Friday, August 16, 2024

Harris’s terrible price controls proposal

"Price gouging" is the focus of Vice President Kamala Harris's economic agenda, her presidential campaign says. She'll crack down on "excessive prices" and "excessive corporate profits," particularly for groceries. So what level counts as "excessive," you might ask? TBD, but Harris will ban it. That's the thing about price gouging: As has been said of hardcore pornography, you know it when you see it. It's not hard to figure out where this proposal came from. Voters want to blame someone for high grocery bills, and the presidential candidates have apparently decided the choices are either the Biden administration or corporate greed. Harris has chosen the latter.

Comments

Something has to be done to reign in these high grocery prices. They are ridiculous to say the least.

#1 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2024-08-16 11:16 AM

Yeah price controls are stupid!!!!!1one

President Trump pledges to cut energy prices IN HALF within one year of taking office " pic.twitter.com/bPZksiL9SD" Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) August 15, 2024

#2 | Posted by qcp at 2024-08-16 11:19 AM

2

So you know Harris is full of it?

#3 | Posted by eberly at 2024-08-16 11:23 AM

What's wrong with holding criminals accountable?

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-08-16 11:36 AM

" Something has to be done to reign in these high grocery prices."
2.2% inflation on food in the last 12 months, according to the CPI.

#5 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-08-16 11:36 AM

"Something has to be done to reign in these high grocery prices."

You know what I used to do (before I retired) when my cost of living went up? I got a better job with a higher income.

Now my COLA takes care of it.

#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-16 11:41 AM

I find it hilarious that republicans pretend things are worse (excuse me more DANGEROUS) than they ever were.

Inflation in the 1980s was volatile, ranging from 12.5% in 1980 to 1.1% in 1986. The average annual increase over the last eight years of the decade was 3.7%, which was higher than the 1950s and 1960s

1980: The federal funds rate started the year at 14%, but by December, it had increased to 19"20%, the highest it had ever been. This led to higher consumer borrowing costs, with the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rate reaching nearly 20%. Six-month CD rates averaged 17.74% APY in March, and three-month CD rates averaged 18.65%.

1981: In October, interest rates reached their highest point in modern history at 18.63%. This was due to the Federal Reserve raising short-term interest rates to combat hyperinflation.
1985: By March, the average 30-year mortgage rate had cooled to around 13%.

1990: Interest rates continued to fall, ending the decade at 9.78%.

#7 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-16 11:46 AM

Price controls = shortages.

We saw it in the 70's with petrol.

#8 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-16 11:58 AM

I don't see a path to try and manage prices of specific items in a grocery store.

What is possible though?? maybe not allow a merger/acquisition of Kroger and Albertsons? That is realistic.

Determining how much is too much profit on a loaf of bread I can shop in 4 different places? (Kroger, Walmart, Aldi, Target, Dollar Store, etc) No ------ way.

Where I live there are more retail options to buy a gallon of milk than a gallon of gas.

#9 | Posted by eberly at 2024-08-16 12:08 PM

We saw it in the 70's with petrol.

#8 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

No you didn't. Price controls were put in place to limit inflation.

The 1970s energy crisis, also known as the 1970s oil crisis, was a period of high petroleum prices and shortages in the Western world, especially the United States, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. The two worst crises of the period were the 1973 oil crisis and the 1979 energy crisis. Both crises were caused by interruptions in Middle Eastern oil exports, the first by the Yom Kippur War and the second by the Iranian Revolution.

In the 1970s, the US government imposed price controls on crude oil to prevent gasoline prices from rising too quickly. The controls were part of a larger program to manage production and limit inflation. The controls were a response to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) causing fuel prices to increase

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-16 12:08 PM

Dinger headlines are always hilarious.

#11 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-08-16 12:31 PM

'price control proposal"

riiiiight....so that's what the WH talking point says.

2013 Maduro did the same thing to combat "corporate greed" in Venezula.

and their inflation graft jumps up as straight and high as the " female -------- cancer" rate has gone in "woke" america.

Maybe I should buy that condo.....next to the city zoo.

#12 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2024-08-16 12:40 PM

Maybe I should buy that condo.....next to the city zoo.

#12 | POSTED BY SHRIMPTACODAN

I bet they have an even more affordable place for you.

IN the city zoo.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-16 12:43 PM

Vs. business as usual.

#14 | Posted by fresno500 at 2024-08-16 12:45 PM

What is possible though?? maybe not allow a merger/acquisition of Kroger and Albertsons? That is realistic.

Determining how much is too much profit on a loaf of bread I can shop in 4 different places? (Kroger, Walmart, Aldi, Target, Dollar Store, etc) No ------ way.

