotrends.net
FYI: #18 | Posted by LampLighter
From #8: The controls were a response to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) causing fuel prices to increase.
If Harris tries to implement what the article states (Warren's old plan), then you can eventually expect shortages similar to what all "controlled economies" have experienced.
I have no idea how this would work in practice, but I certainly understand the political calculus for making this case.
The article states it perfectly.
The most likely template for Harris's proposal is a recent bill from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). (Harris co-sponsored similar legislation with Warren in 2020, when Harris was a senator.) Warren's bill would ban any "grossly excessive price" during any "atypical disruption" of a market. Alas, no definition was provided for these terms, either; rather, the bill would empower the Federal Trade Commission to enforce bans using any metric it deems appropriate.
The political calculus is to appease the peasants/plebs in the short term, but really to build in the long term yet another yoke on corporations to toe the party line.
See this is where it would get crazy over time, where favorites would be played etc etc. It becomes a political weapon. Used to subjugate the undesirables.
There are an enormous amount of literature on this in Russian and Chinese. The argument against "price control" lead to a more free and prosperous China as we embraced "capitalism" in many ways. Feel free to educate yourself, the closest thing I have read about the intricacies to the argument in English is "The Road to Serfdom" by Hayek.
@#20 ... This is false. ...
What is the "this" your current alias' comment refers to?
If it is the "1990: Interest rates continued to fall, ending the decade at 9.78%" the link your current alias provided seems to support that..
If it is my #18 comment, I see nothing in your comment that shows how my #18 was false.
So I'll say my #18 again...
Analysis: Background: What caused the 1970s oil price shock? (2011)
www.theguardian.com
... There were a series of energy crises between 1967 and 1979 caused by problems in the Middle East but the most significant started in 1973 when Arab oil producers imposed an embargo.
The decision to boycott America and punish the west in response to support for Israel in the Yom Kippur war against Egypt led the price of crude to rise from $3 per barrel to $12 by 1974.
The price of petrol rocketed, making all transport more expensive. There was even talk in Britain of rationing using coupons left over from the second world war. ...
#29 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG
But isn't that just alcohol?
This is what the Slinger is talking about, the illusion of choice.
s3.amazonaws.com
I have no issue with Harris' proposal so far. There just isn't enough information to make any kind of worthwhile opinion.
Anyone hyperventilating over this is trying to get attention or being ridiculously and transparently partisan.
Especially when inflation on groceries was 1.1% last month.
Grocery stores typically have a profit margin of about 2%. Price controls will put many chains out of business.
www.marketplace.org
I'm surprised at the author's lack of comprehension on how markets work, though. Then again the WaPo's Opinion pages have been ridiculous on this subject, mischaracterizing and making gross assumptions. Fortunately the comment section is ripping them to shreds for their facile handling of this subject.
Drudge Retort Headlines
This Is Post-Roe America (173 comments)
Central Park 5 Sue Trump for Defamation (72 comments)
U.S. Infant Deaths Rose After Fall of Roe v. Wade (59 comments)
Harris Leads Trump 2-1 Among the Earliest Voters (36 comments)
Trump Talking About Arnold Palmer's Private Parts is Just Weird (36 comments)
McDonald's Donald Trump Worked at Failed Last Health Inspection (30 comments)
Guardrails Will Avert Manipulation of Election Outcome (30 comments)
Trump Calls Judge 'evil' for Releasing Files Before Election (24 comments)