The former is where this proposal is targeted, at the wholesale levels, not at the retail levels. There is already a bill before the Senate with many of the targets and goals in the Harris proposal. I watched Sen. Casey talk about this on tv and I've posted multiple threads pointing out the same numbers and trends.

Corporations that produce goods used the pandemic issues to raise their profits to record levels by increasing the wholesale prices of their products. Then, they actually wrote memos and shareholder reports detailing exactly how they did it to raise profits by using increasing supply chain costs as public cover. And because of mergers and consolidations, there is already less competition in many markets, and instead of competitors holding to lower - yet profitable - prices to gain additional market share, companies simply raised their own prices to match competitors and satisfy their investors while consumers bore all these costs themselves.

I have no idea how this would work in practice, but I certainly understand the political calculus for making this case. I just heard a Republican admit that inflation numbers have gotten markedly better while then lamenting "Why wasn't something done years ago(?)" Harris needs to be able to pivot with a true answer - because we started working on inflation years ago is one of the reasons we're seeing the downward trends we are today. And one of the big things I can think of that's helped was the strategic release of our oil reserves into the market when OPEC was trying to cut production and drive prices even higher to intentionally hurt America and Biden. The sales turned a profit for the government AND helped keep pump prices from exploding more than they did.

#15 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-08-16 12:46 PM

Bellringer: "pRicE cONtroLS WIll dEStrOY tHE mArKEt!"
Dairy Farmers: ...?

#16 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-08-16 12:47 PM

"when OPEC was trying to cut production and drive prices even higher to intentionally hurt America and Biden"

I realize this is an entirely different subject but why would OPEC want to hurt Biden?

I'm not asking about US companies that might collude with OPEC...but OPEC itself.

#17 | Posted by eberly at 2024-08-16 01:28 PM

@#8 ... We saw it in the 70's with petrol. ...

Analysis: Background: What caused the 1970s oil price shock? (2011)
www.theguardian.com

... There were a series of energy crises between 1967 and 1979 caused by problems in the Middle East but the most significant started in 1973 when Arab oil producers imposed an embargo.

The decision to boycott America and punish the west in response to support for Israel in the Yom Kippur war against Egypt led the price of crude to rise from $3 per barrel to $12 by 1974.

The price of petrol rocketed, making all transport more expensive. There was even talk in Britain of rationing using coupons left over from the second world war. ...


#18 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-16 01:37 PM

#17

Sorry. To me, OPEC is MBS - who's also in cahoots with Putin - since SA tacitly controls the organization.

You should now know the answer to the rest of your question.

#19 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-08-16 01:45 PM

1990: Interest rates continued to fall, ending the decade at 9.78%.

This is false.
www.macrotrends.net

FYI: #18 | Posted by LampLighter
From #8: The controls were a response to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) causing fuel prices to increase.

If Harris tries to implement what the article states (Warren's old plan), then you can eventually expect shortages similar to what all "controlled economies" have experienced.

I have no idea how this would work in practice, but I certainly understand the political calculus for making this case.

The article states it perfectly.


The most likely template for Harris's proposal is a recent bill from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). (Harris co-sponsored similar legislation with Warren in 2020, when Harris was a senator.) Warren's bill would ban any "grossly excessive price" during any "atypical disruption" of a market. Alas, no definition was provided for these terms, either; rather, the bill would empower the Federal Trade Commission to enforce bans using any metric it deems appropriate.

The political calculus is to appease the peasants/plebs in the short term, but really to build in the long term yet another yoke on corporations to toe the party line.

See this is where it would get crazy over time, where favorites would be played etc etc. It becomes a political weapon. Used to subjugate the undesirables.

There are an enormous amount of literature on this in Russian and Chinese. The argument against "price control" lead to a more free and prosperous China as we embraced "capitalism" in many ways. Feel free to educate yourself, the closest thing I have read about the intricacies to the argument in English is "The Road to Serfdom" by Hayek.

#20 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-08-16 07:37 PM

@#20 ... This is false. ...

What is the "this" your current alias' comment refers to?

If it is the "1990: Interest rates continued to fall, ending the decade at 9.78%" the link your current alias provided seems to support that..

If it is my #18 comment, I see nothing in your comment that shows how my #18 was false.

So I'll say my #18 again...

Analysis: Background: What caused the 1970s oil price shock? (2011)
www.theguardian.com

... There were a series of energy crises between 1967 and 1979 caused by problems in the Middle East but the most significant started in 1973 when Arab oil producers imposed an embargo.

The decision to boycott America and punish the west in response to support for Israel in the Yom Kippur war against Egypt led the price of crude to rise from $3 per barrel to $12 by 1974.

The price of petrol rocketed, making all transport more expensive. There was even talk in Britain of rationing using coupons left over from the second world war. ...


#22 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-16 07:48 PM

Nixon was a Republican and he imposed price and wage controls.

How about just setting an upper limit on profit margins? No actual numbers in prices but like regulation of utilities an upper limit on profits as a percentage of income by corporations?

It's not targeted specifically but imposed over the entire economy.

Like the ACA requirements about insurance having spend a certain percentage of income on care, not stock buybacks or advertising.

It could help, but the Oligarchs would scream SOSHULISM.

Capitalism is not synonymous with Democracy or a Freedom.

#23 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-08-17 12:28 AM

Sept 2023

"Dairy producer margins continued to hit new lows this summer, as painfully low milk prices swamped dairy producers from coast to coast with a tidal wave of red ink. Many producers have responded by intensively culling the low end of their herds, according to Sarina Sharp, analyst with the Daily Dairy Report.

Mailbox milk prices in July averaged $17.40/cwt., according to USDA's most recent Agricultural Prices report. That was 50 cents lower than June's already low value of $17.90 and a staggering $8.30/cwt. lower than July 2022's $25.70. Wisconsin's All-Milk price in July was only $15.50/cwt., the lowest mailbox price since May 2020.

"Dairy producers in Midwest cheese states have fared among the worst. Milk that was dumped, sold at a steep discount, or hauled to distant processors watered down their checks," said Sharp. "Many producers in Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, and Iowa cashed checks that were below the average cost of milk production."

#24 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-08-17 10:46 AM

Price controls on an industry that lost its ass in 2023.

What, we can't come up with something more out of date?

#25 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-08-17 10:48 AM

Grocery stores typically have a profit margin of about 2%. Price controls will put many chains out of business.

#26 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-08-17 02:07 PM

Kamala needs to add phonetic symbols on her teleprompter.

It's not "price ga(long a)ging".

#27 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2024-08-17 09:20 PM

I think the answer is more competition. We are down to a small handful of companies putting groceries on the shelves, meaning that in most cases they can charge what they want. More competition means fairer prices. I heard Lina Khan the head of the FTC on TV recently and they are working to increase competition in the marketplace. Maybe a CHPB type arm of the FTC can do for consumers of products what the CFPB has done for the finances of Americans.

#28 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2024-08-17 11:59 PM

I think the answer is more competition. We are down to a small handful of companies putting groceries on the shelves, meaning that in most cases they can charge what they want.

#28 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2024-08-17 11:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

That would require breaking the government enforced distributorship monopolies. They exist in most states, it's not partisan. We still have beer distributorship structures leftover from the repeal prohibition. The distributors are owned by big beer and they lobby heavily to keep their structures in place and put business size caps on the small businesses.

#29 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-08-18 10:29 AM

#29 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

But isn't that just alcohol?

This is what the Slinger is talking about, the illusion of choice.
s3.amazonaws.com

#30 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-08-18 12:22 PM


Capitalism is not synonymous with Democracy or a Freedom.
#23 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER

It most certainly is. You can't have Freedom without capitalism. Just not possible. You should be free to put your earnings into whatever you want.

#31 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-08-18 12:23 PM

How about just setting an upper limit on profit margins?

Investment wouldn't materialize knowing that's as good as it can possibly get.

#32 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-08-18 12:25 PM

If it is the "1990: Interest rates continued to fall, ending the decade at 9.78%" the link your current alias provided seems to support that..

No it doesn't unless you're saying the 1980's ended the decade at 9.78%. Which clearly you aren't.

If would be correct if you said "1980: interest rates ... . "

If it is my #18 comment, I see nothing in your comment that shows how my #18 was false.

Of course you don't because you lack basic English & logic skills. Tech person my ass.

#33 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-08-18 12:31 PM

Sit,

At my age I've witnessed something happening the last few decades.

Anti-trust laws not enforced.

It just appears sometime around the 80s there was an economic shift towards "the ends justifies the means".

We've seen more collusion and a breakdown in oversight.

Really it's been a breakdown in many facets of society and just economic.

#34 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2024-08-18 12:48 PM

Not just economic...I meant

#35 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2024-08-18 12:49 PM

You can't have Freedom without capitalism.
#31 | POSTED BY 1LUMPYSHT

Capitalism is -------.

The literal "rat race".

#36 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-08-18 01:12 PM

Re: #34 (& 35)

I concur with what you've said. To add: the "end justifies the means" concept is not new, but seems to have been moved to the front burner and much of that occurring in/since the 1980's. Some examples of which include (but are not limited to!): Citizens United, delaying/manipulating Supreme Court appointments, proliferation of fake news, limiting ability to vote (for specific areas/people), etc..

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
- often (mis)attributed to Edmund Burke

#37 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2024-08-18 01:17 PM

Clown,

The primary people who complain about capitalism are people who didn't participate in it.

Some people were dealt a bad hand and never had a chance.

However, I personally believe there are far more who chose apathy over work and have spent their life blaming and always crying victim with their hands out.

Maybe in some ways they were victims. Victims of a system that enabled and supported their apathy.

#38 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2024-08-18 01:56 PM

True,

"concept is not new, but seems to have been moved to the front burner"

People have become shameless.

What used to be considered negative traits to be discouraged are now worn as badges of accomplishment and rewarded by society.

#39 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2024-08-18 02:10 PM

(sighs)

What people complain about is Crony Capitalism; where Corporations are Super Citizens who get financial perks, including writing their own tax and environmental and hiring/working laws.

Every few decades we need a reset of the the excesses of the powerful; a leveling of the playing field and a break-up of monopolies and their vast powers... which is what we had from TR and FDR, and which is long overdue in this country.

#40 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-18 02:19 PM

I have no issue with Harris' proposal so far. There just isn't enough information to make any kind of worthwhile opinion.
Anyone hyperventilating over this is trying to get attention or being ridiculously and transparently partisan.
Especially when inflation on groceries was 1.1% last month.

Grocery stores typically have a profit margin of about 2%. Price controls will put many chains out of business.
www.marketplace.org

I'm surprised at the author's lack of comprehension on how markets work, though. Then again the WaPo's Opinion pages have been ridiculous on this subject, mischaracterizing and making gross assumptions. Fortunately the comment section is ripping them to shreds for their facile handling of this subject.

#41 | Posted by YAV at 2024-08-18 02:47 PM

#40 - amen to that, Corky.

#42 | Posted by YAV at 2024-08-18 02:48 PM

Corky,

"Every few decades we need a reset of the the excesses of the powerful"

Like the Great Depression?

However, there is an old saying, the bigger they are the harder they fall.

Maybe Harris will push the US into a Super Depression with a spending spree unlike anything we've seen before.

It's unlikely deficient growth will slow down.

#43 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2024-08-18 03:28 PM

- Like the Great Depression?

Just the opposite, which is what I said in my post... the Great Depression was the result of Crony Capitalism... and most obviously not a remedy for it.

And it's your Hero Trump who is pedaling more tax cuts for the wealthy corporate, and higher prices for everyone with tariffs.

#44 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-18 03:48 PM

Corky,

We have laws now that aren't enforced and regulatory agencies that don't do their jobs.

Unfortunately I tend to believe nothing short of a major financial meltdown whete new systems and processes will be put in place will provide the "reset" needed.

While capitalism is failing to meet the needs of enough people to vote for it, it is not sustaining itself.

I would predict a total reset of economic systems would create an economy built around socialism.

However, that won't be able to sustain itself either because it needs a robust economy created with capitalism to generate wealth to pay the bills.

A working hybrid model would be best However in this current political climate that's not what will happen.

#45 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2024-08-18 07:07 PM

- the "reset"

The "reset" is set in and werks fine, according to True Crony Capitalists.

It's called, "Recessions", and it's a feature not a bug to them.

#46 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-18 07:25 PM

#30 it's many grocery store items, like milk.

There's a massive number of state mandated monopolies, and we get ------ for it.

#47 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-08-19 07:15 AM

I can't wait for the government to stop the price gouging.

I should be able to buy a Nvidia RX4090 for $75...

also, a Rolex for under $1,000.

With the new Christian Dior scandal over production costs, force them to live on 60% gross margins like Zara and lower that cost to $100 too.

I bet everyone will want to pick up Bitcoins for $5 each as well.

Price control are wonderful!

#48 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-08-19 10:25 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

This Is Post-Roe America (173 comments)

Central Park 5 Sue Trump for Defamation (72 comments)

U.S. Infant Deaths Rose After Fall of Roe v. Wade (59 comments)

Harris Leads Trump 2-1 Among the Earliest Voters (36 comments)

Trump Talking About Arnold Palmer's Private Parts is Just Weird (36 comments)

McDonald's Donald Trump Worked at Failed Last Health Inspection (30 comments)

Guardrails Will Avert Manipulation of Election Outcome (30 comments)

Trump Calls Judge 'evil' for Releasing Files Before Election (24 comments)